Transcript Gap Analysis System

Perkins Accountability I
Secondary and Postsecondary
Overview
September 15, 2011
JoAnn Simser
State Director, CTE
System Director, Perkins Grant
Susan Carter & Denise Roseland
Office of the Chancellor
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
Dan Smith
Supervisor, Adult and Career Education
Center for Postsecondary Success
[email protected]
Marlys Bucher
CTE Assessment/Evaluation Perkins Coordinator
Center for Postsecondary Success
[email protected]
Goals
 Review the secondary & postsecondary
accountability indicators
-- definitions
-- data sources
-- changes from previous year
 Discuss the Local Negotiation Process
for FY12 and FY13
Slide 2
Secondary Data Sources
Student Data Collected Annually
• Collected using EDEN (MCCC)
• Data match with the Office of Higher
Education and with employment
data from Department of
Employment and Economic
Development (DEED)
• Technical Skill Assessment results
Slide 3
Secondary Definitions
Secondary Participant: an individual who
has participated in career and technical
education courses in one career field for 100
hours or more
Secondary Concentrator: an individual
who has participated successfully (passing
grade) in career and technical education
courses in one career field for 240 hours or
more
Secondary Completer: a secondary
concentrator who graduates from high school
Slide 4
Postsecondary Data Sources
• Student data from the system’s
Integrated Student Record System
(ISRS)
• Transfer data from the National
Student Clearinghouse
• Employment information from the
system Graduate Follow-up process
and from DEED
• Licensing board and Technical Skill
Assessment results
Slide 5
Postsecondary Data Structure
Minnesota is one of a handful of states to use a cohort
model. The use of cohorts aligns with other system
initiatives and reporting.
Perkins IV: Entry Cohort Reporting
FY 09 Cohort
FY 2009
Enter in
Summer
2008
FY 2010
FY 2011
Fall
2008
Spring
2009
Summer
2009
Fall
2009
Spring
2010
Summer
2010
Fall
2010
Spring
2011
Enter in
Fall
2008
Spring
2009
Summer
2009
Fall
2009
Spring
2010
Summer
2010
Fall
2010
Spring
2011
Enter in
Spring
2009
Summer
2009
Fall
2009
Spring
2010
Summer
2010
Fall
2010
Spring
2011
For example, the FY2009-2011 cohort includes students
entering in FY2009 and tracked for three years: 2009,
2010, and 2011
Slide 6
Postsecondary Definitions
Postsecondary Participant: a student taking
a CTE course OR who has a Perkins eligible
major
Postsecondary Concentrator: a student
with a Perkins eligible major who has declared
a CTE award (AAS, AS, Certificate, Diploma)
and has earned 12 or more credits OR who
has received an award in a short term Perkins
eligible program (less than 12 credits)
Postsecondary Completer: a student who
has received an award (AAS, AS, Certificate,
Diploma) in a Perkins eligible program
Slide 7
Final Agreed Upon Performance Levels
(FAUPL)
 Definitions for Core Indicators
 State Negotiated Performance Levels
Definitions for
Core
Indicators
Indicator
Slide 8
State Negotiated
Performance Level
– Accountable in
Dec. 2011 CAR
State Negotiated
Performance Level
– Accountable in
Dec. 2012 CAR
Perkins Core Indicators
Academic Attainment
Secondary
1S1 Academic Attainment –
Reading Language Arts
1S2 Academic Attainment –
Mathematics
Postsecondary
Slide 9
None
Perkins Core Indicators
Technical Skill Attainment
Secondary
Postsecondary
2S1 Technical Skill
Attainment
1P1 Technical Skill
Attainment
For more information on
Technical Skills Assessments, visit:
http://www.cte.mnscu.edu/programs/mntsa.html
Slide 10
Career Pathways Currently Expected to
Implement Technical Skill Assessments
within courses under Perkins IV:
•
•
•
AGRICULTURE, FOOD, &
NATURAL RESOURCES
•

Animal Systems
 Engineering and Technology

Plant Systems
 Facility and Mobile Equipment
Maintenance
ARTS, COMMUNICATIONS, &
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
•
HEALTH SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY
 Printing Technology
 Diagnostic Services
 Visual Arts
 Therapeutic Services
BUSINESS, MANAGEMENT, &
ADMINISTRATION
•
 Marketing Management
 Merchandising
 Professional Sales
HUMAN SERVICES
 Early Childhood Education (Early
Childhood Development and
Services AND Teaching/Training
(Birth to Gr 3)
 Accounting
Slide 11
ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING,
& TECHNOLOGY
 Law Enforcement Services
•
FOUNDATION KNOWLEDGE &
SKILLS
Perkins Core Indicators
Completion/Graduation
Secondary
3S1 School Completion
4S1 Student Graduation
Rate (NCLB)
Postsecondary 2P1 Credential,
Certificate or Degree
Slide 12
Perkins Core Indicators
Student Retention or Transfer
Slide 13
Secondary
None
Postsecondary
3P1 Student Retention or
Transfer
Perkins Core Indicators
Placement
Secondary
5S1 Placement
Postsecondary 4P1 Student Placement
Slide 14
Perkins Core Indicators
Nontraditional Participation
Secondary
6S1 Nontraditional
Participation
Postsecondary 5P1 Nontraditional
Participation
Slide 15
Perkins Core Indicators
Nontraditional Completion
Secondary
6S2 Nontraditional
Completion
Postsecondary 5P2 Nontraditional
Completion
Slide 16
State and Local Negotiations
OVAE/State Negotiations
State/Local Consortia
Negotiations
Evaluation of State Performance
-- Improvement Plans
Evaluation of Local Performance
-- Improvement Plans
Slide 22
OVAE/State Negotiation Process
for 2012 and 2013
Slide 23
Initial OVAE Proposal for
FY2012 and FY2013
March 2011
Deadline for State Response
March 2011
OVAE Review of State
Proposed Levels
April – June
2011
Final FAUPL (Final Agreed
Upon Performance Levels)
June 2011
Evaluation of Performance
2012 & 2013
CAR
State/Local Consortia Negotiation
Process for FY2012 Targets
Target Date
Development of State Proposed
Targets
September 2011
Distribution of Proposed Targets
to Local Consortia
October 18, 2011
Accountability Workshop
Overview
Secondary
Postsecondary
September 15, 2011
September 22, 2011
September 29, 2011
Consortia Responses Due
November 16, 2011
Initial State Response
November 29, 2011
Negotiations Completed
December 9, 2011
Evaluation of Performance
Slide 24
January 2013
Negotiating Your Targets
 Review the proposed targets
 Look at your data
– trends/preliminary data if available
 Discuss the targets with your partners
– any changes in policy or practice that
may affect performance outcomes?
 Understand the context and rationale
for the proposed targets
Slide 25
• Expectation of continuous improvement at the
state and local level
• Need for the state to be able to meet state
targets negotiated with OVAE
Negotiating Your Targets
 Determine if you will accept the proposed
targets or will propose alternatives.
 If you accept the state proposals-• Return the Negotiated Performance for
FY12-13 form
• Include BOTH secondary and
postsecondary signatures
 If you don’t accept the state proposals-• Notify the state
• Submit alternative target(s) along with the
rationale for the proposed alternative(s).
Slide 26
Factors in State Review of
Consortia Proposed Targets
 Rationale provided by the consortium
 Trend data
 Impact of proposed alternatives on
the ability of the state to meet the
state negotiated target
Slide 27
Improvement Plans
The language in the Act regarding improvement
plans and the withholding of funds is very
similar for states and local recipients.
Slide 28
State
Local
Section
123(a)(1): State
Improvement
Plan
Section
123(b)(2): Local
Improvement
Plan
Section
123(a)(3)(A):
Withholding
State Funds
Section
123(b)(4)(A):
Withholding
State Funds
State Improvement Plan Requirement
Section 123(a)(1)–Failure to Meet Agreed
Upon State Level of Performance
…fail to meet at least 90 percent of an agreed
upon State adjusted level of performance for any
of the core indicators…
…develop and implement a program
improvement plan (with special consideration to
performance gaps within subgroups)
…during the first program year succeeding the
program year for which the state failed to meet
the performance level.
Slide 29
Local Improvement Plan Requirement
Section 123(b)(2)–Failure to Meet Agreed
Upon Local Level of Performance
…fail to meet at least 90 percent of an agreed
upon State adjusted level of performance for any
of the core indicators…
…develop and implement a program
improvement plan (with special consideration to
performance gaps within subgroups)
…during the first program year succeeding the
program year for which the local recipient failed
to meet the performance level.
Slide 30
Withholding of Funds
Section 123(a)(3)(A) … the Secretary may
withhold all or a portion the state’s
administrative and leadership funds if a state …
Section 123(b)(4)(A) … the State may withhold all
or a portion of a local recipients funding if the
local recipient…
Slide 31
 Fails to implement an improvement plan.
 Fails to make any improvement within the
first program year of implementation of the
improvement plan.
 Fails to meet at least 90% of an agreed upon
performance level for three consecutive
years.
Withholding of Funds–State & Local
Sanctions may be waived due to
exceptional or uncontrollable
circumstances.
Withheld funds are to be used to
provide technical assistance.
Slide 32
Plans are underway to develop
statewide technical assistance for all
core indicators by consortia.
Evaluation of Performance – Local
At or above target –
No action
Negotiated Level
Below target, but
above 90% threshold
Report Required
Below 90% of target –
Perkins Law requires an
Improvement Plan
Slide 33
90% of Negotiated Level
Components of a Performance
Improvement Plan and Report
Needed to
complete
both
Improvement
reports and
improvement
plans
Needed to
complete
improvement
plans only
Slide 34
 Examination of the data—
comparison of the target level and
actual performance (incl. subgroups)
 Context—an explanation of why the
target was not met
 Identification of general strategies to
address performance gaps.
 Specific actions to be taken to
improve performance and to help the
consortium meet negotiated targets
in subsequent years.
Slide 35
TIME FOR YOUR QUESTIONS!
Please take a moment to enter your
questions in the Chat field to the right.
Slide 36
Upcoming Accountability Webinars
 Perkins Accountability II – Secondary
Sept. 22, 2011
2:00 p.m. – 3:00 p.m.
 Perkins Accountability II – Postsecondary
Sept. 29, 2011
2:00 p.m. – 3:00 p.m.
To register, go to:
www.cte.mnscu.edu/professionaldevelopment
Slide 37
Parting comments…
Thank you for all your valuable
suggestions, diligent efforts and hard
work to improve MN career and technical
education for students, staff and
employers.
Slide 38
Thanks for joining us today!
We value your feedback about today’s
session. Please click on the link in
the chat window now to complete the
session evaluation form.
REMINDER:
For secondary participants, Continuing Education Units (CEU’s) will be made
available for teachers and administrators for this series of webinars. In order to
get the necessary certificates you MUST complete the session evaluation.
Slide 39