Transcript Gap Analysis System - Career & Technical Education in

Perkins Accountability I:
Secondary and
Postsecondary Overview
September 20, 2012
Goals
Gain an understanding of
• Secondary and postsecondary core
indicators
• Definitions of participants, concentrators
and completers
• Data sources
• State and local negotiation process
• Improvement plans and reports
Secondary Data Sources
Student Data Collected Annually
• Collected using EDEN (MCCC)
• Data match with the Office of Higher
Education (OHE) and with employment
data from Department of Employment
and Economic Development (DEED)
• Technical Skill Assessment results
Secondary Definitions
Secondary Participant:
100 hours or more in one career field
Secondary Concentrator:
240 hours or more in one career field
Secondary Completer:
A concentrator who graduates
Postsecondary Data Sources
• Student data from the system’s Integrated
Statewide Record System (ISRS)
• National Student Clearinghouse
• Employment information from the system
Graduate Follow-Up process and from DEED
(Department of Employment and Economic
Development)
• Licensing board and Technical Skill Assessment
results from third parties
Postsecondary Data Structure
Minnesota is one of a handful of states to use a cohort
model. The use of cohorts aligns with other system
initiatives and reporting.
Perkins IV: Entry Cohort Reporting
FY 10 Cohort
FY 2010
Enter in
Summer
2009
FY 2011
FY 2012
Fall
2009
Spring
2010
Summer
2010
Fall
2010
Spring
2011
Summer
2011
Fall
2011
Spring
2012
Enter in
Fall
2009
Spring
2010
Summer
2010
Fall
2010
Spring
2011
Summer
2011
Fall
2011
Spring
2012
Enter in
Spring
2010
Summer
2010
Fall
2010
Spring
2011
Summer
2011
Fall
2011
Spring
2012
The FY2011-2012 cohort includes students entering in FY 2010 and tracked
for three years: 2010, 2011 and 2012.
Postsecondary Definitions
Participant:
Student taking a CTE course OR who has a
Perkins eligible major.
Concentrator:
Student with a Perkins eligible major who has
declared a CTE award (AAS, AS, Certificate, Diploma)
and has earned 12 or more college level credits OR
who has received an award in a short term Perkins
eligible program (less than 12 credits).
Completer:
Student who received a CTE award (AAS, AS,
Certificate or Diploma) in a Perkins eligible program.
Final Agreed Upon
Performance Levels (FAUPL)
 Definitions for Core Indicators
 State Negotiated Performance Levels
Definitions for
Core Indicators
Indicator
State Negotiated
Performance Level –
Accountable in Dec.
2011 CAR
State Negotiated
Performance Level –
Accountable in Dec.
2012 CAR
Perkins Core Indicators
Academic Attainment
Secondary
1S1 Academic Attainment –
Reading Language Arts
1S2 Academic Attainment –
Mathematics
Postsecondary
None
Perkins Core Indicators
Technical Skill Attainment
Secondary
Postsecondary
2S1 Technical Skill
Attainment
1P1 Technical Skill
Attainment
Career Pathways Currently
Expected to Implement
Technical Skill Assessments
AGRICULTURE, FOOD, & NATURAL
RESOURCES
• Animal Systems
• Plant Systems
• Environmental Services Systems
• Natural Resources Systems
ARTS, COMMUNICATIONS, & INFORMATION
SYSTEMS
• Printing Technology
• Visual Arts
BUSINESS, MANAGEMENT, &
ADMINISTRATION
• Accounting
• Marketing Management
• Merchandising
• Professional Sales
• Administrative Support
ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING, &
TECHNOLOGY
•
•
•
•
•
•
Engineering and Technology
Facility and Mobile Equipment
Maintenance
Construction
Production
Manufacturing Production Process
Development
Web & Digital Communications
FOUNDATION KNOWLEDGE & SKILLS
HEALTH SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY
•
•
•
Diagnostic Services
Therapeutic Services
Health Informatics
•
More on the next slide….
Career Pathways Currently
Expected to Implement
Technical Skill Assessments
HUMAN SERVICES
 Early Childhood Education (Early Childhood
Development and Services AND
Teaching/Training (Birth to Gr 3)
 Law Enforcement Services
• Emergency & Fire Management Services
• National Security
• Personal Care Services
• Restaurants & Food/ Beverage Services
• Teaching/ Training (K-12)
Resources for
Technical Skill Attainment
 MDE/MnSCU Position on
Technical Skill Assessment
Implementation
 FY10-FY14 Implementation
Timeline
 FY13 TSA Planning Calendar
 MnSCU Program Inventory by
College an CIP
 2012 Technical Skill
Assessment Handbook
 List of approved
assessments for pathways
currently requiring technical
skill assessments
http://www.cte.mnscu.edu/programs/mntsa.html
Perkins Core Indicators
Completion/Graduation
Secondary
Postsecondary
3S1 School Completion
4S1 Student Graduation
Rate (NCLB)
2P1 Credential,
Certificate or Degree
Perkins Core Indicators
Student Retention or Transfer
Secondary
Postsecondary
None
3P1 Student Retention or
Transfer
Perkins Core Indicators
Placement
Secondary
Postsecondary
5S1 Placement
4P1 Student Placement
Perkins Core Indicators
Nontraditional Participation
Secondary
Postsecondary
6S1 Nontraditional
Participation
5P1 Nontraditional
Participation
Perkins Core Indicators
Nontraditional Completion
Secondary
Postsecondary
6S2 Nontraditional
Completion
5P2 Nontraditional
Completion
State & Local Negotiations
OVAE/State Negotiations
State/Local Consortia Negotiations
Evaluation of State Performance
Improvement Plans
Evaluation of Local Performance
Improvement Plans
OVAE/State Negotiation
Process for 2012 and 2013
Initial OVAE Proposal for
FY2012 and FY2013
March 2011
Deadline for State Response
March 2011
OVAE Review of State Proposed
Levels
April – June
2011
Final FAUPL (Final Agreed Upon
Performance Levels)
June 2011
Evaluation of Performance
2012 & 2013
CAR
State/Local Negotiation
Process for FY 2013 Targets
Target Date
Development of State Proposed Targets
Accountability Workshops: Overview
Secondary
Postsecondary
Distribute Proposed Targets to Consortia
Fall Coordinators Meeting—
Breakout session on negotiations
September/October 2012
September 20, 2012
September 26, 2012
September 27, 2012
Mid to Late October 2012
November 14, 2012
Consortia Responses Due
Late November, 2012
Initial State Response
Early December 2012
Negotiations Completed
Mid December 2012
Evaluation of Performance
January 2014
Negotiating Your Targets




Review the proposed targets
Look at your data
– trends/preliminary data if available
Discuss the targets with your partners
– any changes in policy or practice that may affect
performance outcomes?
Understand the context and rationale for the
proposed targets
• Expectation of continuous improvement at the
state and local level
• Need for the state to be able to meet state targets
negotiated with OVAE
Negotiating Your Targets
 Determine if you will accept the proposed targets or
will propose alternatives.
 If you accept the state proposals-• Return the Negotiated Performance for FY1314 form
• Include BOTH secondary and postsecondary
signatures
 If you don’t accept the state proposals-• Notify the state
• Submit alternative target(s) along with the
rationale for the proposed alternative(s).
Negotiating Your Targets:
Factors in State Review of
Consortia Proposals
 Rationale provided by the consortium
 Trend data
 Impact of proposed alternatives on the
ability of the state to meet the state
negotiated target
Requirements for State and
Local Improvement Plans
The language in the Act regarding improvement plans
and the withholding of funds is very similar for states
and local recipients.
…fail to meet at least 90 percent of an agreed
upon State adjusted level of performance for any
of the core indicators…
…develop and implement a program
improvement plan (with special consideration to
performance gaps within subgroups)
…
Withholding Funds
Applies to State and Local Recipients
… the Secretary may withhold all or a portion the
state’s administrative and leadership funds if a state …
… the State may withhold all or a portion of a local
recipients funding if the local recipient…
 Fails to implement an improvement plan.
 Fails to make any improvement within the first
program year of implementation of the
improvement plan.
 Fails to meet at least 90% of an agreed upon
performance level for three consecutive years.
Withholding Funds
 Sanctions may be waived due to
exceptional or uncontrollable
circumstances.
 Withheld funds are to be used to provide
technical assistance.
 Development of statewide technical
assistance for core indicators.
Evaluation of
Local Performance
No action
At or above target
Negotiated Level
Report Required
Between 90% and 99%
Improvement Plan
Below 90% of target
90% of Negotiated Level
Improvement Plans and Reports
Improvement
Reports and
Plans
Improvement
Plans
 Examination of the data—comparison of the
target level and actual performance (incl.
subgroups)
 Identification of general strategies to address
performance gaps.
 Context—an explanation of why the target
was not met (optional for reports)
 Data and contextual factors for subpopulations or groups where gaps exist.
 Specific actions to be taken to improve
performance and to help the consortium meet
negotiated targets in subsequent years.
Resources for Improvement
Plans and Reports
http://www.cte.mnscu.edu/directories/portal.html
 Template and Overview
 MN Guide to Improvement Planning
Time for Your Questions!
Please take a moment to enter your
questions in the “Chat” field … or unmute
yourself and ask your questions.
Other Upcoming
Accountability Webinars
Perkins Accountability II - Secondary
September 26, 2012
10:00 - 11:00 a.m.
Perkins Accountability II - Postsecondary
September 27, 2012
10:00 – 11:00 a.m.
http://www.cte.mnscu.edu/professionaldevelopment/index.html
Other Upcoming
Webinars and Events
•
Perkins Fiscal Webinars
Tuesday, October 9, 2012
Overview: Perkins Fiscal Training Part I
Perkins Law
Monday, October 15, 2012
Overview: Perkins Fiscal Training Part II
Requirements to Receive Funds
Wednesday, October 17, 2012
Perkins Postsecondary Fiscal Procedures
and Requirements-Treatment of Money
Wednesday, October 24, 2012
Perkins Secondary Fiscal Procedures
and Requirements-Treatment of Money
•
Annual Fall Perkins Contacts and Coordinators Meeting
November 14, 2012
Minnesota Department of Education, Roseville, MN
•
Career Technical Education Fall Conference
CTE: Learning that Works for Minnesota
November 15, 2012
Crowne Plaza Minneapolis West, Plymouth, MN
http://www.cte.mnscu.edu/professionaldevelopment/index.html
Important Websites
MDE Website
http://education.state.mn.us/MDE/Academic_Excellence/Career_Technical_Education/Forms_Resources/index.html
MnSCU Website
http://www.cte.mnscu.edu/
Today’s presenters
JoAnn Simser
State Director, Career and Technical Education
Minnesota State Colleges and Universities
[email protected]
Dan Smith
Supervisor, Adult and Career Education
Center for Postsecondary Success
Minnesota Department of Education
[email protected]
Susan Carter
Associate Director for Research
Minnesota State Colleges and Universities
[email protected]
Marlys J. Bucher, Ph.D.
Secondary Perkins Coordinator
CTE Assessment and Evaluation Specialist
Minnesota Department of Education
[email protected]
Thanks for joining us today!
We value your feedback about today’s session.
Please click on the link here or in the chat
window now to complete the Session
Evaluation Form.
REMINDER:
For secondary participants, Continuing Education Units (CEU’s) will be made
available for teachers for this series of webinars. In order to get the necessary
certificates you MUST complete the session evaluation.