Transcript H - University of Wisconsin–Madison

Diversity Data Resources from
the Office of Academic Planning
and Institutional Research
apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
What kinds of Student data do we measure?
•
•
•
•
•
•
Enrollments
Retention
Graduation
Grades
Majors
High impact practices (study abroad, service
learning project, senior capstone course, etc.)
• Comparisons with peer universities
What categories of students do we track?
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Gender
Race and ethnicity
First generation
Low income
Student level (graduate, undergraduate, first year,
etc.)
Transfer student
International
Age
Program (PEOPLE, Posse, First-year Interest Group,
etc.)
• How many minority students
attend UW-Madison?
• How has the number changed
over time?
Indicator 1: Percent Enrollment of Minority
Undergraduate Students
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
16
Minority Students, 14.5%
From 2003 to 2012
 4.4 percentage
point increase
Targeted
Minority
in Minority
Students,
9.9%
Enrollment
 3.4 percentage
point increase
in Targeted
Revised
Race/Ethnic
Minority
Categories
Enrollment
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
Race/Ethnicity Collection Begins
Southeast Asian Collection Begins
0
74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2012 data is preliminary.
Targeted Minorities include African American, Native American, Hispanic/Latino/a, Southeast Asian (Cambodians, Laotians, Vietnamese, and Hmong). Minorities include
targeted minorities as well as Other Asians and Native Hawaiians. International students are not counted for targeted minority collections.
Indicator 2: Percent Enrollment of Targeted Minority
Undergraduate Students by Race/Ethnicity
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
12%
From 2003 to 2012:
 Increases in
% of Total Undergraduates
10%
8%
3.9%
4.3%
4.4%
0.8%
0.9%
1.0%
0.9%
3.3%
0.7%
0.7%
1.8%
1.8%
1.9%
1.9%
1.9%
1.8%
1.2%
1.4%
1.6%
1.7%
2.4%
2.4%
2.5%
2.7%
2.9%
2.9%
3.0%
2.8%
2.8%
2.7%
6%
2.4%
4%
3.8%
3.6%
0.5%
2.6%
0.6%
2.8%
0.6%
3.1%
0.6%
2%
0%
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
2012 data is preliminary.
undergraduate
Hispanic/ enrollment in all
Latino/a
race/ethnic
categories
Native  3.4 percentage
American point increase in
undergraduate
SE Asian
targeted minority
enrollment
African
American  International
Students: 6.8% of
Undergraduate
Enrollment
Targeted Minorities include African American, Native American, Hispanic/Latino/a, Southeast Asian (Cambodians, Laotians, Vietnamese, and Hmong).
International students are not counted within the targeted minority categories.
Indicator 3: Percent Enrollment of Targeted
Minority Graduate Students, by Race/Ethnicity
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
12%
% of Total Graduate Student Enrollment
From 2003 to 2012:
10%
8%
6%
2.8%
4%
2%
2.5%
2.5%
2.9%
0.4%
0.3%
0.5%
0.5%
2.1%
2.2%
2.1%
4.0%
3.2%
3.5%
1.0%
1.0%
1.0%
1.0%
0.7% 0.8%
0.9%
1.0%
1.0%
2.7%
2.6%
2.7%
2.8%
2.9%
2.7%
0.5%
0.5%
3.7%
0.6%
0.6%
0.7%
0.7%
0.8%
2.3%
2.5%
2.7%
0%
 Increases in
graduate student
enrollment in all
race/ethnic
Hispanic/ categories
Latino/a 3.2 percentage
point increase in
graduate targeted
Native
minority
American
enrollment
SE Asian
 International
Students make up
African
American 25.6% of graduate
enrollment
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
2012 data is preliminary.
Targeted Minorities include African American, Native American, Hispanic/Latino/a, Southeast Asian (Cambodians, Laotians, Vietnamese, and Hmong).
International students are not counted within the targeted minority categories.
Indicator 4: Percent Enrollment of Targeted
Minority Professional Students, by Race/Ethnicity
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
% of Total professional Student Enrollment
12%
• From 2003 to
2012:
10%
3.7%
3.7%
8%
4.0% 4.1%
6%
4%
2%
3.5%
3.4%
3.6%
1.2%
3.4% 3.3%
Hispanic/
2.9% Latino/a
1.3%
1.2% 1.0%
1.0% 1.0%
1.1%
0.9%
1.3% 1.6% 1.6% 1.3% 1.2%
0.7%
1.1% 1.0% 0.7% 0.9%
0.3% 0.4%
4.4% 4.5% 4.1% 4.2% 4.2% 4.3%
3.6% 3.4% 3.9% 4.0%
0%
Constant percent
of professional
targeted minority
Native
enrollment
American
SE Asian  International
Students make
up 3.9% of
African
American professional
student
enrollment
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
2012 data is preliminary.
Professional: DVM, MD, PharmD, Law, PA, MPH, DPT
Targeted Minorities include African American, Native American, Hispanic/Latino/a, Southeast Asian (Cambodians, Laotians, Vietnamese, and Hmong).
International students are not counted within the targeted minority categories.
• How do we compare to other
universities?
80%
N = 15,396
N = 15,180
N = 15,024
N = 14,160
N = 14,089
N = 13,892
N = 8,720
N = 16,673
N = 6,468
N = 11,040
N = 9,963
N = 11,891
N = 10,197
N = 5,366
N = 8,745
N = 4,108
N = 10,125
N = 6,473
N = 4,053
N = 6,110
N = 3,456
N = 6,109
N = 4,371
N = 2,904
N = 6,559
N = 5,870
N = 3,050
N = 4,137
N = 3,360
N = 4,365
N = 4,102
N = 2,328
N = 1,917
N = 2,228
Percent of Undergraduates
who are Minorities at AAU
Public Institutions, Fall 2010
UC-Irvine
UC-San Diego
UCLA
UC-Davis
UC-Berkeley
Rutgers
UC-Santa Barbara
Texas
Stony Brook
Washington
Average Percent Minority for
Maryland
Florida
AAU Public Institutions: 29%
Arizona
North Carolina
Illinois
6 AAU Public Institutions have
Virginia
Texas A & M
a lower percent of minority
Michigan
Buffalo
students than UW-Madison.
Minnesota
Oregon
Michigan State
10 AAU Public Institutions
Colorado
Pittsburgh
have a smaller number of
Ohio State
Penn State
minority students than UWKansas
Madison.
Wisconsin
Missouri
Indiana
Purdue
Iowa State
Nebraska
Source: IPEDS Fall Enrollment, Fall 2010
Iowa State
0%
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
20%
40%
60%
Percent of Undergraduates
80%
Peer
Enrollments
by Minority
Status
• What about some other
measures of student diversity?
–How many low income students and
first generation students are enrolled
at UW?
Indicator 5: Percent Enrollment of Pell Grant
Recipients (Undergraduates)
20
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
All Undergraduates
17.0
15
10
12.6 12.8
14.7
11.6 11.5 12.2 11.7
• 14.3% of all
undergraduates
16.0
14.3
are Pell Grant
recipients.
5
0
20
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
New Undergraduates
15
10
12
5
• 13.7% of new
students (new
16.0 16.5
14.1
13.7
freshmen + new
12.5
11.7
11.1
10.7 11.4
transfers) are Pell
Grant recipients.
0
2003
2004
2005
2012 data is preliminary.
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Indicator 6: Percent Enrollment of FirstGeneration Students (Undergraduates)
25
20
15
10
5
0
25
20
15
10
5
0
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
All Undergraduates
20.8
17.6
22.3
22.1
21.8
20.8 • Data on first-
generation status
13.3
is collected at the
8.1 Accumulating Data
time of
application.
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 • Question first
New Undergraduates
asked in 2005.
21.9 23.0 23.4 22.9 23.1 21.4 21.9
• 18.9% of New
18.9
Students (New
Freshmen + New
Transfers) are
first-generation
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
students.
2012 data is preliminary.
• What does the pipeline to UWMadison look like?
–How many low income students
are enrolled in high school in
Wisconsin?
–How many students of color?
Pipeline: Low Income
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
Wisconsin's Low-Income Recruiting Pool
Economically Disadvantaged High
School Public School Students
Economically
Disadvantaged Public
High School Graduates
(90,991 of 264,206)
•34% of Public K-12 students
in Wisconsin are
Economically Disadvantaged
(2011-12)
(14,504 of 64,687)
•23% of Public High School
Graduates are Economically
Disadvantaged (2010)
No Data Available on
Low-Income Status of
UW-Madison Applicants
or Admits
UW-Madison
Enrolled
0%
10%
•We have no reliable
information on income of
applicant students, all data
based on financial aid
applications
(591 of 3,515)
20%
30%
40%
50%
Percent of Group Total
60%
“Economically Disadvantaged” represents those students who are eligible for free/reduced lunch.
Sources: Wisconsin DPI WINSS, 2010-12 Enrollment by Student Group, Completions by Student Group
UW-Madison Data based on Fall 2012-13
70%
•17% of Resident New
Freshmen are Pell Grant
80% Recipients
Pipeline: Minority
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
Wisconsin's Minority Recruiting Pool
Minority Public High
School Students
Minority Public High
School Graduates
(56,519 of 264,206)
•21% of Public High School
students in Wisconsin are
minority students(2011-12)
(290,550 of 385,907)
(11,568 of 64,687)
"Well-Prepared"
Minority Public High
School Graduates
•18% of Public High School
Graduates are minority
students (2009-10)
(753 of 14,943)
•14% of Resident New
Freshmen are minority
students (2012)
UW-Madison
(1,335 of 8441)
Applicants
UW-Madison
Admits
UW-Madison
Enrolled
0%
10%
(729 of 5,740)
(483 of 3,515)
20%
30%
40%
50%
Percent of Group Total
60%
70%
80%
“Well-prepared” high school graduates are in the top quartile of their graduating classes and score at least 22 (WI Average) on the ACT (or equivalent SAT
score). The ACT is only one of many academic factors considered in the admissions process.
• How many students return for a
second year?
• How many graduate within six
years?
Retention
and
Graduation
Retention Rates: (percent retained to the second year)
Percent Retained
100
All Students: 94%
Targeted Minority
Students: 92%
90
80
2 percentage point First-Year
Retention Rate gap
70
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
2010
Percent Graduated
100
Graduation Rates: (percent graduated within 6 years)
90
All Students: 83%
80
70
Targeted Minority Students: 69%
60
14 percentage point
Graduation Rate gap
50
40
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
2010
Year of Cohort Entrance
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
Summary of Retention and Graduation
Rates by Student Group
All New Freshmen
Women
Men
Targeted Minority
Non-Targeted
African American
Native American
Hispanic/Latino/a
South East Asian
Non-Targeted Asian
International
Wisconsin Residents
Non-Residents
First-Generation College Students
Freshmen Who Received Need-Based Aid
Freshmen Recipients of Pell Grants
FIGs
Targeted Minority in FIGs
1-Year Retention Rate
% Difference
93.9
93.7
94.1
91.7
94.2
92.9
89.5
92.3
89.9
95.9
88.7
95.0
92.4
93.1
93.2
91.7
95.0
93.8
-.2
0.2
-2.2
0.3
-1.0
-4.4
-1.6
-4.0
2.0
-5.2
1.1
-1.5
-0.8
-0.7
-2.2
1.1
-0.1
Note: 1-Year Retention Rate for 2010 Cohort, 6-Year Graduation Rate for 2005 Cohort
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
6-Year Graduation
% Difference
Rate
82.8
83.4
0.6
81.9
-0.9
68.8
-14.0
84.1
1.3
61.9
-20.9
68.6
-14.2
74.9
-7.9
68.4
-14.4
81.7
-1.1
70.5
-12.3
83.4
0.6
Equity
in
80.7
-2.1
Educational
75.8
-7.0
76.4
-6.4
Outcomes
69.7
-13.1
79.1
-3.7
64.7
-18.1
Percentage Point Graduation Gap of Fall 2003-2005
Entrance Cohorts, Selected AAU Institutions
10.0
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
5.0
-5.0
-10.0
Arizona
Kansas
SUNY-Buffalo
Nebraska
SUNY-Stony Brook
Colorado
Oregon
Missouri
Iowa State
Purdue
Minnesota
Iowa
Indiana
Rutgers
Ohio State
Weighted Average
Pittsburgh
Michigan State
Georgia Tech
UC Santa Barbara
Case Western
Texas A&M
Washington
Texas
UC Davis
Maryland
Syracuse
UC Irvine
Wisconsin
Illinois
Florida
Penn State
Caltech
Michigan
UCLA
UC Berkeley
Vanderbilt
MIT
Columbia
Cornell
Virginia
Brown
Northwestern
Percentage Point Gap
0.0
-15.0
-20.0
•Average graduation gap among AAU institutions is 1.2% (was 9.1% for 2002-2004
cohorts)
•Gap at UW-Madison is 10.5 percent, Compared to 17.1% for 2002-2004 cohorts.
Selected Institutions, CSRDE data, sorted from lowest to highest overall
graduation rates.
What do we know about our employees?
•
•
•
•
•
Employee counts over time
Recruitment
Retention and turnover
Promotions
Comparisons with peer universities
What groups of employees can we examine?
•
•
•
•
•
Gender
Race and ethnicity
Age
International
Type of position (classified staff, academic
staff, faculty, teaching assistant, etc.)
• Tenure status
• Work unit
Women as a Percentage of
Faculty and Staff
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
Percent of Women Faculty and Staff by Employee Type
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Total
Faculty
Exec/Dir/
Admin
Instructional Acad. Other Acad. Staff
Staff
•Women make up just under 50% of all employees at UW-Madison.
•A smaller proportion of faculty members are women (31%)
2012 data available in December 2012
Classified
All Employee Groups
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
Percent of Minority Faculty and Staff by Employee Type
20%
18%
16%
14%
12%
10%
8%
6%
4%
2%
0%
Total
Faculty
Exec/Dir/
Admin
Instructional
Acad. Staff
Other Acad. Staff
-Around 13% of all employees are minorities
-A larger proportion of faculty are minorities.
2012 data available in December 2012, New race/ethnic categories implemented in 2010
Classified
Indicator 12: Minority Faculty
Representation
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
Minority Faculty as a Percent of the Total Faculty
Headcount
17.6%
18
16.2%
15
13.2%
13.8%
14.3%
14.6%
15.1%
16.9% 16.8%
Two or More
Races, 0.6%
15.4%
Hispanic, 3.5%
American Indian,
0.5%
12
9
Asian, 10.9%
6
3
Black, 2.2%
0
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2012 data available in December 2012, New race/ethnic categories implemented in 2010
•In 2010: 2,177
total faculty
members
•17.6% (384) of
Faculty are
racial/ethnic
minorities.
•8% increase in
minority faculty
since 1996
Indicator 11: Minority Faculty Recruitment
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
UW-Madison Faculty Hires by Minority Status
35
Minority Faculty
Non-Asian Minority Faculty
30
Percent
25
Madison Plan
20
15
Strategic Hires
SHI - 2
10
5
0
82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10
Year of Hire
2010-11 Data is preliminary.
•Increases in
the percent of
faculty hires
that are
racial/ethnic
minorities.
Instructional Academic Staff
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
Minority Instructional Academic Staff as a Percent of
the Total Headcount
18
15
11.5% 11.9%
12
10.5%
12.1%
11.2%
11.7%
11.8%
9
Two or More
Races,
.4% (8)
•11.8%
Hispanic/
Latino/a,
2.6% (57)
American
Indian,
.2% (5)
9.8%
8.9%
8.8%
6
•In 2010, 2,225
Instructional
Academic Staff
members
(263) of
Instructional
Academic Staff
are racial/ethnic
minorities
•2.7% increase in
Asian,
7.1% (159) minority
3
Black,
1.5% (34)
0
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2012data available in December 2012, New race/ethnic categories implemented in 2010
instructional
academic staff
since 1996
Non-Instructional Academic Staff
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
Minority Non-Instructional Academic Staff as a
Percent of the Total Headcount
18
15
•In 2010: 5,092
non-instructional
Two or More
Academic Staff
Races,
.5% (26)
12
11.2%
10.9% 11.1%
9.4%
9.6%
11.7%
12%
12%
12.3%
Hispanic/
Latino/a,
1.8% (90)
10.2%
9
American
Indian,
.5% (23)
•12.3% of noninstructional
Academic Staff
are minorities
•3.7% increase in
minority nonAsian,
8.0%
instructional
(406)
academic staff
Black,
since 1996
1.7% (85)
6
3
0
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2012 data available in December 2012, New race/ethnic categories implemented in 2010
Classified Staff
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
Minority Classified Staff as a Percent of the Total
Headcount
18
15
12
11%
11.3%
11.8%
12%
Two or
More
12.6% 12.9% Races,
0.5% (28)
•12.9% (697) of
Hispanic/ classified staff are
Latino/a,
5.4% (291) minorities
10%
9
8.1%
8.5%
•In 2010: 5,410
Classified Staff
members
9.1%
American
Indian,
.3% (16)
3
•8.7% increase in
minority classified
Asian,
4.3% (233) staff since 1996
0
Black,
2.4% (129)
6
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2012 data available in December 2012, New race/ethnic categories implemented in 2010
Indicator 13: Percent of Faculty
Promoted to Tenure by Gender
80
Percent Promoted to Tenure by Gender,
within Six (6) and Nine (9) Years
Men
Women
70
72%
67%
60
50
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
54%
40
42%
30
20
10
0
6 Years
9 Years
• At 9 years, 67% of women faculty have been promoted to tenure.
Percent tenured based on data for hires from 1992-93 to 2005-06
Indicator 14: Percent of Faculty
Promoted to Tenure by Minority Status
80
Percent Promoted to Tenure by Minority
Status, within Six (6) and Nine (9) Years
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
Non-Minority
70
71%
66%
60
50
40
50%
48%
30
20
10
0
6 Years
9 Years
• At 9 Years, 66% of minority faculty members have been promoted to tenure.
Percent tenured based on data for hires from 1992-93 to 2005-06
Promotion to Tenure
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
• A lower
percentage of
women and men
are promoted to
tenure within the
Social Studies.
Percent of Faculty Promoted within Nine (9) Years,
by Gender and Division
90
Men
80
70
60
50
Women
81%
N=144
72%
N=547
79% 81%
64%
N=279
N=89
N=93
74% 72%
N=190
66%
N=74
N=29
57%
N=124
40
48%
N=83
30
20
10
0
Total
Physical Sciences
Arts and
Humanities
Data on faculty hires from 1992-93 to 2004-05
Biological Sciences
Social Studies
• The largest gap in
tenure rates by
gender is within
the Physical
Sciences division.
• What kind of survey data do we have?
– National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)
includes many climate-related questions. Fielded
in 2001, 2004, 2006, 2008, 2011
– Women in Science and Engineering Leadership
Institute (WISELI) survey of faculty worklife in
2003, 2006, 2010, 2012
– UW System Climate survey of staff and students
in CALS in 2011
National Survey of Student Engagement
(NSSE) 2011
Selected NSSE 2011 Results
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
Percent of Seniors who often or very much:
Understand people of other
racial/ethnic backgrounds
56
56
55
All
Non-Minority
Minority
Had serious conversations with
student of a different race or
ethnicity than your own
Included diverse perspectives in
class discussion or assignments
52
49
71
**
57
56
63
67
66
Tried to better understand someone
else's views by imagining how it
looks from their perspective
75
** significantly different
See: http://apir.wisc.edu/students-surveys.htm
**