Transcript Slide 1


You should be able to answer these
questions:
1. Where can I go for resources on this stuff?
2. What’s my child supposed to know and who
determines that?
3. How do the State Achievement Tests fit in?
4. What’s the difference between achievement and
growth?
5. What happened to our “Excellence with
Distinction?”

I’m putting resources here for your
consideration.

Highlights include:
 10 Ways to You Can Support Your Child’s Future
 Article from Harvard Family Research Project on
elementary school children
 Family Involvement in Your Child’s 1st through 3rd
grade Education

Ohio determines the things kids are supposed to
know and be able to do through the content
standards
 In the case of the common core, this is a more
“nationalized” curriculum

OFCS’ teachers determine:
 When the learning targets will be taught
 How they will be taught
 How they will assess

The OAAs determine whether or not kids
demonstrate a common level of proficiency on
the standards

Common Core Standards in English Language Arts &
Mathematics

Revised Ohio Content Standards in Science and Social
Studies

Where did the standards come from? A quick history
lesson on this…

The content standards determine what kids should know
and be able to do.

The Ohio Achievement Tests are written for the specific
purpose to determine whether or not they know it.
Key Point
 The OAA is a standards-based assessment
 The Terra Nova is a norm-referenced assessment

The OAA was designed to measure a student’s
understanding of the academic content standards in
May.
 Reading & Math (grade 3)

The TN is used to create an initial starting point for the
purposes of value-added in Olmsted Falls.
 Reading, Math, Sci, Soc Studies (grade 2)
 Sci and Soc Studies (grade 3)




To determine what kids know at a particular
point in time.
To give a grade
For the purpose of showing that the district
isn’t leaving particular groups behind
To show the growth of students based on
where they entered.
This is a fundamental understanding

Achievement—tells how much a student knows
in comparison to what he is supposed to know
for his grade level. Think height chart—”how tall
is he compared to how tall he is supposed to be”

Growth (value-added)—tells how much a
student has progressed based on his/her
previous test experiences. Think—”how much
has he grown compared to his previous
measurement?”
… sets a proficiency level students are expected to
meet.
Considerations
for Gauging
Effectiveness:
?
(Yes/No)
1) External
Standard
(proficiency
level)
2) Student’s
Ending Point of
Achievement
… sets one end of the measurement at the students’
entry point, not at an external standard.
Considerations
for Gauging
Effectiveness:
How much
gain?
1) Student’s
Prior
Achievement
Level
2) Student’s
Ending Point of
Achievement
Success?!? Failure?!?

It is a valid & reliable measure if used
responsibly

You shouldn’t apply it individually to
children—you will never receive an individual
value-added report because they do not
exist. The power is in the group

It offers district another lens to examine
instructional practice and how to improve
A designation given by the ODE
Remember the distinction we made between
achievement and growth…
…with Distinction is determined by:





Did the district meet all of the achievement
targets (in grades where OAA & OGTs exist)?
Did the district meet the graduation &
attendance criteria?
As a group, was the growth of students: above,
met or below? Above=…with Distinction
Curriculum Mapping
Lesson Design
Assessment
Data Teams

Teachers create curriculum maps for each
subject.

The goal is to create a document that
details what a teacher will teach during the
school year, including specific concepts
and skills, laid out month-by-month and
week by week.
Rebecca Molineaux (2008)
Allows for
 All students to receive instruction on standards in
a planned sequence.
 Common planning
 Common assessments and report cards
 Helps educators identify instructional gaps and
redundancies
 Clarifies teachers' professional development
needs
 Provides an opportunity for teacher collaboration
 Provides direction for novice teachers

Teachers share ideas and strategies as they
plan interdisciplinary units of instruction.
Example:
Teachers writing engaging
lessons that follow the
map and identifying level of
Bloom’s Taxonomy
for each lesson.
Teachers create common assessments both
formative and summative to check student skills.
Examples:
 Teachers place formative assessments for clickers
on the shared drive. Efficient and effective!
 Teachers analyze quarterly assessment data to
check student understanding of content
standards to revise instruction and/or grouping as
necessary.
Purposes
 Explore achievement and growth data at
building and grade level teams.

Determine areas for celebration.

Identify potential areas for improvement.
Subject Tests Proficient
Taken
Proficient % Target
State
Indicator
Met?
Reading 274
240
87.6%
75%
MET
Math
247
90.1%
75%
MET
273
CONGRATULATIONS!
Subject
Proficient %
Reading Spring 2011
87.6%
Fall 2010
66.6%
Spring 2010
90.6%
Math Spring 2011
Spring 2010
90.1%
90.2%
Reading Standards
Math Standards
Acquisition of Vocabulary
Measurement
Reading Process
Number, Number Sense and
Operations
Patterns, Functions and
Algebra
Data Analysis and Probability
Informational Text
Literary Text
Geometry and Spatial Sense
41% Advanced
34% Accelerated
13% Proficient
10% Basic
3% Limited
30% Advanced
32% Accelerated
28% Proficient
7% Basic
3% Limited
Questions?
Please feel free to contact :

Dr. Jim Lloyd, 440-427-6531, [email protected]

Miss Colleen Longville, 440-427-6401,
[email protected]