Transcript Data Gathering - Quincy Journal

Interim Facilities
Report
Quincy Public School District #172
September 25, 2013
Data Gathering
Data Gathering
O Demographic Info
O Enrollment Projections
O Capacity Analysis
O Building Data Record
O Operating Costs
O Renewal & Replacement Schedule
O Research on Facilities Condition & Student
Performance
10,000
9,500
Quincy Public School District #172
Projected Enrollment
Thru 2018-19
9,000
8,500
8,000
7,500
7,000
6,500
6,000
5,500
5,000
4,500
4,000
3,500
3,000
2,500
2,000
1,500
1,000
500
0
TOTAL
10 - 12
7-9
4-6
K-3
2010
6407
1500
1399
1449
2059
2011
6441
1514
1390
1471
2066
2012
6433
1441
1426
1480
2086
2013
6381
1359
1437
1458
2127
2014
6496
1433
1456
1488
2119
2015
6589
1479
1441
1491
2178
2016
6672
1487
1470
1514
2201
2017
6715
1479
1485
1551
2200
2018
6739
1466
1491
1533
2249
2019
6820
1496
1514
1588
2222
Defining Capacity
O Building Planning Capacity
O student enrollment that a school can best serve while fully
utilizing its physical facilities.
O combination of factors:
O the number of teaching stations available,
O the area of auxiliary spaces, and
O the adopted program for a school of that level.
O Capacity number is used for planning proposes,
O enrollment boundaries
O building utilization levels.
O Each individually facility may be capable of handling physically
many more students than its planning capacity,
O The Planning Capacity is a practical capacity that provides for
an easily understood and comparable number between
facilities, as well as, providing an optimal operating size.
Defining Capacity Elementary
O Defined simply as 25 students per classroom
multiplied by the number of classrooms
O Classroom Size Factor
O Reduced by 2 students with an average classroom size
below 750 square feet
O Reduced another 1 student if the average classroom
size is below 650 square feet.
O For example, building has 15 classrooms; the Planning
Capacity would be 375, (25 x 15). If the room sizes
were 725 sq. ft, the capacity would be 345, (23 x 15).
Defining Capacity –
Junior High School
O The Junior High capacity is defined utilizing 150
students for every four classrooms and one
science lab.
O Additionally, there is a minimum of one Art and
Life Skills labs for every 750 students.
O Each Junior High will have a band room, general
music/vocal room,
O Three rooms for special service programs
Defining Capacity –
High School
O High School capacity is defined as 175 Students
for every four classrooms and one science lab.
O One Art, Life Skills and Tech Arts Areas/Labs per
800 students.
O Other areas are required and are determined by
the curriculum and extra-curricular activities.
O band and vocal music facilities
O performing arts areas
O athletic facilities.
O Six classrooms for special service programs.
Capacity Analysis
Planning Capacity
BUILDING NAME
ADAMS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
BERRIAN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
DEWEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
ELLINGTON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
MADISON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
MONROE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
WASHINGTON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Grades
Served
K-3
K-3
K-3
K-3
K-3
K-3
K-3
TOTAL K-3
Gross Sq. Ft.
46,145
36,969
38,630
33,588
44,392
32,385
33,720
265,829
# of
general
purpose
classrms
21
15
15
16
17
16
16
116
Enrollment
406
205
247
322
416
257
307
25
23
23
25
23
25
23
2160
BALDWIN INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL
4-6
211,537
68
1476
QUINCY JR HIGH SCHOOL
7-9
303,504
76
1431
10-12
260,509
75
1334
QUINCY SR HIGH SCHOOL & VOC CTR
Planning
Class Size
Factor
Planning
Capacity
525
345
345
400
391
400
368
Capacity by Sq Ft
Sq Ft per
Student*
114.6
114.6
114.6
114.6
114.6
114.6
114.6
2774
23
Sudent
Capacity
403
323
337
293
387
283
294
2,320
1564
120.6
1,754
1583
127.4
2,382
140.3
1,857
1,562.5
Building Information
O Building Data Record
O Building Age & Square Footage
O Construction Timeline
O Demographic Information
O Enrollment
O Free and Reduced Lunch
O Information on Program Spaces
O Information on Building Systems
O Technology
O Major Projects
O Floor Plans
O Aerial Site Plan
O Attendance Map
Operating Costs
OPERATING COSTS
ADA
BER
DEW
ELL
TOTALS
$69,095
$29,748
$28,485
$24,803
Square Footage
46,145
36,969
38,630
33,588
Costs per Square Foot $
1.50 $
0.80 $
0.74 $
0.74 $
IRV
MAD
MON
WASH
$13,497
$36,842
$40,233
40,524
44,392
32,385
0.33 $
0.83 $
1.24 $
QHS
ECFC
$46,907 $177,353 $184,458
$196,659
$36,248
33,720
260,509
60,000
1.39 $
QJHS
303,504
0.58 $
BALD
211,537
0.87 $
0.75 $
DIST. WIDE
$195,965 $ 1,080,294
1,141,903
0.60 $
1,141,903
0.17 $
0.95
UTILITY COSTS
ADA
Total
BER
DEW
ELL
IRV
MAD
MON
WASH
QJHS
BALD
QHS
ECFC
DIST. WIDE
$ 56,033 $ 37,195 $ 34,406 $ 32,108 $ 16,045 $ 41,634 $ 28,270 $ 40,630 $232,042 $178,364 $ 372,697 $ 71,771
Square Footage
46,145
Costs per Square Foot $
1.21 $
36,969
1.01 $
38,630
0.89 $
33,588
0.96 $
40,524
44,392
0.40 $
0.94 $
32,385
0.87 $
33,720
1.20 $
303,504
0.76 $
211,537
0.84 $
260,509
1.43 $
$ 1,141,197
60,000
1,141,903
1.20 $
-
1,141,903
$
1.00
Labor Costs
ADA
TOTAL
BER
DEW
ELL
$114,854 $101,893 $ 96,988 $116,467 $
Square Footage
46,145
Costs per Square Foot $
2.49 $
36,969
2.76 $
38,630
2.51 $
33,588
3.47 $
IRV
-
MAD
WASH
QJHS
BALD
QHS
ECFC
DIST. WIDE
$106,456 $ 93,135 $ 98,488 $372,233 $532,648 $ 434,975 $136,006 $ 975,746 $3,179,889
40,524
-
MON
44,392
$
2.40 $
32,385
2.88 $
33,720
2.92 $
303,504
1.23 $
211,537
2.52 $
260,509
1.67 $
60,000
1,141,903
2.27 $
0.85 $
1,141,903
2.78
Building Square Footages
Square Footage
Total Costs
ADA
BER
DEW
ELL
IRV
MAD
MON
46,145
36,969
38,630
33,588
40,524
44,392
32,385
4.04%
3.24%
3.38%
2.94%
3.55%
3.89%
2.84%
WASH
QJHS
BALD
QHS
ECFC
DIST. WIDE
33,720
303,504
211,537
260,509
60,000
1,141,903
1,141,903
2.95%
26.58%
18.52%
22.81%
5.25%
100.00%
100.00%
$239,982 $168,836 $159,880 $173,378 $ 29,543 $184,933 $161,637 $186,026 $781,628 $895,471 $1,004,331 $244,025 $1,171,711 $5,401,380
Costs per Square Foot $
5.20 $
4.57 $
4.14 $
5.16 $
0.73 $
4.17 $
4.99 $
5.52 $
2.58 $
4.23 $
3.86 $
4.07 $
1.03 $
4.73
Renewal & Replacement Schedule
2013
Facility or Building
Name and/or Number
EED # xxxxxxxx
Dist. # xxxx-xxx
Gross Square Footage
Number of Stories
Building or Facility Use
Replacement Value
NOTES
Facility Cost Index
Current Dollar Value of Systems/Components that require
Renewal or Replacement during Year
Building System Appraisal
(in thousands of dollars)
Remain- Year
Year ing Life work
Year
Year Year Year Year Year
System
Installed Span req'd
1
2
3
4
5
6
Site Improvements
Site Utilities
Foundation/Substruct.
11,060
393
X
Superstructure
29,518
1,126
X
Exterior Wall System
17,553
X
Exterior Windows
2,076
X
Exterior Doors
894
29
93
39
X
Roof Systems
6,297
4,077
297
733
X
Interior Partitions
9,534
X
Interior Doors
3,861
X
Interior Floor Finishes
6,180 4,566
2,224
X
Interior Wall Finishes
4,860
X
Interior Ceiling Finishes
4,739
X
Specialties
Conveying Systems
330
X
Plumbing piping
4,576
X
Plumbing Fixtures
1,005
X
Fire Protect./Suppres.
HVAC Distribution
289
X
HVAC Equipment
7,894
X
HVAC Controls
2,101
163 1,660
377
325
X
Electrical Serv./Gen.
Electrical Distribution
Electrical Lighting
4,442
X
Special Electrical
2,798
1,818
364
X
Equip and Furnishings
Totals
120,008 4,566 6,088 3,839 3,426
364 $138,292,188
Attach Survey if
included in CIP
FY
Total Costs by
System (in
dollars)
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
11,453
30,644
17,553
2,076
1,055
11,404
9,534
3,861
12,971
4,860
4,739
330
4,576
1,005
289
7,894
4,625
4,442
4,979
Six Year Total
Quincy Public School District #172
Technology by Building - 2012 - 2013
25-Sep-13
ADA
BER
DEW
ELL
IRV
MAD
MON
WASH
QJHS
BALD
QHS
Number of Classrooms
20
13
13
13
0
17
13
16
66
64
52
15
19
321
Number of Computers
42
14
31
13
0
30
30
19
95
84
83
79
0
520
Interactive Board, Projection, Doc Camera
& Computer setup
14
13
13
10
0
9
10
14
6
29
13
0
0
131
Classrooms w/o Interactive Board Setup
6
0
0
3
0
8
3
2
60
35
39
15
19
190
Age of Computers
4 - 6 yrs 4 - 5 yrs 4 - 5 yrs 4 - 5 yrs
0
QAVTC ECFC
4 - 7 yrs 4 - 5 yrs 4-5 yrs 4-7 yrs 4-5 yrs 2-7 yrs 6m - 7 yrs
Totals
?
Labs
Number of Labs
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
3
2
4
3
1
15
Number of Computers
0
0
8
24
0
0
0
0
80
39
86
84
7
328
Age of Computers
0
0
0
0
0
0
1 yr
4 yrs
?
14
14
0
16
10
12
41
51
47
6 to 7 yrs 8 to 10 yrs
1 - 2 yrs 4-7 yrs
Office/Administration
Number of Computers
Age of Computers
11
12
6 - 7 yrs 4 - 5 yrs 4 - 6 yrs 4 -5 yrs
0
6
24
4-7 yrs 1-5 yrs 4-5 yrs 1-6 yrs 4-5 yrs 2-6 yrs 3 - 6 yrs 3-7 yrs
258
Facilities Conditions and Student
Performance
O Studies support educators common
sense - Students do better when they:
OHear well
OSee well
OAre not packed into small spaces
ONoise is not distracting
OLighting is good
OAir Quality is good
OHeat and cooling are balanced
Facilities Conditions and Student
Performance
O Educational Delivery
O Milwaukee study suggest facility conditions have
stronger affect on performance than other
factors, such as family background, socioeconomic status, attendance and behavior
O Indoor Air Quality
O About 40% of schools report unsatisfactory
environmental conditions
Facilities Conditions and Student
Performance
O Temperature & Ventilation
O Good ventilation systems are effective in keeping
toxic and nuisance materials out of the air.
O Acoustics
O Studies have linked student hearing problems
with being held back a grade
O Lighting
O The visual environment is one of the most
important factors in learning, affecting mental
attitude, class attendance, and performance
Facility Appraisal
Appraisal Instrument
O An Appraisal Guide for Older & Historic
School Facilities
O Developed by The Council of Educational
Facility Planners International
O A tool to evaluate the physical condition and
educational adequacy of older and historic
school facilities, and is designed to engage a
broad audience in the appraisal process.
Appraisal Criteria
O Educational Adequacy
O Educational Environment
O The School Site
O Building Safety and Security
O Structural Condition and Electrical &
Mechanical Systems
O Plant Maintainability
Appraisal Team
O Team Members
O Bill Sanders – QHS
O Mike Carter – Klinger & Assoc.
O Todd Moore – Architechnics, Inc.
O Dave Schlembach - Poepping, Stone, Bach &
Associates, Inc.
O Dan Nutt – QPS Maint Dept
O Dane Barnes – QPS Maint Dept
O Dennis Peters – QPS Maint Dept
O Rick Selsor – QPS Maint Dept
O Rick Owsley – QJHS
O Joel Murphy, Facilitator – QPS
Initial Findings
Initial Findings
O “Great Schools”, not so Great Facilities
O “A good teacher can teach anywhere”
O Physical Structure is limiting the learning
experience
O No Facility Rated higher than Satisfactory
O Only one Elementary was rated Satisfactory
O 7 out of 12 of our active facilities were rated
Borderline
O Grade Alignment out of sync with current
practices
Initial Findings
O Smaller Elementary Schools generate some operational inefficiencies
O Large Intermediate School causes logistical and operational issues
O Small Elementary & Intermediate Classrooms – Avg 750 Sq Ft
O Undersized Gym & Cafeterias
Multiple Lunch Periods
O Limited PE Activities
O
O Relationship between spaces limiting
Restrooms located only on one floor
O Movement restricted by Multi-Leveled buildings
O Old and outdated Building designs limiting programs
O
O Lack of Specialized Learning Areas
No Art Rooms
O Music taught in converted classrooms or other spaces
O
Initial Findings
O Library well undersized
O Technology Access Limited
O Computer Labs small or lacking
O Low computer to student ratios
O Space for teacher resource areas
limited
O Administrative Spaces very limited
Initial Findings
O Most Elementary sites too small, lack adequate
open space and parking
O Most Elementary sites too small to allow for
expansion of building
O Vehicular & Pedestrian Traffic patterns not
separated
O Site Ingress/Egress Issue at Elementary sites
O Bus Drop Off Areas
O Parent Drop Off Areas
O Staff/Visitor Parking
Initial Findings
O Inability to meet ADA Requirements w/o extensive work
O Deterioration due to ages of facilities
O HVAC Inadequate
O Fresh air exchange
O Individual AC Units
O Efficiency of older equipment
O Poor Energy efficiency
O Electrical system is unable to accommodate additional
technology in classrooms
O Trying to maintain 100+ year old buildings
O Maintaining “temporary” facilities
O Building systems “tired”, needed major upgrades
Initial Findings
O Inability to meet ADA Requirements w/o extensive
work
O Deterioration due to ages of facilities
O HVAC Inadequate
O Fresh air exchange
O Individual AC Units
O Efficiency of older equipment
O Poor Energy efficiency
O Electrical system is unable to accommodate
additional technology in classrooms
O Trying to maintain 100+ year old buildings
O Maintaining “temporary” facilities
O Building systems “tired”, needed major upgrades
Qui n
cy
A CR
SS &
AB C
A cd
my
ECF
Average
Rating
Average
Percentage
Rating by
Condition
104
100
93
134
143
133
158
120
60%
Borderline
2.0
Environment for
Education
200 156
106
118
119
131
143
126
92
138
149
162
150
164
135
67%
Borderline
100
82
53
64
58
60
77
64
53
75
77
82
76
75
69
69%
Borderline
200 145
123
118
123
129
138
113
88
136
141
150
158
164
133
66%
Borderline
Structural Condition
and
5.0
200 149
Electrical/Mechanic
al Systems
129
101
116
130
111
125
75
108
148
163
168
167
130
65%
Borderline
62
50
56
72
58
55
44
56
64
78
77
81
64
64%
Borderline
573
556
564
661
646
587
452
605
713
777
763
808
650
3.0 School Site
4.0
6.0
Building Safety &
Security
Plant
Maintainability
100
75
TOTAL 1000 749
C
Ba ld
win
118
HS
Ir vin
139
Qui n
cy J
High r
W as
93
g
Mon
ro
106
hi ng
t
Ma d
i son
99
e
Ell in
g ton
200 142
ey
Dew
Educational
Adequacy
Category
Ada
ms
1.0
Possible
Points
Be rr
i an
on
Building Condition
65.0% Borderline
Educational Adequacy
O District Average – 60% - Borderline
O Elementary & Intermediate - 56% -Borderline
O Berrian, Ellington & Baldwin –Poor
O Quincy Jr High School - 67% - Borderline
O Quincy High School - 64% - Borderline
O ACRSS & ABC Academy - 67%
O ECFC - 80% - Satisfactory
Borderline
Educational Environment
O District Average – 67% - Borderline
O Elementary & Intermediate - 65% -Borderline
O Quincy Jr High School – 75% - Satisfactory
O Quincy High School – 81% - Satisfactory
O ACRSS & ABC Academy – 75%
Satisfactory
O ECFC - 79% - Satisfactory
-
The School Site
O District Average – 69% - Borderline
O Elementary & Intermediate - 67% -Borderline
O Quincy Jr High School - 77% - Satisfactory
O Quincy High School - 82% - Satisfactory
O ACRSS & ABC Academy - 76% - Satisfactory
O ECFC – 75% - Satisfactory
Building Safety & Safety
O District Average – 66% - Borderline
O Elementary & Intermediate – 64% O
O
O
O
Borderline
Quincy Jr High School – 70% - Satisfactory
Quincy High School – 75% - Satisfactory
ACRSS & ABC Academy – 79% Satisfactory
ECFC – 82% - Satisfactory
Structural Condition and
Electrical & Mechanical Systems
O District Average – 65% - Borderline
O Elementary & Intermediate - 61% -Borderline
O Quincy Jr High School – 74% - Satisfactory
O Quincy High School - 81% - Satisfactory
O ACRSS & ABC Academy - 84%
Satisfactory
O ECFC - 83% - Satisfactory
Plant Maintainability
O District Average – 64% - Borderline
O Elementary & Intermediate - 61% -Borderline
O Dewey - Poor
O Quincy Jr High School - 64% - Borderline
O Quincy High School - 78% - Satisfactory
O ACRSS & ABC Academy - 80% Satisfactory
O ECFC - 81% - Satisfactory
Next Steps
Planning Parameters/Guidance Needed to Develop Recommendations
Options to Address Finds
Community Input
Refining Options
Develop Recommendations
Planning Parameters
O Limiting Transitions/Grade Level
Configurations
O Current, 3 Transitions: K-3, 4-6, 7-9, 10-12
O Other Models
O K-5, 6-8, 9-12 – 3 Transitions
O K-8, 9-12 – 2 Transitions
O Historical Preservation
Planning Parameters
O Site Ingress/Egress
O Bus Drop Off Areas
O Parent Drop Off Areas
O Staff/Visitor Parking
O ADA Compliance
O Need for Specialized Spaces
O Cafeteria
O Gym
O Library
O Music
O Art
O Other
Planning Parameters
O Technology
O Infrastructure
O Devices
O Size of School
O Small schools – More Buildings
O Larger Schools – Less Buildings
O Neighborhood Schools
O Sustainability/Energy Efficiency – “Green Bldgs”
O Alternate Use for Buildings
Options to Correct Findings
O New Construction
O Additions
O Renovations
O Building Replacements
O Cost Estimates?
O Tax Impact?
Next Steps
O Community Dialog 1
O School Size
O Grade Configuration
O Neighborhood schools
O Historic Preservation
O Refine Facility Options
O Community Dialog 2
O Rate/Rank Facility Options
O Gauge Support
O Final Report & Recommendation to Board
Questions