Portage Lake Watershed Forever Plan
Download
Report
Transcript Portage Lake Watershed Forever Plan
Portage Lake
Watershed Forever Plan
Joint Executive Committee and
Technical Advisor Meeting
August 2, 2007
Agenda
Welcome and introductions
Portage Lake Watershed Forever
endowment fund update
Progress report
Recommended strategy for Phase II
Next meeting date
Adjourn
Progress Report Overview
Summary of public engagement
Phase I report transitioning into
watershed plan
Plan updates and other follow-up
Summary of meeting with MDEQ
Public Engagement Update
Focus Groups
Seasonal resident meeting—June 28
Final summary of 8 focus groups and
community forum on website
Nearly 150 people participated in total,
representing diverse interests
Informed household survey instrument and
the watershed plan
Portage Point Summer Resort Corp.
Annual Meeting
Public Engagement Update
Household Survey
Targeted year-round and seasonal residents
228 completed, 28% of households in
watershed
Collected information about:
•
•
•
•
How residents use surface water in the watershed
Water quality concerns
Goals for improvement/protection
Where residents get information
Household Survey
Activities:
1. Boating
2. Swimming
3. Fishing
Most rated overall water quality as excellent/
good and better than other lakes
Concerns:
1. Invasive, exotic species
2. Failing/poorly maintained septic systems
3. Lack of understanding about how actions impact
water quality
Household Survey
Protection goals:
1. Lake Michigan sand dune and beach areas
2. Natural features that help maintain water
quality (e.g., wetlands and buffer strips)
Protection actions:
1. Addressing unplugged and abandoned
hydrocarbon and mineral wells
2. Getting more students involved
3. More effective planning for future growth by
local leaders
Household Survey
Respondents get information from local
newspaper (not local cable, radio,
Internet, e-mail, or newsletters)
Most trustworthy information sources
1. Neighborhood/lake association
2. Manistee County Health Department
3. University Extension, professors, and
scientists
Household Survey
Other tidbits
38% of respondents live on Portage Lake/river/stream
74% are full time residents, 26% are seasonal
residents
80% of respondents maintain a grass lawn
93% have a washing machine
45% have a garbage disposal
72% have a dishwasher
81% of respondents are served by a septic system:
• 84% have had their system inspected and/or pumped out
in the last five years
• Nearly half (41%) of septic systems are less than 10
years old.
Watershed Plan Updates
Phase I report is transitioning into
watershed plan
We are addressing questions and
comments raised at last meeting and
meeting with MDEQ
Updated draft plan posted on website by
August 31, 2007
Updated Land Use
Source: Center for Geographic Information, Michigan
Department of Information Technology, 2001.
Land Use/Cover Projections
SOURCE : The Computational Ecology and Visualization Lab/Michigan Statue University Land
Policy Institute, 2007
Based on MDNR – Michigan Resource Information (MiRIS) data
Land Use/Cover Projection
Summary
Land Use Changes, 190-2040, Acres
Class
1980
2040
Change
%
Increase/
Decrease
Agriculture
4,043
2,701
– 1,132
-33%
Built
1,137
5,790
4,653
409
Forestland
5,508
3,408
– 2,100
– 38
425
175
– 250
– 59
2,493
1,532
– 961
– 39
Wetland
Other vegetation
General Soils Map
SOURCE: United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resource Conservation Service,
Grayling Area Office, 2007.
Location of Oil and Gas Wells
SOURCE: Center for Geographic Information, Michigan
Department of Information Technology, 2007.
Underground Storage Tank Sites
SOURCE: Michigan Department of
Environmental Quality, 2007.
Threatened, Endangered and
Species of Concern
Scientific Name
Common Name
State Status
Buteo lineatus
Red-shouldered hawk
T
Cirsium pitcheri
Pitcher's thistle
T
Pomatiopsis cincinnatiensis
Brown walker
Trimerotropis huroniana
Lake Huron locust
SOURCE: Michigan Natural Features Inventory - MSU Extension, Watershed Element Data.
SC
T
Additional Updates
Additional characterization of water
quality data for tributaries
Hydrology and precipitation data
Additional information on invasive species
Connection to Great Lakes
Plant, animals, diseases
MDNR fish stocking data since 2000
Little River Band of Ottawa Indians
Walleye Recruitment Assessment data
Additional Updates
Information about water well nitrate levels
and uncapped wells
Air quality information (Tribe not currently
monitoring toxics or nutrients)
Additional data from Onekama Schools
water quality monitoring (pre-2004 and
2007 data)
Onekama Township 2006 water quality
monitoring data (will not be included in
plan)
Additional Follow Up
Beach monitoring during times of heavy
use—assisting Onekama Township with a
2007 interim monitoring strategy
Additional dissolved oxygen profiles
during summer stratification—MDNR
completed July 16
Information on how to identify Eurasian
water milfoil (posted on website)
Eurasian Water Milfoil
SOURCE: Wisconsin DNR, 2004.
Meeting with MDEQ
Purpose: Discuss approval requirements
Participants: PSC, PLWF, MDEQ
Summary
Agreed on components and general outline
Not anticipated that additional data collection
will be required
Recommend consideration of inventory work by
committees, if there is a need and can be led by
volunteers
Additional needs for monitoring/inventorying can
be identified as action items in plan
Meeting with MDEQ
Additional information needed
More detailed description/info on tributaries
Hydrology and precipitation
Chart of designated and desired uses,
sources, and causes
Estimates of known or suspected pollutant
loadings
List and map critical areas for designated and
desired uses, organized by threat or
opportunity
Analysis of how/if local programs, projects,
and plans could further watershed plan goals
and objectives
Meeting with MDEQ
Additional information needed
Development of long-term goals, measurable short-term
outcomes, and tasks—including time frame and cost
estimate for each task
Long-term
goals
Goal 1
Short-term
objectives
1.1
Applicable
designated/desired
uses addressed
BMPs
(tasks)
1.1.1
1.1.2
1.2
1.2.1
1.2.2
1.2.3
Goal 2
2.1
2.1.1
Timeline
Cost
estimate
Task partner
(responsible
party)
Meeting with MDEQ
General comment: The primary purpose
of the plan is to help the community
identify what should be done next—and
why—to protect the Portage Lake
Watershed
MDEQ review could take 45–60 days per
draft, including Lansing review
This meeting provided foundation for
finalizing Phase II strategy
Phase II Strategy
Identify and prioritize potential threats,
pollutants, sources, and causes for
designated and desired uses
Establish long-term goals for protecting
designated and desired uses
List and map critical area for meeting
goals for designated and desired uses
Establish measurable objectives and
identify management measures and other
actions to help achieve goals
Phase II Strategy
Inform, educate, and engage the public
Analyze how/if local programs, projects,
and plans could further plan goals and
objectives
Develop an evaluation process to track
plan progress
Assemble the Portage Lake Watershed
Forever Plan and submit to MDEQ
Total cost = $50, 015
Additional Recommendations
Although not requirements of approvable
watershed plans, the following are viewed
as priority needs:
Portage Lake Watershed Forever website
($5,800)
Comprehensive water quality monitoring
strategy ($3,000)
Phase II Time Line
Elements of Phase II are already under
way
Draft plan submitted to Executive
Committee and Technical Advisors by
September 30
Draft plan submitted to MDEQ by October
31 (after review by EC, TA, PLWF
Committee)
Request for Committee Assistance
Goals:
Community engagement
Leveraging local talent/building capacity
Cost efficiency
Priority inventory needs
Website
Analysis of local programs, projects,
plans
Fund raising for near-term needs
Additional ideas?
Discussion and Request for
Approval
Next Meeting Date
Goal–Setting Session
Joint Executive Committee and
Technical Advisor Meeting
September 4, 2007
4:00–6:00 PM
Manistee County Road Commission
Community Meeting Room
Thank You!
Your time and input are critical to making the
Portage Lake Watershed Forever Plan and its
implementation a success.