Transcript Slide 1

RepNet/RSP Event:
“Supporting and Enhancing Your Repository”
21st January, 2013 – BCS, London
Andrew Dorward
Wave 1 Decisions by JISC
A: Aggregation, Text mining & Search
REPUK
CORE
IRS
Innovation Zone
RoMEO
Wave 1
Innovation zone
Juliet
Wave 1
RJBroker
Wave 1
Innovation Zone
B: Benchmarking, Statistics and Report
IRUS-UK
Wave 1
C: Creating Relevant Registries
Open
DOAR
ITT - OARR
ROAR
ITT - OARR
ORI
D: Deposit Tools
E: Enhancing Metadata Quality
NAMES2
Align with ORCID
Wave 1
2
RepNet Service Portfolio (ITIL)
Service
Concepts
Service
Design
Continual
Service
Improvement
Third-party
components
Market
Research
Innovation
Zone
(REPUK,
CORE, IRS)
RoMEO-Hosted
JULIET-Hosted Service
IRUS-UK
Transition
ORI
RJBroker
Operational Services
RoMEO
JULIET
Retired
Services
3
Overview
External/existing systems/services
HEI Finance Systems
Wave 1 components
- Reporting and Deposit
JULIET
RoMEO
R-J Broker
IRUS-UK
KPL Study
on Search
HEI CRIS Systems
IR Managers
ORI
OpenDOAR
ROAR
Aggregation Benchmarking Registry of
and Search and Reporting Repositories
Deposit
tools
Metadata
quality
4
RepNet snapshot – Autumn 2012
HEI Finance Systems
HEI CRIS Systems
External/existing systems/services
IR Managers
JULIET
RoMEO
R-J Broker
IRUS-UK
KPL
Report on
Search
ORI
OpenDOAR
ROAR
Aggregation Benchmarking Registry of
and Search and Reporting Repositories
Deposit
tools
Metadata
quality
5
RepNet snapshot – Winter 2012-13
External/existing systems/services
IR Managers
HEI Finance Systems
HEI CRIS Systems
RepNet Service Catalogue
RepNet Service Desk
JULIET
RoMEO
OARR
R-J Broker
IRUS-UK
KPL
Report on
Search
ORI
OpenDOAR
ROAR
Aggregation Benchmarking Registry of
and Search and Reporting Repositories
Deposit
tools
Metadata
quality
6
Review of new functionality for RepNet services
Supporting activities
Consider for inclusion in RepNet service catalogue
IR Managers
HEI Finance Systems
HEI CRIS Systems
RepNet Service Catalogue
RepNet Service Desk
CERIF/OAIPMH
RIOXX
ISNI/ORCID
JULIET
RoMEO
Benchmark
Publisher
Website
Delivery
R-J Broker
IRUS-UK
KPL
Report on
Search
OARR
Project
Reporting
Metadata
Enhancement
CRIS/Sword
EndPoints
KeepIt (Eprints)
ORI
PDF->XML
OpenDOAR
DOI retrieval
– Cross-Ref
ROAR
Fund-Ref
Aggregation Benchmarking Registry of
and Search and Reporting Repositories
Deposit
tools
Metadata
quality
Gap analysis
7
Potential Reconfiguration + Aggregation
Potential Application onto Components
Supporting activities
Available through RepNet service catalogue
Potential New Service
IR Managers
HEI Finance Systems
HEI CRIS Systems
RepNet Service Catalogue
RepNet Service Desk
RIOXX
ISNI/ORCID
JULIET
RoMEO
Benchmark
Publisher
Website
Delivery
R-J Broker
IRUS-UK
KPL
Report on
Search
OARR
Project
Reporting
Rules-based
Deposit for Broker
from
RoMEO/JULIET
data
CERIF/OAIPMH
Metadata
Enhancement
KeepIt (Eprints)
ORI
Deposit
monitor
CRIS/Sword
EndPoints
PDF->XML
OpenDOAR
DOI retrieval
– Cross-Ref
ROAR
Fund-Ref
Aggregation Benchmarking Registry of
and Search and Reporting Repositories
Deposit
tools
Metadata
quality
GAP
Aggregation middleware: from Registry,
for Monitoring (and Search)
8
Use cases for potential new applications
- Pablo
9
The Value to Repository Managers
- what’s in it for me?
10
The 4 challenges for IRs: Deposit; Discover; Report; Disseminate
Deposit
Discover
Report
• How to increase deposit rates into IRs, particularly full-text?
• How to address publisher/funder OA policies at time of deposit
and impact on definition of item copyright and access levels?
• How to improve repository content indexing rates for
Google/Google Scholar?
• What means to measure and improve these?
• Faceted search functionality for researchers/reporting?
• How can IRs address institutional and funder reporting
requirements for OA policy?
• How can IRs co-exist with HEI CRIS systems? [1]
Disseminate • How to establish best practise with peers?
• How to measure KPIs against peers?
• How to establish IR’s value within HEI?
[1] there is a clear trend to making CERIF and CRISs the default standards for provision and
exchange of research information. The transition to this model may affect demand over time for
RepNet services. One of the RIOXX specific objectives is to “develop these [recommendations]
such that they pave the way for a likely CERIF-based solution in the medium-long term”
(http://blog.paulwalk.net/2012/12/23/rioxx-application-profile-draft-1/)
11
How challenges are addressed by RepNet
Deposit
• Automated deposit from funder and subject repositories,
publishers into IRs via R-J Broker
• Publisher and funder policies from RoMEO and JULIET
• Further automation of R-J Broker through rules derived from R/J
Discover
• UK-wide aggregation to collate IR metadata and
expose OAI-PMH as tagged files for indexing
• Measure discoverability as download stats via IRUS
Report
• Metadata enhancement through RIOXX, V4OA
• Enrichment through feeds from CrossRef (DOI), FundRef
(Funder, project ID), IRIOS/UKRISS (output linked to funder info)
• Report on mandate compliance through to research impact via
service built on aggregation
Disseminate • IR-focussed events through RSP, UKCoRR, COAR
• IRUS, OARR for providing benchmarking
• Improved project-based reporting; interoperability with CRIS
through CERIF; RepNet as observatory for IR-CRIS transition
12