Transcript No Slide Title

Joint Forces Ready to Fight
Joint Assessment and Enabling Capability
(JAEC)
MORSS – WG 22
23 June 2004
Bill Millward
Technical Lead, JAEC
FOUO
Outline
Joint Assessment and
Enabling Capability
• JAEC Background
• Performance Assessment Concept
• OSD Balanced Scorecard – T2 contribution
• Strategies for the Future
2
Training Transformation
Vision and Capabilities
Provide dynamic, capabilities-based training for the Department of Defense
in support of national security requirements across the full spectrum of
service, joint, interagency, intergovernmental, and multinational operations.
Create Dynamic,
Global
Knowledge
Network
Build Live, Virtual,
Constructive (LVC)
Training
Environment
Establish
Performance
Assessment
Architecture
Joint Knowledge
Development &
Distribution
Capability
Joint National
Training
Capability
Joint
Assessment
& Enabling
Capability
Training Transformation Background
Joint Assessment and
Enabling Capability
To achieve training system transparency in joint force
operations, the Deputy Secretary of Defense
established the following training transformation
objectives to better enable joint operations:
• Strengthen joint operations by better preparing
forces for new warfighting concepts
• Continuously improve joint force readiness by
aligning joint education and training capabilities and
resources with combatant command needs
• Develop individuals and organizations that
intuitively think jointly
• Develop individuals and organizations that
improvise and adapt to emerging crises
• Achieve unity of effort from a diversity of means
Source: 2004 DoD Training Transformation Implementation Plan (Section 1.0)
4
T2—JNTC and JKKDC Capabilities
Joint Assessment and
Enabling Capability
Preparing forces individually
Human
Experts
Models
and
Simulations
Digital
Knowledge
Bases
Illustrative Metrics
Joint Certified
Courses
War
Colleges
Universities
Individuals
Joint Educated
JKDDC
Regional
Centers
International /
Multinational
Reach-Back
Preparing forces collectively
Mission Planning
and Rehearsal
Adaptability
Illustrative Metrics
Joint Training
Events
Test
Ranges
Models
and
Simulations
Embedded
Systems
Units trained to
Joint Standards
Major
Training
Centers
JNTC
Mission Planning
and Rehearsal
New Joint
Operational
Concepts
Lessons Learned
Adaptability
5
T2—JAEC role
Joint Assessment and
Enabling Capability
Anticipating, Evaluating, and Guiding Development
Illustrative Metrics
Strategic
Transformation
Appraisal
JNTC
Joint
Operational
Concepts
Unit
TC AOA
T2 Capabilities
Staff
JAEC
Training
Value
DOTMLP
Individual
JKDDC
Barriers
Defense
Readiness
Reporting System
Strategies and
Investments
6
JAEC Tenets
Joint Assessment and
Enabling Capability
•
To achieve Training Transformation objectives leading
ultimately to training system transparency in joint force
operations1, then we must understand the ways and means
necessary to reach this future state.
•
JAEC provides the analytic rigor to understand, assess,
measure and report training system performance and progress
toward achieving transparency in joint force operations.
•
JAEC assessments will include analyses across the joint
training continuum to help determine optimal means of joint
capability sourcing, delivery and improvement feedback.
•
To properly conduct assessments, we must be able to
determine measures of merit.
– measures of effectiveness,
– measures of performance.
1) Refer to 2004 DoD Training Transformation Implementation Plan (Section 1.0)
7
Outline
Joint Assessment and
Enabling Capability
• JAEC Background
• Performance Assessment Concept
• OSD Balanced Scorecard – T2 contribution
• Strategies for the Future
8
Setting Measurable Outcomes for T2
Joint Assessment and
Enabling Capability
Focused on COCOM needs
• All Forces Joint Educated and Trained
• New Joint Operation Capabilities
• Dynamic Mission Planning and Rehearsal
Continuous Readiness Improvements
Ref: 2004 DoD Training Transformation Implementation Plan (Section 1.0)
The Secretary has a saying “you can only manage what you can
measure,” and that’s what JAEC is all about. Trying to
systematically assess, adapt, be able to revise and understand
what these other capabilities are bringing to bear. The
department has made a tremendous investment of resources,
both dollars and people, and we want to know, does it make a
difference. Dr. Paul Mayberry, DUSD (Readiness)
9
Performance Assessment Concept
Joint
Assessment
and
T2 Vector
Assessments
• COCOM
Alignment
Enabling
Capability
• Service Alignment
• Force Transformation Alignment
T2 Integration Assessments
• Policy integration
• Program and process integration
• Information systems integration
T2 Training Value Assessments
• Joint Educated and Trained Personnel - quantity
• Staffs & Unit skill mix
• Responsiveness to COCOM requirements changes
T2 metrics evolve over time to guide achievement of successive outcomes
Throughput
Innovation
Transparency
All Forces Joint
Educated and Trained
Enable Environment to
Create New Joint
Operational Capabilities
Mid-Term Outcomes
Dynamic Mission
Planning and Rehearsal
Near-Term Outcome
Far-Term Outcomes
Source: 2004 DoD Training Transformation Implementation Plan (Section 1.0)
10
Outline
Joint Assessment and
Enabling Capability
• JAEC Background
• Performance Assessment Concept
• OSD Balanced Scorecard – T2 contribution
• Strategies for the Future
11
Main Menu
Joint Assessment and
Enabling Capability
DoD Balanced Scorecard
Main Menu
Force
Management
Risk
Operational Risk
Institutional Risk
Future
Challenges
7BACK: Title Slide
12
Training Transformation Balanced Scorecard Concept
Joint Assessment and
Training Value
Enabling
Capability
Assessment
Through the T2 Strategic
Plan and Goals
and Implementation Plan
tied to the TPG and
Strategic Performance
Assessment
•Level 1
Initial Measures
• Quantity
• Quality
• Responsiveness
COCOM Satisfaction
Training Integration
Assessment
Initial Measures
• Customer satisfaction
• Level 2
Initial Measures
• Policy integration
• Process integration
• Information integration
Transformation
Vector Assessment
•Level 3
The T2
Balanced Scorecard
Initial Measures
•COCOM Alignment
• OFT Alignment
• Services Alignment
“The Balanced Scorecard for Risk
Management is a central element of
the Defense Strategy. It gives DoD
leaders a disciplined way of
measuring near and mid-term defense
outputs, in critical areas, against
longer-term strategic Defense goals.”
Dr. David Chu, USD(P&R)
13
Outline
Joint Assessment and
Enabling Capability
• JAEC Background
• Performance Assessment Concept
• OSD Balanced Scorecard – T2 contribution
• Strategies for the Future
14
Transforming the Joint Education & Training Enterprise
Joint Assessment and
COCOM’s
Military Service
Information Age Model
Constraints Can Limit Achievement of Goals
(Customers)
(Suppliers)
of Education and Training
Enabling Capability
• Driven by the Deliberate Planning Cycle
• MPETE requirements poorly understood
JKDDC
• Difficulty aligning supply with demand
• Relatively low throughput efficiency
Military Service
Industrial Age Model
(Suppliers)
of Education and Training
JAEC
JNTC
Use Metrics
to align T2
Capabilities
COCOM’s
(Customers)
Throughput: Efficiency achieved by distributing
production of Jointness across DoD
Innovation: Continuous process / readiness
improvements = adaptable, agile, and lethal
Transparency: Convergence of education,
training, mission planning and rehearsal
Harmonizing MPETE flow around system capacity
MPETE: Manpower, Personnel, Education, Training & Experience
Source: 2004 DoD Training Transformation Implementation Plan (Section 1.0)
15
What’s ahead for the JAEC Analysis Support?
Joint Assessment and
Enabling Capability
‘The Industrial Age brought about specialization of skills. The Information
Age brings about specialization of the mind’ – Charles Williams
•
•
•
•
How might we apply Fourth-Generation Instructional System
Design (ISD4) across the Education/Training continuum to
deliver, more optimally, the right forces with the right skill &
‘mind’ mix at the right time to meet combatant commander
needs ?
Given the current compliance-focused tenet of education and
training measurement – ‘teach what you test and test what you
teach’ – what other type measurement frameworks are
available to assess performance (readiness) ?
How might we employ performance-based Standards and
Conditions (versus compliance-based) across the
Education/Training continuum to ensure quality results are
delivered in sufficient quantity and when needed ?
How might we achieve ‘adaptive’ readiness – readiness beyond
base requirements that serves to meet constantly evolving
joint warfighting needs ?
16
Joint Assessment and
Enabling Capability
Questions & Discussion
17