Transcript No Slide Title

Ohio’s New Accountability
System
Ohio’s Response to No Child Left
Behind (NCLB)
January 8, 2002
a.k.a. Elementary & Secondary Education Act
a.k.a. ESEA
Challenges
• Tougher system
• New ground-rules
– All students accounted for
– Group, as well as aggregate,
performance counts
• Creates new starting point for judging
future performance
– 2002-03 results are not directly
comparable to past years
2
Opportunities
• Multiple ways to tell the achievement
story
• Highlights the achievement of all
students
• Ohio’s educators have been
improving achievement for almost a
decade -- we believe that 2003-04
and beyond will result in continuing
improvement
3
Key Features
• Grades 3-8 reading & math tests
• Multiple measures
• School building designations
• Group accountability
• Recognition & consequences
• More timely results
4
Tests Administered
Previously
• Grades 4, 6, 9
• 5 subjects
Now
• Grades 3-8, 10
• 5 subjects
 Reading
 Mathematics
 Writing
 Science
 Citizenship
 Reading
 Mathematics
 Writing
 Science
 Social studies
5
Ohio Test Schedule
Grades
K-2
Grade 3
2003-04
2004-05
2005-06
2006-07
2007-08
Diagnostics
Diagnostics
Diagnostics
Diagnostics
Diagnostics
R, W, M
R, W, M
R, W, M
R, W, M
R, W, M
Achievement
Achievement
Achievement
Achievement
Achievement
R
R, M
R, M
R, M
R, M
Diagnostics
Diagnostics
Diagnostics
Diagnostics
Diagnostics
W
Grade 4
Proficiency
R, W, M, S, C
Grade 5
W
W
W
W, S, SS
Achievement
Achievement
Achievement
Achievement
R, W
R, M, W
R, M, W
Proficiency
R, M, W
Diagnostics
M, S, C
S, SS
Achievement
Achievement
Achievement
R
R, M
R, M, S, SS
Achievement
R, M, S, SS
Diagnostics
W
Grade 6
Proficiency
Proficiency
R, W, M, S, C
R, W, M, S, C
Achievement
Achievement
R, M
R, M
Achievement
R, M
Diagnostics
W, S, SS
Grade 7
Achievement
Achievement
Achievement
M
R, M
R, M, W
Achievement
R, M, W
Diagnostics
S, SS
Grade 8
Achievement
Achievement
Achievement
R, M
R, M
R, M, S
Achievement
R, M, S, SS
Diagnostics
W
Proficiency
Grade 10
R, W, M, S, C
OGT
OGT
R, M, W, S, SS
R, M
O GT
O GT
O GT
R, M, W, S, SS
R, M, W, S, SS
R, M, W, S, SS
Test Performance Levels
Achievement Tests
• Advanced
• Accelerated
• Proficient
• Basic
• Limited
Proficiency Tests
• Advanced
• Proficient
• Basic
• Below Basic
7
Diagnostics
• ODE-developed diagnostics required for:
– Students in buildings missing AYP for 2 years or
more
– Transfer students
– All Kindergarten students within first 6 weeks
• If school met AYP or missed for one year,
district may select diagnostic
• 9th graders in AE & AW districts (10th grade
practice test)
8
Student Intervention
• Required for:
– 3rd graders reading below “proficient” -intense remediation
– Students scoring below “proficient” on
achievement tests
– Students failing to make satisfactory
progress toward attaining grade level
academic standards on diagnostic tests
– 9th graders scoring below “proficient” on the
10th grade practice test
9
Designations Applied
Now
• Districts
• School buildings
• Community
schools
Previously
• Districts only
10
Same Five Designations for Ohio
•
•
•
•
•
Excellent
Effective
Continuous Improvement
Academic Watch
Academic Emergency
11
Designations Determined
Previously
• Percent of
performance
(local report
card) indicators
met
•
•
•
•
12
Now
Percent of
performance
indicators
Performance
index score
Improvement
AYP
Multiple Measures to
Determine Designations
• Current Ohio Indicators
(existing)
• Performance Index (new)
• Growth Calculation (new)
• Adequate Yearly Progress
(federal requirement)
13
Multiple Measures:
Current Ohio Indicators
• 22 total
– 20 test scores
• 5 subjects
• 4 grades (4th, 6th, 9th, 10th)
– graduation rate
– attendance rate
• High standard -- 75% plus
14
Multiple Measures to
Determine Designations
• Current Ohio Indicators
(existing)
• Performance Index (new)
• Growth Calculation (new)
• Adequate Yearly Progress
(federal requirement)
15
Multiple Measures:
Ohio Performance Index
• More sensitive to gradations of
achievement than indicators
• Credits achievement at all performance
levels
• Weights higher performance more than
lower performance
• Rewards “advanced” performance
16
Multiple Measures:
Ohio Performance Index
Advanced
Proficient
Basic
Below Basic
Untested
1.2
1.0
0.6
0.3
0.0
17
Multiple Measures:
Ohio Performance Index
Perf. Level
Advanced
Proficient
Basic
Below Basic
Untested
%
2.0
21.6
33.3
39.2
3.9
Total
100
Weight
1.2
1.0
0.6
0.3
0.0
Score
2.4
21.6
20.0
11.8
0
55.8
18
Multiple Measures:
Performance Index
N
advanced
prof icient
basic
below basic
untest ed
t ot al
2
22
34
40
4
102
2001-02
%
weight
2.0%
1 .2
21.6%
1 .0
3 3 .3 %
0 .6
39.2%
0 .3
3.9%
0 .0
s c ore
2.4
21.6
2 0 .0
11.8
0.0
55.8
N
3
25
41
32
3
104
2002-03
%
weight
2.9%
1 .2
24.0%
1 .0
3 9 .4 %
0 .6
30.8%
0 .3
2.9%
0 .0
19
s c ore
3.5
24.0
2 3 .7
9.2
0.0
60.4
N
5
28
40
26
4
103
2003-04
%
weight
4.9%
1 .2
27.2%
1 .0
3 8 .8 %
0 .6
25.2%
0 .3
3.9%
0 .0
s c ore
5.8
27.2
2 3 .3
7.6
0.0
63.9
Multiple Measures:
Ohio Performance Index
120
100
80
63.9
60.4
60
55.8
40
20
0
2001-02
2002-03
20
2003-04
Multiple Measures to
Determine Designations
• Current Ohio Indicators
(existing)
• Performance Index (new)
• Growth Calculation (new)
• Adequate Yearly Progress
(federal requirement)
21
Multiple Measures:
Growth Calculation -Value Added
• Based on individual student gain
– once grades 3-8 tests in place
– multiple years of data
22
Multiple Measures:
Growth Calculation -Temporary Measure
• Based on improvement in
performance index score
– two years of improvement
– at least 10 total points
– at least 3 points in most recent
year
23
Multiple Measures:
Growth Calculation -Temporary Measure
• District or school can move from:
– Academic Emergency to Academic
Watch
– Academic Watch to Continuous
Improvement
24
Multiple Measures to
Determine Designations
• Current Ohio Indicators
(existing)
• Performance Index (new)
• Growth Calculation (new)
• Adequate Yearly Progress
(federal requirement)
25
AYP Applies to:
Now
• All public
schools &
districts,
including
community
schools
• Regardless of
Title I funding
Previously
• Title I funded
schools &
districts only
26
Group Accountability
Now
• Reported
• Basis of federal
Adequate Yearly
Progress
calculation
Previously
• Reported only
27
Multiple Measures:
NCLB Adequate Yearly Progress
• Whole school (all students)
• Groups
–
–
–
–
Race/ethnicity
Students with disabilities
Limited English proficient
Economically disadvantaged
28
Multiple Measures:
Adequate Yearly Progress
• Same targets for each district,
building, group, & statewide
– Separate targets for % proficient:
• reading
• mathematics
– 95% participation requirement
• High school graduation rate
• K-8 attendance rate
29
Multiple Measures:
Adequate Yearly Progress
(2002-03
targets)
Reading
Math
Grade 4
40.5%
35.9%
Grade 6
36.0%
36.8%
Grade 9
78.0%
53.1%
30
Multiple Measures:
Adequate Yearly Progress
(trajectory based on 40% starting point)
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Series1
2002-03
40%
2003-04
40%
2004-05
50%
2005-06
50%
2006-07
50%
2007-08
60%
31
2008-09
60%
2009-10
60%
2010-11
70%
2011-12
80%
2012-13
90%
2013-14
100%
Who Counts
Previously
• Districts could
exclude:
•
•
•
 Students with
disabilities
 Limited English
proficient
•
32
Now
All students
No exclusions
Full academic
year
New rules for
where students
count
New Report Card Criteria:
Multiple Ways of Earning Designations
Existing Ohio
Report Card
Indicators
Performance
Index Score
94% to 100%
(21 or 22 for districts)
or
100 to 120
94% to 100%
(21 or 22 for districts)
or
100 to 120
75% to 93%
(17 to 20 for districts)
or
90 to 99
75% to 100%
(17 to 22 for districts)
or
90 to 120
0% to 74%
(0 to 16 for districts)
and
0 to 89
50% to 74%
(11 to 16 for districts)
or
80 to 89
or
Academic
Watch
31% to 49%
(7 to 10 for districts)
or
70 to 79
or
Academic
Emergency
0% to 31%
(0 to 6 for districts)
and
0 to 69
Excellent
Effective
Continuous
Improvement
Value Added --
Once
grades 3 to 8 reading and
math assessments are
implemented and multiple
years of data available, Ohio
will incorporate a measure
of individual student gradeto-grade achievement gains
to help determine school
building and district
designations.
Temporary Growth
Calculation ** --
33
Federal AYP
Requirements
Growth Calculation
Districts and schools will
move from Emergency to
Watch or from Watch to
Improvement if: (a)
improved performance index
score each of past two years,
(b) total two-year gain of at
least 10 points,and (c) most
recent year's gain of at least
3 points.
and
Met AYP
and
Missed AYP*
and
Met AYP
and
Missed AYP*
and
Met AYP
and
Missed AYP
and
Missed AYP
and
Missed AYP
2002-03 Report Card
Content
Previously
• Percent of
performance (local
report card)
indicators met
• Designation
•
•
•
•
•
34
Now
Percent of
performance
indicators
Performance index
score
Improvement
AYP
Designation
Timeline for Report Card
Release
Now
• Before start of
next school year
Previously
• February of next
school year
35
Recognition & Consequences
Recognition
• Excellent
• Effective
Consequences
• Continuous
Improvement
• Academic
Watch
• Academic
Emergency
36
Consequences
School Buildings
• School district
has primary
responsibility for
support,
intervention, &
consequences
Districts
• State has
primary
responsibility for
support,
intervention, &
consequences
37
Consequences
Failing to Meet AYP
1 Year
2 Years
Effective
Continuous Improvement
Academic Watch
Academic Emergency
38
3 Years
4 Years
5 Years
Consequences:
Title I Funded Schools Only
• Choice (after missing AYP for two years)
• Supplemental services (after missing AYP for
three years)
39
Consequences: All Schools
after 4 years missing AYP
•
•
•
•
Less Intrusive
New curriculum
Decrease
management
authority
Appoint outside
expert
Extend day or year
More Intrusive
• Replace key staff
• Reorganize
administrative
structure
40
Consequences: All Schools
after 6 years missing AYP
• Reopen as community school
• Replace personnel
• Contract w/ nonprofit or for-profit entity to
operate school
• Turn operation of building over to ODE
• Other significant restructuring of
building’s governance
41
Consequences: All Districts
after 4 years missing AYP
Less Intrusive
More Intrusive
• Withhold Title I
funds
• New curriculum
• Alternate
governance for
particular schools
• Replace key staff
• Appoint trustee in
place of
superintendent &
school board
42
Challenges
• Tougher system
• New ground-rules
– All students accounted for
– Group, as well as aggregate,
performance counts
• Creates new starting point for judging
future performance
– 2002-03 results are not directly
comparable to past years
43
Opportunities
• Multiple ways to tell the achievement
story
• Highlights the achievement of all
students
• Ohio’s educators have been
improving achievement for almost a
decade -- we believe that 2003-04
and beyond will result in continuing
improvement
44
Accountability Website
www.ode.state.oh.us/Accountability/
default.asp