Transcript ATTENTATS 11 Septembre 2001

9/11 Strikes
Technical Investigation
Eng. Mehmet
Official Theory:
• 4 teams of 19
“SUICIDE
MUSLIM
TERRORISTS”
hijacked 4 flights
and crashed the
planes into
buildings and the
ground.
THEY USED CUTTERS
• This cutter was
presumed to be
used in flight
UA93, exhibit of
the government in
Moussaoui’s trial.
Consequences
• 2948 killed during the strikes.
• Two wars started and two countries invaded.
• More than 3600 American soldiers dead, in addition to
hundreds of thousands of innocent civilian people.
• Bin Ladin, known by few, became an overnight
televison celebrity.
• Terrorist strikes increased as never before: Bali,
Madrid, London, Iraq, Afghanistan, Turkey, Yemen, …
• Muslims are labeled as TERRORISTS. That was the
beginning of the never-ending war against Muslims
and no one acted to stop it.
Anomalies 1
• Flight passenger lists had none of the terrorists
names. It is possible to make false identity documents
for 1, 2 or 3 people; where are the rest?
• Several terrorists reported alive. See BBC
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/1559151.stm
• FBI Director Robert Mueller admitted that "the identity
of several of the hijackers is in doubt", but he never
explained how they had first been identified.
• Arguing over « National Security » almost all
information has been classified secret and became
inaccessible.
Anomalies 2
• None of the black boxes have ever been released
to the public.
• None of the planes parts has been identified by
their serial numbers.
• The twin towers could not collapse. They were
designed to resist an impact of a similar sized
commercial plane, the 707.
• The official reports contain too many omissions,
distortions, and lies.
What’s the Reality?
• There are several evidences. But we will study only
three proved facts:
• All four planes were controlled by only ONE
team. They used American electronic weapon
technology.
• Twin towers were demolished by explosives.
• The plane that hit the Pentagon was not a
Boeing 757.
• For more details, we recommend to look into internet.
Attention: There are too many unrealistic theories on the web. We want to
emphasize that we refute them. But when the amount of available
information is very small it’s normal to get so many theories, and many
disinformation agents. You have to form your own opinion.
How could the US government make the strikes?
• Set up a team to make the strikes
• Use technology to precisely control the planes
• The realisation by one team using technology will create
some behavioral differences compared with the official
version of 4 different terrorist teams
One team / 4 teams
Work
Coordination
between
planes
Relation
between
One team
Four Teams
Serial,
Parallel,
To guarantee the reliability of the
actions and make no mistake, they
could manage only one plane at a
time
Yes,
As consequence of the serial work it
becomes an obligation
End of one plane action &
Beginning of the next plane
deviation
Each plane has its own team and
pilot, they will act independently
from other planes
No,
As the terrorists couldn’t contact
each other after the takeoffs, the
planes will be independent
Take off & Deviation
of the same plane
Probable Timeline Graphic
if 4 Different Teams
•The deviation from flight route will happen about 15 minutes after the take off.
•Each plane will fly directly to its target without worrying about other flights.
•Take off delays couldn’t be anticipated.. After take off, terrorists could not contact
each other.
•There couldn’t be any interdependence between the planes.
Official Flight Path
Source:
http://www.9-11commission.gov/report/911Report.pdf
Source:
http://www.9-11commission.gov/report/911Report.pdf
The sequence of the events
Timeline graphic & conclusions
•All hijacks were made sequentially, one plane at a time!
•Before deviating from its flight route, each plane waited for the
previous plane to be put on target!
•The deviation of any plane was dependent on the situation of
the preceeding plane.
CONCLUSION
• The planes were hijacked by
ONE TEAM!
• To guarantee the reliability of the action
and not make mistakes
they managed one plane at a time.
• When their job was finished on a plane,
they began the job of the next plane.
HOW IS THAT POSSIBLE?
• It’s possible if the planes have remote adjustable
automatic control capabilities!
• This technology has existed for decades.
• 1994 - An experiment at the Crows Landing NASA
Facility in the Central Valley of California involved 110
landings of a Boeing 737 airliner using an experimental
GPS navigation system. http://ludb.clui.org/ex/i/CA3033/
• In 10/1/2001, Raytheon released a document showing
developments made on civil aircrafts like 727 and 737 to
control them by automatic systems.
TOMAHAWK MISSILES
A SMALL PLANE WHICH GUIDES ITSELF
ACCORDING TO GPS MEASURED POSITION
CONTROLE AND GUIDANCE SYSTEM
POSITION
MEASUREMENT
Independent from the
missile
ORIENTATION
MEASUREMENT
Independent from the missile
FLIGHT SURFACES
MOTORISATION
Simulates pilot actions in an aircraft
Size increases when missile becomes
bigger
COMPUTER
They must be too much bigger in an aircraft
Independent from the missile
In the market it is possible to find different
sizes and versions, including non reversible
ones as standard product.
• If all these systems are installed inside the aircraft but
not activated, the plane reacts normally and can take
off naturally.
• When activated, the plane reacts like a missile.
• The install has to be done during the last maintenance operation. The
maintenance database of these planes has been cleaned up the day of 9/11
and became inaccessible to everybody including the professional aviation
companies.
WHAT ABOUT THE PILOTS?
• The installed flight surface control servos can be of
non reversible type to prevent the pilots
countermanding the remote controls.
• The guidance control computer could use one digital
output to activate a release valve injecting a military
war gas inside the plane killing all passengers and
flight crew.
• In this case, the autopilot can be used to guide the
planes. But for the required precision and the
validation of the ground control systems, the use
missile control system would be necessary.
PLANES
• In the next page, we consider that technology
installed in all planes which are controllable like
missiles with the same ground equipment.
• Lets notice that for high speed equipment like
planes, the precision of the GPS is reduced.
Especially in altitude measurement it becomes
impossible to measure at better precision than +/50m.
• The realization explained in the next page is the
most probable explanation we found considering all
available evidence, the feasibility, the reliability and
simplicity of each action. We demand that an
independent justice court collect all evidences, make
the investigation and tell us the reality of these
actions.
Managing and sequence of events
~8:25 – The automatic control of AA11 is validated
8:14 – Right rotation
request
to AA11, pilots ok
7:59 – Take
off AA11
End of connection = pilots dead &
Deviation towards twin towers
automatic control activated
8:25+ – Automatic guidance system PID
parameters are adjusted to guarantee the
precision of impact
Take off UA175
8:42 – Pilots reported have heard « everyone stay in your seats »
End of connection = pilots dead & automatic control activated
Deviation of UA175
8:45 – AA11 impact on
North Tower
8:42 – AA11 adjustments end
10:06 – UA93 impact to ground
9:35 – Pentagon plane adjustments end
Deviation of UA93
8:54 - UA175 adjustments end
9:03 – UA175 impact on
8:42 – Take off AU93 South Tower
Deviation of AA77
With 41 min delay
~8:50 – The automatic control of UA175 is validated
PID parameters of AA11 copied into UA175, same B767
Immediate deviation towards twin towers
8:20 – Take off AA77
9:38 – Pentagon impact
The Pentagon Strike
• These are the sole published
images of the Pentagon
strike. Everything is done to
avoid any possibility of
identifying the plane. We only
see the tail part of the plane.
• In reality, there are some
movies of the strike recorded
by surveillance cameras,
some civilian. All were
confiscated by the FBI
immediately after the strike
and have never been
released.
Pentagon : Damages on the right Façade
•
•
•
The entry hole – central fuselage of plane, Column 14
The last damaged column in the right side, Column 20
With 10ft between two columns and 6 bays, that makes 60ft as half the damage span
Pentagon : Plane
Approach Direction
• The wingspan calculated
corresponds to a Boeing 737-400
that is 95ft
• Flight AA77 was a 757 with a
wingspan of 125ft so 3 extra
columns should have been
damaged
• Approach angle of the plane 52° :
Half a wingspan = right side half
damage span(60ft) * sin52° = 47ft,
Implies a wingspan = 94ft
Pentagon: Closer Impact Drawing
• The dimensions fit exactly to those of a Boeing 737
Pentagon : Official Report
• The official report
recognizes that
the damages
span over 120ft,
converted to the
perpendicular of
the plane
direction that
makes 90ft
instead of 125ft
for a 757
• But to justify the presence of a Boeing 757, the same report
tells « the external 1/3 of the wings did no damage on the
façade ». And that is justified with the impact that the engines
made prior to reaching the façade which had to break down the
extremity of the wings.
Broken ventilation wall
The report
assumes this
was broken by
the left engine.
Note no traces
of the engine
ploughing into
the ground
before the wall.
All cable drums were before the wall. This cable drum crossed over starting
from the ground near the wall. It had to touch the wall at the ground.
Pentagon : Construction of 737 impact
Pentagon : Plane Position at Impact
Official Theory :
White plane
The reality :
Red plane
737-400
• The entry hole, Column 14
• The last damaged column in the right side, Column 20
757-200
AA77
Hidden plane
• A Boeing 757-200
was too long and had
to be visible behind
the box
• A Boeing 737-400 is
just hidden behind the
box
The Pentagon strike review
•
•
8:54 The team finished their job on UA175 which is flying toward its target. The team switches
on the missile control system on board AA77, switches off the transponder and lowers it to
make it invisible to radar. After that moment the flight route of AA77 is unknown.
But we know that it flew the going path in 8:54-8:20=34 minutes including the take off. For the
return path, it took 9.38-8.54=44 minutes WITHOUT TAKE OFF. Including the presence of
another take off, there are still 10 min extra. These are the required 10 min for the crash of
AA77 on the ground in a secret military zone. There is still enough time to take off a 737 and fly
it to the Pentagon situated at 10km from Dulles airport where AA77 took off.
Why Change the Plane?
• It is possible to hit a plane on 400m high
towers using a GPS receiver. A precision of
+/-50m is still enough. A receiver like that can
be installed in the nose of the plane where it
is invisible from outside.
• To hit a plane on 23m high building the GPS
receiver is not precise enough. But it had to
be done while not being sure on the result.
So it was necessary to install another altitude
sensor which has a precision less than 1m.
• To reach that precision, the sensor must
have its measurement surface placed
outside of the aircraft body. If that kind of
sensor was installed on the 757 of AA77 it
would be detected by the visual inspection
made before each take off.
• If the altitude measurement is not precise
enough, the plane can either hit the ground
or pass over the building. That’s
unacceptable for this kind of action.
Pentagon :
All Damages
• Notice the orange
area where the
slab deflected
upwards. The sole
possibility for that
deflection is an
explosion
happening under it.
A kerosene
explosion can not
accomplish this so
far from the façade.
TOWERS COLLAPSE
• Official Theory : Kerosene fire highly
weakened the metal and made the
towers collapse.
• The heating of structures of the
towers is a speculation subject. In
practice, it was impossible to
measure temperature of the
structures. The smoke was dark
showing low temperature fires. In
the History, there is no steel framed
building collapsing by fire. The fire
could not explain these collapses.
• The bottom levels of the buildings
were not heated at all.
ANOMALIES OF THE
OFFICIAL REPORTS
• The official reports give
all details of outer
columns and floor trusses
but they hide the most
important information
about the inner core
columns. In some
pictures the size of these
columns are reduced to
present them as
meaningless.
Floor plan
of NIST
report
Interior core columns
are drawn at good
scale. But no
dimension details
appear in the whole
report.
Notice that most of the
core columns can be
accessed from inside
the elevators shafts.
Source:
http://wtc.nist.gov/pub
s/NISTNCSTAR11.pdf
NIST Report
exterior columns oversized
Floor plan
of FEMA
report
Interior core columns
are drawn as small
square dots
representing them as
minor elements.
Dimension details are
not shown in the
whole of the report.
Source:
http://www.fema.gov/p
df/library/fema403_ch
2.pdf
Columns
picture
Interior core columns
are much bigger and
stronger than exterior
columns. In addition
these interior core
columns are linked to
each other making
them extremely strong.
PHOTO AFTER THE COLLAPSE
NORTH
TOWER
WTC1
SOUTH
TOWER
WTC2
Outer
columns
still vertical
Internal
columns
demolished
Internal
columns
demolished
Outer
columns
still
vertical
PHOTO AFTER THE COLLAPSE
Façade
columns
still
vertical
Internal
columns
demolished,
There must
be 47 tube
columns,
which are 5”
thick in the
lower floors
STRUCTURE OF THE TOWERS
Internal columns are the main structure of the building
Demolished during the collapse! The Commission report contains that LIE :
External columns
that remained
vertical over
some floors after
the collapse
It is clear that the inner columns are
the main structure of the building.
That’s true in all well produced high
buildings.
Reversely, the exterior walls can
really be compared to a hollow steel
shaft.
RESISTANCE OF THE STRUCTURE
According to the official reports
According to the reality of the towers and
to anti-seismic construction rules
CONCRETE MADE SKYCRAPER (30floors)
Cast
concrete
core
section
Outer
columns
Possible damage
• These internal columns are able to resist against
collapsing of all upper floors.
• The worst possible damage is the sinking of some
floors at impact level. Lower floors remaining
unchanged.
Internal Core Columns Remain Standing
During the Collapse
WTC2
These pictures are taken
by Aman Zafar who was
near the towers
(www.amanzafar.com) . They show
that the inner core of both
WTC1 and WTC2
remained standing while
the floors and façade
columns were collapsing.
That proves that the core
section was resistant
enough and could not
collapse without
explosives.
WTC1
Pictures Set
1 2
3
4
Internal Column Dimensions WTC2
• WTC2: The width of the
columns remaining still
standing are smaller than the
width of the core section. It is
consistent with the width of
the two smallest columns
rows in blue. That's identical
to the core reduced by the
columns which are accessible
from the lift shafts. The
destruction of these columns
will lead to the demolition of
whole tower.
Internal columns dimensions WTC1
TOWERS DEMOLITION
• The sole possibility to
demolish these towers
is to explode these
internal columns at
their junctions.
HOW that can be made?
• During the last week-end of 8-9 September 2001,
radio controlled and coded RDX or C4 explosives
were installed on all junctions of the core columns
that are accessible from the lift shafts. Each pack
is identified by a numeric code. The explosives for
the same floor have the same code. Each pack
has a quick fixing tool for assembly on the
columns. 15 people can install explosives on both
towers during the week-end.
• After the plane hit, on basis of the impact floor, the
authors knew the identity code of the explosives
which must be exploded to start the demolition.
• To avoid the upper level parts from falling on lower
level explosives causing them to explode, the
explosion speed must be higher than free fall in the
air.
• The measured progression speed of the explosions
is near the free fall speed +/- measurement errors.
• A laptop computer situated near the towers
contained a program producing the radio codes to
fire the explosives at wanted speed.
• The control center where the team acted is very
probably the WTC building 7 from where both
towers are visible and which was collapsed during
the afternoon of 9/11/01 and which was owned by
the same Larry Silverstein who owned the twin
towers.
Core Columns Destruction Method
• Such explosions happened on all welded junctions of the columns.
The distance between two explosions is approximately 3 floors, 36ft
EXPLODED COLUMNS
Horizontal sheared column
• This picture shows the sheared connection between a box core column and
an H section column. This type of connection existed at the uppermost floors
of WTC towers. We see that the shearing was made by lateral displacement
of the H sectioned column. The welds are pushed rightward in the picture.
Such shearing is consistent with the explosion demolition method.
TOWERS DEMOLITION
• Only very big
explosions can
explain the creation
of such a huge
amount of dust and
metal columns
thrown so far away.
The explosions cut
the internal columns
of the structure of
the tower.
SOUTH TOWER DEMOLITION
Continuously increasing dust size is meaningful. The explosions are
so quick that falling dust reaches newly created dust by the
explosions of the lower floors.
NORTH TOWER DEMOLITION
Video: http://www.plaguepuppy.net/public_html/collapse%20update/wtc1_jets.mpg
OFFICIAL FALSIFICATIONS 1
• Arabic flight manuals found in a car near of one of the
airports: the international language for aviation is
English. Student pilots must have an adequate
knowledge of English to be accepted for training and
all their flight manuals would be in English if, as has
been claimed, they undertook flight training in the USA.
Arabic manuals are highly suspect and might have
been specially prepared in justification of the events
following 9/11.
• The half burnt hijacker’s passport found at ground
zero: No human body was found, no debris was
recognizable, but this passport remained intact, only
slightly charred! In reality, this passport was retained
by the CIA or some other agency. Then burnt before
being shown to the medias.
OFFICIAL FALSIFICATIONS 2
• Phone calls Phone calls made by cellular phones from
planes flying at high altitudes of 30,000 feet: Even now
in 2007, such calls remain impossible. By design
mobile phone signals are guided horizontally to save
power and only reach mobile phones at ground level.
Therefore, the cellular phones cannot be used in the
air.
• Since several decades the technique of synthesizing a
voice synthesis is widely used. Israeli companies
connected to Hollywood are the market leaders in this
domain.
• When listening to some of the alleged call, there is no
background noise coming from the planes; the sound
is extremely clear as if spoken by actors.
OFFICIAL FALSIFICATIONS 3
• Cockpit communications from UA93 released in 2006: These
communications do not have any credibility. They contain
meaningless repeats of "sit down!", "what?", and "Allahu akbar".
This last sentence is the most familiar Muslim expression in the
West, but Muslims would not use it when faced with death.
• Moussaoui case: He was arrested 3 weeks before the strikes
when intending to start flight training on 747s. When preparing
strikes of this magnitude, it would make sense to start training
years ahead, no 3 weeks.
• "I want to learn to fly without take off and without landing" :
These alleged comments were provided of their willingness to
crash the planes into a building. However, many amateurs
interested in flying express themselves like this, wanting the
enjoyment of flight without the tedious hard work. By itself such
a sentence is worthless as evidence.
What About Bin Ladin?
•
•
•
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
During the first three years Bin Ladin said he was not
involved in 911!
Now, he is telling that he is the author!
To consider his messages, this needs to be handled by
a court of impartial justice :
He should speak to an independent court.
He should be protected, his life guaranteed, to make
his testimony totally free.
All of his testimony should be checked against the
facts.
It is too easy for the Bush Administration to have him
free, speaking as Bush wants him to speak. It is also
very easy to produce his voice.
I refuse to recognize Bin Ladin as a spokesman for
Muslims.
OFFICIAL FALSIFICATIONS 4
Video of OBL released in November 2001: We saw a bearded
man like OBL speaking with very bad sound and making
statements like "their lost is more than 3 billion dollar",
whereas OBL had studied in England and spoke English well.
Physiognomic studies showed that this person was not Bin
Ladin. In addition, an ideological fighter will not emphasis
financial losses. But we know that for the domestic media the
emphasis on financial losses is very important to make an
impression on people in the US
Video of OBL released in November 2004 : Here I believe that it
was indeed Bin Ladin and he spoke like a Muslim. He indirectly
takes responsibility for the strikes and justifies them on basis of
1980's Lebanon strikes: It's too easy for the USA to ask OBL to
take responsibility for the strikes in order to left alone! Any way,
OBL must be heard by a court of justice, and all what he says must
be checked.
In 9/2007, other movies containing another OBL with shorter and
painted beard speaking against the same background have been
released. It's clear that this is not the same person. What kind
game is being played here? After using him in 2004, did they kill
him and put an actor in his place? It is difficult to tell. The truth can
only be found if real evidence is presented.
CONCLUSIONS
• There are many convergent evidences
that prove the official theory is false!
• The presence of Muslim suicide pilots is
not proved.
• There is enough evidence to request the
disclosure of all classified information.
Without that disclosure, both national and
world security are in danger.
• These strikes can not be managed without
knowledge and permission of the Bush
administration’s high level deciders.
Does the US Administration
have the skills to accomplish
these strikes?
• YES, they do!
Some false flag terror strikes having
different manner and authors that
justified wars :
• Explosion of cruiser Maine! (1898)
• Reichstag fire (1933)
• Pearl Harbor (1941)
• Operation Northwoods (1962)
• Assassination of JFK (1963)
• Gulf of Tonkin, Vietnam (1964)
IMAGE GAMES
OFFICIAL ASCE REPORT’S FIRST PAGE
US Navy Base in
San Diego City
googleearth
THE REALITY OF THE FACTS
The Conquistador, Successor of Hitler
He managed to start the invasion of Muslims countries
Why? Bali, Madrid, London, Morocco,..
• Life in Muslim countries is simple: If you don’t bother anyone,
no one will bother you. But if you attack someone, you will get
an equal reaction.
•
Let’s remember that before 9/11/01, during Clinton’s Administration efforts for peace
in Palestine, the strikes had been reduced and there was dialogue.
• If the number and the intensity of the attacks are low and the
reactions remain moderate, it can be resolved with good
results.
• Today the intensity of the aggression (Americans) and injustices
(Israelis) are so high that there is no room for dialogue or
moderate reactions.
• The traditional method of Muslim countries has not adapted to
today’s aggressions and injustices.
• We need another solution! The last remaining one is Justice
which is imperfect, costly, and slow. Muslims must get used to
its methods and complexities. And justice must be less
imperfect.
Why? Madrid and London
• Let me explain some doubts about the Madrid and London blasts. I did no
investigation into these actions. But my thoughts are:
• In Madrid they used cellular phones as radio controlled firing systems,
similar to the explosives used in the WTC towers. The method was new. In
2007 Muslims are still making suicide bombings without using such
technology. The authors must be the same people who made 9/11 strikes. I
hope the current lawsuit in Spain will lead to some truth. I trust Spanish
justice.
• The cctv cameras of the London tube were controlled and recorded by an
Israeli company, before, during, and after the blasts. Simple children are
shown as terrorists.
• These are the sole organized big blasts in European countries.
• All other actions done by Muslims in European countries were individual
actions made by foolish people: Theo Van Gogh murder and other people
placing gas bottles near the door of a synagogue.
• These small actions are not comparable to the Madrid and London blasts.
• To get stronger credibility and remove all doubts in such investigations, all
evidences must be checked and independent Muslim professionals must be
fully involved.
• This was before the verdict of Spanish court on 31 october 2007.
11 March 2004 Madrid strikes
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
The Spanish court of justice reached its verdict on 31th October 2007 after 3 years of
investigation and an 8-month trial against 28 defendants.
Three of them were found guilty and received more than a total of 40,000 years
imprisonment for having supplied or placed the explosives without participating in the
actual bombing.
The remaining 25 defendants were not at all involved in the Madrid bombings.
18 of them received several jail sentences of up to 18 years without having taken
part in or being related to the bombings.
7 were acquitted.
The masterminds of the bombings were not identified.
How can 3 years of investigation bring 25 uninvolved people to the trial while the
masterminds remain unknown?
This poses serious questions for the impartiality of the trial. During 3 years of
investigation all the evidence collected should have identified the masterminds and
let those 25 without any direct involvement go free.
It appears that the court needed to put the blame on someone and thus found
passed guilty verdicts on random Muslim suspects.
As for the exploded flat in Madrid it could well be that ordinary Arab tourists had
stayed there. Whilst they were out of the flat some people might have installed
explosives in their flat. Upon their return the culprits ignited the explosives by remote
control, filming it at the same time for the benefit of the media.
July 7, 2005 London strikes
• The cctv cameras of the London tube were controlled and recorded by an
Israeli company.
• There is no record showing the Muslim bombers entering these wagons.
• Natanyahu who had to give a conference near the explosion area received a
call from the Mossad asking him to remain in his hotel.
• The policewoman Lizzie Kenworthy was next to the exploded wagon. She
entered inside the explosion area and explained what she saw: The chap
next to her had lost his leg and there was a woman to their left who was on
her back trapped in the metal, which had twisted up through the middle of
the carriage. The roof was still on, but the lining of the carriage had been
blown off. The sides had also come off and there was a big hole in the floor.
That means the bombs were placed under the carriage. Sources
http://www.julyseventh.co.uk/
http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/crime/article333787.ece
• According to that testimony of a policewoman it’s impossible that any
passenger have placed these bombs under the carriage. So Muslims are not
involved in 7/7 London events.
• Justice has to be done again.
MY MOTIVES
• The World is becoming a small village, the changes are very
huge.
• Humanity is facing several challenges. One of the challenges is
diversity of life.
• As a Muslim, I believe that diversity, being the will of God, will
enrich us with our differences. Koran 5/48, 49/13.
• As a scientist, I consider peaceful diversity as one of the most
important conditions for life to exist.
• That diversity can only exist in a just world!
• I know that interest groups created these strikes to start wars. I
didn’t start this investigation to help these warlike people. So
let’s not deviate into hate which will make easier the work of
these warlike people. Only some American Republican leaders
are guilty.
• Let’s act as responsible people for peace and justice. That
means fighting against our own unjust people as well. Justice is
in the best interest of all.
END
Eng. Mehmet
Copyright 2003-2008