Transcript Document
Optronic Measurement, Testing and the
Need for Valid Results Example of
Infrared Measurements for Defence
Countermeasures
Azwitamisi E Mudau, C.J. Willers, M.J. Hlakola,
F.P.J. le Roux, B. Theron, J.J. Calitz, M.J.U. Du Plooy
Defense, Peace, Safety and Security, Council for Scientific and
Industrial Research
[email protected]
Overview
Peace and Humanitarian Support
Heat Seeking Missiles and Infrared Countermeasures
Infrared Measurements at the Optronic Sensor Systems
Airborne Infrared Countermeasure Characterization
Strategy for Successful Measurement
Details of Experiments
Equipment used and Settings
Experimental layout
Understanding Infrared Temperature Measurements
Results
Reference Measurements
Flare Measurements
Conclusion
© CSIR 2010
www.csir.co.za
Peace and Humanitarian Support
• South African Air Force transport
aircraft are the platforms of choice to
deliver humanitarian aid
• are used in rescue and support
missions
• used to carry soldiers into countries
for UN sanctioned peace support and
stabilization efforts
• the core of the SANDF’s transport
and lift capabilities acquired by the
country at tremendous cost.
• If they are destroyed or attacked it
seriously limits the ability for South
Africa to perform the humanitarian
role
Heat Seeking Missiles
© CSIR 2010
www.csir.co.za
Infrared Countermeasures
• Airborne IRCM flares are defensive mechanisms employed from
military and civilian aircraft to avoid detection and attack by enemy
infrared seeker missiles.
The Infrared Signature of the Aircraft
The engine hot parts
Exhaust plume
The skin of the airframe
Infrared Measurements at the Optronic
Sensor Systems
Airborne Infrared Countermeasure
Characterization
•
To model airborne IRCM
flares effectively and correctly
as missile countermeasures
- Radiant intensity
- Emissivity
- Temperature
de
dt
es
Un
tai
le
De
lan
tp
t
tes
tes
led
he
tai
dt
ns
De
an
aig
rst
de
mp
Un
Ca
st
Te
tp
rst
ro c
an
ed
dt
u re
Me
h
e
s
as
p ro
u re
ce
me
ss
nts
Strategy for Successful Measurement
Sensors
Understand the sensor
Characteristics & Procedures
Strategy is required for
measuring the
signatures of infrared
countermeasure flares
Details of Experiment
Measurements were performed
using Cedip Jade LWIR thermal
imager
Fluke 574 Precision Infrared
Thermometer
A high temperature Electro Optics
Industries extended-area
blackbody
(b) MWIR Imager Responsivity
(c) SWIR Imager Responsivity
1
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
Normalized Response
1
Normalized Response
Normalized Response
(a) LWIR Imager Responsivity
1
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0
7
8
9
10
11
12
Wavelength (microns)
13
© CSIR 2010
0
3.5
4
4.5
Wavelength (microns)
www.csir.co.za
5
0
0
1
2
3
Wavelength [micros]
4
Prior Infrared Measurements
The Jade IR thermal imagers need to
be CALIBRATED
The objective of the calibration is to
obtain a relationship between the
incident flux and the instrument output
(digital level).
They are calibrated over a broad
range of temperatures.
© CSIR 2010
www.csir.co.za
During Infrared measurement trials
Flare
Launcher
Reference
Measurements
Blackboy
420
m
Capture quality IR images of
the unit under test (UUT) and
two reference source
(blackbody)
Instrument settings and
meteorological data
Weather
Station
Infrared Mobile
Laboratory
Atmospheric Transmittance
•
•
To account for the target
radiation losses through the
atmosphere
MODerate spectral resolution
atmospheric TRANsmission
(MODTRAN) code
Atmospheric conditions during test
Parameter
2009/11/11
2009/11/12
Atmospheric Temperature [°C]
20.7-28
25.3-29.4
Humidity [%RH]
51-77
35-58
Cloud Cover
Partially Cloudy
Cloudy
Visibility [km]
Good
Good
Understanding Infrared Temperature
Measurements
“The same as” measurement technique was used to calculate the
Pyrolysis flame temperature (Tm).
L T S
c bb
c
ac
0
0
d m Lbb Tm S am d 1 m Lbb Ta S ae d Lpath
Tc is determined from the calibration curves
by Tc = fcal(D), where D is the measured digital
level and fcal is the calibration curve
ae is the spectral atmospheric transmittance
between the measured source and ambient
environment (near unity ) and Lpath is the
c is the calibration source emissivity
atmospheric path radiance (near zero) .
Lbb(T) is blackbody radiation of a source with
temperature T
am is the spectral atmospheric transmittance
between the instrument and the object during
S is the instrument spectral response
ac is the atmospheric transmittance during
calibration
Ta is the ambient environment temperature
© CSIR 2010
measurement
m is the measured source emissivity
Tm is the unit under test temperature
www.csir.co.za
Reference Measurements
(a) Blackbody Reference in the MWIR Spectral Band
(b) Blackbody Reference in the SWIR Spectral Band
730
730
Blackbody Reference # 112
Blackbody Reference # 212
Blackbody Reference # 211
Blackbody Reference # 112
Blackbody Reference # 211
Blackbody Reference # 212
725
725
720
Temperature [K]
Temperature [K]
720
715
710
715
710
705
705
700
700
695
0
0.2
Test Point
0.4
0.6
0.8
Time [s]
1
695
1.2
MWIR (K)
0
0.2
Fluke (K)
SWIR (K)
0.4
0.6
Time [s]
0.8
1
1.2
Percentage Difference (%)
MWIR MWIR
/ SWIR / Fluke
SWIR /
Fluke
211
709.76 ± 2.13
709.34 ± 2.84
711.15
0.06
0.20
0.25
112
707.54 ± 3.14
718.98 ± 1.76
708.50
1.60
0.14
1.47
212
704.04 ± 5.97
709.36 ± 2.64
712.15
0.75
1.15
0.39
© CSIR 2010
www.csir.co.za
Temperature vs Test Point
720
Fluke
SWIR
MWIR
718
Temperature [K]
716
714
712
710
708
706
704
211
Test Point
112
Test Point
MWIR (K)
212
Fluke (K)
SWIR (K)
Percentage Difference (%)
MWIR MWIR
/ SWIR / Fluke
SWIR /
Fluke
211
709.76 ± 2.13
709.34 ± 2.84
711.15
0.06
0.20
0.25
112
707.54 ± 3.14
718.98 ± 1.76
708.50
1.60
0.14
1.47
212
704.04 ± 5.97
709.36 ± 2.64
712.15
0.75
1.15
0.39
Flare Measurements
(a) Normalized Intensity at MWIR Spectral Band as a
Function Burning Time
0.9
0.9
0.8
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.1
0
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
Normalized Burning Time
0.8
(b) Normalized Intensity at SWIR Spectral Band as a
Function Burning Time
1
Normalized Intensity
Normalized Intensity
1
0
1
0
(a) Flare Temperature in MWIR Spectral Band
0.2
0.4
0.6
Normalized Burning Time
0.8
1
(b) Flare Temperature in SWIR Spectral Band
2500
2500
2400
2450
2300
Temperature [K]
Temperature [K]
2400
2350
2200
2100
2300
2000
2250
2200
1900
© CSIR 2010
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
Normalized Burning Time
0.8
1
www.csir.co.za
1800
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
Normalized Burning Time
0.8
1
Conclusion
The methodology used was developed over several field trials,
spanning several years.
The deep understanding of the instruments is essential in exploiting
the instrument and avoiding its weaknesses.
reference measurements are essential, during field trial to ensure
confidence in the measured data.
The results show that atmospheric corrections were done accurately
© CSIR 2010
www.csir.co.za
Thank you