SAMPLE MASTER SLIDE - Missouri State University

Download Report

Transcript SAMPLE MASTER SLIDE - Missouri State University

Missouri Association of Colleges for Teacher Education October 13, 2011

Missouri public schools: the best choice . . . The best results!

Missouri Education

2

What Have I Learned in the Past Year…….

TOY

L-1

PRAXIS ABCTE SAMs ISLLC

LA

NBPTS

…Acronyms

3

What Have I Learned in the Past Year…….

No Money $$$$$ More Work 4

What Have I Learned in the Past Year…….

Who are the Players… 5

Our Future, Our Teachers

Teacher Education Reform and Improvement Plan September 2011 6

The shape of the teaching profession is changing, raising the stakes on teacher preparation.

Teacher experience as share of workforce 1987-1988 7% 6% 5% 4% 3% 2% 1% 0% 1 Mode: 15 years of experience.

6 11 16 21 26 31 36 7% 6% 5% 4% 3% 2% 1% 0% 1 2007-2008 Mode: 1 year of experience.

6 11 16 21 26 31 36 7

Teachers are dissatisfied with their pre-service training.

62%

of new teachers

say

they graduated from their school of education

unprepared for “classroom realities.”

62% 8

Superintendents and principals are dissatisfied with pre-service teacher training.

Principals reporting their teachers were… … NOT prepared to work with parents: …NOT prepared to address needs of students from diverse cultural backgrounds : … NOT prepared to address needs of students with disabilities : …NOT prepared to address needs of students with limited English proficiency: …NOT prepared to maintain order and discipline in the classroom: 72% 70% 67% 79% 84% 9

2011Missouri's Survey Data …Understanding of how students differ in their approaches to learning unsatisfied satisfied …Designing lessons that address differentiated learning unsatisfied satisfied …Success in application of these lessons unsatisfied satisfied …Prepared to address needs of students with limited English proficiency unsatisfied satisfied 10 24% 35% 38% 37% 65% 62,6% 63.% 76%

The U. S. Department of Education is Proposing a Three Part Strategy

1. HEA Title II Regulations Revise federal reporting requirements to reduce burden and focus on the most important indicators of quality.

2. Presidential Teaching Fellows – A new $185 million program to support rigorous state-level policies and provide scholarships to attend top programs.

3. August F Hawkins Centers for Excellence - $40 million in first-time funding for a program supporting teacher preparation at minority-serving institutions.

11

Missouri Education Reform Plan 12

4 Goals:

Goal 1 – All Missouri students will graduate college and career ready.

Goal 2 – All Missouri children will enter kindergarten prepared to be successful in school.

Goal 3 – Missouri will prepare, develop and support effective educators.

Goal 4 – The Department will improve efficiency and operational effectiveness.

13

Goal 3 – Missouri will prepare, develop and support effective educators Objective 1:

By 2020, all candidates will be highly effective Strategy: Develop a process for approving educator prep programs based on current research and student achievement

14

Goal 3 – Missouri will prepare, develop and support effective educators Objective 2:

By 2020, all educators will be highly effective Strategies: Review and revise all licensure policies and procedures Provide districts access to educator evaluation resources aligned to educator standards

15

16

Student Success High Quality Instruction & Leadership Core Teaching Standards Growth Opportunities & Supports Professional Development Standards Common Core State Standards for Students 17 Educator & System Accountability Data Standards School Leader Standards

18

State Consortium on Educator Effectiveness

19

The Founding States

NCATE State Alliance

20

The Office of Educator Quality

Missouri Model Teacher and Leader Standards

21

Missouri Model Teacher and Leader Standards

A Resource for State Dialogue

A Resource for State Dialogue Adopted and approved by the Missouri State Board of Education: June 2011

22

Acknowledgments

• Partners involved with the creation / development • 27 organization partners • 32 school district partners • 25 higher education partners • Well-over 150 different people • More than 2 years of work overall 23

Senate Bill 291

June, 2010 • Missouri school districts are directed to adopt a set of teaching standards • The work of MACCE on educator standards (2009) served as starting point for the state model • The standards provide a model/resource available for use by districts 24

Model Teacher and Leader Standards

• The Core Concepts of Teaching and Leading • “articulate expectations of performance” • Articulate Expertise and Effectiveness • “develop student capacity for continuous academic and personal growth and development” • Purpose of the Model Standards • “serve as a resource for educators” • Extensive research-base • “inform and build collective capacity to grow and develop the knowledge and skills of students” 25

The Professional Continuum

Candidate

 College, university or state approved alternate pathway  Content knowledge and skills are developed 

New teacher/leader

 Entering the profession  Begin to apply knowledge and skills from preparation 

Developing

 Expanding knowledge and skills from experiences 

Proficient

 Continued advancement of knowledge and skills 

Distinguished

 Exhibits mastery and formal/informal leadership 26

Measures of Evidence

Multiple measures of evidence

help to determine the appropriate level of the educator  Examples of evidence also

provide a blueprint

for how to increase knowledge and skills 

Continuous improvement

is characterized by mastery and increasing levels of expertise 

Formative development

occurs through the use of rubrics for each indicator 27

2 1 0 7 6 5 4 3

Missouri Teacher Standards 36 Quality Indicators Quality Indicator Comparison

Content Knowledge Learning, Growth & Dev Curriculum Critical Thinking Classroom Environment Communictation Use of Student Data Professional Practice Collaboration 28

1 0 3 2 4

Missouri Leader Standards 12 Quality Indicators Quality Indicator Comparison

Vision, Mission, Goals Teaching & Learning Management Collaboration Ethics 29

Professional Commitment

Professional Frames

Professional Practice Teacher / Leader Standards

9 Standards/36 Indicators 5 Standards/12 Indicators

Professional Impact

30

Professional Frames of the Educator

Professional Commitment Professional Practice …agreement or pledge made as a result of being an educator Professional Impact …action or process of educating based on knowledge & skills …effect or cause that results because of the educating

31

32

Glossary of Key Terminology

 Provides a

collective definition

and understanding  Establishes

standardized language

using credible resources (i.e. InTASC Standards) 

34 terms

defined and referenced 32

Development of Missouri Standards for Educators

 Teachers  Leaders  Superintendent  Counselor  Librarian

All with diverse stakeholder direction and input!

33

Collective Capacity Strategy Model

Refine Model Evaluation System Intensive study of assessment rubrics with Pilot Project field test Common Language Build purpose, understanding and ownership MASA, MASSP, MAESP, MSTA, MNEA, AFT Model Evaluation System Standardized & Effective Refine the Continuum & Rubric Process Mentor new educators to grow from “new” to “developing” Refine the Continuum & Rubric Process Experienced Practitioners grow from “developing to proficient to

34

Phase I: Professional Continuum Teacher and Leader Standards

• Develop/Design/Adapt: In Collaboration with a Broad-based group of Educators • Examined Proposed Missouri Standards 2009 • InTASC Common Core Teaching Standards • Standards from other states • Experts in the field of research and development 35

Phase II. Educator Accountability and Assessment

• Develop/Design/Adapt: In Collaboration with a Broad-based group of Educators • Identify educators interested in being part of the work • Identify tools that are already out there • Identify what research says is best practice in teacher evaluation/assessment; in leader evaluation/assessment 36

Phase III. Redesign of Evaluation of Educational Preparation Programs

The development of highly effective educators

The establishment of standards wrapped in a professional continuum with data points and the development of a performance assessment system.

The Redesign Work Group focusing on scope & sequence, courses/competencies, assessment system; field & clinical experiences; candidate profiles; faculty profiles; and unit operations and resources.

37

Redesign has started!

The development of highly effective educators

The establishment of standards wrapped in a professional continuum with data points and the development of a performance assessment system.

38

Looking Ahead

What steps are ahead?

Approval of Unit and Program Standards with an implementation plan that allows phases of roll out.

Implementing institution and statewide assessment plans that inform program improvement

Resubmission & approval for unit and certification programs

Developing a new review process with an annual reporting system.

39

The Essence of Time

• Moving Forward • Discontinued the submission on December 1st • New institutions/units • Changes in current programs • Discontinue the MoSTEP Reviews (starting in 2011-12) and focus energies on the redesign, development of assessments including the annual reporting system, and resubmission of unit/programs. 40

The Essence of Time

• NCATE/MoSTEP Reviews • Conduct the 2011-2012 Reviews as scheduled • Truman State University (Piloting New Program Reporting Templates) • Missouri State University • University of Missouri – Kansas City (Piloting New Program Reporting Templates) • Develop a “Joint” partnership allowing Missouri Board of Examiner members to serve on NCATE/MO state reviews 41 41

The Essence of Time

• 2012-2013 work with institutions to delay their reviews until 2013-2014 (Optional) • Evangel University • Lincoln University • University of Missouri – St. Louis • Webster University • Northwest Missouri State University • 2013-2014 implement Joint Protocol and add Drury & Park University 42

43

The Essence of Time

• Work with TEAC to develop & implement a partnership agreement for our institutions belonging to TEAC • Development of the annual accountability process & reporting for community colleges 43

When I Grow Up I Want to Be a……

TEACHER!!!

44

What Have I Learned in the Past Year…….

• Exciting Work • Quality Educators Great Friends 45

dese.mo.gov

[email protected]

CONTACT US

46