Transcript Document
Travel Forecasting
for New Starts
The FTA Perspective
September 27, 2004
1
Topics
Why FTA cares about forecasts
What FTA is doing about forecasts
What FTA requires about forecasting
What project sponsors should be doing
2
Why FTA cares about forecasts
FTA responsibilities
Accuracy record of forecasts
External scrutiny
3
FTA Responsibilities
Evaluation of “New Starts” proposals
FTA Major Capital Investment Program
Discretionary funding
Annual recommendations to Congress
based on mandated criteria:
Mobility *
Environment *
Land use *
Operating efficiency *
Cost-effectiveness *
Finance *
* Strong ties
to travel
forecasting
4
FTA Responsibilities
Count all of the benefits (and costs)
Maintain a level playing field
Ensure that promises can be kept
Make solid cases for good projects
5
Accuracy of Forecasts
FTA analysis of 19 latest New Starts
Full Funding Grant Agreement
Subsequent to 1990 Pickrell report
Open to service
Documented guideway ridership forecasts
6
Accuracy of Forecasts
2003 assessment
Exceeded AA forecast:
80-100% of AA forecast:
70-80% of AA forecast:
3 of 19
3 of 19
4 of 19
1990 assessment
Exceeded AA forecast:
80-100% of AA forecast:
70-80% of AA forecast:
0 of 10
0 of 10
1 of 10
7
Accuracy of Forecasts
Conclusions
Forecast accuracy is much better
Risk of large errors still remains
Enhanced quality control is crucial
8
External Scrutiny
Annual
Office of Management and Budget
Congress
General Accounting Office
Special studies
Office of the Inspector General
General Accounting Office
9
What FTA is Doing
about Forecasts
User benefits
Detailed reporting of forecasts
Summit
Research
10
User Benefits
Transportation system user benefits
User benefits are the changes in mobility for
individual travelers that are caused by a
project or policy change, measured as hours of
travel time savings, and summed over all
travelers.
11
User Benefits
Changes in mobility
Shorter transit times: in-vehicle, walk, wait
Fewer transfers
Changes in unmeasured characteristics
Relief of crush loading conditions
(Shorter auto times due to lower congestion)
Project-oriented growth [new option in 2003]
12
Detailed Reporting
Reporting of trips and user benefits
Totals across all socio-economic segments
District-to-district summaries reports
Row totals, column totals thematic maps
Frequency distributions of per-trip benefits
Results for individual socio-economic
segments
13
Reporting: Transportation Benefits
for Individual Travel Markets
Report 1-5
Total User Benefits (hours) for the Build Alternative
All Transit-Access Markets
Home-Based-Work
Production
Attraction District
District
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17 | Total
-------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+-----1 CBD
|
4
-1
4
0
5
0
0
6
15
1
0
9
0
0
0
0
0 |
41
2 Urban
| 194
86
67
0
39
0
0
73 281
8
0 220
0
15
0
0
0 |
984
3 N Suburb | 135
50
37
0
21
0
0
10
39
2
0
54
0
3
0
0
0 |
351
4 N Rural
|
1
1
3
0
1
0
0
0
2
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0 |
10
5 W Suburb | 219 140
41
0
93
0
0
23 240
4
0
83
0
3
0
0
0 |
846
6 NW Suburb | -13
2
7
0
0
0
0
1
10
0
0
8
0
0
0
0
0 |
15
7 NW Rural |
42
18
13
0
5
0
0
2
4
0
0
8
0
0
0
0
0 |
93
8 S Suburb | 150
86
14
0
17
0
0 130
63
7
0
72
0
1
0
0
0 |
540
9 SW Suburb | 201 147
17
0 108
0
0
31 195
5
0
62
0
1
0
0
0 |
766
10 SE Suburb |
18
12
3
0
4
0
0
3
7
0
0
14
0
0
0
0
0 |
62
11 SE Rural |
2
4
2
0
1
0
0
1
3
1
0
8
0
0
0
0
0 |
22
12 E Suburb | 832 467
88
0 111
0
0
97 191
25
0 909
0
20
0
0
0 | 2739
13 E Rural
|
0
3
3
0
1
0
0
1
3
0
0
9
0
0
0
0
0 |
20
14 NE Suburb | 104
49
13
0
10
0
0
5
11
2
0
78
0
3
0
0
0 |
276
15 NE Rural | -41 -16
-2
0
-3
0
0
-1
-1
0
0
-7
0
0
0
0
0 |
-72
16 External | 835 345 123
0
79
0
0
37
95
7
0 138
0
8
0
0
0 | 1668
17 Other
|
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 |
4
-------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+-----Total
| 2684
432
493
0
1158
0
0
0
0 |
|
1396
0
0
420
61
1665
55
0
| 8364
14
Reporting: Transportation Benefits
for Travel Produced in Each Zone
15
Detailed Reporting
Unhappy outcomes
Previously unknown “properties” of models
Problems with highway time savings
Inconsistencies among models nationally
Problems in definitions of the alternatives
New opportunities
Understanding and refinement of projects
Making a better case for projects
16
Detailed Reporting
Brief “make the case” write-up
The case for your project as you and FTA can make
it given the “justification” criteria in TEA-21
“Three” pages supported by your forecasts
Problem(s) that you are trying to address
Causes of the problem(s)
Specific ways the project addresses the problem(s)
Reasons that the project is preferable to lower-cost options
17
Calculations in Summit
User benefit calculations
Embedded function
Several (in-stream) runs per build alternative
For each mode choice run (purpose; time of day?)
For summations across purposes, times of day
User specifications
Filenames
Table titles
18
Calculations in Summit
User benefit calculations
Required inputs
Special output file from base alternative
FTA-standard output file from build alternative
Zonedistrict equivalence file
Outputs
Report file – district-to-district user benefits; totals
Output file – district-to-district user benefits (binary)
19
Special Mode Choice Output
Files for Summit User Benefits
Prices/Quantities files from mode choice application
HBW
HBO
NHB
TRIP GEN;
TRIP DIST
TRIP GEN;
TRIP DIST
TRIP GEN;
TRIP DIST
MODE
CHOICE
TIME OF DAY;
ASSIGNMENT
HBW
Ps/Qs
MODE
CHOICE
TIME OF DAY;
ASSIGNMENT
HBO
Ps/Qs
MODE
CHOICE
NHB
Ps/Qs
TIME OF DAY;
ASSIGNMENT
20
Summit Applications to
Compute User Benefits
Summit applications: Alternative versus Base
Alt
HBW
Ps/Qs
Alt
HBO
Ps/Qs
Summit
Base
HBW
Ps/Qs
User
Bens:
D-D &
TEsum
Summit
Base
HBO
Ps/Qs
User
Bens:
D-D &
TEsum
Summit
Alt
NHB
Ps/Qs
Summit
Base
NHB
Ps/Qs
User
Bens:
D-D &
TEsum
District-District
Row/Col-Sums
21
Calculations in Summit
Other features
Analytical reporting of forecasts
Row-sums and column sums GIS
Selected rows and columns GIS
Trip-length frequency distributions grapher
Trip tables stratified by + and – user benefits
Analytical summaries of trip tables
Software interfaces: TP+
TransCAD
Emme/2
MinUTP
TRANPLAN
22
Research
Technical methods
Reliable quantification of congestion relief
Reasonable alternative-specific constants
Synthesis of data on guideway ridership
Approaches to quality control
Others
Guidance and requirements
23
What FTA Requires
about Forecasting for New Starts
Models that tell a coherent story
Forecasts that can be explained
A case for the project built upon insights
obtained from the forecasts
24
Coherent Models
Consistency with current good practice
Level playing field
Likelihood of “promises kept”
Threats to coherency of models
Naïve or less-than-rigorous calibration and validation
Incorrect travel markets represented in person-trip tables
Odd properties in mode choice models
Inconsistencies between transit path-builder and mode choice
Inaccurate network speeds for auto and bus travel
25
Model Calibration, Validation
Does it tell a coherent story about behavior?
Nesting structure and coefficients
Constants and implied effect of unincluded attributes
Does it reproduce current travel patterns?
Any beginner can match totals by adjusting Ks
Scrutiny of markets and patterns within the totals
Does it predict rational responses to change?
For changes inherent in New Starts projects
For all model components
26
Travel Markets
Trip productions & traveler characteristics
Production-attraction flows
Characteristics of travelers
Implications for mode choice
Calibration
Forecasting
27
Mode Choice
Unusual coefficients
Bizarre alternative-specific constants
Non-Logit decision rules
Problems in choice-set formation
28
Transit Path-Builder and
Mode Choice Model
Conformance between parameters in:
Transit path selection
Mode choice utility expressions for transit choices
Consequences of disagreement
“Better” paths may look worse to mode choice
Build alternatives may lose some trips and benefits
Consistency crucial; possible exceptions
Bifurcation of 1st wait time?
Treatment of transfers?
29
Network Speeds
Highway
Replication of current average travel times
Comparability between alternatives
Bus
Relationship to auto speeds
Replication of current average travel times
Handling of “dead” highway links
30
Bottom Line
Purpose of models
Insights into problems, solutions, benefits
Development of a solid case for a project
Required performance by models
Remain consistent with current good practice
Provide coherent insights
Support a coherent story about the project
31