Transcript Slide 1

Disaster
Laws
International norms for international
disaster response & preview of disaster
law at the 31st International Conference
Bridgetown, Barbados
October 19, 2011
David Fisher,
IFRC IDRL Programme Coordinator
www.ifrc.org
Saving lives, changing minds.
Disaster
Laws
Why legal preparedness for international
disaster response? (IDRL)
www.ifrc.org
Saving lives, changing minds.

More frequent and larger
natural disasters

More and different
international responders

Absence of procedure to
regulate the increasingly
complex context
Disaster
Laws
Research shows that the lack of legal
preparedness hampers int’l relief
Research
 27 legal case studies
 Global survey
 Regional forums
Findings
 Unnecessary delays and costs
 Unnecessary relief items, poor
coordination, lack of respect
www.ifrc.org
Saving lives, changing minds.
Disaster
Laws
A few anecdotes
www.ifrc.org
Saving lives, changing minds.
Disaster
Laws
Key global treaties
Istanbul Convention (1990)
Kyoto Convention (rev 1999)
Tampere Convention
(1998)
Convention on
Maritime Traffic (1965)
Chicago Convention,
Annex 9 (rev 2004)
www.ifrc.org
Saving lives, changing minds.
Conv. on UN P&I
(1946 & 1947)
Vienna Conv. (1961)
Int’l Health Regs
(rev 2005)
Covenant on ESCR
Rights (1966)
Disaster
Laws
Regional agreements
ASEAN
Agreement
Draft SAARC
Agreement
APEC Strategy
SCO Agreement
SOPAC
Agreement
EC Civil Protection
Mechanism
BSEC Agreement
NATO Guidelines
Inter-American
Convention
CDEMA Agreement
CAPRADE
Agreement
CEPREDENAC
Agreement
www.ifrc.org
Saving lives, changing minds.
Arab League
Agreement
ECOWAS
Mechanism
IGAD Agreement
Disaster
Laws
A few “soft law” instruments
Resolutions and Guidelines
UN General Assembly Resultion 46/182 (1991)
UN General Assembly Resultion 57/150 (2002) (INSARAG)
Oslo Guidelines on the Use of Military and Civil Defense
Assets in Disaster Relief (rev’d 2007)
Codes and Standards
Red Cross/NGO Code of Conduct (1994)
Sphere Charter and Minimum Standards (2000)
www.ifrc.org
Saving lives, changing minds.
Disaster
Laws
Red Cross/Red Crescent (Soft) Law


Status Agreements
Statutes of the Movement
 Roles of the components
 fundamental principles

Principles and Rules
 mechanisms
components

Other resolutions on facilities for the
Movement

www.ifrc.org
Saving lives, changing minds.
for assistance between
visas, radio frequencies
Disaster
Laws
Achievement of the 30th International
Conference: the IDRL Guidelines
www.ifrc.org
Saving lives, changing minds.

Adopted by consensus by the state
parties to the Geneva Conventions in
2007

Compile existing international norms
and best practice

Recommendations to governments on
how to prepare domestic laws and
procedures for international
assistance
Disaster
Laws
The IDRL Guidelines’ proposed legal
facilities

Personnel




Goods and equipment







www.ifrc.org
Saving lives, changing minds.
Customs clearance and duties
Food, vehicles, telecoms, medicines
Transport
Domestic legal status


Visas
Work permits
Professional qualifications
Power to open bank accounts, contract, etc.
Taxes
Security
Extended hours
Costs
Disaster
Laws

Aid providers always:




The IDRL Guidelines’ standards
Abide by domestic and international law
Coordinate with domestic authorities
Abide by humanitarian principles
To the greatest extent practicable, they:





Meet int’l quality standards
Coordinate with other actors
Involve beneficiaries
Use fully trained personnel
Build on local capacities
www.ifrc.org
Saving lives, changing minds.
Disaster
Laws
Three disaster law topics at the 31st
International Conference
Legal preparedness for international disaster
response (IDRL)
Legislating enhanced disaster risk reduction,
particularly at the community level
Regulatory barriers to emergency and transitional
shelter for people affected by natural disasters
www.ifrc.org
Saving lives, changing minds.
Disaster
Laws
Progress on country-level implementation
of the IDRL Guidelines
Reported follow-up on the IDRL Guidelines

9 new laws/
procedures
2009 Survey
2011 Survey
60
50
50
45
43

11 pending
40
30

20 formal
technical
assistance
projects
23
24
20
10
0
Using the IDRL
Dialogue about
Advised
Guidelines for
IDRL Guidelines
Government
laws
States (2009)
National Societies (2009)
www.ifrc.org
Saving lives, changing minds.
22
Disseminated the States following National Societies
Guidelines
up
following up
States (2011)
National Societies (2011)
Disaster
Laws
Progress on mainstreaming the IDRL
Guidelines (some examples)

International






Regional





www.ifrc.org
Saving lives, changing minds.
UNDAC preparedness missions
UNGA/ECOSOC resolutions
WCO resolution
ILC “draft articles”
Commonwealth
Americas/ASEAN questionnaires
OAS GA Resolution
AU Humanitarian Policy Framework
EU Council Conclusions
CAPRADE manual
Disaster
Laws
Why disaster risk reduction at the
community level?
www.ifrc.org
Saving lives, changing minds.

Prevention is much better than cure

Research shows that the
community level is consistently
under-served

Communities are also under-used
resources for their own protection
Disaster
Laws
What can legislation accomplish when it
comes to disaster risk reduction?
Legislation is an important tool to increase
impact at the community level – it can:




www.ifrc.org
Saving lives, changing minds.
empower communities to take an active role
promote full implementation of incentives
prioritize resources for community level work
encourage accountability
Disaster
Laws
Why regulatory barriers to emergency and
transitional shelter?
www.ifrc.org
Saving lives, changing minds.

Shelter is critical to health, safety and
recovery

Shelter professionals say that regulatory
issues are among the biggest barriers
they face

Many of these barriers have complex
origins – but, as a first step, short-term
answers must be found
Disaster
Laws
Regulatory barriers to shelter – key
questions
www.ifrc.org
Saving lives, changing minds.

What can be done for persons
who lack formal title?

How can we quickly obtain
(temporary) use of land?

How can we avoid homelessness
pending disputes over land
ownership?

How do we ensure equitable
shelter assistance?