Peer review – principles 6 and 15

Download Report

Transcript Peer review – principles 6 and 15

1
11.2
Trust in official statistics – and
dissemination policies and
practices
Jan Byfuglien
Statistics Norway
1
Introduction
• Trust is a cornerstone for National Statistical institutes
• Dissemination policies and practices are important elements
in building the public image - and thus trust
• This presentation will discuss some issues related to
measurement, building – and destruction of trust
2
Some key elements of trust and trust-building
(Fellegi 2004*):
• Structural factors:
– Legislative basis
– The position of the head
– Equal access to statistical information…
• Statistical factors:
–
–
–
–
Broad user dialogue and transparent programming
Professional methods, competent staff and high product quality
Respondent privacy
Professional dissemination, analysis and documentation…
• Reputational factors
– Transparent and user oriented dissemination policy…..
* Maintaining the credibility of official statistics. Conference of European Statisticians, CES/2004/11.
3
What makes official statistics trusted by users?
(Heinrich Brüngger 2007*):
• Trust in results and products of official statistics
– Relevance, quality, accessibility …..
• Trust in institutions that act as producers
– Integrity, professionalism, impartiality, transparency
about methods and sources…
• Trust in the institutional set-up for official statistics
– Legal framework, professional independence,
appointment/dismissal of DG
*Joint EFTA/ECE/SSCU Seminar Kiev 2007
4
Trust in public statistics should also be of vital
importance for the government: The UK case*:
• A survey in 2005 identified that
– Only 17 per cent thought that statistics were produced without the
interference from government
– Only 31 per cent felt that government figures were accurate
– 59 per cent thought that the government used statistics dishonestly
• The most common reason for thinking statistics inaccurate
was the perception that statistics was manipulated for
political purposes, or that they were misrepresented by
politicians and media
*Monitoring and Improving Public Trust in Official Statistics: The United Kingdom example.
Karen Dunnel, National Statistician, UK. OECD Committee on Statistics June 2008
5
A model for building trust (UK)
6
Four main strands to improve confidence (UK):
• Improve communication infrastructure and capability
• Develop and maintain effective relationship with opinion
formers
• Modernise product range
• Continue to invest in quality
7
Trust: long time to build, quickly destroyed
External review
Relevance User orientation
Integrity
Confidentiality
Independence
Professionalism
Proper legal basis
Political bias
Wrong figures
Misuse of microdata
8
Trust can be quickly destroyed:
• For instance by suspicion of political pressure to improve
figures – such as the case in Argentina related to CPI:
9
Break of confidentiality. The US case*
• Second War Powers Act passed in 1942 authorized the
•
•
•
release of any census (micro) data to any US Federal
agency if needed ”for use in connection with the conduct
of war”
Several disclosures of microdata took place, including
data used for internment of Japanese
The Census Bureau since the repeal of the act in 1947,
has a strong legal basis and a good record for protecting
statistical confidentiality
However, the issue is still alive:
– The Patriot Act after the 9/11 attack, has some similar provisions
– Some citizens object to the census because of fear of misuse
* Census Confidentiality under the Second War Powers Act (1942-1947). W. Seltzer & M. Anderson. 2007
10
Credibility of statistics a concern in many
countries: The China case
11
Measurement of ’trust’: Percentage with ’very
good’ or ’fairly good’ total impression of
Statistics Norway.
12
Percentage with ’very good’ or ’fairly good’
impression of openness and information of
different agencies. 2008 (SSB- Statistics Norway)
13
A potential threat to misuse of microdata:
unclear borderline between official statistics and
administrative data
•
Use of administrative data for statistical purposes is important and
growing
•
NSIs has often had an active role in the development of administrative
registers (as has been the case in Norway)
•
However, it is very important to ensure clear formal and practical
procedures to ensure that the NSI cannot be accused of disclosing
microdata:
– Official statistics: Statistics produced by public authorities based on well
defined principles for wide dissemination and usage (aggregated)
– Administrative data: Data collection based on specific administrative laws to
serve administrative purposes (often micro/individual data)
– One way traffic: Micro data from administrative registers to NSI statistics –
but never opposite
14
UN Fundamental principles on trust
• Bearing in mind that the essential trust of the public in
official statistical information depends to a large extent on
respect for the fundamental values and principles, which are
the basis of any society, which seeks to understand itself
and to respect the rights of its members.
• To retain trust in official statistics, the statistical agencies
need to decide according to strictly professional
considerations, including scientific principles and
professional ethics, on the methods and procedures for the
collection, processing, storage and presentation of
statistical data.
15
What measures to improve trust?
• Perform surveys to understand why users don’t trust the
NSI and official statistics
• Avoid any suspicion of political interference:
– Clear and transparent rules for preparation and release of
information
– Clear policy for protecting confidentiality
• Systematic quality control to avoid erroneous data
• Implement a clear policy of equal access to the same
information to all sectors and parties of society
• Supplement all figures with user-friendly documentation
• Inform and train users
16
17
Thanks for your attention!
Any comments/questions?
17