Transcript Slide 1

Chapter 4

Measurement Issues in Research Sum 2014

Dawn M. McBride

The Process of Research in Psychology

Second Edition

Steps in the Research Process

2 Dawn M. McBride The Process of Research in Psychology, 2nd Edition © 2013 SAGE Publications, Inc.

Variables: Operational Definition

3  Way to

measure

or

manipulate

(construct) in a research study a concept  Example: intelligence -

numerical measure

  Q test score; GPA -- problem-solving accuracy  Example: treatments  

Groups - Nominal

Manual for Cognitive Behavior and for Interpersonal treatment Violent videogames and non violent-videogames Dawn M. McBride - The Process of Research in Psychology, 2 nd Edition © 2013 SAGE Publications, Inc.

Scales of Measurement

4 Dawn M. McBride - The Process of Research in Psychology, 2 nd Edition © 2013 SAGE Publications, Inc.

5

Scales of Measurement

Nominal

: non-ordered category responses  Example: Groups formed based on : #1 How do you feel today? (Circle one)

happy sad anxious excited

#2 Condition: Type of Condition

Violent

or

non-violent

videogame Dawn M. McBride The Process of Research in Psychology, 2nd Edition © 2013 SAGE Publications, Inc.

6

Scales of Measurement

Ordinal:

ordered category responses; no equal space between categories;

not numerical

 Example: How do you feel today? (Circle one)

Scales of Measurement

Interval

: equally spaced, numerical responses, values are not ratio relations  Example: Rate your pain (

Likert Scale

) 7 A rating of 10 twice the pain of a 5

Scales of Measurement

8 

Ratio:

equally spaced, numerical responses, values are ratio relations (difference between 4 and 8 = difference between 6 and 12)  Examples:  Time   Length Accuracy Distance Height Weight Dawn M. McBride - The Process of Research in Psychology, 2 nd Edition © 2013 SAGE Publications, Inc.

9

Validity of Scales

Construct validity

:

scale measures the construct it was designed to measure

(e.g. behavior, attitude, belief, value, feeling, state) 

Face validity

 Do the scale (items, drawings) reflect the construct of interest ?

Dawn M. McBride The Process of Research in Psychology, 2nd Edition © 2013 SAGE Publications, Inc.

Construct Validity

Concurrent Validity

 A new measure of depression

correlates highly

with the Beck Depression Inventory 10 

Discriminant Validity

 A measure of parenting

does not correlate

highly with a measure of Social Desirability Dawn M. McBride - The Process of Research in Psychology, 2 nd Edition © 2013 SAGE Publications, Inc.

Construct Validity

Predictive Validity

 SAT score (taken now) predicts College GPA (some time later) 11 

In sum

Validity

of numerical scales is determined by examining the correlation of the scores with scores in other numerical scales Dawn M. McBride The Process of Research in Psychology, 2nd Edition © 2013 SAGE Publications, Inc.

12

Name of the Scale: Type of Scale:

Nominal, Ordinal, Interval, Ratio ?

Dawn M. McBride - The Process of Research in Psychology, 2 nd Edition © 2013 SAGE Publications, Inc.

13

Name of the Scale: Distress Disclosure Index Type of Scale:

Nominal, Ordinal,

Interval

, Ratio

Likert

14

Reliability:

Consistency of Measurement

15

Reliability: Measures

Test-retest reliability

Internal reliability

Inter-rater reliability - Observations

16

Reliability: Measures

Test-Retest

Responses do not change across time

 With no intervention, participants respond to scale similarly across two points in time 

Internal

Responses are consistent across items in the survey

  Similar score with

different forms

Similar scores in two half's of the test

17

Reliability: Measures

Inter-rater reliability - Observations

 Several observers rate behaviors in a similar way

18

Independent Variables

:

Experimental Research

Manipulation Independent Variables: Type and Amount

19 

Type

 Compares different that is manipulated

versions

of the “something”  drugs or therapies   versions of an ad or product different types of instructions  All groups include the factor being compared  Each group

receives a different type or version

of that factor (between groups designs) Dawn M. McBride - The Process of Research in Psychology, 2 nd Edition © 2013 SAGE Publications, Inc.

20

IV: Type of Video Game DV:

Manipulation: Independent Variables Type and Amount

Amount

 manipulates amount (quantity, intensity, length of time) of a factor in each group  Quantity of drug that is optimal for relieving symptoms   Off time between the study and test of material memory research Intensity of noise 21 Dawn M. McBride - The Process of Research in Psychology, 2 nd Edition © 2013 SAGE Publications, Inc.

22

IV: Amount of Sleep DV: Reaction Time

Designs: Independent Variables

Bivalent design:

 an independent variable with

two levels

or groups: 

Multivalent design:

 an independent variable that includes

three or more levels

or groups 23 Dawn M. McBride - The Process of Research in Psychology, 2 nd Edition © 2013 SAGE Publications, Inc.

24

IV: Type : consequence observed in the model DV: Extent child imitated model ’s behavior

25

Quasi- Independent Variables

:

Quasi-Independent Subject in Experimental Designs : Variables

 Characteristic of the participant s that is used to group participants

in the analysis of the data

– e.g. Gender – Age  Effect of IV on DV is observed separagtelty for the various groups 26  Caution in reaching conclusions, since randomization is not possible .

27

IV(s): Consequence observed & Gender (ANOVA) DV: Extent child imitated model’s behavior

28

Quasi-Experiment Design

 Participants are assigned to different treatments based

on already existing groups

 5 th grade Homerooms A and B and C- Bandura study  Researcher is unable to manipulate participants assignment to treatments, therefore there is no

Randomization

at all  Groups are compared in the same way as in experimental designs Dawn M. McBride - The Process of Research in Psychology, 2 nd Edition © 2013 SAGE Publications, Inc.

29

HRA- Reward Model ; HRB Punish Model ; HRC- No consequence Model (Bias)

30

Bias: Experimental Designs

 Bias can lower internal validity of experiment  A study with

good internal validity

provides a good test of 

a causal hypothesis

 controls for

confounding factors

that could affect results, but are not of interest in the study.  In other words, a study with good internal validity will remove

alternative explanations for the findings

(besides the independent variable). Dawn M. McBride - The Process of Research in Psychology, 2 nd Edition © 2013 SAGE Publications, Inc.

31

Sources of Bias in Research

Treatment Group differences

(randomization does not always work) 

Experimenter bias

(e.g. allegiance effect )  Single and double blind studies (deception) 

Testing effects

(order, practice, fatigue)  Survey Research: vary order of measures across participants Dawn M. McBride The Process of Research in Psychology, 2nd Edition © 2013 SAGE Publications, Inc.

Sources of Bias in Experiments

32 

Regression towards the mean

 Extreme scores are not likely to recur  Difficult Bias to Remove     Random assignment Use several repetitions of the test that measures DV for each condition Taking outliers out of the data Large number of participants (dilutes extreme scores) Dawn M. McBride - The Process of Research in Psychology, 2 nd Edition © 2013 SAGE Publications, Inc.

33

External Validity: Experiment

 External validity is the degree to which a study:   measures realistic behaviors and results can be generalized to every day life  If participants behave in a research study the way they would in their everyday lives, then the study has good external validity. Dawn M. McBride The Process of Research in Psychology, 2nd Edition © 2013 SAGE Publications, Inc.

34

External Validity

External Validity can be affected by:

 Hawthorne effect  Demand Characteristics   Participants

comply with or contradict

what they perceive is expected from them Deception – does not always work Dawn M. McBride - The Process of Research in Psychology, 2 nd Edition © 2013 SAGE Publications, Inc.

ZERO-SUM Game

35

Internal Validity External Validity

Between-Within Subjects Designs

Between Subject

 Different participants receive different treatments 

Within Subjects

 All participants receive the same treatments some times in different order 36 Dawn M. McBride - The Process of Research in Psychology, 2 nd Edition © 2013 SAGE Publications, Inc.

Smith & Moynan (2008)

Within Subject Manipulation

 IV #1 = type of word list – Categories: neutral, emotional/memorable, and emotional/not memorable

Between Subject

 IV #2 = filler activity (control and “forget” tasks ).

. 37 Dawn M. McBride The Process of Research in Psychology, 2nd Edition © 2013 SAGE Publications, Inc.

Smith & Monyan (2008)

Within Subjects

 #1 type of list (neutral, emotional and memorable, and emotional but not memorable);  

Between Subjects

# 2 filler activity (control and “forget” tasks).

38 Dawn M. McBride - The Process of Research in Psychology, 2 nd Edition © 2013 SAGE Publications, Inc.