MRCE - Willis Internal pres
Download
Report
Transcript MRCE - Willis Internal pres
The Market Reform Contract Endorsement
and where are we going to take it and us?
Let’s start with a brief history lesson
2
Market Reform Contract Endorsement (MRCE)
● Why Guidance?
No prior definitive guide to Endorsements
Formal launch of new style documentation
Aids training and implementation
● Benefits
Assists in meeting code of practice, “Contract changes need to be
certain and documented properly”
3
Reduces the time and effort handling Contract Changes
Key Elements
● Eliminates use of the “honeycomb” endorsement condensing
the long established two document (and sometimes three)
process into one
● Allows for the MRCE to be used as an Insurer Authorised
Document or as a Broker Insurance Document (BID)
● Follows MRC approach and section layout
● Provides an unambiguous Settlement Due Date default position
● The MRCE may be used immediately; formally adopted as the
Market Standard after 31 March 2008
4
‘Old’ Honeycomb style
5
Cover Note Addendum
6
MRCE Standard Structure
STRUCTURE
MRCE Structure
Page header
RISK and ENDORSEMENT
IDENTIFICATION DETAILS
CONTRACT CHANGE(S)
Primary
sections
INFORMATION (where required)
Secondary
sections –
order of
sections is
reversible
7
CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION AND
ADVISORY
(mandatory, where applicable)
AGREEMENT
New style layout
Risk Identification and
Endorsement Details section
- Additional details may be
included
Contract Change(s) Section
using MRC format and
headings
8
New style layout
Contract Administration
and Advisory Section
(mandatory where
applicable)
Settlement Due Date
default position (always
include on APs)
Agreement Section –
GUA Example
Agreement Boxes –
ensure date of
agreement is captured
9
Evidencing Contract Changes
● The MRCE may be used irrespective of the form of the original
contract documentation
●MRCE approach to evidencing Contract Changes
10
A copy of the MRCE
A copy of the MRCE with the Contract Administration and
Advisory and Agreements sections in the contract
documentation being omitted
Brokers may also evidence agreements of change(s) to
contract(s) by means of a Broker Insurance Document
A formal policy endorsement document which is produced
and authorised in accordance with the Insurer Contract
Documentation heading of the MRC
e-MRCE
e-MRCE
Project Approach
● Primary target audience - the vast number of easy (noncomplex) endorsements
● As many as possible as quickly as possible
● Attaching an MRCE to an e-mail or message for agreement
and return to the broker
● Formal adoption criteria to join initiative
● Measurement
● E-mail being used as an interim stage (minimum entry
requirement)
12
Benefits Accumulation
Data
Integration
Benefits
Accumulation
Application/
Platform
E-mail
agreement
E-mail
delivery
Technology phase
MRCE
Face to Face
Implementation phase
Benefit increments not to scale
13
Benefits
Clients
● Align the relative low value that clients place on brokers and
insurers handling easy (non-complex) Contract Endorsements
with the actual expense to the Market
This means embedding a more cost effective and efficient process
for all
● Clients should benefit from quicker turnaround of agreement
process and therefore receive Contract documentation earlier –
supports achieving Contract Certainty
Regulator
● Code of practice states “Contract Changes need to be certain
and documented promptly”
14
Benefits
Insurers
● Allows insurers to apply “triage” to incoming endorsements
● Free up box time for more important , significant, productive and
valuable business
● Free up “line” underwriters time by matching materiality and value
with appropriate level of insurer personnel and personnel location
● “Following” markets see full audit trail and could be much more
easily notified when not an Agreement Party
● Much easier to get “agreed” endorsements into insurer’s systems
● Use the consistency of presentation and data to integrate into
insurer’s systems
15
Benefits
Brokers
● Reduce time spent on delivering endorsements to insurers
● Provides more control and clearer accountability
● Reduces hand-off between “Account Handlers” and “Market
Brokers”
● Simplifies onward confirmation of agreement to the Contract
Change(s) to the client
● Allows for parallel insurer agreement process which will speed
up endorsement agreement
● Affords the technology opportunity from the use of consistent
presentation/data to integrate into broker’s systems
● Encourages confidence in electronic trading in the London
Market and its growth and development
16
Adoption
● Assign a Project Champion
● Actively promote the change in culture and behaviour
● Determine which technology (if in doubt start with e-mail)
● Start in an easy place
Single agreement endorsements
Contracts with ‘regular’ endorsements
● Know the process e.g., dealing with “Urgent’s” and slow
responses
● Workflow considerations
● Changing roles and responsibilities in the organisation
● Simple measurement – collated by MRO
17
Remote Agreements – Technology overview
● E-mail – use with authentication software
● Document Repositories such as Lloyd’s Wordings Repository and ECF
Repository are also available for automatic download of documents.
● Electronic Forms. This is the simplest option, involving the use of electronic
forms for capturing or presenting information and using ACORD messages to
transport the information between trading parties.
● Direct Messaging refers to the ability to received and send (ACORD standard)
messages through your own gateway and integrate the documents and data
directly onto your own core systems.
● Messaging Hub. This is a web-based application offering users the ability to
route electronic messages between trading partners. It is used primarily to
outsource the connectivity configuration where there are multiple destinations for
sending/ receiving messages and keeping/maintaining live connections . Note:
some technology vendors sell messaging hubs that have electronic forms
integrated with them.
● Trading Platform. This is a web-based application offering users secure access
to a trading environment which provides placement workflow and data
management functionality via the internet. Risks may be bound on-line within the
trading platform.
18
What are the risks and issues?
Key Risks and issues
19
Resolution/mitigation
● Have to change the Culture and
Behaviour
● Requires commitment from each
organisation to adopt and adhere
to new practices and procedures
● Varying views from Brokers/Insurers
on method of deploying electronic
endorsements can act as barrier to
take-up
● being mitigated by Implementation
Pack guidance and the work of the
Electronic Placing Steering Group
● No common infrastructure or
(placing) systems platform that
facilitates endorsement agreements
● Standards and common processes
from usage scenarios. ACORD
working on standards. Service
Providers are already building
Endorsement solutions
● Endorsement numbers are not
currently officially monitored. For
proper and accurate measurement
of the penetration and success of
the initiative, Market-wide
endorsement statistics will be
required and centrally monitored
● Simple measurement approach for
now; count what is sent “remotely”
and what is agreed “remotely”.
Brokers and Insurers submit highlevel data
Next Steps
● December 2007, January and February 2008
● Finalise “starter” pack
Definitive e-mail guidance
Overview of remote agreement processes
Adoption and implementation considerations
Measurement
● Market guidance and presentations early 2008
Insurer Briefings
Broker Briefings
● Build-up market endorsement framework via cross-market
representation for:
Usage scenarios – Practitioners
Messaging standards – Associations/ACORD
Build systems around market framework – Technology providers
20