Transcript Slide 1

Program Update
◦ Recovery Act authorized $2.25 billion for grants to
State housing credit agencies under HOME heading
 “Capital investment” in projects that received LIHTC
award in Federal FYs 2007, 2008, 2009
 Funds to replace lost equity and private financing
 Federal crosscutting requirements apply
 Davis-Bacon
 Section 504
 NEPA and LBP
 URA and Section 3 waived by Secretary
◦ TCAP projects must retain LIHTC awards
 Credits must be sold or claimed by the
developer
◦ Applications were due 6/4
◦ Grants expected to be made in July
◦ All funds must be expended by February 16, 2012


Authorized by HERA
Provides Grants to States for:
 Development and operating costs of rental housing for
very low-income and extremely low-income families
 Up to 10% of grants may be used for homeownership
assistance for extremely low-income families

Funding originally to be % of GSE new
originations
◦ Now is a part of the President’s 2010 Budget
 $1 Billion Request
◦ HUD will publish:
 Proposed rule on how formula
allocations will be determined
 Target date: July
 Proposed rule outlining all program
requirements:
 Target date: Late summer

Proposed HOME Rule is on hold
◦ Awaiting new CPD Leadership
◦ May be broken out into proposed changes and
interim changes for effect
•
Rental Compliance Guides
– Two guides on maintaining long-term compliance
with HOME requirements have been issued:
• PJ
• Project Owners Guide
– Guides explain rent, occupancy, and property
condition requirements at project completion and
during affordability period
– Available on HOME webpage and from Community
Connections (1-800-998-9999)


HUD OIG has been conducting both national
and individual audits of the HOME Program
Major Findings have been made that will
result in more OIG audits, increased focus
during monitoring and additional HUD
oversight
◦ Program Income
 Not being expended before program funds
 Many PJs have huge balances of PI
 Not being reported in IDIS
 Some PJs do not receipt program income
 Some PJ’s IDIS data do not match own records
 Not being properly accounted for in local accounts
 Some PJs’ accounting systems are deficient – cannot
distingush between HOME PI and HOME appropriated
funds that are drawn down and deposited in local account
before disbursement
•
Program Income – What to Expect:
– Increasing number of individual PJ audits assessing
use of PI and sufficiency of financial systems
– HOME Financial Training for PJs in every CPD Field
Office (training design underway)
– Increased CPD monitoring of Program Income,
including reconciliation of CAPER PI reporting and
IDIS entries
– HOME regulatory changes strengthening
requirements

Commitments
◦ PJs entering commitments in IDIS for projects:
 Before written agreement executed
 For which there is no written agreement at all
 Without reasonable expectation of construction
beginning within 12 months
 Which are allowed to sit for years with no draws
All four situations overstate HOME
commitments, unfairly allowing some PJs to
avoid deobligation of funds for failure to
meet 24- month deadline

As a result of the IG findings, OAHP did an
analysis of projects committed in IDIS for
>1 year with 0 draws:
There are 2,162 HOME projects committed in
IDIS for more than 1 year with 0 draws
The amount committed to these projects
exceeds $341 million
•
Commitments – What to Expect:
– Increasing number of individual PJ audits sufficiency
and timing of written agreements committing HOME
fund
– CPD monitoring to include assessing sufficiency of
agreements and comparing dates on agreements
and IDIS entries
– HQ will automatically begin cancelling project
committed for 1+ years with 0 draws
• Will start the month after PJ’s 24 month deadline