Transcript Brainstorming session on online data transmission from

Workshop on “Real Time Data Transmission from
Continuous Monitoring Systems (CMS)”
Experience of Real Time
Systems Managed by CPCB
Presented By
Aditya Sharma
Central Pollution Control Board
Parivesh Bhawan, Delhi-110032
7/17/2015
1
Workshop on “Real Time Data Transmission from
Continuous Monitoring Systems (CMS)”
CPCB Installed Continuous Ambient Air Quality
Monitoring Stations during late 90’s in Delhi.
At this point of time, systems were there to record data
into Text Format. So the systems were recording data
into a floppy which was carried manually from one
location to another.
Thereafter databases were introduced which were
recording data.
Then many systems were installed and data
communication technology got developed. Hence data
transfer started from different locations to one location
and Protocols have become critical.
7/17/2015
2
Workshop on “Real Time Data Transmission from
Continuous Monitoring Systems (CMS)”
Thereafter remote connectivity has picked up and today
we can use this for our data management and
verification procedure in the field of environment.
7/17/2015
3
Heterogeneous System
In our country continuous monitoring system: Heterogeneous:
 Different Instruments:- Different suppliers
 Different Technologies:- Single Parameter &
 Different Technologies:- Different parameters
 Different Communication Protocols:- Data Transfer
Since, systems are different, platforms are different,
formats are different, data collection and verification
mechanism is very complex.
Protocols Complexity
 Bayern Hessen Protocol
 Gesytec
 AK (German Automobile Industry Protocol)
 Modbus
 Profibus
……. List of more than 200 protocols as on date
REAL TIME MONITORING STATIONS DATA PICK UP POINT
Data may be picked up from
Station logger or Central server
in the network, and transmitted
to Central server at SPCB/CPCB.
GSM/
Phone
At LOCATION
Protocol
Used
Protocol
used
CPCB
CENTRAL STATION
Real Time Data Generating Station in Remote Location
Selective Data may be
Displayed at www.cpcb.nic.in
or at respective SPCBs on
continuous basis after
validation.
Possibilities of creating desired Network
 SYSTEM 1: CPCB can develop a Protocol of its own
requirements and publish. This protocol will provide a uniform
system of possible interaction with desired industry.
Limitation: It is a very challenging work ??
May take more time.
 Thereafter implementation may also require validation at
each specific system.
 SYSTEM 2: ALL SPCBs/PCCs/CPCB hire one software
development firm, which picks up data from all different make
instruments.
Limitation: This may provide two way communication,
because implementation of Complete protocols is a very
difficult task.
Even if it is done, than surety of implementation can not be
done.
It shall also become a monopolistic approach.
Possibilities of creating desired Network
 SYSTEM 3: EACH SPCB hire one system of an Instrument
Supplier and asks this supplier to integrate other systems into this
network.
Limitation: a. This may also not provide two way
communication.
Even if it is done, than surety of implementation can not be
done.
It shall also become monopolistic approach as this supplier
may dictate (Monopolistic).
 SYSTEM 4: Instrument suppliers be allowed to install their
systems in different locations as per their instrument installations.
Limitation: It may require many servers to be located in
each SPCB & CPCB.
The issue can be resolved by developing a network of Data
Sharing among SPCBs/PCCs.
Proper data server managing is required?
Network Plan-A for SPCBs having IT Support
Server of SPCB
with Software of
Firm
Note : 1. Central Server at CPCB & SPCB server should be similar systems
2. Remote calibration and data crosscheck mechanism should be in place without any human intervention.
Network for SPCB Not Having IT support
Sharing of Servers can be allowed among SPCBs/PCCs
SPCB
Central
Server
industry
Central
Server
1. Understanding between SPCBs required.
2. Remote sharing of servers for remote calibration etc.
3. Installation of number of servers is based on volume of installations in any specific area.
Scenario : Calculation : if Analysis
Maharashtra
Karnataka
Gujrat
AP
Rajasthan
Punjab
Haryana
Delhi
HP
Jammu &
Kashmir
UP
Bihar
Orissa
WB
Assam
Arunachal
Nagaland
Manipur
TN
Kerala
Zone 1
Zone 2
Zone 3
Zone 4
Zone 5
Zone 6
350
250
170
100
10
150
No. of
servers
√
√
√
√
X
√
2. Thermo
40
70
50
100
10
10
SPCBs
(21)
1.
ESA
No. of
servers
3. Chemtrols
√
150
No. of
servers
4. S:can
25
Total Ind.
Covered
02
150
10
05
05
150
02
-
√
√
740
580
150
200
√
275
04
In case of sharing SPCBs
Firms needs to provide
provision of remote
connection, where
Internet line and work
station to be provided by
SPCB
14
Ind. = 2572
01
25
20
√
405
a. Distance
b. Management of servers
c. Criticality of industry
d. Volume of data
e. Volume of no. of
stations etc.,
f. Acceptability of SPCBs
02
√
150
Factors influencing on
no. of servers
20
√
No. of
servers
5. Forbes
Marshall
50
√
50
05
√
100
Total no.
of servers
to be
installed
372
200
Number of Installations in a Zone and accordingly number of servers to be installed
Scenario: Analysis
Space requirement of one server = 3.5 inch height in 19” Rack
12 servers can be accommodated in one RACK.
Total power consumption 600W per server
Cost of Rack Rs. 80,000/- only.
Hence, by adapting this model, our manpower would be in a
better position to concentrate on their job of pollution control
and would be a (PPP) Public Private Partnership model.
Model would provide a National Database without human
intervention and purpose of surveillance will be served better.
Number of Stations Connected to CPCB as on Date
CMS(Emission) = 135
Number of Industries = 78
CMS(Water) =11
CAAQMS operated by Industries= 163
CAAQMS operated by SPCB/CPCB= 41
7/17/2015
13
CPCB System
In order to overcome the heterogeneity of the systems & shortage of
Manpower following model of data collection and verification had been
adopted:
 Help of Instrument Suppliers taken and were allowed to install their
servers in CPCB, resolving complex protocol issue.
 Polluter Pay Principle followed & industries were asked to take help of
instrument suppliers for timely, correct data submission with remote
calibration facilities.
 Server-Client software architecture used which enabled to view and
verify data through
 remote configuration and calibration,
 Diagnostics
 Immediate Display of data through web portals, through Internet and
Data available for scrutiny of Industries/SPCB/CPCB.
 System based data validation and reporting procedure for validation in
a time bound manner.
7/17/2015
Workshop on "Real Time Data Transmission
from CMS"
14
CPCB System
 To keep a check strict conformity testing is maintained which is modified
time to time.
 Routine data backups maintained to ensure data availability.
 Safety measure: Beside data backups, work stations configured in
SPCB/PCC. However, If entire mechanism is in place, the data will
automatically get collected in to repository to be maintained at NIC.
 Networks are installed with security devices having separate domains,
hence are very safe.
7/17/2015
Workshop on "Real Time Data Transmission
from CMS"
15
Instruments connected
 Horiba
 Thermo Environment
 Environment SA
 SICK Inc
 API
 S:can
 Chemtrols
 Ecotech
 Swan
 Nevco
 Forbes Marshall
7/17/2015
Workshop on "Real Time Data Transmission
from CMS"
16
CEMS & CAAQMS Data Available at CPCB
•CPCB_CAAQMS – http://cpcb.gov.in/caaqm
•M/s Environnement S.A India Pvt. Ltd. – www.iseo.fr/cpcb
•M/s Thermo Fisher Scientific India Pvt. Ltd. – http://182.71.166.202
•M/s Chemtrols Industries Ltd. – http://27.251.80.58
•M/s Envirotech Online Equipments Pvt. Ltd.
http://cpcb.envirotechlive.com
•M/s Yokogawa India Ltd.– http://cpcb.yilrc.net
User name: cpcb
Password: cpcb1
User Type: CPCB
•M/s Swan Environmental Pvt. Ltd. – www.swancpcb.co.in
User name: cpcb
Password: cpcb
•M/s Forbes Marshall CODEL Pvt. Ltd. –
http://203.145.138.170:8080/plantconnect/aqms
•M/s Nevco Engineers Pvt. Ltd. –
http://202.191.230.91:8080/plantconnect/aqms
7/17/2015
Workshop on "Real Time Data Transmission
from CMS"
17
Comparison of Systems
Features
Data Collection
without human
intervention
1 min data
SYSTEM 4
CPCB
SYSTEM 2(A)
One S/W Dev.
firm collects
data from
others
SYSTEM 3
System of
single firm at
SPCB
SYSTEM 2(B)
Patch to pick
up data from
CMS Comp./
Interface with
NIC
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
As programmed
Raw Data Available
Y
Y
Y
N
Y Available
No mechanism
Y
No mechanism
Frequency of data
collection can be
varied?
Y
N
Y
N
Check of data
acceptance criteria
Y
N
Y
N
Validated
Database?
7/17/2015
Workshop on "Real Time Data Transmission
from CMS"
18
Comparison of Systems
Features
SYSTEM 4
CPCB
SYSTEM 2(A)
One S/W Dev.
firm collects
data from
others
SYSTEM 3
System of
single firm at
SPCB
SYSTEM 2(B)
Patch to pick
up data from
CMS Comp./
Interface with
NIC
Diagnostics
Y
N
Y
N
Diagnostics is in Y
Database
N
Y
N
Each parameter Y
of instrument
N
Y
N
Previous record Available
Diagnostics
Not Available
Available
Diagnostics
Not Available
N
Y
N
Can it be viewed Y
remotely
Diagnostics
7/17/2015
Y
N
Workshop on "Real Time Data Transmission
from CMS"
Y
N
19
Comparison of Systems
Features
Calibration
SYSTEM 4
CPCB
SYSTEM 2(A)
One S/W Dev.
firm collects
data from
others
SYSTEM 3
System of
single firm at
SPCB
SYSTEM 2(B)
Patch to pick
up data from
CMS Comp./
Interface with
NIC
Y
N
Y
N
Calibration
through remote
Y
N
Y
N
Current
Calibration
Values view
Y
N
Y
N
Database of
Calibration
available
Y
N
Y
N
Performance
criteria testing
Possible
N
Y
N
Configuration
Y
N Data Transmission
Workshop on "Real Time
from CMS"
Y
N 20
7/17/2015
Comparison of Systems
Features
SYSTEM 4
CPCB
Possibility of Integration of
other parameter like temp
of station and flow meter of
stack ?
Any type of Real Time
System can be
connected?
Supplier refuses to
continue?
7/17/2015
Y
SYSTEM 2(A)
One S/W Dev.
firm collects
data from
others
SYSTEM 3
System of single
firm at SPCB
SYSTEM 2(B)
Patch to pick
up data from
CMS Comp./
Interface
with NIC
Y
Y
N
Revise
program
code
Y
Depending upon
firm’s capability
N
Revise program
code
Yes
N
Will be very
Will continue
Supplier
difficult because
as data is
independent
SPCBs are not
stored and
having IT S/w Dev
other supplier
& Handling teams
can take over
Workshop on "Real Time Data Transmission
from CMS"
Supplier
independent
21
Comparison of Systems
Features
SYSTEM 4
CPCB
Manpower low
Requirement As most of the
at SPCB/CPCB work is being
taken up by IS
Does it N
become a
monopoly
7/17/2015
SYSTEM 2(A)
One S/W Dev.
firm collects
data from
others
SYSTEM 3
System of
single firm at
SPCB
SYSTEM 2(B)
Patch to pick
up data from
CMS Comp./
Interface with
NIC
Low
As no cross
verification of
data is
available
More in
comparison
Low
As no cross
verification of
data is
available
Y
Y
(Vendor
provided
system and
PCB has to
operate it)
Workshop on "Real Time Data Transmission
from CMS"
N
22
Comparison of Systems
Features
SYSTEM 4
CPCB
If New No issue
Instrument
having
protocol not
supported by
existing system
7/17/2015
SYSTEM 2(A)
One S/W Dev.
firm collects
data from
others
SYSTEM 3
System of
single firm at
SPCB
SYSTEM 2(B)
Patch to pick
up data from
CMS Comp./
Interface with
NIC
Will develop
new protocol
integration
system.
Firm may
develop but
would require
additional cost
No affect as
instrument
provider is
responsible to
provide data in
defined format
Workshop on "Real Time Data Transmission
from CMS"
23
Thank you
7/17/2015
Workshop on "Real Time Data Transmission
from CMS"
24