Transcript Document
MTFC and Multifunc Réttur til verdnar, virkni og velferdnar Barneverndarting 2014 Bernadette Christensen Norwegian Center for Child Behavioral Development Unirand, University of Oslo, Norway 7/17/2015 © The Norwegian Center for Child Behavioral Development Slide 1 Multidimensional Treatment Foster Care (MTFC) Intervention Model • Alternative to treating delinquent youth in institutions • Youth are placed individually in foster homes • Treatment in a family setting and focusing on the youth and the family Intensive support and treatment in a setting that closely mirrors normative life • Intensive parent management training is provided weekly to biological parents (or other aftercare resource) • Youth attend public schools 7/17/2015 © The Norwegian Center for Child Behavioral Development Side 2 MTFC • Objective: To prevent the negative trajectory of delinquent behavior by improving social adjustment with family members and peers through simultaneous and well-coordinated treatments in the youth’s natural environment: home, school, & community. • Treatment is provided in a family setting where new skills can be practiced and reinforced. 7/17/2015 © The Norwegian Center for Child Behavioral Development Side 3 Critical Components of MTFC: Known Risk and Protective Factors • Provision of close supervision • Provision of consistent limits and consequences for rule violations and antisocial behavior (nonharsh discipline) • Minimization of influence of delinquent peers • Daily adult mentoring • Encouragement/reinforcement for normative appropriate behavior and attitudes • Youth’s parents increase skills at supervision, limit setting, reinforcement 7/17/2015 © The Norwegian Center for Child Behavioral Development Side 4 Clinical Team • Program Supervisor– treatmentdirector • Family Therapist Individual Therapist Skills Trainer Foster Parent Recruiter/PDR Caller Foster Parent 7/17/2015 © The Norwegian Center for Child Behavioral Development Side 5 Individualtherapist Familytherapist Skillstrainer Familieterapi Family Supervisor Youth Fosterparents MTFC Fosterparent recruiter School Friends Recreati on Clinical Dynamic • Youth referred to MTFC Present with a high level of challenging behaviors – • typical parenting strategies are ineffective • Draw adults to set harsh reactive limits, to be negative, & to focus on discipline • Treatment supports foster parents & parents to re- establish the balance - reinforce normative & positive and to set non-punitive, appropriate limits 7/17/2015 © The Norwegian Center for Child Behavioral Development Side 7 Behavioral Program • The Point and Level system is a daily behavior management program. It provides a concrete way for parents to: • Teach appropriate skills • Reinforce desired behaviors or attitudes • Provide consequences for problem behavior • The pont and level system is developed tby the program supervisor to tailor the individual needs of each youth and it is implemented by fosterparents 7/17/2015 © The Norwegian Center for Child Behavioral Development Side 8 Legislative changes • MTFC is a hybrid between institutional placement and foster care • Until recently the legal position of MTFC was unclear • MTFC is now legally defined as an «institution with homes» • New regulations are in progress, and will define: – – – – The use and limits for use of ”force” for treatment purposes The obligations of the treatment team and foster home The competency demands on the team and foster home The need for at case manager with responsibility for all aspects of the treatment – The material demands on the foster home to be used – The need for quality assurance of the treatment 8 Randomized Trials • Youth (ages 9–18) leaving the Oregon State mental hospital fared better in MTFC than in usual community services (Chamberlain & Reid, 1991) • placed more quickly • lower rates of behavioral and emotional problems • stayed out of the hospital more days in follow-up • JJ Boys (ages 12–18) -- average of 14 criminal referrals (Chamberlain & Reid, 1998; Eddy, Whaley, & Chamberlain, 2004) • fewer official and self-reported follow-up offenses • spent more time in assigned placements returned to their families more often spent less time incarcerated and as runaways • had fewer violent offenses 7/17/2015 © The Norwegian Center for Child Behavioral Development Side 13 • JJ Girls (ages 13–17) -- average of 11 previous criminal referrals • (Chamberlain, Leve, & DeGarmo, 2007) • fewer incarcerations and less delinquency at follow-up • the amount of unsupervised time youth spent associating with antisocial peers was a strong predictor of official and self-reported delinquent activities at follow-up (Eddy & Chamberlain, 2000) 7/17/2015 © The Norwegian Center for Child Behavioral Development Side 14 Mediation Outcomes • Specific processes that drive positive outcomes: • positive relationship with a mentoring adult • close supervision • fair and consistent discipline for rule violations and antisocial behavior • completion of homework assignments 7/17/2015 © The Norwegian Center for Child Behavioral Development Side 15 Contingency Management (CM) • The early focus is engaging all key family members to participate and motivating them to alter their patterns that create and sustain substance use of youth and/or parents. • interventions are based on a functional analysis of the antecedents and consequences of drug use • Urine analyses are incorporated into treatment to provide a possibility for reward for clean urine screens • To support long term change once the urine screens and treatment are complete, positive incentives are awarded for other treatment activities such as session attendance and homework completion • Youth and adults proceed through treatment phases as their substance use is eliminated 7/17/2015 © The Norwegian Center for Child Behavioral Development Side 16 CM • Urine analyses are not conducted by FFT therapists but instead by family members in a way that empowers them to support each other’s efforts to eliminate substance use • Cognitive behavioral interventions are not merely therapist driven processes. Rather, family members are fully engaged by the therapist to participate and lead these activities to facilitate new relational processes and individual skills, • including core communication skills, supervision and monitoring skills, • builds comfort and confidence in talking about and monitoring substance use • families are taught new skills and strategies to combat triggers, urges, and cravings for substance use, 7/17/2015 © The Norwegian Center for Child Behavioral Development Side 17 CM • The families are provided with a range of positive and negative reinforcement strategies to increase healthy behaviors that replace unhealthy behaviors. • In the final phase of treatment, Generalization, youth and families extend the changes made during treatment into new situations and systems • A primary focus is on anticipating future triggers for relapse and high risk situations and developing and practicing strategies that can be implemented to prevent relapse 7/17/2015 © The Norwegian Center for Child Behavioral Development Side 18 The MultifunC-project was sponsored by the Ministry of Children and Equality in Norway, The National Board of Institutional Care (SiS) and Centre for Evaluation of Social Services (IMS) in Sweden. 1. Review of the research on residential treatment of antisocial behaviour in juveniles (2001-2002). 2. Development of a residential treatment program based on the research (2003-2004). 3. Implementing the treatment program – MultifunC - in Norway (five units) and in Sweden (two units) (2005-2007). Later also in Denmark. 4. Evaluation of the program (2010-14) The MultifunC-institutions Small units (8 juveniles in each unit) Open institutions (non-secure). This does not mean that they are free to go……….. Located close to community services (school, leisure/recreation activities and communication /transport) Makes it possible to establish prosocial contacts, to be in local schools, training in new skills in natural settings, and to maintain contact with family. Target group for MultifunC Juveniles with serious behaviour problems (crime, substance abuse, violence, etc.). High risk for future criminal behaviour (high total sum of risk factors – static and dynamic) Before placement the Risk level is assessed with the risk inventory Youth Level of Service/Case Management Inventory (YLS/CMI) Risk assessment tools Youth Level of Service / Case Management Inventory (YLS/CMI): • 42-item instrument designed to measure risk, need, and responsivity factors in adolescents who have had contact with the justice system. • It has been validated for use with both males and females between the ages of 12 and 17 YLS/CMI: Risk domains • • • • • • • • Prior and current offences/dispositions Family circumstances/parenting Education/Employment Peer relations Substance abuse Leisure/recreation Personality/behaviour Attitudes/orientation Risk level (YLS) 25 20 15 Admission Discharge 10 5 0 FFT MST MTFC YLS/CMI: Risk domains • • • • • • • • Prior and current offences/dispositions Family circumstances/parenting Education/Employment Peer relations Substance abuse Leisure/recreation Personality/behaviour Attitudes/orientation Family Peers •Parental skills •Decrease antisocial •Communication •Increase prosocial Treatment Targets Juvenile School •Behaviour •Attendance •Skills •Skills •Attitudes •Behaviour Treatment process Residential / institution Community Inntake Treatment Transition Motivation Motivation Prepare Family re-entry support Assesment Focused Treatment Structure Reintegration / aftercare Treatment climate Duration of residential stay: Duration of aftercare: about 6 months (not fixed) about 4-5 months (not fixed) Juvenile Focus of School treatment Peers Family Organizational model for each MultifunC-unit Leader Assessment and Planning team Mileau therapy -team Educational/ Pedagogical team Family- and After-care team For each juvenile there areTreatment teams across all teams including one or several staff from each team. Treatment that takes place during the residential stay with focus on the youth The treatment mileau: Control where this is neccesary, but no unneccessary control Involvement of the juveniles wherever this is possible Structure, but not unneccessary structure Principles from ”Core correctional practice” - staff behaviour Interventions with focus on individual juveniles: Motivating for change (based on Motivational Interviewing) Behavioural analysis and/or MST’s fit-cirkel Contingency Management Systems/Tocen economy and behavioural contracts Aggression Replacement Training (ART) Weekly treatment goals and evaluation of progress (intesivity) «Core correctional practice» (Andrews et al., 2004) • The firm, fair and clear use of authority • Modelling prosocial and anti-criminal attitudes and behaviour • Teaching concrete problem solving skills • Using community resources • Forming and working through warm, open and enthusiastic relationships Motivational interviewing • Motivational interviewing is a directive, clientcentered counseling style for eliciting behaviour change by helping clients to explore and resolve ambivalence. • Compared with nondirective counselling, it is more focused and goal-directed. The examination and resolution of ambivalence is its central purpose, and the counselor is intentionally directive in pursuing this goal. Treatment levels & Contingency Management Intake Residential treatment Re-entry CC (further) Contingency contract Individual General Intensive Aftercare Family contract Aggression Replacement Training (ART) Tocen economy and Motivational Interviewing motivates for change. The basis for actual change is new skills which makes changes possibly. Aggression Replacement Training (ART) consists of a multimodal intervention design that combines: Training in control of aggression (ACT), Training of social skills, and Learning of moral thinking (Goldstein og Glick, 1994). Model for Aftercare Youth Family team Parents School or work Peers Family support and aftercare Focus Increasing family affection/communication Increasing monitoring/supervision skills Methods: Principles from Parental Management Training (PMT) during the residential stay Principles from Multisystemic Therapy (MST) during leaves and aftercare Quality assurance systems • Written Manuals for each topic (assessment, treatment, aftercare and so on) is included in the treatment model • Training program for staffs • Weekly phone-consultations with checklists and discussions with each institution • Regularly Boosters on spesific topics The existing MultifunCTromsø Youth Centre institutions Stjørdal Youth Centre Bergen Youth Centre Brättegården Sandefjord Youth Centre Ås Youth Centre Two units in Denmark Råby Youth Centre Conclusions from a recent review (Mark Lipsey, 2010) The challenges in treatment of juvenile justice involved youth is not a result of a lack of knowledge. We now have research on best practices. We have learned about the importance of advancing our work on an ecological platform and to target risk factors on several domains, better connecting youth to family, school and to prosocial peers while utilizing a strenght based approach. The true challenge is not a lack of knowledge of what works, but rather in translating the robust body of knowledge into practice. MultifunC is presented in a chapter in a book in USA and England 2014: THERAPEUTIC RESIDENTIAL CARE WITH CHILDREN AND YOUTH, IDENTIFYING PROMISING PATHWAYS TO EVIDENCE-BASED INTERNATIONAL PRACTICE. Publicated: Jessica Kingsley Publishers, London, U.K. and Philadelphia,U.S.A. Edited by Whittaker, Fernandez del Valle and Holmes. We have some guidelines from reserach, but there is no «Magic bullet» (Lipsey, 2007). The End