Transcript Slide 1

Common crystal structures
•Simple close packed structures
atoms
hard spheres
problem of structure
most efficient packing *
Donuts
*Proposition made by Goldschmidt 1926.
Useful approach for metals, where the chemical bond does not provide geometrical constrains like in diamond for instance
hexagonal layers packed in 2 different ways
hexagonal close-packed
Hexagonal Close-Packed Structure
cubic close packed
layers stack according to ABAB
hexagonal layers are stacked ABC
Cubic Close-Packed Structure
FCC

(close packed
structures
- unit cells
)
*
= FCC
* more complicated packing sequence such as ABAC, ABCB, etc
hcp and fcc have both 74% packing ratio :=
Volume of the spheres in the unit cell
100%
Volume the unit cell
all others including bcc have less packing ratio
Johannes Kepler asserted in the early 1600's that
no packing can improve the Face-Centered Cubic packing
Proof took nearly 400 years
!
1998 Thomas Hales (presently University of Pittsburgh) announced to have a proof of the
(click to see an e-mail of T.Hales
Kepler conjecture
announcing the proof)
Computer proof: minimizing a function with 150 variables
250 pages of notes and 3 gigabytes of computer programs, data and results
Lattices which can be considered as 2 interpenetrating fcc lattices
diamond lattice: not packing but symmetrically placed valence bonds
determine the structure
(0,0,0)
1 1 1
( , , )
4 4 4
diamond lattice: fcc lattice with basis
1 1 1
4 4 4
= two identical atoms at (0,0,0) and ( , , )
What happens if atoms of the basis are different
ZnS (zincblende), or GaAs
Four neighbors
all of opposite chemical species
(click here for animations)
?
1 1 1
( , , )
2 2 2
(0,0,0)
1 1 1
( , , )
2 2 2
(0,0,0)
NaCl:
fcc translational symmetry with basis
CsCl:
Simple cubic space lattice with basis
The most advantageous crystal structure for ionic solids*
NaCl
CsCl
versus
structure
Competition between packing and avoiding of e.g. anion-anion contact
RR+
To avoid
r0
r0 2
-
contact in NaCl structure
2  2R
R  R  2 R
R
 2 1
R
Radius Ratio
Coordination no.
Binary (AB) Structure-type
r+/r- = 1
12
none known
1 > r+/r- > 0.732
8
CsCl
0.732 > r+/r- > 0.414
6
NaCl
0.414 > r+/r- > 0.225
4
ZnS
r0
(*the explanation in Blakemore page 15 is misleading )