Transcript apir.wisc.edu

Diversity Update 2011
September 2011
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
Equity Scorecard Framework
Access
Each of the four
perspectives has an
objective.
From this objective
we can:
Retention
Excellence
-Measure baseline
performance
-Set an improvement
target
Institutional
-Work towards equity
Receptivity
in educational
The Equity Scorecard was developed by Dr. Estela Mara Bensimon at the Center for Urban Education, outcomes.
Equity in
Educational
Outcomes
University of Southern California (http://www.usc.edu/dept/education/CUE/).
Demographic Variables for Analysis
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
This presentation is limited to variables for which we
have quantitative information, including:
 Race/ethnicity
 Income level
 First-generation in college
 Gender
 Geographic diversity.
Information is not systematically available for other groups
that are important to inclusive excellence.
Access
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
Components:
• Enrollment
–
–
–
–
Undergraduate
Graduate
Professional
School/College
• Pipeline
• Financial Aid/Need-Based
Aid
• Majors/Degrees
Access
Retention
Equity in
Educational
Outcomes
Institutional
Receptivity
Excellence
Indicator 1: Percent Enrollment of Minority
Undergraduate Students
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
16
Minority Students, 14.5%
14
Targeted
Minority
Students,
9.9%
12
10
8
Revised
Race/Ethnic
Categories
6
4
From 2002 to 2011
 4.9 percentage
point increase
in Minority
Enrollment
 3.7 percentage
point increase
in Targeted
Minority
Enrollment
2
Race/Ethnicity Collection Begins
Southeast Asian Collection Begins
0
74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11
2011 data is preliminary.
Targeted Minorities include African American, Native American, Hispanic/Latino/a, Southeast Asian (Cambodians, Laotians, Vietnamese, and Hmong). Minorities include
targeted minorities as well as Other Asians and Native Hawaiians. International students are not counted for targeted minority collections.
Race/Ethnic Categories: Students
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
Students self-report their race/ethnicity at the time of application.
• Targeted Minorities include:
»
»
»
»
African American
Native American
Hispanic/Latino/a
Southeast Asian (Cambodians,
Laotians, Vietnamese, and Hmong)
• Minorities include:
» Targeted Minority categories
» Other Asians
» Native Hawaiians
 Continued terminology from
Plan 2008
 Excludes all Asians, useful for
national peer comparisons.
International students are not counted in any of these collections, in keeping with
state/federal guidelines.
Access: Enrollment
Reporting Methodologies for Race/Ethnicity Information
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
The relatively new ability to indicate multiple race/ethnic values results in a much richer picture of student diversity
but data reporting is more complicated. To deal with these complexities, methodology options for data reporting have
emerged . The method that is most appropriate depends on for what purpose the data will be used. The table below
describes the features of each method and shows how the methods are similar and different from each other.
Reporting Feature
Results in single count of students
Primary
Federal
P
P
Prioritizes Hispanic/Latina(a) over other values
P
Creates new categories that are not reported by
students themselves
P
Displays race/ethnic values only for domestic
(non international) students
P
P
Displays ALL students who indicate a particular
race/ethnicity
Prioritizes some race/ethnicities over others
Used in external data reporting and rankings
Count All
P
P
P
P
P
Access: Enrollment
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
Fall 2011 UW-Madison Students by Race/Ethnicity and Methodology
“Primary”
Federal
Count All
Hispanic/Latino(a)
1,698
1,735
1,735
Black or African American
1,219
1,033
1,315
American Indian or Alaska Native
399
136
418
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander
107
38
124
Asian
2,477
2,160
2,564
White
31,083
31,083
32,527
---
798
---
Unknown
1,088
1,088
1,088
International
4,370
4,370
4,370
Total
42,441
42,441
44,141
Two or more races
Subsequent slides use “Primary” race/ethnic methodology
Indicator 2: Percent Enrollment of Targeted Minority
Undergraduate Students by Race/Ethnicity
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
12%
From 2002 to 2011:
 Increases in
% of Total Undergraduates
10%
8%
6%
2.4%
4%
2.4%
2.6%
0.6%
2.8%
0.6%
0.5%
0.5%
1.0%
1.2%
1.4%
1.6%
2.3%
2.4%
2.4%
2.5%
3.8%
3.9%
0.8%
0.9%
3.3%
3.6%
0.7%
0.7%
1.7%
1.8%
1.8%
1.9%
1.9%
2.7%
2.9%
2.9%
3.0%
2.8%
3.1%
0.6%
2%
0%
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
2011 data is preliminary.
undergraduate
enrollment in all
4.3%
race/ethnic
Hispanic/
categories
Latino/a
 3.7 percentage
Native
1.0%
American point increase in
undergraduate
1.9% SE Asian
targeted
minority
2.8% African
enrollment
American
 International
Students: 6% of
2011
Undergraduate
Enrollment
Targeted Minorities include African American, Native American, Hispanic/Latino/a, Southeast Asian (Cambodians, Laotians, Vietnamese, and Hmong).
International students are not counted within the targeted minority categories.
Indicator 2 Detail: Percent Enrollment of First-Year
Targeted Minority Undergraduates, by Race/Ethnicity
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
% of Total First Year Undergraduates
12%
From 2002 to 2011:
10%
4.7%
8%
3.7% 3.7%
2.8%
6%
0.5%
4%
2%
2.6%
0.8% 0.6%
3.7%
4.2%
3.3% 3.4%
0.6% 0.9%
5.2%
1.2%
1.0% 1.0%
 3.1 percentage
Hispanic/ point increase in
Latino/a first-year
undergraduate
targeted minority
enrollment
Native
American
0.9%
2.0% 2.2%
2.2%
2.2% 2.0% SE Asian
2.1% 1.5% 1.9% 1.9%
1.6%
0.6%
African
3.3% 3.0%
2.6% 2.7% 2.7% 2.9%
2.6% 3.0% 2.6% 2.8%
American
0%
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
2011 data is preliminary.
Targeted Minorities include African American, Native American, Hispanic/Latino/a, Southeast Asian (Cambodians, Laotians, Vietnamese, and Hmong).
International students are not counted within the targeted minority categories.
80%
N = 15,415
N = 14,752
N = 15,355
N = 13,949
N = 14,408
N = 13,156
N = 8,557
N = 16,039
N = 11,943
N = 11,795
N = 9,049
N = 9,493
N = 8,449
N = 3,781
N = 4,339
N = 9,060
N = 5,952
N = 5,903
N = 6,087
N = 2,511
N = 2,757
N = 4,118
N = 6,193
N = 5,579
N = 4,042
N = 2,446
N = 2,776
N = 2,917
N = 3,900
N = 3,797
N = 2,042
N = 2,003
N = 2,135
N = 1,787
UC-Irvine
UC-San Diego
UCLA
UC-Davis
UC-Berkeley
Rutgers
UC-Santa Barbara
Texas
Washington
Florida
Maryland
Arizona
Illinois
Virginia
North Carolina
Texas A & M
Michigan
Minnesota
Michigan State
Stony Brook
Pittsburgh
Colorado
Ohio State
Penn State
Wisconsin
Oregon
Kansas
Missouri
Purdue
Indiana
Buffalo
Iowa
Iowa State
Nebraska
Percent of Undergraduates
who are Minorities at AAU
Public Institutions, Fall 2009
Average Percent Minority for
AAU Public Institutions: 27%
9 AAU Public Institutions have
a lower percent of minority
students than UW-Madison.
12 AAU Public Institutions
have a smaller number of
minority students than UWMadison.
Source: IPEDS Fall Enrollment, Fall 2009
0
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
20
40
60
Percent of Undergraduates
80
Access:
Peers
Indicator 3: Percent Enrollment of Targeted
Minority Graduate Students, by Race/Ethnicity
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
% of Total Graduate Student Enrollment
12%
From 2002 to 2011:
10%
8%
6%
2.8%
4%
2%
2.9%
2.9%
3.2% 3.5%
3.7%
2.4% 2.5% 2.5% 2.7%
1.0% 1.0% 1.0%
0.8%
0.7%
0.6%
0.7% 0.8% 0.9% 1.0%
0.5% 0.5% 0.4% 0.5%
0.7%
0.6% 0.5% 0.3% 0.5% 0.6%
2.7% 2.6% 2.7%
2.2% 2.1% 2.2% 2.1% 2.3% 2.5% 2.7%
0%
 Increases in
graduate student
enrollment in all
race/ethnic
categories
Hispanic/
Latino/a  2.8 percentage
point increase in
graduate targeted
Native
American minority
enrollment
SE Asian
 International
African
Students make up
American
24.3% of graduate
enrollment
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
2011 data is preliminary.
Targeted Minorities include African American, Native American, Hispanic/Latino/a, Southeast Asian (Cambodians, Laotians, Vietnamese, and Hmong).
International students are not counted within the targeted minority categories.
Indicator 4: Percent Enrollment of Targeted
Minority Professional Students, by Race/Ethnicity
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
% of Total Professional Student Enrollment
12%
• From 2002 to
2011:
10%
3.7%
3.7%
8%
6%
4%
2%
3.5%
4.0% 4.1%
3.5%
3.4%
3.6%
1.2%
Hispanic/
3.4% 3.3%
Latino/a
1.3%
1.2% 1.0%
Native
1.0%
1.1%
0.9%
1.3% 1.6% 1.6% 1.3% 1.2% American
SE Asian
1.1% 1.0% 0.7% 0.9%
1.2%
0.3% 0.4%
0.4%
African
4.4% 4.5% 4.1% 4.2% 4.2%
4.0%
3.9%
American
3.2% 3.6% 3.4%
0%
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
2011 data is preliminary.
Professional: DVM, MD, PharmD, Law, PA, MPH, DPT
 1.4 percentage
point increase in
professional
targeted minority
enrollment
 International
Students make
up 4.6% of
professional
student
enrollment
Targeted Minorities include African American, Native American, Hispanic/Latino/a, Southeast Asian (Cambodians, Laotians, Vietnamese, and Hmong).
International students are not counted within the targeted minority categories.
Percent Enrollment of Targeted Minority
Students
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
12
10
8
6
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
All Undergraduates
6.2
6.5
7.1
7.5
8.0
8.6
9.0
9.7
9.5
• 9.9% of all
9.9
undergraduates
are targeted
minorities.
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
New Undergraduates
8.0
8.7
8.8
9.6
11.1
9.8
9.3
11.1
9.5
7.4
4
2
0
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
• 11.1% of new
students (new
freshmen + new
transfers) are
targeted
minorities.
2011 data is preliminary.
Indicator 5: Percent Enrollment of Pell Grant
Recipients
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
20
15
10
All Undergraduates
11.9 12.6 12.8 11.6 11.5 12.2 11.7
14.7
17.0 16.0
5
• 16% of all
undergraduates
are Pell Grant
recipients.
0
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
20
New Undergraduates
15
10
12.4 12.0 12.5
14.1
16.0 16.5
10.7 11.4 11.7 11.1
5
0
2002
2003
2004
2011 data is preliminary.
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
• 16.5% of new
students (new
freshmen + new
transfers) are Pell
Grant recipients.
UC-San Diego
UCLA
UC-Davis
UC-Berkeley
SUNY - Stony Brook
SUNY - Buffalo
UC-Santa Barbara
UC-Irvine
Florida
Pell Grants are federally funded grants for
Rutgers
Arizona
students with high financial need. This indicator
Texas
is a proxy for low income student enrollments.
Washington
Oregon
Michigan State
Iowa State
Ohio State
Nebraska
Minnesota
Iowa
Texas A&M
Pittsburgh
Missouri
Illinois
Purdue
Penn State
North Carolina
Maryland
Kansas
Indiana
Wisconsin
Michigan
Colorado
Virginina
N = 7,589
N = 8,160
N = 7,610
N = 7,487
N = 4,824
N = 5,384
N = 4,802
N = 5,567
N = 8,209
N = 6,784
N = 6,557
N = 7,952
N = 5,713
N = 3,311
N = 6,837
N = 4,092
N = 7,291
N = 3,087
N = 5,584
N = 3,281
N = 6,192
N = 2,672
N = 3,421
N = 4,744
N = 5,121
N = 5,610
N = 2,490
N = 3,809
N = 2,985
N = 4,303
N = 3,534
N = 3,078
N = 3,267
N = 1,275
Percent of Undergraduates
who Pell Recipients at AAU
Public Institutions, 2008-09
Average percent pell recipients
for AAU public institutions: 19%
3 AAU public institutions have a
lower or equal percent of Pell
recipients than UW-Madison.
10 AAU public institutions have a
lower number of Pell recipients
than UW-Madison.
Source: IPEDS Student Financial Aid Data, 2008-09
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
0
10
20
30
40
Percent of Undergraduates
50%
50
Access:
Peers
Indicator 6: Percent Enrollment of FirstGeneration Students
25
20
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
All Undergraduates
20.8
15
22.1
21.8
2009
2010
2011
21.4
21.9
2010
2011
17.6
13.3
10
5
22.3
8.1
Accumulating Data
0
2005
2006
2007
2008
25
New Undergraduates
20
21.9
23.0
23.4
22.9
23.1
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
15
10
5
0
2011 data is preliminary.
• Data on firstgeneration status
is collected at the
time of
application.
• Question first
asked in 2005.
• 21.9% of New
Students (New
Freshmen + New
Transfers) are
Percent Targeted Minority Enrollment
by School/College: Undergraduates, Fall 2011
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
18%
•
16%
N = 143
15%
14%
12%
10%
10%
8%
N = 1,782
N = 207
N = 2,833
11%
10%
N = 234
N = 82
•
10%
N = 288
8%
7%
6%
N = 90
5%
4%
N=1
3%
2%
In 2011, the College of
Letters and Science has
the largest number of
undergraduate
targeted minority
students enrolled.
The School of Human
Ecology has the largest
percentage of
undergraduate
targeted minority
students enrolled, with
15 percent of SoHE
students identifying as
targeted minorities.
0%
Total
CALS
Business Education Engineering
SoHE
L&S
Nursing
Pharmacy
2011 data is preliminary.
Targeted Minorities include African American, Native American, Hispanic/Latino/a, Southeast Asian (Cambodians, Laotians, Vietnamese, and Hmong).
International students are not counted within the targeted minority categories.
Targeted Minority Enrollment by School/College:
Graduate/Professional Programs, Fall 2011
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
18%
• Fall 2011
N = 183
16%
16%
N = 124
14%
N=9
14%
13%
12%
10%
N = 135
N = 1,045
8%
9%
9%
N = 69 N = 42
7%
6%
7%
N = 48
N = 309
8%
7%
N = 89
6%
N=8
N = 23
6%
6%
• The School of
Education has
the largest
percentage of
targeted
minority
graduate
students
(16%).
N=6
4%
4%
2%
0%
Total
CALS Business Educ.
Engin.
SoHE Nelson
L&S
Law
SMPH Nursing Pharm Vet Med
2011 data is preliminary.
Targeted Minorities include African American, Native American, Hispanic/Latino/a, Southeast Asian (Cambodians, Laotians, Vietnamese, and Hmong).
International students are not counted within the targeted minority categories.
Access: Enrollment
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
Targeted Minority Undergraduate Enrollment by School/College
2002-2011
2002
Total
CALS
Business
Education
Engineering
SoHE
L&S
Nursing
Pharmacy
2011
Change
Targeted
Targeted
Targeted
Minority
Total
% of Total
Minority
Total
% of Total
Minority
Total
% of Total
Enrollment Enrollment Enrollment Enrollment Enrollment Enrollment Enrollment Enrollment Enrollment
1728
28677
6.0%
2833
28736
9.9%
1105
59
3.8%
104
2190
4.7%
234
2764
8.5%
130
574
3.7%
55
1332
4.1%
90
1940
4.6%
35
608
0.5%
137
2371
5.8%
207
2016
10.3%
70
-355
4.5%
147
3601
4.1%
288
3847
7.5%
141
246
3.4%
66
1005
6.6%
143
928
15.4%
77
-77
8.8%
1232
17495
7.0%
1782
16384
10.9%
550
-1111
3.8%
22
446
4.9%
82
783
10.5%
60
337
5.5%
0
15
0.0%
1
38
2.6%
1
23
2.6%
2011 data is preliminary.
Targeted Minorities include African American, Native American, Hispanic/Latino/a, Southeast Asian (Cambodians, Laotians, Vietnamese, and Hmong).
International students are not counted within the targeted minority categories.
Access: Enrollment
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
Primary Race/Ethnic Detail of Enrollment (Undergraduate), by School/College, Fall 2011
CALS
Total
2,764
White
2,185
African
American
64
Business
Education
Engineering
SoHE
L &S
Nursing
Pharmacy
Total
1,940
2,016
3,847
928
16,384
783
38
28,736
1,506
1,719
3,027
735
12,573
661
27
22,433
23
54
68
64
498
23
1
795
Hispanic/
Latino/a
98
52
87
128
43
796
24
0
1,228
South East
American
Asian
Other Asian Indian
49
147
23
6
44
58
28
317
29
0
531
54
47
184
17
760
25
5
1,239
9
22
34
8
171
6
0
273
Hawaiian/
Pacific Islander
9
International
150
Unknown
39
3
8
8
2
47
4
0
81
254
15
288
20
979
2
5
1,713
33
20
52
11
243
9
0
407
2011 data is preliminary.
Targeted Minorities include African American, Native American, Hispanic/Latino/a, Southeast Asian (Cambodians, Laotians, Vietnamese, and Hmong).
International students are not counted within the targeted minority categories.
Individuals who indicate more than one race have a primary race selected giving precedence to the least prevalent race/ethnicity within Wisconsin’s population.
Access: Enrollment
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
Targeted Minority Enrollment in Graduate/Professional Programs by School/College
2002-2011
2002
Total
CALS
Business
Education
Engineering
SoHE
Nelson
L&S
Law
SMPH
Nursing
Pharmacy
Vet. Medicine
2011
Change
Targeted
Targeted
Targeted
Minority
Total
% of Total
Minority
Total
% of Total
Minority
Total
% of Total
Enrollment Enrollment Enrollment Enrollment Enrollment Enrollment Enrollment Enrollment Enrollment
708
10994
6.4%
1045
12078
8.7%
337
1084
2.2%
42
978
4.3%
69
965
7.2%
27
-13
2.9%
46
624
7.4%
42
598
7.0%
-4
-26
-0.3%
118
1100
10.7%
183
1118
16.4%
65
18
5.6%
41
1325
3.1%
89
1462
6.1%
48
137
3.0%
7
102
6.9%
9
67
13.4%
2
-35
6.6%
6
163
3.7%
6
146
4.1%
0
-17
0.4%
196
3842
5.1%
309
4252
7.3%
113
410
2.2%
118
882
13.4%
124
889
13.9%
6
7
0.6%
70
1043
6.7%
135
1470
9.2%
65
427
2.5%
3
165
1.8%
8
127
6.3%
5
-38
4.5%
23
603
3.8%
48
608
7.9%
25
5
4.1%
21
371
5.7%
23
367
6.3%
2
-4
0.6%
2011 data is preliminary.
Targeted Minorities include African American, Native American, Hispanic/Latino/a, Southeast Asian (Cambodians, Laotians, Vietnamese, and Hmong).
International students are not counted within the targeted minority categories.
Access: Enrollment
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
Primary Race/Ethnic Detail of Enrollment (Grad/Professional), by School/College, Fall 2011
CALS
Business
Education
Engineering
SoHE
Law
L&S
Medicine
Nelson
Nursing
Pharmacy
Vet Med
Total
Total
965
598
1,118
1,462
67
889
4,252
1,470
146
127
608
367
12,069
White
578
414
712
680
39
526
2,658
1,018
110
101
471
308
7,615
African
American
16
24
76
19
3
53
84
61
2
3
17
8
366
Hispanic/
Latino/a
39
13
67
52
5
52
134
48
3
2
11
10
436
South East
American
Asian
Other Asian Indian
7
31
7
3
35
2
16
35
24
10
56
8
0
3
1
3
37
16
48
117
43
18
135
8
0
4
1
2
1
2
15
38
5
1
11
4
123
503
121
Hawaiian/
Pacific Islander
6
2
3
3
0
3
5
1
1
0
1
0
25
International
252
80
160
599
14
107
1,000
101
17
11
38
16
2,395
2011 data is preliminary.
Targeted Minorities include African American, Native American, Hispanic/Latino/a, Southeast Asian (Cambodians, Laotians, Vietnamese, and Hmong).
International students are not counted within the targeted minority categories.
Individuals who indicate more than one race have a primary race selected giving precedence to the least prevalent race/ethnicity within Wisconsin’s population.
Unknown
29
25
25
35
2
92
163
80
8
5
12
9
485
Indicator 7: Percent Undergraduate
Enrollment by Gender, Fall 2011
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
56%
Women have
comprised more
51.5% than half of
undergraduate
enrollment since
1996.
54%
52%
Women
50%
48%
46%
48.5%
Men
44%
42%
2002
2003
2004
2011 data is preliminary.
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
Women as a Percentage of Total Undergraduate
Enrollment, by School/College, Fall 2011
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
100%
• Fall 2011
90%
89%
80%
81%
70%
72%
60%
58%
57%
50%
53%
52%
40%
43%
30%
20%
19%
10%
0%
Total
CALS
Business Education Engineering
2011 data is preliminary.
SoHE
L&S
Nursing
Pharmacy
• Nursing has the
highest percent
of women
undergraduates
enrolled (89%)
and Engineering
has the lowest
percent (19%)
Indicator 8: Percent Graduate/Professional
Enrollment by Gender, Fall 2011
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
56%
54%
Women
52%
51%
50%
48%
Men
49%
46%
44%
42%
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
2011 data is preliminary.
Women have
comprised more
than half of
graduate/
professional
enrollment since
2003
Women as a Percentage of Total Grad/Professional
Enrollment, by School/College, Fall 2011
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
100%
•
90%
•
92%
85%
80%
70%
67%
50%
67%
64%
60%
54%
54%
52%
49%
46%
40%
41%
34%
30%
20%
20%
10%
0%
ALS
BUS
EDU
2011 data is preliminary.
EGR
HEC
IES
L&S
MED
MSN
NUR
Fall 2011
PHM
VET
LAW
Nursing has the
highest percent of
women enrolled in
a graduate or
professional
program, while
Engineering has
the lowest percent
of women
enrolled.
Access: Enrollment
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
Fall Semester Enrollment by Gender
Student Level
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
Men
13,302
13,454
13,271
13,437
13,229
13,232
13,337
13,621
13,880
13,778
13,969
Women
15,174
15,334
15,406
15,146
14,988
15,226
15,125
15,378
15,273
14,912
14,931
53.3
53.3
53.7
53.0
53.1
53.5
53.1
53.0
52.4
52.0
51.7
Men
4,650
4,670
4,628
4,647
4,556
4,478
4,465
4,456
4,366
4,576
4,735
Women
3,970
4,074
4,194
4,277
4,387
4,363
4,367
4,404
4,344
4,540
4,624
46.1
46.6
47.5
47.9
49.1
49.3
49.4
49.7
49.9
49.8
49.4
Men
1,027
1,003
999
1,037
1,050
1,064
1,110
1,120
1,123
1,143
1,157
Women
1,347
1,337
1,381
1,393
1,410
1,469
1,469
1,443
1,447
1,497
1,525
56.7
57.1
58.0
57.3
57.3
58.0
57.0
56.3
56.3
56.7
56.9
Men
790
768
818
755
703
736
718
745
759
788
821
Women
959
912
810
896
846
912
875
874
838
865
836
54.8
54.3
49.8
54.3
54.6
55.3
54.9
54.0
52.5
52.3
50.5
Men
19,769
19,895
19,716
19,876
19,538
19,510
19,630
19,942
20,128
20,285
20,682
Women
21,450
21,657
21,791
21,712
21,631
21,970
21,836
22,099
21,902
21,814
21,916
Percent Women
52.0
Source : Registrar's Enrollment Report
52.1
52.5
52.2
52.5
53.0
52.7
52.6
52.1
51.8
51.4
Undergraduates
Percent Women
Graduate Students
Percent Women
Professional Students
Percent Women
Special Students
Percent Women
Total
Access: Enrollment
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
Home County of UW-Madison Undergraduate Students (Wisconsin Residents)
Among the 72 Wisconsin counties, each is
represented by at least 5 undergraduate students in
Fall 2011.
There are 18,107 Wisconsin Resident undergraduates
enrolled in Fall 2011.
Red: More than 4% of resident undergraduates from county
Black: Between 2% and 4% of resident undergraduates from
county
Light Gray: Less than 2% (but at least one student) of
resident undergraduates from county
Access: Enrollment
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
Students from Farms: Home County of UW-Madison Undergraduates from
Wisconsin Farms* in 2010
*Students from farms are identified by the presence of
farm income on the Free Application for Federal
Student Aid (FAFSA). There may be undergraduates
from Wisconsin farms who did not apply for financial
aid.
Black: More than 4% of undergraduates from farms
Dark Gray: Between 2% and 4% of undergraduates from
farms
Light Gray: Less than 2% (but at least one
undergraduate) from farms
White: No undergraduates from farms
Access: Enrollment
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
Home County of UW-Madison Undergraduate FASTrack Participants in 2010
FASTrack is a financial aid program that assures a student’s
financial need will be met each year for four years. Single,
financially dependent students are considered for the
program based on the family's current and past financial
situation and need for assistance. Both work and borrowing
are minimized to reduce the student's financial burden. All
students who apply for aid are considered for FASTrack, there
is no special application. Qualifying students are selected by
the Office of Student Financial Aid.
Black: More than 4% of undergraduates in the FASTrack
program
Dark Gray: Between 2% and 4% of undergraduates in the
FASTrack program
Light Gray: Less than 2% (but at least one student) of
undergraduates in the FASTrack program
White: No undergraduate participants in the FASTrack
program
Access: Diversity Programs
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
Academic Excellence Communities
Programs that increase access and success for underrepresented
populations on campus
• Programs with a Pre-College Component
– PEOPLE
– POSSE
• Student Support Programs
– CEO (formerly TRIO)
– Academic Advancement Program
– Pathways
• Scholarship Programs
– Chancellor’s Scholars
– Powers/Knapp
– First Wave
Fall 2011 Undergraduate Participation
in Academic Excellence Communities
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
Academic Excellence
Community
Total
Participants
Targeted
Minority*
Male
Wisconsin
Resident
First
Generation
Pell Grant
Eligible
Academic
Advancement Program
(AAP)
393
96%
44%
70%
25%
44%
Center for Educational
Opportunity (CEO)
477
90%
40%
69%
94%
84%
PEOPLE
342
89%
40%
95%
58%
63%
Posse
137
84%
48%
0%
66%
66%
First Wave
46
65%
42%
22%
52%
61%
Chancellor’s Scholar
Program
193
100%
36%
69%
35%
29%
Powers/Knapp
Program
160
100%
47%
86%
51%
46%
Pathways
36
89%
58%
53%
17%
28%
*Targeted Minorities include African American, Native American, Hispanic/Latino/a, Southeast Asian (Cambodians, Laotians, Vietnamese, and Hmong).
AllInternational
Undergraduates
10%categories.
students are not counted28,736
within the targeted minority
48%
63%
22%
16%
Access: Pipeline
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
Pipeline
The population in high school serves as a major pool for UWMadison undergraduates
• We can estimate the pipeline for several groups
–
–
–
–
Minority Students
Low-Income (Pell or Free/Reduced Lunch)
First-Generation Students
Rural students
Access: Pipeline: First Generation
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
Wisconsin's First-Generation College-Going Recruiting Pool
2009-10 Data
Population 13-17
"Potential"* First
Generation Students
(290,550 of 385,907)
An estimated 75% of 13-17
year old Wisconsin residents
live in households where no
parent/guardian holds a
bachelor’s degree.
No data available on graduation rates or
academic achievement by parental
education levels within Wisconsin
UW-Madison
Applicants
(2,323 of 8,140)
UW-Madison
Admits
(1,409 of 5,637)
UW-Madison
Enrolled
(908 of 3,452)
0%
10%
Approximately 26% of UWMadison Resident New
Freshman are firstgeneration students.
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
We do not have a reliable
data source on high school
graduation or college
preparedness by parental
education levels for
Wisconsin residents.
Percent of Group Total
*“Potential” First Generation Students does not imply any level of academic achievement, school enrollment, or preparedness. This estimate reflects the
population 13-17 with no parent/guardian in the household with a Bachelor’s Degree.
Sources: Overall WI Population (U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2005-2007 Estimates), Potential First Generation Students (“Parental
Education and College Participation Rates in Wisconsin”, Sara Lazenby, August 2009), Applicants, Admits, and Enrolls for 2009-10 School Year
Access: Pipeline: Low Income
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
Wisconsin's Low-Income Recruiting Pool
Economically Disadvantaged High
School Public School Students
Economically
Disadvantaged Public
High School Graduates
2009-10 Data
(88,196 of 279,103)
•34% of Public K-12 students
in Wisconsin are
Economically Disadvantaged
(2008-09)
(13,042 of 66,266)
•23% of Public High School
Graduates are Economically
Disadvantaged (2008-09)
No Data Available on
Low-Income Status of
UW-Madison Applicants
or Admits
UW-Madison
Enrolled
0%
10%
•We have no reliable
information on income of
applicant students, all data
based on financial aid
applications
(561 of 3,437)
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Percent of Group Total
“Economically Disadvantaged” represents those students who are eligible for free/reduced lunch.
Sources: Wisconsin DPI WINSS, 2008-09 Enrollment by Student Group, Completions by Student Group
UW-Madison Data based on Fall 2009-10
70%
80%
•16% of Resident New
Freshmen are Pell Grant
Recipients
Access: Pipeline: Minority
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
Wisconsin's Minority Recruiting Pool
Minority Public High
School Students
Minority Public High
School Graduates
(57,495 of 279,103)
(1,114 of 8164)
UW-Madison
Admits
(733 of 5,651)
10%
•21% of Public High School
students in Wisconsin are
minority students(2008-09)
•18% of Public High School
Graduates are minority
students (2008-09)
(697 of 11,623)
UW-Madison
Applicants
0%
(290,550 of 385,907)
(11,623 of 66,266)
"Well-Prepared"
Minority Public High
School Graduates
UW-Madison
Enrolled
2009-10 Data
•15% of Resident New
Freshmen are minority
students
(517 of 3,457)
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
Percent of Group Total
“Well-prepared” high school graduates are in the top quartile of their graduating classes and score at least 22 (WI Average) on the ACT (or equivalent SAT
score). This does not reflect any policies by UW-Madison admissions with regards to academic preparation requirements.
Access: Pipeline: Rural
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
Percent Rural, by Pipeline Step
Not Rural
Rural
49
51
Percent of High Schools
75
Percent of 12th Graders
Percent of Freshmen Applicants
Percent of Freshmen Admits
Percent of Enrolled Freshmen
•
•
25
83
17
•
83
17
83
17
Source: High School Characteristics and Early Academic Performance at UW-Madison, Clare Huhn,
APA, 2005
While over half of
WI high schools are
considered rural,
only 25% of 12th
graders attend a
rural high school.
Rural high school
students apply at
lower rates than
other students
Once they apply,
rural students are
admitted and
enroll at rates
proportional to
their application
rate.
Impact of People and POSSE on Freshmen
Enrollment
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
Targeted Minority New Freshmen Fall 2011 / Fall 2001
2011 New Freshmen (644)
Non-Residents
(256)
Illinois
(96)
POSSE (9)
Other (87)
Minnesota
(59)
California
(18)
DC/Maryland/VA
(18)
POSSE (8)
Other (10)
POSSE (11)
Other (7)
Other States
(65)
•The first PEOPLE/POSSE
students entered college
in 2002
2001 New Freshmen (389)
WI Residents
(388)
Milwaukee
(105)
PEOPLE (22)
Dane
(68)
PEOPLE (37)
Waukesha
(29)
PEOPLE (2)
Racine
(11)
PEOPLE (2)
Other (83)
Other (31)
Other (27)
Other (9)
Marathon
(19)
Kenosha
(17)
PEOPLE (8)
Other Counties
(139)
PEOPLE (7)
Other (9)
Other (132)
Non-Residents
(143)
WI Residents
(246)
Illinois
(42)
Milwaukee
(76)
Minnesota
(36)
Dane
(54)
California
(9)
Waukesha
(16)
New York (7)
Brown
(12)
Other States
(49)
Outagamie
(10)
Kenosha
(7)
Other Counties
(71)
Access: Applicants, Admits, and Enrolls,
New Freshmen, Fall 2011
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
Total
%
% Enrolled/
Applicants Admitted Yield Rate
Overall 28,983
50.5
39.8
Male
Female
14,265
14,688
47.8
53.1
40.5
39.3
Resident
Domestic Non-Res.
International
8,921
12,023
4,570
62.9
49.4
26.9
61.9
22.5
20.5
Targeted Minorties
Total Minority
3,304
5,257
44.1
48
44.2
38.1
First Generation
5,127
43.2
50.9
•Wisconsin residents
are the most likely
applicants to be
admitted and are most
likely to enroll
compared to other
groups.
Access: Applicants, Admits, and Enrolls,
Transfer Students, Fall 2011
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
Total
%
% Enrolled/
Applicants Admitted Yield Rate
Overall 5,167
42.1
60.9
Male
Female
2,627
43.2
57.2
2,540
40.9
64.8
Resident
Domestic Non-Res.
International
2,726
51.9
71.1
1,166
35.1
35.2
968
22.3
46.8
Targeted Minorties
Total Minority
514
36.7
58.9
713
40.4
58.8
1,606
40.3
67.7
First Generation
•One reason for low admit
rates for transfer applicants
is that many applicants do
not meet the minimum
requirements for admission
•Wisconsin residents are
the most likely applicants
to be admitted and are
most likely to enroll
compared to other groups.
Access: Comparisons
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
UW-Madison educates relatively large numbers of minority students
• UW-Madison had 2,750 targeted minority undergraduates
(Fall 2009)
• There are 2,528 institutions in the United States that grant
bachelor’s degrees. Of these, only 816 (32.3%) have more
total undergraduates enrolled than UW-Madison has targeted
minority undergraduates enrolled
• There are 48 institutions in Wisconsin that grant bachelor’s
degrees. Of these, only 18 (38%) have more total
undergraduates enrolled than UW-Madison has targeted
minority students enrolled
Retention
Components :
• Retention
• Course-taking
• Success
• Degree Completion
Access
Retention
Equity in
Educational
Outcomes
Institutional
Receptivity
Excellence
100
•
Percent of First Year Undergraduates Retained after
One Year (All Students)
For the cohort entering in
2009-10, 95% of students
were retained after one year.
Percent Retained
90
80
70
60
50
40
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
Fall Semester of Entrance
100
Percent of First-Year Undergraduates Graduated After
6 Years (All Students)
•
Percent Graduated
90
84% of the 2004 cohort
graduated after six years.
80
70
60
50
40
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
Fall Semester of Entrance
2006
2007
2008
2009
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
Retention
Indicator 9: Retention and Graduation Rates of Targeted
Minorities, Pell Recipients, and First-Generation Students
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
Summary of Retention and Graduation Rates by Student Group
1-Year
% Difference
Retention Rate
All New Freshmen
Targeted Minority
First-Generation College Students*
Freshmen Recipients of Pell Grants
94.8
91.3
93.1
92.5
Note: 1-Year Retention Rate for 2009 Cohort, 6-Year Graduation Rate for 2004 Cohort
* Graduation rates not yet available for first-generation college students,
-3.5
-1.7
-2.3
6-Year
Graduation
Rate
83.9
66.8
Equity in
73.1
Educational
Outcomes
% Difference
-17.1
-10.8
Summary of Retention and Graduation
Rates by Student Group
All New Freshmen
Women
Men
Targeted Minority
Non-Targeted
African American
Native American
Hispanic/Latino/a
South East Asian
Non-Targeted Asian
International
Wisconsin Residents
Non-Residents
First-Generation College Students*
Freshmen Who Received Need-Based Aid
Freshmen Recipients of Pell Grants
FIGs
Targeted Minority in FIGs
PEOPLE
POSSE
Chancellor's Scholars
Powers/Knapp Scholars
AAP Participants
First Wave*
CEO*
Pathways*
1-Year Retention Rate
% Difference
94.8
95
94.5
91.3
95.2
91.9
83.3
92.8
91.2
95.5
92
95.4
92.9
93.1
93.6
92.5
94.4
92.4
88.9
96.6
97.7
92.5
90.4
100
0.2
-0.3
-3.5
0.4
-2.9
-11.5
-2
-3.6
0.7
-2.8
0.6
-1.9
-1.7
-1.2
-2.3
-0.4
-2.4
-5.9
1.8
2.9
-2.3
-4.4
5.2
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
6-Year Graduation
% Difference
Rate
83.9
85.6
1.7
81.8
-2.1
66.8
-17.1
85.5
1.6
62.6
-21.3
60
-23.9
71
-12.9
68.5
-15.4
84.4
0.5
72.7
-11.2
85.6
1.7
Equity
in
81.8
-2.1
Educational
78.9
Outcomes
73.1
81.4
63.8
75.7
82.6
88.1
78.6
68.9
Note: 1-Year Retention Rate for 2009 Cohort, 6-Year Graduation Rate for 2004 Cohort
* Graduation rates not yet available for first-generation college students, First Wave. Data not yet available for CEO, Pathways
-5
-10.8
-2.5
-20.1
-8.2
-1.3
4.2
-5.3
-15
Summary of Retention and Graduation
Rates by Student Group
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
Summary of Retention and Graduation Rates by
Student Group
1-Year Retention
6-Year Graduation
% Difference
% Difference
Rate
Rate
All New Freshmen
Targeted Minority
Targeted Minority in an Academic
Excellence Program
Targeted Minority Not in an Academic
Excellence Program
PEOPLE
POSSE
Chancellor's Scholars
Powers/Knapp Scholars
AAP Participants
First Wave*
CEO*
Pathways*
94.8
91.3
92.4
90.4
88.9
96.6
97.7
92.5
90.4
100
-3.5
83.9
66.8
-17.1
-2.4
75.1
-8.8
-4.4
-5.9
1.8
2.9
-2.3
-4.4
5.2
Equity in
60.3
Educational
75.7
Outcomes
82.6
88.1
78.6
68.9
-23.6
-8.2
-1.3
4.2
-5.3
-15
Note: 1-Year Retention Rate for 2009 Cohort, 6-Year Graduation Rate for 2004 Cohort
*Retention/Graduation Rates not yet available for CEO and Pathways; Graduation rates not yet available for First
Wave
Graduation Rates of Targeted Minorities by
Participation in an Academic Excellence Program
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
90
85
All Students
80
Targeted Minorities
in an Academic
Excellence Program
75
70
Equity in
Educational
All Targeted Minorities
Outcomes
65
Targeted Minorities
not in an Academic
Excellence Program
60
55
50
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
Retention and Graduation Rates,
by Gender and Race/Ethnicity
100
UW-Madison Retention and Graduation Rates
By Gender and Race/Ethnicity
All Students
White
Asian/Pacific Islander
Hispanic
Black
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
American Indian/Alaskan Native
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Retained to Second Year Retained to Second Year Graduated in Six Years
(Men)
(Women)
(Men)
Graduated in Six Years
(Women)
Source: UW-Madison CSRDE Submission; 3-Year Average of Rates from 2002-2004, SL, APA, August 2011
Retention and Graduation Rates,
among Student Athletes
Graduation Rates Among Student-Athletes
(Average of 2000-2004 Entering Cohorts)
90
All Students
80
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
Student-Athletes
N=26
N=19,593
N=22,727
N=253
70
N=658
N=357
60
N=557
50
40
N=64
30
20
10
0
Total
White
Black
International
Source: 2010 NCAA Graduation Rates Report. Data represents those groups with at least 10 student athletes in the four-cohort average.
SL, APA, August 2011
-5%
-20%
-25%
Carnegie-Mellon
Arizona
Kansas
SUNY-Buffalo
Columbia
Nebraska
SUNY-Stony Brook
Colorado
Oregon
Iowa
Minnesota
Missouri
Iowa State
Purdue
Indiana
Ohio State
Rutgers
Pittsburgh
Weighted Average
Michigan State
Georgia Tech
Texas A&M
Washington
Texas
UC Santa Barbara
UC Davis
UC Irvine
Maryland
Syracuse
Florida
Wisconsin
Illinois
Penn State
North Carolina
Michigan
Caltech
UCLA
Vanderbilt
UC Berkeley
Cornell
MIT
Virginia
Northwestern
Brown
Harvard
Percentage Point Gap
Percentage Point Graduation Gap of Fall 2002-2004
Entrance Cohorts, Selected AAU Institutions
5%
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
0%
-10%
-15%
•Average graduation gap among AAU
institutions is 9.1%
•Gap at UW-Madison is 17.1 percent
Selected Institutions, CSRDE data, sorted from lowest to highest overall
graduation rates.
Excellence
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
•
•
•
•
Grades
GPA
Honors and Awards
Participation in High
Demand Programs
Access
Retention
Equity in
Educational
Outcomes
Institutional
Receptivity
Excellence
Excellence: Wisconsin Experience
• “Wisconsin Experience” captures four
inquiry-based high-impact practices
and includes:
– Substantial research experiences that
generate knowledge and analytical
skills
– Global and cultural competencies and
engagement
– Leadership and activism opportunities
– Application of knowledge in the “real
world”
• In 2009-10, 88% of bachelor’s degree
recipients participated in at least one
Wisconsin Experience Program
• Targeted minority graduates were
slightly more likely to have completed
at least one Wisconsin Experience
activity.
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
Percent of Graduates with at Least
One Wisconsin Experience Activity
100
80
60
40
20
0
All Graduates
88%
Equity in
Educational
Outcomes
Targeted Minority Graduates
92%
Excellence: Wisconsin Experience
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
• In 2009-10 targeted minority students were slightly more likely to
have completed a Wisconsin Experience activity.
Bachelor's Degree Recipients in 2009-10
by Targeted Minority Status
Number of Graduates
ALS
BUS
EDU
EGR
HEC
L&S
MPH
NUR
PHM
Total
Non-Targeted
588
639
360
564
278
3,314
51
164
4
5,962
Targeted*
45
28
24
28
43
324
3
16
1
512
Percent of Graduates with at Least One
Wisconsin Experience Activity
Non-Targeted Equity in Targeted*
Educational 100
100
Outcomes 82
81
96
96
87
96
92
93
85
90
100
100
100
100
100
100
88
92
Excellence: Wisconsin Experience
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
• Transfer-start graduates participated in Wisconsin Experience
activities at lower rates (80%) than freshman-start graduates (90%).
Bachelor's Degree Recipients in 2009-10
by Type of Entrance to UW-Madison (Freshman or Transfer)
Number of Graduates
Freshman-Start
ALS
BUS
EDU
EGR
HEC
L&S
MPH
NUR
PHM
Total
491
540
286
469
238
2,861
29
104
3
5,021
TransferStart
141
127
98
123
83
777
25
76
2
1,453
Percent of Graduates with at Least One
Wisconsin Experience Activity
TransferFreshman-Start Equity in
Start
Educational
100
100
Outcomes
84
70
98
90
91
75
93
89
88
73
100
100
100
100
100
100
90
80
Institutional Receptivity
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
• Diversity of:
Access
– Faculty
– Staff
– Administrators
• Climate
Retention
Equity in
Educational
Outcomes
Institutional
Receptivity
Excellence
Institutional Receptivity: Employees
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
Employees self-report their race/ethnicity at the time of hire.
Employees may choose any of the following designations,
and may select two or more races as of 2009:
•
•
•
•
•
•
White
Black
Asian
American Indian
Hispanic/ Latino/a
Hawaiian
Institutional Receptivity: Employees
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
Employees by Category
2010 Headcount of Faculty and Staff by Gender and Race/Ethnicity
Executive/
Director/
Instructional
Academic
Other
Academic
Classified
Employes-
Graduate
Faculty
Administrator
Staff
Staff
Staff
in-Training
Assistants
Total
Women Black
23
11
11
46
59
15
83
248
Asian
69
5
68
198
130
108
516
1,094
6
0
3
13
7
0
19
48
31
10
24
52
138
19
136
410
541
171
870
2,523
2,578
280
1,632
8,595
Native American
Hispanic
White/unknown
Two or more races
Men
4
0
5
20
17
0
5
51
Total
674
197
981
2,852
2,929
422
2,391
10,446
Black
24
9
23
39
70
8
57
230
Asian
169
1
91
208
103
215
741
1,528
4
3
2
10
9
2
8
38
46
8
33
38
153
17
132
427
1,252
190
1,092
1,939
2,135
346
1,957
8,911
Native American
Hispanic
White/unknown
Two or more races
Total
8
2
3
6
11
0
5
35
1,503
213
1,244
2,240
2,481
588
2,900
11,169
Grand Total
2,177
410
2,225
5,092
5,410
1,010
5,291
21,615
Source: October IADS data. Notes: Non-duplicating headcount reported- see Technical Note # 7. LTEs, Student and Unclassified hourly workers excluded.
See technical note #10 for information on new race/ethnicity categories.
2011 data available in December 2011
Institutional Receptivity: Employees
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
Headcount of Faculty and Staff by Gender
Faculty
Executive/Director/
Administrator
Instructional
Academic Staff
Other
Academic Staff
Classified Staff
Employes-in-Training
Graduate Assistants
Total
Women
Men
Total
Women
Men
Total
Women
Men
Total
Women
Men
Total
Women
Men
Total
Women
Men
Total
Women
Men
Total
Women
Men
Grand Total
Source: October EEO and IADS data.
excluded.
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
546
563
586
603
617
638
643
648
663
674
1,667
1,662
1,650
1,635
1,603
1,572
1,555
1,530
1,512
1,503
2,213
2,225
2,236
2,238
2,220
2,210
2,198
2,178
2,175
2,177
171
183
187
187
188
179
182
186
192
197
205
198
202
201
200
197
201
201
207
213
376
381
389
388
388
376
383
387
399
410
763
793
795
836
876
871
901
942
973
981
1,099
1,123
1,088
1,113
1,162
1,152
1,147
1,197
1,210
1,244
1,862
1,916
1,883
1,949
2,038
2,023
2,048
2,139
2,183
2,225
2,373
2,475
2,482
2,522
2,494
2,530
2,597
2,667
2,751
2,852
1,902
2,004
2,091
2,150
2,158
2,133
2,181
2,179
2,187
2,240
4,275
4,479
4,573
4,672
4,652
4,663
4,778
4,846
4,938
5,092
2,876
2,902
2,887
2,872
2,852
2,829
2,843
2,866
2,904
2,929
2,236
2,252
2,287
2,365
2,333
2,353
2,385
2,399
2,462
2,481
5,112
5,154
5,174
5,237
5,185
5,182
5,228
5,265
5,366
5,410
275
281
282
314
324
324
325
361
424
422
437
459
460
485
489
503
482
507
571
588
712
740
742
799
813
827
807
868
995
1,010
2,001
2,128
2,243
2,341
2,398
2,310
2,261
2,279
2,327
2,391
2,794
2,788
2,876
2,881
2,888
2,828
2,822
2,728
2,779
2,900
4,795
4,916
5,119
5,222
5,286
5,138
5,083
5,007
5,106
5,291
9,005
9,325
9,462
9,675
9,749
9,681
9,752
9,949
10,234
10,446
10,340
10,486
10,654
10,830
10,833
10,738
10,773
10,741
10,928
11,169
19,345
19,811
20,116
20,505
20,582
20,419
20,525
20,690
21,162
21,615
Notes: Non-duplicating headcount reported- see Technical Note #7. LTEs, Student and Unclassified hourly workers
2011 data available in December 2011
Indicator 10: Women as a
Percentage of all Faculty
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
35
2,500
31%
•In Fall 2010
31% of
Faculty were
women.
30
2,000
1,500
20
15
1,000
10
500
5
0
2001
2002
2003
2004
2011 data available in December 2011
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
0
Percent of Faculty
Number of Faculty
25
•24.4% of Full
Professors,
35.3% of
Associate
Professors,
and 43% of
Assistant
Professors
were women.
Institutional Receptivity: Employees
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
Percent of Women Faculty and Staff by Employee Type
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Total
Faculty
Exec/Dir/
Admin
Instructional
Acad. Staff
Other Acad. Staff
•Women make up just under 50% of all employees at UW-Madison.
•A smaller proportion of faculty members are women (31%)
2011 data available in December 2011
Classified
Indicator 11: Minority Faculty Recruitment
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
UW-Madison Faculty Hires by Minority Status
45
Minority Faculty
40
35
Madison Plan
Percent
30
25
20
Strategic Hires
SHI - 2
15
10
5
0
82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10
Year of Hire
2010-11 Data is preliminary.
•Increases in
the percent of
faculty hires
that are
racial/ethnic
minorities.
Indicator 12: Minority Faculty Representation
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
Minority Faculty as a Percent of the Total Faculty
Headcount
17.6%
18
16.2%
15
13.2%
13.8%
14.3%
14.6%
15.1%
16.9% 16.8%
Two or More
Races, 0.6%
15.4%
Hispanic, 3.5%
American Indian,
0.5%
12
9
Asian, 10.9%
6
3
Black, 2.2%
0
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011 data available in December 2011, New race/ethnic categories implemented in 2010
•In 2010: 2,177
total faculty
members
•17.6% (384) of
Faculty are
racial/ethnic
minorities.
•8% increase in
minority faculty
since 1996
Institutional Receptivity: Staff
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
Minority Instructional Academic Staff as a Percent of
the Total Headcount
18
15
11.5% 11.9%
12
10.5%
12.1%
11.2%
11.7%
11.8%
9
Two or More
Races,
.4% (8)
•11.8%
Hispanic/
Latino/a,
2.6% (57)
American
Indian,
.2% (5)
9.8%
8.9%
8.8%
6
•In 2010, 2,225
Instructional
Academic Staff
members
(263) of
Instructional
Academic Staff
are racial/ethnic
minorities
•2.7% increase in
Asian,
7.1% (159) minority
3
Black,
1.5% (34)
0
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011 data available in December 2011, New race/ethnic categories implemented in 2010
instructional
academic staff
since 1996
Institutional Receptivity: Staff
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
Minority Non-Instructional Academic Staff as a
Percent of the Total Headcount
18
15
•In 2010: 5,092
non-instructional
Two or More
Academic Staff
Races,
.5% (26)
12
11.2%
10.9% 11.1%
9.4%
9.6%
11.7%
12%
12%
12.3%
Hispanic/
Latino/a,
1.8% (90)
10.2%
9
American
Indian,
.5% (23)
•12.3% of noninstructional
Academic Staff
are minorities
•3.7% increase in
minority nonAsian,
8.0%
instructional
(406)
academic staff
Black,
since 1996
1.7% (85)
6
3
0
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011 data available in December 2011, New race/ethnic categories implemented in 2010
Institutional Receptivity: Staff
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
Minority Classified Staff as a Percent of the Total
Headcount
18
15
12
11%
11.3%
11.8%
12%
Two or
More
12.6% 12.9% Races,
0.5% (28)
•12.9% (697) of
Hispanic/ classified staff are
Latino/a,
5.4% (291) minorities
10%
9
8.1%
8.5%
•In 2010: 5,410
Classified Staff
members
9.1%
American
Indian,
.3% (16)
3
•8.7% increase in
minority classified
Asian,
4.3% (233) staff since 1996
0
Black,
2.4% (129)
6
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011 data available in December 2011, New race/ethnic categories implemented in 2010
Institutional Receptivity: Staff
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
Minority Executive/Director/Administrators as a
Percent of the Total Headcount
18
•In 2010: 410
Executive/Director
/Administrators
15
12
10.9%
11.1%
10.2%
10.8%
10.8%
11.2% 11.2%
11.6%
11.2%
9
6
Two or
11.9% More
Races,
.5% (2)
Hispanic/
Latino/a,
4.4% (18)
American
Indian,
.7% (3)
Asian,
1.5% (6)
3
Black,
4.9% (20)
0
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011 data available in December 2011, New race/ethnic categories implemented in 2010
•11.9% of
Executive/Director
/Administrators
are racial/ethnic
minorities
•1.4% increase in
minority
Executive/Director
/Administrators
since 1996.
Institutional Receptivity: Employees
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
Percent of Minority Faculty and Staff by Employee Type
20%
18%
16%
14%
12%
10%
8%
6%
4%
2%
0%
Total
Faculty
Exec/Dir/
Admin
Instructional
Acad. Staff
Other Acad. Staff
-Around 13% of all employees are minorities
-A larger proportion of faculty are minorities.
2011 data available in December 2011, New race/ethnic categories implemented in 2010
Classified
Non-White Full-Time
Faculty as a Percent of
Total Full-Time Faculty
at AAU Public
Institutions, 2009-10
Average percent non-white
faculty for AAU public
institutions: 26%
UW-Madison: 18%
1 AAU public institution has
a lower percent of nonwhite faculty.
7 AAU public institutions
have a lower number of
non-white faculty.
Michigan
Rutgers
Purdue
UC-Irvine
Maryland
UCLA
Texas
Minnesota
UC-Davis
Iowa State
Arizona
UC-San Diego
Illinois
Buffalo
Iowa
UC-Berkeley
Michigan State
Pittsburgh
Texas A & M
Florida
UC-Santa Barbara
Missouri
Ohio State
Nebraska
Colorado
Stony Brook
Washington
Kansas
Penn State
North Carolina
Indiana
Oregon
Wisconsin
Virginia
Source: IPEDS Fall HR, 2009-10 (AAUDE data)
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
Institutional
Receptivity:
Peer
Comparisons
for Faculty
Diversity
N=2,093
N=812
N=805
N=661
N=951
N=1,073
N=800
N=1,210
N=788
N=616
N=696
N=655
N=617
N=411
N=604
N=597
N=678
N=1,048
N=583
N=1,058
N=280
N=744
N=816
N=396
N=553
N=344
N=776
N=555
N=685
N=630
N=473
N=224
N=528
N=357
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
Institutional Receptivity: Tenure
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
Notes about faculty tenure data:
• Tenure and promotion rates are
calculated at 6 and 9 years after
hire, to account for those who
have extensions on the tenure
clock.
• Data combine hires from 1989-90
to 2003-04 or 1991-92 to 200304. This is necessary to account
for small numbers of hires.
• Small Ns make tenure rates
subject to large variation.
• Those who did not receive
tenure include the
following:
– Those who were denied
tenure
– Those who left the university
for another position
elsewhere
– A few faculty members still
hold probationary
appointments after 9 years.
Indicator 13: Percent of Faculty
Promoted to Tenure by Gender
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
Percent Promoted to Tenure by Gender,
within Six (6) and Nine (9) Years
80
Men
Women
70
72%
64%
60
50
55%
40
42%
30
20
10
0
6 Years
9 Years
• At 9 years, 64% of women faculty have been promoted to tenure.
Percent tenured based on data for hires from 1995-96 to 2004-05
Indicator 14: Percent of Faculty
Promoted to Tenure by Minority Status
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
Percent Promoted to Tenure by Minority
Status, within Six (6) and Nine (9) Years
80
Non-Minority
Minority
70
70%
65%
60
50
51%
47%
40
30
20
10
0
6 Years
9 Years
• At 9 Years, 65% of minority faculty members have been promoted to tenure.
Percent tenured based on data for hires from 1995-96 to 2004-05
Institutional Receptivity: Promotion
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
Faculty Disciplinary Divison Affiliation,
by Minority Status and Gender
•
100%
19
38
80%
60%
40%
20%
23
33
11
16
27
14
34
Social
Studies
10
Physical
Science
29
Arts and
Humanities
27
Biological
Sciences
32
35
32
20
•
Selecting a divisional
affiliation is a step in
the tenure process.
Faculty are not
required to identify
their divisional
affiliation at the time
of hire, but many do.
Women, especially
minority women, are
heavily concentrated
within the Social
Studies Division
0%
Minority Males
Minority Female
Non-Minority Male Non-Minority Female
Note: Chart excludes 24 faculty members who have not yet selected a disciplinary division, as they are not required to do so until they
go up for tenure. Data as of October 2010 payroll.
Institutional Receptivity: Promotion
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
• A lower
percentage of
women and men
are promoted to
tenure within the
Social Studies.
Percent of Faculty Promoted within Nine (9) Years,
by Gender and Division
90
Men
80
70
60
50
Women
81%
N=144
72%
N=547
79% 81%
64%
N=279
N=89
N=93
74% 72%
N=190
66%
N=74
N=29
57%
N=124
40
48%
N=83
30
20
10
0
Total
Physical Sciences
Arts and
Humanities
Data on faculty hires from 1989-90 to 2002-03
Biological Sciences
Social Studies
• The largest gap in
tenure rates by
gender is within
the Physical
Sciences division.
Institutional Receptivity: Promotion
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
• A lower
percentage of
faculty members
are promoted to
tenure within the
Social Studies
division.
Percent of Faculty Promoted within Nine (9) Years,
by Minority Status and Division
90
Minority
Non-Minority
80
70
60
50
69%
61%
N=669
82%
81%
N=129
N=140
71%
N=44
68%
N=42
67%
71%
N=230
N=34
54%
N=157
45%
40
N=170
N=37
30
20
10
0
Total
Physical Sciences
Arts and
Humanities
Data on faculty hires from 1989-90 to 2003-04
Biological Sciences
Social Studies
• The largest gap in
tenure rates by
minority status is
within the Physical
Sciences and Arts
and Humanities.
Institutional Receptivity: Promotion
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
Percent of Faculty Promoted within Nine (9) Years,
by Gender and Division
90
Minority Men
Minority Women
85
80
78
70
60
Non-Minority Women Number
Non-Minority Men
72
61 63
71 69
64
Minority
83
78
74
73
67
61
Total
63
59
45 46
40
48
30
20
10
0
Biological Sciences Physical Sciences
Data on faculty hires from 1989-90 to 2004-05
Non-Minority
Men
Women
Men
Women
99
59
448
221
20
14
170
60
39
6
105
24
19
23
70
70
21
16
103
67
72
50
Total
of Faculty Promoted
to Tenure
Arts and
Humanities
Social Studies
Biological
Sciences
Physical
Sciences
Arts and
Humanities
Social
Studies
Institutional Receptivity: Promotion
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
Key findings from tenure/promotion data:
• All groups have lower promotion rates within the Social Studies
division.
• Women, and especially minority women, are more likely to be
within the social studies division.
• For groups with small hiring pools, the effect of one person’s
tenure/non-tenure can affect the percent tenured dramatically.
• Those not receiving tenure includes those who took a position
elsewhere or still have a probationary appointment after 9
years.
Data on faculty hires from 1989-90 to 2004-05
Institutional Receptivity: Climate
Selected NSSE 2011 Results
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
Percent of Seniors who often or very much:
Understand people of other
racial/ethnic backgrounds
56
56
55
All
Non-Minority
Minority
Had serious conversations with
student of a different race or
ethnicity than your own
Included diverse perspectives in
class discussion or assignments
52
49
71
**
57
56
63
67
66
Tried to better understand someone
else's views by imagining how it
looks from their perspective
75
**
** significantly different
See: http://www.apa.wisc.edu/performance_students_surveys.html
Institutional Receptivity: Climate
Selected NSSE 2011 Results
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
Percent of Seniors for whom the university emphasizes quite a bit or
very much:
72
72
71
Providing the support you need to
succeed academically
41
41
40
Providing the support you need to
thrive socially
All
Non-minority
Helping you cope with non-academic
responsibilities (work, family, etc)
Encouraging contact among students
from different economic, social, and
racial or ethnic backgrounds
Minority
22
21
25
46
47
44
See: http://www.apa.wisc.edu/performance_students_surveys.html
Summary of Indicators
http://apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
Indicators present in this report:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
Percent enrollment of minority undergraduate students
Percent enrollment of targeted minority undergraduate students
Percent enrollment of targeted minority graduate students
Percent enrollment of targeted minority professional students
Percent enrollment of Pell grant recipients
Percent enrollment of first-generation students
Percent enrollment of undergraduates by gender
Percent enrollment of graduate/professional students by gender
Retention/Graduation rates of targeted minorities, Pell grant recipients,
and first-generation students.
Women as a percent of all Faculty
Minority Faculty recruitment
Minority Faculty representation
Percent of Faculty promoted to tenure by gender
Percent of Faculty promoted to tenure by minority status
Diversity Update 2011
• Slideshow available at
http://www.apa.wisc.edu/diversity.html
• Questions about these slides:
– Sara Lazenby ([email protected])
– Jocelyn Milner ([email protected])