Transcript Slide 1
Grants Landscape II: Project, Proposal and Budget Development Office of Sponsored Programs Raubinger Hall, Room 107 William Paterson University 973-720-2852 June 2009 Contact Information: Staff: Martin Williams, Director TBH, Assistant Director for Pre-Award Services Beth Ann Bates, Program Assistant Graduate & Undergraduate Assistants Nina Jemmott, Associate Vice President and Dean, Graduate Studies and Research Office: Raubinger Hall 107 Phone: 973-720-2852, fax: 973-720-3573 Email: [email protected] Webpage: www.wpunj.edu/osp Agenda I. Grants Landscape I a) The Office of Sponsored Programs b) Proposal process c) Proposal components d) Searching for funding e) WPUNJ Process, Policies and Procedures regarding grants II. Grants Landscape II a) Elements of a proposal b) Guidelines and proposal review c) Narrative components d) Budget components Elements of a Proposal A. Cover Page, forms, signatures B. Abstract C. Narrative 1. 2. 3. 4. Background and problem statement Goals and objectives Activity Plan Evaluation D. Budget, budget support, other forms E. Appendix and support material Abstract • Every agency has its own way of naming the sections of a proposal – Grants.Gov has reduced this some but allows for flexibility for unique agency issues and added more – Can vary by department/unit within an agency • It is up to you as the applicant to do it the right way for the agency that will receive your application • It is also up to you as the applicant to use the correct forms, correct titles/headings, correct formatting and to ask for support for appropriate projects with appropriate costs Guidelines and Review Criteria Guidelines First! Read the Guidelines Thoroughly to: Verify Eligibility for the grant program Establish Connection to the funder’s mission, goals and the grant program’s expected outcomes Learn the Details of the application process, format, including special information or review requirements Get Answers to Questions: Call the Program staff! Evaluate whether the program is right for you, your project and the University Review Criteria: Content Narrative Requirements Their language for sections of the whole proposal Order of sections Information expectations for sections Point value for sections Evaluation Criteria The “Grading Rubric” for proposals Checklist MAY BE IN SEPARATE OR MULTIPLE DOCUMENTS The first & most important review issue is Intellectual Quality, Merit and Significance: How will the project advance “knowledge and understanding in its own field or across different fields?” (NSF) Does it “address an important problem?” & “How will scientific knowledge or practice be advanced?” (NIH) Is it “broadly conceived, based on sound scholarship, and appropriately analytical?” (NEH) ”The extent to which the design of the proposed project reflects up-todate knowledge from research and effective practice.” (US Dept of Education) Other Intellectual Quality Issues: Originality/Innovation: Does it address an innovative hypothesis or employ novel concepts, approaches, methodologies, tools or techniques? Validity of the need, goals, objectives and supporting information as presented Quality of participants Realistic design and likelihood for success Conducive facilities and environment The second most important review issue is Potential Broader Impact On project participants (you, others; direct, indirect)? On the service/support environment/infrastructure? Of the data or insights to be produced? Of how others will use the outcomes? • A Key Aspect to address is dissemination: • How will you share the outcomes with others? Other Broader Impact Issues: How well will the project/activity: • Promote integration of service, research and education? • Broaden the participation of underrepresented groups (e.g. genders, racial/ethnic minorities, persons with disabilities)? • Benefit your community and society in general? Review Criteria: Technical Was a Letter of Intent or Preliminary Proposal Required? Forms: Cover sheet, summaries, assurances Format: Length, margins, font size, attachments Organization: Specific sections in specific order Special Requirements: Human Subjects, ADA Letters of Commitment: Partners, Evaluators THESE ARE EASY EXCUSES TO REJECT PROPOSALS Narrative Component Writing Order 1. Activity Plan AND 2. Budget 3. Goals & Objectives 4. Background, Need(s), Problem(s), Benefits 5. Introduction: Credibility of PI/PD, WPU, etc. 6. Evaluation Plan 7. Dissemination Plan 8. Future Activity 9. Summary/Final Introduction/Abstract Project & Proposal Development Chart Office of Sponsored Programs, WPU A. Original ideas Literature, prior experience, other Preliminary work Funding guidelines Revised, expanded ideas B. Completely developed project 5. Introduction: credibility of PI/PD, WPU, partners 9. Summary, Introduction, Abstract 4. Background, needs, problems, benefits 3. Goals & Objectives 1. Activity Plan 2. Budget 6. Evaluation & Assessment 7. Dissemination 8. Future Activity Timeline, Personnel, Tables, Charts, Forms A P P E N D I C E S 1. Activity Plan or Methodology Rationale: Why are you doing project this way? Literature review, programs at other institutions Preliminary activities, outcomes and data Activities Plan and Accomplishments: Tasks Timeline Personnel: Who will perform each task? Resources: Facilities, Equipment, Supplies, Money? DETAILS! DETAILS! 2. Budget Budget Summary Total expenses by category Budget Detail or Narrative Present as narrative or spreadsheet (or both) Provides details on expenses by category Provides fiscal perspective on the project and narrative No expenses included in the budget that are not identified in the narrative No expenses in narrative that are not in the budget 3. Goals, Objectives, Outcomes Goal: A broad statement of the ultimate result of the research or change being pursued Objective: The narrowly defined, measurable and time-specific result you expect to accomplish Process vs. outcome objectives; Action verbs Interventions: To [direction of change] + [area of change] + [target population] + [degree of change] + [timeframe] Research: To [specific research activity] then [impact of research] on [status of problem/need] + [timeframe]. Outcomes: Short term accomplishments and long term impacts, direct and possibly indirect 4. Background, Problem, Needs, Benefits Defines what the project will address Who, what, where, when, why? Hard evidence and documentation Statistics, data, evidence From your literature search & preliminary activities Authoritative: Census data, government reports, credible experts and publications Anecdotal evidence gives life to statistics Impact/outcome if problem is addressed Link outcome to missions (You & funder) Summary or problem statement 5. Introduction: Credibility and Capacity Concise statement of project goal, including problem/need addressed and objectives Crucial information reader needs to know Discuss importance, innovation, creativity Concise statement describing project activities and key outcomes expected Crucial information reader needs to know How project addresses the funder’s priorities Related organizational and staff experience Previous successful related experience Discipline, Project & Grant Program-Specific Activity Plan Components These vary significantly based on the nature of the project, your discipline, and the specifics of grant program: 6. Evaluation/Assessment: What will success look like? How will it be documented? External Consultant(s)? 7. Dissemination of Results: Think realistic and attainable! Publications & Conference Presentations; Webpage? 8. Future Activities and Impact: Sustainability: $$$/infrastructure; You & your field If seed or start-up, this is very important 9. Proposal Summary or Abstract Stands alone at beginning First for agency staff and reviewers Important as public summary of project “Professional English” as well as “Plain English” May have special content requirements Limited length – usually one page or less Touches on all key details of project Ones that define the importance, impact and scope of the project: Goal, objectives & outcome Ones that are most important to the funder Ones that distinguish your project from others Appendices Summary Vita/Resume or Biographical Sketch Education and work history Related programmatic, research, publication or professional activities and experiences Leadership and peer-acknowledgement Letters of support Work or publicity samples Agency history, background and plans Agency tax status and financial statements The Ultimate Goal of a Proposal Abstract Helpful Hints: Content Be innovative wherever possible Based on what others are doing Focus on key questions Be convincing and thorough Demonstrate knowledge of subject State the expected contributions (outcomes) to your field of work Convey excitement and commitment Clearly link to the funder’s priorities Helpful Hints: Structure Clear, concise sentences Use section- and sub-headings Use page headings and number pages Avoid or define jargon or technical terms Be specific – Do not make readers assume Objective: “To increase rate by 25% in 2 years.” Activity: “The PI and a student will travel to North Park to collect samples on ten consecutive Saturdays. A sample will consist of . . .” Budgets Budget Basics Budget Details Budget Summary Total expenses by category Budget Detail or Narrative Present as narrative or spreadsheet (or both) Provides details on expenses by category Provides fiscal perspective on the project and narrative No expenses included in the budget that are not identified in the narrative No expenses in narrative that are not in the budget Process of developing the narrative and spreadsheet forces the technical review of the project methodology and overall activities Reason for tracking expense needs while preparing narrative BUT NOT doing the details until after the first complete draft of the narrative is finished Terminology • Direct Costs: Project-Specific Expenses – Personnel Costs: Salary and Wages, Taxes and Fringe benefits – Non-Personnel Costs: Equipment, supplies and materials, travel, publication charges, consultants, subcontracts, tuition, other costs • Indirect Costs – Also known as: Overhead, Indirect Cost Reimbursement, Facilities and Administration or F&A Rate, Administrative Costs, and Facilities Costs • Cost Sharing Personnel Costs • Types – Full time and part time professional or support staff – Undergraduate and Graduate Students – Post-Docs, Fellows or Research Associates • Salary and Wages – Salary, hourly wage, stipends – Percent of time or effort, straight computation – Calendar or summer salary • To obtain your salary – WPConnect/Employee Apps; call HR • To estimate future salary – Increase by 4.0% per year or use number from HR • How to estimate a colleague’s salary? – Ask them to provide (HR, WPConnect) or call HR – Sponsored Programs can find out from HR for you • Summer salary for faculty – Two months over the summer doing research • Two tenths of your annual salary for 100% of your time or a percentage of that amount if not 100% • Undergraduate Students – Typical rate $10.00/hour – Academic Year, 35 weeks; Summer, 12 weeks – Hours: Academic Year, 20 hrs; Summer 30 hours • Graduate Students – Grad Assistant: $6,000 stipend; 9-credit tuition & fees as a Fringe Benefit; September 1 to June 30, 20 hrs/week – Typical rate $15.00/hour for summer or if NOT a “Graduate Assistant” during the Academic Year – Academic Year 35 to 40 weeks, Summer, 8 - 12 weeks – Hours: Academic Year, 20 hrs; Summer 30 hours • Other Staff – Percentage of time and salary – Hourly, similar to Undergrad Student but higher rate Taxes & Fringe Benefits • Payroll Taxes – Federal Income Tax and Social Security (FICA) for all full and part time staff and faculty in July and August as well as faculty wages for overload or additional compensation – NJ taxes, disability, unemployment, other for full time staff and faculty during the academic year • Benefits – Pension, health insurance, other for full time staff • Rates – Federal Income Tax and Social Security: 7.65% (constant) – All items: 36.05% (changes annually – check with OSP) • Fringe Example – The granting agency will only support summer research salary of $7500.00 over the summer. – These funds must cover your salary and fringe during the summer. What number plus 8.9% of that number yields 7500? • 6887.05+(6887.05*0.089)=7500 – So your salary would be $6887.05 and the fringe based on that value would be $612.95. Non-Personnel Costs • Travel – Domestic • In-State and Local auto (48.5 or 31.5 c), bus, van, taxi • Out-of-State estimated costs for plane/train, per diem as per city, registration costs – International • Costs estimated similar to out-of-state • Funder must approve; US Air Carrier requirement – Specific reason – Specific locations if known • Equipment – Single items over $5,000 – Specific items, capabilities or expectations – Best price for application; may need to attach bid/estimate • Student Support – Tuition, fees, “cost of education” – Stipends, travel, other expenses • Consultants and Contractors – Limited purpose support that could be provided by another person or company – Independent contractors – Set fee or formula • Subaward/Subcontract – Critical, significant, irreplaceable element of project – Usually includes a Co-PI/PD and partner institution – Costs computed as “prime” award and appropriate forms and support letter attached • Supplies & Materials – Office, lab, program, educational, books, software – Computers, small “equipment,” furniture • Publication/Dissemination Costs – Reprints, technical production costs • Other – Memberships, registrations, subscriptions, refreshments – Other expenses not covered elsewhere Indirect Costs • Indirect Costs are reimbursed for common facility and administrative expenses that cannot be identified specifically with a particular sponsored project. – Facilities • Office, lab, classroom, seminar/conference rooms • Electricity, heat, water, snow plowing • Incidental photocopying, telephone, office supplies – Administration • Financial Administration (HR, Accounting, Payroll) • Academic Administration (Provost, Deans, Sponsored Programs) • Library, IRT • Indirect Cost at WPUNJ – Negotiated through the Department of Health and Human Services using the “Short Form” – Based on a percentage of Salary and Wages • 68.8% to June 30; 59.5 2009-2012 – Department of Education, other agencies • 8% for education and other non-research projects – “Long Form” provides the Modified Total Direct Costs (MTDC) Rate used at research-intensive institutions Indirect Costs Calculation • Example – A proposal includes $50,000 in salary and $50,000 for fringe, equipment and other expenses – The indirect cost is based on the salary portion of the request or ($50,000) and is determined by the indirect rate x salaries • 50,000 x 0.688 = 34,400 – The total request would then be • $50,000 (salary) + $50,000 (all other)+ $34,400 (indirect) = $134,400 Matching Costs • Project funds listed on the proposal that don’t come from the funding agency. – Required or Voluntary Committed Match • Soft Costs: Already planned expenses or allocations • Hard Costs: New funds that the institution will provide – External Matching • Funds that are being applied to the project from other grants, private funds or partner institutions – In-Kind Contribution • Donated goods or services provided by a third party • When included? • Only when it is required or suggested for competitiveness • Always there, whether or not budgeted • Who pays? • Home Department (Chair’s approval) • Another Department (documentable cost whether or not actually charged) • College (Dean’s approval) • Provost’s Office (Provost’s Approval) • Other Funding (Internal/External) • When Agreed? • Discuss during project/proposal development • Authorized during review process Use Excel / Spreadsheet Program • Excel is a spreadsheet that is relatively straightforward to use – Formulas for accurate math – Tracks year to year costs and increments – Tracks annual and cumulative total costs • Spend some time to learn the program – On campus workshops to learn the basics – Many good uses once you learn it • OSP has worksheets for NSF, USED, USDA Sample Detailed Budget Category Personnel Fringe Supplies Consultants Travel Item Proj. Dir. Cost Detail Funder Matching Total $150,000 x 15% 15,000 7,500 $22,500 x 33.15% 4,973 2,486 Ed. Materials 2000 @ $5 avg cost 10,000 Evaluation 5 days @ $500/day 2,500 To conf. In Proj Dir, round trip 250 250 Washington train @ $250 + hotel Total Direct Expense 32,723 10,236 Indirect 68.8% Salary + Wages 10,320 5,160 Total Project Expenses 43,043 15,396 22,500 7,459 10,000 2,500 500 42,959 15,480 58,439 Summary Budget • Agency form • Provides quick-view of entire cost of project in the funder’s format • Shows annual totals and/or total project cost Budget Justification • A narrative description of the financial aspect of the project • The budget justification should clearly detail the costs proposed and, in some instances, explain how the cost was determined by stating the formula from the spreadsheet • Can incorporate selections (tables) from the spreadsheet • Compare the budget justification to the budget detail to make sure all costs are justified • Review the project narrative and the budget narrative together to insure that expenses identified for project are included in budget and that the converse is true as well • Critical are for internal review • Get costs from appropriate sources How you probably feel right now ! Grant proposals are hard – but very “do-able.” Workshop Evaluation All responses are completely anonymous. Data will not be reported in a way that could divulge the identity of any respondents. Grants Landscape II: Project, Proposal and Budget Development June 2009 Contact Information Staff: Martin Williams, Director TBH, Ass’t Director, Pre-Award Beth Ann Bates, Program Assistant Nina Jemmott, Associate VP & Dean, Graduate Studies and Research Office: Raubinger Hall 107 Fax: 973-720-3573 Webpage: www.wpunj.edu/osp EXT 3263 EXT 3794 EXT 2852 EXT 3093