Intellectual Disability: Definition, Classification
Download
Report
Transcript Intellectual Disability: Definition, Classification
SW 644: Issues in Developmental Disabilities
The Wisconsin Children’s Long-Term Support Service
System: Where We’ve Been, Where We Are, and Where
We’re Going
Lecture Presenters: Beth Wroblewski, DHS DTLC Deputy
Administrator & Sally Mather, MSSW
Department of Health Services, Bureau of Long-Term Support
Children’s Section
Children’s Long-Term Supports
Where we’ve been
System focused on adults
Institutional settings
Colonies
Centers
Role of Parents
Educational Services
Right to an education for children
with disabilities
Segregated, self-contained
classrooms
Legislative Changes
Free and Appropriate Education
Evolution of WI Children’s LongTerm Support (CLTS) Programs
Family Support Program
Provides goods and services to keep
children in their homes
Grant funded – Board for People with
Developmental Disabilities
County expansion
Statewide
Evolution of WI CLTS Programs
Katie Beckett Program
Parent initiative
Tax Equity and Fairness Reform Act
Access to Medicaid Wisconsin Forward
card
Voluntary
Benefits
Children and families
Taxpayer
Evolution of WI CLTS Programs
Katie Beckett Program
Partnership
Public – Private
System – Family
Programmatic structure based on
partnership
Value parents as the experts
Families’ Experience
Historically
Disability as a medical condition
Disconnection of families
Messaging still occurs
Evolution of CLTS system
Normalization & Social Justice
Wolf Wolfensberger
Community inclusion as a civic issue
Values-based training
Evolution of CLTS continued…
Shift in systematic foundational
values
“light touch” v. comprehensive plans
Home and Community Based Service
(HCBS) waivers
Issue for families: some supports
available only in out-of-home
placements
Redesign of adult support system
Issues Surrounding Access
Fragmentation
Coordination
Issues when families are involved
with multiple systems
Choice in services
Menu: Fitting child to the available
programs and service options v. child
and family-centered planning
Outcome-based language
Quality
Who determines quality?
Are needs being met?
Are family-based outcomes being
achieved?
Funding
Evolution of system + State and
Federal regulations = Silos of funding
Compass Wisconsin
Blending sources of funding
More seamless for families
Concepts of Compass Wisconsin
Children and families as the North
Star
Partnering with families in navigation
Example re utilization of Family Support
Program
Trust
Access – Compass Wisconsin
Threshold
Concepts of Compass Wisconsin
(continued…)
Waiting list reduction
Relational v. “Transactional”
Wisconsin compared to other
States
Best-practice & value-based
Commitment to children and their
families
Waiting lists
Paternalistic language/values and
practice reflected
Learning opportunities
Conclusion
Continued Professional Development
Systematic Challenges
Caseload
Training
Learning conversation opportunities
Shift of shared responsibility to
entitlement
See Transcript for Biographical Information