The Business Case for Dementia Care
Download
Report
Transcript The Business Case for Dementia Care
The Business Case for Dementia
Care
Mike Tullett
MKBCA
January 2011
What is dementia?
An umbrella term taking in over 30 types
A difficult medical diagnosis
4 main types- AD, Vas Dem, Mixed, Lewy Body
Different presentations but all hold characteristics of
Loss of cognitive function
Altered behaviour
Some extension of the person’s life course
A PROGRESSIVE CONDITION
Demography
614000 people aged 65yrs plus have dementia in UK (POPPI
2010*)
The National age related ratio is 1:13/65yrs *
Predictions are for a rise of nearly 400000* in 20 yrs, giving an
increase in dementia of 200 cases per year.
Population of Bucks is currently 479000 of which 32000 (14%)are
male over 65 yrs and 40000 (16.4%)are female.
Baseline figures would indicate 5500 PWD in Bucks.
Local demographics
The local Health Profile (Bucks 2008) identifies 15000
people with Vascular disease; 2279 people with Ca; 5000
with COPD. In comparison there are likely to be 5500 with
dementia although official figures are not available.
Added to this, the profile expects MK older population to
grow by 248% in the next decade. This will add to the 200
new cases of dementia predicted per year.
Local Provision
There are currently estimated to be 2700 beds for PWD in
the locality (67 homes: Range 4-120 beds).
The Alzheimer’s Society estimate 40% of PWD are requiring
Residential Care. By statistics we have an overload of
available beds of some 500 at this time.
Some alteration is expected in the light of funding cuts to
LAs, but it is clear dementia care is not an easy option, at
least for the next 2-3 years.
Government Policy
It is clear the changes in the NHS are unclear at this time.
However, the emphasis of care is placed upon the community and
upon families to look after their own.
The myth put out by the Government is that dementia is an illness
that may be relatively static. The use of anti-D drugs and CST are
being relied upon to stem the progression.
In contrast, Dementia is a progressive illness and current
approaches are short term.
Commissioning for Dementia Care
There are 3 strands to commissioning
Strategic Planning
Outcomes and procurement
Demand and Performance
Currently we are not seeing those strands in place within
Bucks. It is likely Bucks is at the start of developing their
strategy. The Care Home Audit sent out 6 Jan 2011 sought to
establish the prevalence of dementia.
Strategic Planning
The base line strategy follows the National Dementia Strategy. First and
foremost is the safety of the PWD in terms of meeting physical, mental
and social needs.
The second part of this string is the effectiveness of a service. The
Government want to use PROMs to measure effectiveness, alongside
other clinical measures. In keeping with the official stance they want to
see improvements in the PWD’s experience.
This experience cannot be held purely in the PWDs experience but
must cover relatives, informal carers and formal carers. The major
impacts of dementia in these groups are mental distress, guilt and
feelings of loss.
Outcomes and Procurements
Based in the NDS this makes reference to Living Well with
Dementia in Care Homes, and the reduced use of antipsychotic medication.
There are no qualitative measures in place to recognise when
such a state is achieved. We see a change from dependency
states to outcomes achieved, but these measures are not
robust.
At present there is no way of operating this strand of
commissioning.
Demand and Performance
There are measures to rely upon in this area.
NICE (2009; Quality Standards) include:
Appropriate training for staff- (What is available?)
Personalised assessment with a named coordinator
People with Mental Capacity have the opportunity to make: Advanced
statements, refusal of treatment, LPOA and Preferred priorities of Care
Physical symptoms and those that cause distress are analysed and
interventions planned
EOL Care is planned through the GSF or LCP
Outcomes of Demand and
Performance
Information is given to people to allow choice
Specialist care is provided to slow or even reverse the
progression of incapacity.
Challenging behaviour is managed rather than drugged.
Needs are seen early and appropriately supported to achieve
stability of co-morbidities
How will a Good Service benefit users
and commissioners?
DH 2010: The level of resources should be proportionate to
the value, complexity and risk. The higher the benefit, the
higher the cost.
Local commissioners need to know the benefits and the value
of our services
The Benefits
Reduced LOS in Hospital
Improved Hospital discharge
Prevention of re-admission and the avoidance of crises
Clarity of service purpose and expected outcomes. (Care
Pathway)
Provision of risk management strategies for users and family
Ability to adapt and manage partnership working
Effective management of co-morbidities
The provision of an information service for the community
Key elements for Commissioners
A service provision that demonstrates:
A Reflective culture acting within client’s best interests
Integration with local clinical networks
Adaptability and capability to work within the new
commissioning environment
Effective and consistent safeguarding procedures
Clear activity plans- Financial activity and care pathways
Cost effective support for vulnerable people
Quality Outcomes may include:
User experience strategies (DCM)
Incidence of:
Pressure sores
EA to hospital
Falls
UTIs
Staff turn over and agency use
Clinical errors (i.e Medicine errors)
Achievement of agreed goals
The Cost of Dementia care
Costs being driven down as demand increases
Our locality offer care at a range of $650 to $1295 per week
PCTs are seeking to return OOC placements and will accept
higher rates if there is a saving.
Very tight to gain reasonable price for movement from
Residential to Nursing care
Costs nationwide vary immensely.
We need a formula to identify the actual cost of care in
keeping with expected outcomes.