Transcript Document
What is so special about Specialty? PRESENTED BY: Kim Foerster, Director, Managed Markets Sales, Diplomat Specialty Pharmacy Jeremy Faulks, Retail Specialty Manager for Target Specialty Pharmacy Learning objectives Specialty Pharmacy Basics Cost of Lick It, Stick It, Ship It Models The Basics of Specialty Management The Good + Bad of Co-Pay Assistance Diplomat Case Study, July 2013 – January 2014. 2 Specialty pharmaceuticals Difficult Medication Delivery • Strict temperature control • Distribution can be limited • Restricted location for administration Complex Treatment • Personalized dosing or administration • Clinical management or close monitoring required Adapted from Blaser DA, et.al. How to Define Specialty Pharmaceuticals – A Systematic Review. Am J Pharm Benefits. 2010;2(6).371-380. Diplomat Case Study, July 2013 – January 2014. 3 Specialty pharmacy market The specialty market is not a level playing field, as extreme variations are seen in patient care management, service, and outcomes.6 1. Cohen GM, Calla N, Moore TS. Evolution of a community pharmacist to a specialty pharmacist. Specialty Pharmacy Conference; 2013. 4 Specialty pharmacy landscape SP Model Characteristics PBM Owned • Structured programs • Higher use of technology for patient outreach • Strong buying power • Ability to shift costs • Specialty pharmacy is a piece of the business Plan Owned • Ability to easily view all claims data (medical + pharmacy) Retail Owned • Independents • More flexible – willingness to customize • Specialty pharmacy is primary expertise • Focused on patient care and service – more high-touch • Greater transparency Community based care 5 Top 10 specialty drug classes 1 • Inflammatory Conditions – Rheumatoid Arthritis 2 • Multiple Sclerosis 3 • Cancer 4 • HIV 5 • Growth Deficiency 6 • CNS Disorders 7 • Respiratory Conditions – Cystic Fibrosis 8 • Anticoagulants 9 • Organ Transplant 10 • Pulmonary Hypertension Express Scripts®. Drug Trend Report [Internet]. 2014 April [cited 2014 Apr 8]. Available from: http://lab.express-scripts.com/drug-trend-report/table-of-contents. 6 Stakeholder concerns PAYOR PHARMA PHYSICIAN PATIENT • Marketplace trends • UM programs • Measured and reportable clinical outcomes • Patient adherence / satisfaction • Access to drugs • Data • Spend trends • Adherence • Biosimiliars • Patient assistance programs • Therapy initiation • Manufacturing cost • Administrative work burden • Patient compliance • Time for appropriate care • Buy and bill • Administration • Adverse event management • Disease progression / quality of life • Cost UM: Utilization Management Cohen GM, Calla N, Moore TS. Evolution of a community pharmacist to a specialty pharmacist. Specialty Pharmacy Conference; 2013. 7 Collaboration is the future of health care Affordable Care Act (ACA) Requires collaboration on quality initiatives with reportable savings Physician Value-Based Modifier coming in 2015 – need to measure how medication contributes to quality Care coordination is priority in six NQS (National Quality Strategy) domains Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Call Letter “. . . ensure continuity of care and integration of services through arrangements with contracted providers.” Demonstrate improved outcomes and achieve patient satisfaction through advancement of good quality health. Measured by five CMS star rating categories: Patient outcomes Intermediate outcomes Patient experience Patient access to care Process 8 Specialty care coordination – The basics Adherence Teamwork Tolerance Access 9 Coordination of benefits Physician education on guideline updates Medical billing Side effect and symptom management Customized communication Injection training support Support group enrollment Clinical Management Case management coordination Patient education + empowerment Care Collaboration Best-in-class care Motivational Interviewing Techniques Drug regimen assessment and collection of medication history Adherence calls Proactive PA & Rx renewal support 10 Improving adherence “ Technology Nurse Adherence Calls Prophylactic Starter Kits Compliance Packaging Patient Training & Education 11 Compliance & persistency Adherence tools Proactive side-effect management 12 Cost of ineffective care Category Surplus medication Most Recent Fill Days Name of Supply Drug Dispensed 11/27/2012 84 10/25/2012 84 8/2/2012 84 10/8/2012 28 Quantity on Hand Amount of Surplus / Waste Member had 4 week supply of 6 week Avonex medication on hand in early March surplus Enbrel Member did not set up first shipment 11 week Sureclick until early April surplus Member had 60 day supply of Humira medication on hand as of early May Member had a six week supply of Aranesp medication on hand in mid January 24 week surplus 10 week surplus Cost of surplus medications on-hand Waste due to member stopping therapy 9/17/2012 60 9/25/2012 84 6/6/2012 84 Member had 60 day supply of waste of 60 Sensipar medication on hand in May days Enbrel Member had 60 day supply of waste of 60 Sureclick medication on hand in early March days Enbrel Member had 60 day supply of waste of 60 Sureclick medication on hand in early April days AWP for surplus/wasted quantity $7,045.20 $7,295.90 $15,767.78 $7,462.50 $37,571.38 $2,129.76 $5,306.00 $5,306.00 Cost of excess drugs dispensed and not used due to discontinuation $12,741.76 TOTAL $50,313.14 13 Co-pay assistance controversy Traditional Drugs: Use of co-payment cards to bypass plan formularies, step edits and patient contribution Specialty Therapies: Co-payment assistance through foundation grants allows continuation of therapy Care collaboration = Improved patient outcomes 14 The bridge to breast cancer patient care: co-pay assistance Diagnosis: Metastatic breast and bone cancer $1,927.23 co-pay is roadblock to initiating therapy Funding team was awarded a Patient Advocate Foundation grant on behalf of patient 7-month case study 27% Prescriber faxes (average 3 per month) 73% Patient care phone calls (average 8 per month) *Physician discontinued therapy after 7 months due to anemia anemia Patient and prescriber communications, Diplomat Case Study, July 2013 – January 2014. 15 Higher cost-sharing leads to greater prescription abandonment Abandonment rate (%) Oral Oncolytic Abandonment Rate at Varying Cost-Sharing Amounts (n=7,638) (n=529) Streeter SB, et al. Am J Manag Care. 2011;17(5 Spec No.):SP38-SP44). (n=614) (n=1727) 16 1% reduction in cost-sharing can increase utilization of oral oncolytics up to 3.3% Increase in utilization with each 1% decrease in co-pay (%) 3.5 3.0 3.3% 2.7% 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 Oral Chemo <$1500 per Treatment Oral Chemo >$1500 per Treatment n=24,474 cancer patients, 20–69 years of age. Milliman Inc., Parity for oral and intravenous/injected cancer drugs. January 25, 2010. Available at: http://publications.milliman.com/research/health-rr/pdfs/parity-oral-intravenous-injected.pdf. Accessed March 3, 2013. 17 Bankruptcy rates for patients with cancer Ramsey S, Blough R, Kirchoff A, et.al. Washington State Cancer Patients Found To Be At Greater Risk For Bankruptcy Than People Without A Cancer Diagnosis. Health Affairs, May 2013;32(6):1143-1152. 18 Reporting: proof of collaborative value Patient satisfaction Medication adherence Pharmacist interventions Quality of life measures Cost avoidance outcomes Co-pay assistance summary Patient communication summary Specialty pipeline strategies 292 patients averaged 11.42 touches 3.16 Doctor - 28% Insurance - 11% 7.04 1.22 Patient - 62% Communications per patient, Diplomat Case Study, Q1 2013. 19 Questions 20