Overview of the City’s Transport & Traffic Situation

Download Report

Transcript Overview of the City’s Transport & Traffic Situation

Social Watch Philippines
Monitoring Initiatives
by
Rene Raya
Ma. Luz Anigan
Social Watch Philippines
Objectives of Workshop on Monitoring
system/initiative focused on the MDGs
To be able to appreciate/learn about the
monitoring initiatives applied in the Philippines by
Social Watch Philippines
To be able to reflect on national monitoring in the
different countries and identify the gaps (the weak
areas) and possible intervention of CSO
To Exchange/Present ideas for possible
coordinated piloting of local monitoring in the
participating countries
What is SWP doing in monitoring
1. Social Watch monitoring system
(with the five modules)
2. Quality of life monitoring
3. Tracking the MDGs at different levels
4. MDG local monitoring system
The SWP Local
Monitoring System
Social Watch Local Monitoring System
OBJECTIVES
LOCALIZING the “MDG Plus”
1. To establish benchmarks for tracking
accomplishments in key development indicators
2. To assess the operationalization of the Millennium
Development Goals and Targets and other
international commitments at the level of provinces
and municipalities
3. To strengthen advocacy for adopting the “MDG
Plus” as framework for local development planning
and fiscal management
Social Watch Local Monitoring System
Content of the “MDG Plus”
Module 1: SWP Monitoring Template of Key Social
Indicators
Module 2: Assessment of Special Concerns
(Thru Quantitative and Case Analysis)
Module 3: Quality of Life Index - Trends
Module 4: Review of Development Plan
Module 5: Analysis of Budget/Expenditure Program
Indicators  Social Analysis  Planning  Budgeting
The SWP Local Monitoring System
A. Basic Social Indicators
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Demographics
Income & Employment
Health
Education
Infrastructure
Shelter
Personal Security
Women/Children
B. Special Concerns
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Social Integration
Gender Equity
Quality of Employment
Disaster
Asset Reform
Industry Profiling
Partnership with CSOs
Environment and
Sustainable Development
SWP Monitoring Template
C. Quality of Life Index (QLI)
Three component indicators used to generate QLI:
1.
Under-Five Nutrition
2. Attended Births
3.
Elementary Cohort Survival Rate
QLI is used for local poverty and capability mapping
D. Review of Local Development Plan
Clarity of framework and strategies
Use of indicators as planning guide; clear targets
Comprehensiveness of situation analysis
Poverty reduction strategy; identification of vulnerable sectors
Inclusion of MDG and WSSD commitments; Gender content
E. Analysis of Budget/Expenditure Program
Analysis of sectoral allocation
Assessment of investment plan, budget and actual expenditure in terms of
responsiveness to MDG and WSSD concerns.
ETC…
SOCIAL WATCH LOCAL MONITORING SYSTEM
Module III– Quality of Life Index (Rate of Malnutrition)
ETC…
ETC…
ETC…
The Quality of Life Index (QLI)/
Basic Capabilities Index (BCI)
Gender Equity Index
Social Watch use of composite index to
measure overall poverty and well-being
Quality of Life Index
QLI is an alternative measure of people’s well-being

It is a derivative of the pure capability-based measure as
proposed and popularized by Amartya Sen.

It complements HDI and Income-based poverty measures

1.
2.
3.
Index is composed of 3 Indicators with equal weights:
1) Capability to be well-nourished
Under-five nutrition status
2) Capability for healthy and safe reproduction
Births attended by trained health personnel
3) Capability to be educated & be knowledgeable
Elementary Cohort Survival Rate
National Level
Quality of Life
Index
Philippines, 1999
0.479 - 0.600
0.601 - 0.700
0.701 - 0.800
0.801 - 0.908
Missing data
Quality of Life Index (QLI)
 Basic Capabilities Index (BCI)
QLI was adopted by Social Watch International with a
slight modification of the Component Indicators
1) Under-five child mortality
2) Births attended by trained health personnel
3) Cohort Survival to Grade 5
Applied Globally and found to be applicable for
significant number of countries and highly
correlated to HDI, Food Security, overall
Health and Educational Attainment.
Tracking the MDGs
From National…
to Local Areas…
down to Households.
National Level Monitoring
Poverty Situation by Region, 2000
I-35.5
CAR-38.0
II-29.7
V-56.2
III-20.9
VIII-45.4
NCR-7.6
VII-37.4
IV-25.9
CARAGA- 50.2
VI-45.7
X-38.7
IX-44.5
XI-36.5
ARMM-62.9
XII-55.3
No of
Poverty
49
improvement
79 actually
Provinces
rising
into
Rural
miss
in ARMM,
Poverty
MDG Poverty
Central
Situation
Reduction
Mindanao
since 1988
and
Target
Bicol
THE MDG SCOREBOARD – Social Watch
MDG Targets
Perspective of the
Poor, Vulnerable
and Powerless
Poverty
r Unlikely
Hunger/Nutrition
r Very Unlikely!
Safe water
r Unlikely
Educ: Participation
hLess Likely
Educ: Survival
r Unlikely
Educ: Gender
r Equality, No!
Child Mortality/IMR
r Unlikely
Maternal Health
r Very Unlikely!
HIV / AIDS
? Parity
? Growing Threat
Environment
r Unlikely
On Slum Dwellers
r Unlikely
Regional Level Monitoring
Camarines Norte
Quality of Life
Index
Catanduane
Camarines Sur
Bicol Region, 1999
Albay
Sorsogon
0.532 - 0.600
0.601 - 0.700
0.701 - 0.800
0.801 - 0.642
Missing data
Masbate
Provincial and Municipal Level Monitoring
Quality of Life
Index
Guimaras, 2001
0.536
0.560
0.581
0.687
0.731
Elementary School Participation Rate in Palawan, 2002
Elementary School Participation Rate
in Brookespoint, Southern Palawan, 2002
Barangay Level Monitoring
Elementary School Participation Rate
in Bgy. Oring-Oring, Brookespoint,Southern Palawan, 2002
Back
Household Level Monitoring
A total of 76 children
(6-16 year old) do not
attend school
Sample MDG Mapping at the Household Level
International Comparison
Ubojan
40.64%
Proportion of population with access
To Sanitary Toilets
Tubigon
72.9%
Bohol
Indonesia
55%
Thailand
96%
Proportion of population with access to improved sanitation
Percent
International Comparison
Peru
71%
Burkina
Faso
29%
Ghana
72%
MDG Local
Monitoring System
MDG Local Monitoring System
Social Watch Philippines MDG Indicators
Insert on GIS
MDG Local Monitoring System
Capacity Building
(MDG Monitoring and
Localization)
FIELD SURVEY,
Data Processing and
Validation
ENCODING and DATA
Processing
Preparing the
MDG REPORTS
PLANNING & BUDGET
Preparation
TWG: Selecting the indicators
TWG: Information System
Enumerators’ Training for
the MDG Survey in Kiangan
Enumerators’ Training for
the MDG Survey in Kiangan
Monitoring Tools
Software Packages
1. DevInfo Database Software
2. GIS (Geographic Information System)
Free and Open Software
3. MDG Planning Matrix
4. SPSS and CSPro
DevInfo Database System
The Integrated MDG Database
All data compiled in one system
Creates Tables, Graphs and Maps
Analysis of trends over time
Easy retrieval of data
National, sub-national levels
DevInfo Database System
JagnaInfo
A Customized Variant of the UN’s DevInfo
BoholInfo
Used also in NEPAL
Used also in AFRICA
The MDG Planning Matrix
Designed by AER in cooperation with Social Watch and the
European Union (For uploading in the Internet soon)
The MDG Planning Matrix Software
Municipality:
Goal 1 : Eradicate Extreme
Poverty And Hunger
INDICATORS
BASELINE
PROGRAM
TARGET
1.1 Poverty Incidence
(Proportion of households with income less than the poverty
threshold)
1.2 Subsistence Poverty
(Proportion of households with income less than the food
threshold)
In 2003
24% of families were
considered income poor
15% were living below
the subsistence level
See more poverty statistics…[PDF]
See NEDA report on Goal 1…
P ro po rtio n o f families belo w
po verty thresho ld
50
40
39.9
30
20
27.6
24.7
20.4
19 . 9 5
12 . 3
10
10 . 4
10 . 2
0
1991
2000
2003
2015
Software for Data Processing
CSPro Encoding Software
Thank
You!
Monitoring Workshop
Guide Questions
1. What monitoring initiatives have your
group/s undertaken? (Share monitoring
experiences)
2. What is the existing monitoring system of
the government? What are its strong and
weak points? What are the gaps?
Monitoring Workshop
Guide Questions
3. How do we design our own monitoring system--
1. Select the indicators which you think are
relevant, applicable and practical
2. Given the current programs and concerns of
your organization, what monitoring initiatives
could be put/set in place at the local/national
or even provincial level
3. What are the capacities and skills needed to
implement this monitoring initiative