Platform switch – to be or not to be?
Download
Report
Transcript Platform switch – to be or not to be?
Platform switch –
to be or not to be?
Andrija Petar Bošnjak
School of Dental Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia
Andrej Meniga
Private practice, Zagreb, Croatia
Ann Wennerberg, Victoria Fröjd
School of Dentistry, Göteborg, Sweden
Background
Bone resorption to the first thread during initial
loading
Biologic width around implants (Berglundh &
Lindhe 1996)
No resorption when an abutment with a narrower
diamater is connected to the implant (Gardner
2005) – so called platform-switching
Objective
Evaluation of the difference in histological
findings between a platform-switching implant-toabutment interface using a tight seal and a flat-toflat interface
Differences in ISQ values during 3 months for
implants with transmucosal healing (one-stage
procedure)
Material and methods
26 consecutive patients treated with 43 Ospol
study implants
4.0 diameter, implant length of 10, 12 and 15 mm
supporting single crowns or fixed partial dentures
36 implants (83.7%) – single tooth replacements in
lateral parts of mandible (58.8%) and maxilla
(41.2%)
Material and methods
Paired implants
One with a healing
abutment – creating
flat-to-flat interface
One with a standard
abutment – creating
platform switch interface
Material and methods
2×2 mm biopsy of soft tissue was acquired 3
months after implant placement for histological
evaluation (at the time of crown/fixed partial
denture fixation)
Immersed in sodium-cacodylate solution and
subsequently analyzed
Material and methods
Radiographic assessment of marginal bone level
At the time of implant placement
At 3 months recall (time of crown fixation)
All patients were recalled monthly during
osseointegration process
ISQ measurements at the time of surgery and 3
months postoperatively
Results
Cross-sections of fixated samples
Inflammatory cell inflitrate
Thickness of the epithelium
Thickness of the connective tissue
Platform switch
No substantial number of inflammatory
cells
Epithelial thickness
Well-defined “rete pegs”
Connective tissue layer
Flat-to-flat
No substantial inflammatory cell
infiltrate
Epithelial thickness
Connective tissue layer
ISQ measurements
Platform-switch
(± SD)
Flat-to-flat
(± SD)
p
At implant
placement
72.5 ± 6.3
71.8 ± 5.9
NS
At 1 month
77.3 ± 4.2
77.1 ± 3.8
NS
At 3 months
81.8 ± 5.5
80 ± 4.7
NS
Conclusion
Histologic analysis is in the early stage, but there is
no significant inflammatory cell infiltrate
Platform-switch seems to be as reliable for onestage procedures as flat-to-flat interface
ISQ measurements confirm that the stability was
maintained during initial three months of healing
Further developments
Further developments
Further developments
Acknowledgments
Ospol, Malmö, Sweden
Göran Urde & Hans Berglund @ Ospol, Malmö, Sweden
Petra Hammarström Johansson @ Dept Biomaterials/Handicap
Research, Göteborg, Sweden
Martina Vlah, Gordana Sporis & Lana Vodopija @ Meniga &
Bosnjak LLC, Zagreb, Croatia
Kresimir Sankovic, School of Pharmacy, Zagreb, Croatia
Drazen Jovicevic, Dental Laboratory, Zagreb, Croatia