Transcript Tips and Strategy - International Scientific Publication Office

for international scientific journal
: tip and strategy
Ratya Anindita
Dekan FIB – Univ. Brawijaya
Editorial Board of Greener Journal, Nigeria
TIDAK SULIT
MENGAPA?
SIAPA:
SIAPAPUN YANG PERNAH MENULIS DI JURNAL NASIONAL
SIAPAPUN YANG MAU MENULIS JURNAL
BAGAIMANA ?
Ada tulisan yang sudah dipersiapkan
Paper hasil penelitian
 kualitas penelitian menentukan jurnal internasional yang
dituju
 bagaimana paper/artikel dapat diterima
Jurnal yang dituju
: jurnal yang memiliki reputasi internasional yang diakui DIKTI
Kenali jati diri
jurnal internasional
yang akan dituju
―sesuaikan tulisan dengan syarat dan ketentuan jurnal
menerapkan OJS, Open Journal System
penulis dan penyunting dari berbagai
negara
menerapkan single blind atau double
blind reviewing
penulis adalah pakar di bidangnya
ditulis dalam bahasa resmi PBB
terdaftar di lembaga indeks bereputasi:
- Google Scholar
-
DOAJ, Directory of Access Journals
Proquest, Copernicus
Eksevier/Scopus
Thomson Reuter
jurnal asing yang telah terindeks internasional
→ diakui bereputasi internasional
jurnal asing yang belum terindeks internasional,
ditetapkan oleh Tim Penilai Jurnal Ilmiah
Bereputasi Internasional
tertinggi derajat pengakuan orang padanya (terakreditasi)
terkuat pengaruhnya (bermakna vs tak terasa
kehadirannya): sering diacu → ditunjukkan: impact factor
terluas jangkauannya (bahasa internasional, on line)
terlebar wawasannya (keglobalan vs asal penulis)
terbaik kepionerannya (melulu hasil penelitian)
terbanyak pembacanya (besar tiras, on line)
tercepat pemerosesannya (panjang vs pendek antriannya)
tersering frekuensi terbitnya (lama vs sebentar masa
tunggunya)
The impact factor (IF) of an academic journal is a measure
reflecting the average number of citations to recent articles
published in the journal;
It is frequently used as a proxy for the relative importance
of a journal within its field, with journals with higher impact
factors deemed to be more important than those with lower
ones;
Impact factors are calculated yearly for those journals that
are indexed in the Journal Citation Reports.
The impact factor was devised by Eugene Garfield, the
founder of the Institute for Scientific Information.
In a given year, the IF of a journal is the average number of citations
received per paper published in that journal during the two preceding
years.
For example, if a journal has an IF of 3 in 2008,
then its papers published in 2006 and 2007 received 3 citations each
on average in 2008.
The 2008 IF of a journal would be calculated as follows:
A = the number of times that articles published in 2006 and 2007
were cited by indexed journals during 2008.
B = the total number of "citable items" published by that journal in
2006 and 2007. ("Citable items" are usually articles, reviews,
proceedings, or notes; not editorials or letters to the editor.)
2008 IF of journal = A/B.
Bagaimana jurnal di FIB?
http://journals.indexcopernicus.com/abstracted.php?icid=1016153
http://gjournalsreview.com/wordpress/?page_id=440
http://studiaoeconomica.ubbcluj.ro/
http://www.rjoas.com/
http://www.iiste.org/journal.html
http://www.gjournals.org
ada perbedaan:
fee
format
impact factor
Hati-hati dengan jurnal predator
Jeffrey Bealls, 2014 mempublikasikan
List of Predatory Publishers 2014
www.scholarlyoa.com
Fee berkisar antara 0 – lebih dari 700 US$
Check apakah ada impact factor
Apakah online jurnal
Editorial board
Apakah terhubung dengan library
Kalau tidak hati-hati akan membayar mahal dan mendapatkan
jurnal yang tidak berkualitas
Pelajari dua tiga nomor terbitan terakhirnya
Pahami guideline-nya
Pahami persyaratan yang diminta
Baca 3-4 artikel di dalamnya sambil
membandingkannya dengan petunjuknya
..... dan mulailah menulis untuk
menyiapkan naskah
Artikel untuk jurnal: non plagiarism dan memuat kebaruan (novelty)
Plagiarism: tindakan secara sengaja atau tidak sengaja dalam memperoleh
atau mencoba memperoleh kredit atau nilai suatu karya ilmiah dengan
mengutip sebagian atau seluruh karya dan/atau karya ilmiah pihak lain yang
diakui sebagai karya ilmiahnya, tanpa menyatakan sumber secara tepat dan
memadai.
Guideline ikuti sepenuhnya. Setiap jurnal memiliki format penulisan
yang berbeda. Kesalahan format yang diinginkan seringkali jadi
penyebab langsung ditolaknya naskah artikel
Ketaatan langsung pada konvensi bidang ilmu yang dianut jurnal
Mintalah rekan lain untuk membaca draft naskah
+ mengkritisinya
Baca sekali lagi naskah ―perbaiki kesalahan-kesalahan
minor
karena masalah spelling, salah ketik atau karena disebabkan terubahnya
format di dalam word processor oleh proses editing,
mis. tabel yang terpotong karena page break, halaman bergeser, dlsb.;
Pelajari bagaimana mengoperasikan OJS;
penyimpangan kecil atas prosedur OJS dapat menyebabkan naskah
ditolak komputer ―tahapan ini merupakan desk evaluation awal atas
“sosok administratif” naskah yang masuk;
Setelah naskah dikirim ......
akan melalui proses reviewing
The steps toward publication:
doing research ◄
write manuscript ◄
submit ◄
editor sends to review ◄
returned manuscript ◄
with reviews ◄
revise ◄
published ◄
Pelaksana proses reviewing
Proses penyuntingan
oleh reviewer
Penyuntingan
pengaturan, perbaikan isi dan gaya naskah
agar selaras dengan pola penyajian yang dibakukan oleh jurnal
ilmiah
dilakukan oleh:
redaksi/editor
mitra bestari, reviewer
→ sosok fisik dan formast naskah
→ menyangkut: content ilmiah naskah
Semua naskah wajib melalui proses
penyuntingan
Penyuntingan mengacu pada butir-butir telaah
Butir Telaah
dalam penyuntingan
Naskah baru atau orisinil?
Pernahkah diterbitkan
Tema sesuai dg jurnal yang dituju?
Pengetahuan penulis komprehensif?
Pustaka mutakhir dan lengkap?
Metode dan pendekatan memadai?
Semua bagian perlu diterbitkan?
Kerangka susunan naskah sesuai?
The Element of
a Scientific Article
The Element of
a Scientific Article
Title
Author name(s) and address(es)
Abstract
Introduction
Main body of manuscript
: methods, result, discussion
Conclusion/Summary
Acknowledgments
References Cited
Illustrations and Figure captions
Tables
The Element of a Scientific Article
Title
The title provides the first impression to the reader,
so selecting the most appropriate title requires some thought. The title
influences whether a reader is interested in reading the manuscript.
The title should include all essential words in the right order such that
the topic of the manuscript is accurately and fully conveyed (e.g.
clearly related to the purpose of the study) (Rudestam and Newton,
1992).
Avoid long titles (the recommended length is 10 - 12 words) and those
which begin with redundant words such as “A study of…”
The Element of a Scientific Article
Author name(s) and address(es)
include all information about
authorship: author and co-author names
ownership ―representing address of the institution where the research
conducted
e-mail ―for correspondence purposes
The Element of a Scientific Article
Abstract
a brief summary (of specified word limit) of the content of the manuscript
provide the highlights from the introduction, methods, results, discussion and
conclusions;
usually written as one or two paragraphs
the text flows and does not resemble a collection of disjointed sentences;
the choice of words should be simple, jargon avoided and abbreviations omitted
except for standard units of measurement and statistical terms;
citations are not usually included;
excessive detail such a long lists of variables, large amounts of data
or an excessive number of probability (p) values is not acceptable;
the trick to producing a clear abstract is to provide just enough detail to
demonstrate that the design of the study was good and that the evidence of the
answer to the question is strong.
The Element of a Scientific Article
Keywords
most journals require the author to identify three or four key words which
represent the major concept of the paper;
keywords are used for indexing purposes
The Element of a Scientific Article
Introducti0n
The purpose of the introduction is to stimulate the reader’s interest and
to provide background information which is pertinent to the study.
is the most important part of the
introduction. The review of the literature needs to be short and concise.
The content of the introduction is outlined as follows
The Element of a Scientific Article
Introducti0n
The content of the introduction
(cont.)
The Element of a Scientific Article
Methods
This section is descriptive. The main consideration is to ensure that
enough detail is provided to verify the findings and to enable
replication of the study by an appropriately trained person. Information
should be presented, using the past verb tense, in chronological order.
Sub-headings should be used, where appropriate.
Reference may be made to a published paper as an alternative to
describing a lengthy procedure.
The content of the methods .......
The Element of a Scientific Article
Methods
The content of methods ....
The Element of a Scientific Article
Methods
The content of methods (cont.) ....
The Element of a Scientific Article
Result
The function of the result are
-
to report the results (past verb tense) of the procedures described in the
methods; and
to present the evidence, that is the data (in the form of text, tables or figures),
that supports the results.
It is important to plan which results are important in answering the
question and which can be left out. Include only results which are
relevant to the question(s) posed in the introduction irrespective of
whether or not the results support the hypothesis(es).
After deciding which results to present, attention should turn to
determining whether data are best presented within the text or as tables
or figures.
The Element of a Scientific Article
Result (cont.)
Confusion sometimes arises as to the difference between results and
data. Results statements provide the message, that is, they interpret the
data. Data rarely stand alone, they are facts, often numbers, which may
be presented in their raw form, summarized (e.g. means) or transformed
(e.g. percentages, ratios) (Zeiger, 1991).
The Element of a Scientific Article
Discussion
The discussion should be considered as the heart of the paper and
invariably requires several attempts at writing (Portney and Watkins,
1993).
It serves to answer the question(s) posed in the introduction, explain
how the results support the answers and how the answers fit in with
existing knowledge on the topic (Zeiger, 1991).
This is the main section in which the author can express his/her
interpretations and opinions, for example how important the author
thinks the results are, the author’s suggestions for future research and
the clinical implications of the findings (Portney and Watkins, 1993).
The Element of a Scientific Article
Discussion
The content of the discussion is outlined as follows
The Element of a Scientific Article
Conclusion
This section should comprise a brief statement of the major findings and
implications of the study. It is not the function of this section to summarise
the study; this is the purpose of the abstract. New information must not be
included in the conclusions.