Transcript Slide 1
THE WEIDT GROUP
Building Energy Benchmarks
THE WEIDT GROUP
PAGE 1
Sustainable Buildings 2030
© 2008
THE WEIDT GROUP
Presentation Agenda
Introduction
Comparison of building energy benchmark methods
and systems
Comparison of energy use indexes for different
benchmark systems for 13 different building types
Recommended Method for Developing Minnesota
Benchmarks
How to Disseminate the Sustainable Buildings 2030
Energy Benchmark System
PAGE 2
Sustainable Buildings 2030
© 2008
THE WEIDT GROUP
Introduction
The Benchmark sets the starting point for CO2 Reduction
against which each subsequent target is measure
Sustainable 2030 Benchmarks
100%
90%
Percent CO2 Emissions
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
PAGE 3
2030
2029
2028
2027
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
0%
Targets: Reduce CO2 60% by 2010, 90% by 2030
Sustainable Buildings 2030
© 2008
THE WEIDT GROUP
Criteria for a Good Benchmarking system
Easy to use and understand
Accurate – for our climate
Consistent – methodology for all benchmarks
Comprehensive – for all buildings we build
and can account for the specific program
criteria unique to each building
PAGE 4
Sustainable Buildings 2030
© 2008
THE WEIDT GROUP
Benchmarking Methods in Use Today
Comparing a building to itself
– the “tracking” or “baseline” approach
Empirical model from a sample of other similar
buildings in a population
– Target Finder / Energy Star approach
Results of an energy simulation model with certain
pre-defined baseline characteristics, such as
meeting an energy code or standard
– current Minnesota B3 Benchmarking and DOE
method
PAGE 5
Sustainable Buildings 2030
© 2008
THE WEIDT GROUP
What are Metrics used to Benchmark
Buildings?
For cars we use:
Miles per gallon
For lighting efficiency we use:
Lumens per Watt
For Cooling equipment efficiency we use:
kW/ ton
For buildings we use:
Energy Use Intensity (EUI) typically expressed in units
of
Annual energy consumption per floor area per year
kBtu / Square feet / year or maybe …
CO2 / Square foot/ year
PAGE 6
Sustainable Buildings 2030
© 2008
THE WEIDT GROUP
Research Existing Building Energy
Benchmarking Systems
Target Finder / Portfolio Manager
15 different building types – 5 are different hotel
types
Minnesota B3 Benchmarking system
Over 50 different building types based of Current
MN 1993 Energy Code
New DOE Benchmarking system
Same types as Target Finder based on ASHRAE
90.1 2004 Energy Code
PAGE 7
Sustainable Buildings 2030
© 2008
THE WEIDT GROUP
Comparison of Benchmark System Features
Architecture 2030
Architecture 2030
B3 Benchmarking
Benchmark Goals DOE Benchmarks
EPA National
See Figure
1
System
Features
on
Page
6
EPA Target Finder
Program
Averages
Easy to use
Accurate
Consistent
Comprehensive
PAGE 8
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes, for the
available building
types
Yes, for the
available building
types
No
Yes
Yes
Will vary based on
new CBEC
surveys
Will vary based on
new CBEC
surveys
Yes
16 building types
representing a mix
of public and
private sector
types.
15 building types
representing a mix
of public and
private sector
types.
18 building types
representing a mix
of public and
private sector
types
Over 50
building/space
types covering full
range of public/
private sector
types
Sustainable Buildings 2030
© 2008
THE WEIDT GROUP
Comparison of Benchmark System Features
Benchmark Goals
Modify Benchmark
based on operational
characteristics
No
Yes
No
Yes
Modify Benchmark
based on special use
conditions of the building
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes, within
available building
types
No
Yes
No
Will contain 5
Minnesota
weather zones
Mixed-use building types
Geographic location
(weather determinants)
PAGE 9
Architecture
B3
DOE
Architecture 2030
2030 EPA
Benchmarking
See Figure
1 System
on Page
6
Benchmarks
EPA Target
Finder Features
National
Program
Averages
16 locations
nationally
Yes
Sustainable Buildings 2030
© 2008
THE WEIDT GROUP
Comparison of energy use indexes for
different benchmark systems
Architecture 2030 EPA Target Finder
Architecture 2030 EPA National averages
B3 Models, 1989, Mn 1993, 2004
DOE 2004
Sensitivity analysis of operational characteristics to
compare how Target Finder and the B3
Benchmarking system account for changes in
building operation.
PAGE 10
Sustainable Buildings 2030
© 2008
THE WEIDT GROUP
All Comparisons
ASHRAE 2004 DOE Model
ASHRAE 2004 B3 Model
MN 1993 B3 Model
ASHRAE 1989 B3 Model
Target Finder
2010 60% Savings Goal
140
127
125
119
120
117
113
110
100
kBtu / SF
100
93
60%
Saving
s
70 72
80
116
114
119
95
90
60 62
60
47
40
47
51
37
30
20
0
0
0
Warehouse
PAGE 11
Small Hotel
Sustainable Buildings 2030
Medium office
Primary school
© 2008
THE WEIDT GROUP
System comparisons All CUT
ASHRAE 2004 DOE Model
ASHRAE 2004 B3 Model
MN 1993 B3 Model
ASHRAE 1989 B3 Model
Target Finder
2010 60% Savings Goal
400
371
350
316
300
278
268
kBtu / SF
250
60%
Saving
s
225
200 198
200
206
178
152
150
100
100
112
148
125
114
107
71
50
0
0
Stand-alone retail
PAGE 12
Hospital
Sustainable Buildings 2030
Supermarket
© 2008
THE WEIDT GROUP
Comparisons 1989 B3 to Target Finder
ASHRAE
1989 B3
Model
Target
Finder
Difference
% Change
Warehouse
62
93
na
na
Small Hotel
125
119
6
5%
Medium office
100
117
-17
-17%
Primary school
119
127
-8
-7%
Stand-alone retail
152
178
-26
-17%
Hospital
206
268
-62
-30%
Supermarket
316
371
-55
-17%
Building Type Name
Conclusions
The ASHRAE 90.1 1989 B3 Benchmark model results and the Target
Finder results are the best fit of data systems compared in this study.
PAGE 13
Sustainable Buildings 2030
© 2008
Comparison of 1989 B3 to Architecture 2030
National Averages
THE WEIDT GROUP
MN 1993 B3 Model
Arch 2030 National Average
2010 60% Savings Goal
18 0
16 0
160
136
124
14 0
kBtu / SF
12 0
123
122
120
96
10 0
86
78
80
60
78
77
66
50
48
40
31
31
26
31
20
0
College University
Fire Station
Police Station
Nursing
Home/Assisted
Living
Public Assembly
Service
Conclusions
The national average data is national average data; it occasionally
resembles Minnesota data but usually does not. It is not a valid
method for setting benchmarks for Minnesota buildings.
PAGE 14
Sustainable Buildings 2030
© 2008
Sensitivity Analysis for Operational Characteristics
Retail Buildings
Heated/ cooled area variations
100
80 hrs/ w k
111
168 hrs/ w k
150
115 hrs/ w k
125
80 hrs/ w k
Target Finder
B3 benchmarking
115 hrs/ w k
DOE
Retail Buildings
operation schedule variations
160
168 hrs/ w k
206
115 hrs/ w k
-
178
50
100
150
100% heated/ cooled
100
reduced cooling/ heating area
91
reduced heating area
96
reduced cooling area
120
100% heated/ cooled
Target Finder
B3 benchmarking
DOE
THE WEIDT GROUP
200
250
125
reduced cooling/ heating area
152
reduced heating area
154
reduced cooling area
176
100% heated/ cooled
178
-
50
100
150
200
KBTU/sf/year
KBTU/sf/year
Conclusions: Changes in operating hours and the conditioned area of the
building, have significant impacts on establishing the buildings benchmark.
Variations in the parameters studied show impacts up to 25%. We will need a
system that accounts for these variations to develop an accurate Benchmark
System.
PAGE 15
Sustainable Buildings 2030
© 2008
THE WEIDT GROUP
Recommended Method for Developing
Minnesota Benchmarks
The 2004 code is too stringent, would be difficult to
achieve 60%.
Target Finder can not be extended to a larger range of
building types – we want a consistent methodology
used for all building types.
The National Average EUI’s developed by the
Architecture 2030 team are not accurate for running a
program in this State.
PAGE 16
Sustainable Buildings 2030
© 2008
THE WEIDT GROUP
Recommendation:
Use the ASHRAE 1989 90.1 Energy Code
A very efficient analysis method for creating a
comprehensive list of building types
It will not require expensive data collection of existing
building energy use
The code is a rule based system that can be modeled
consistently and accurately for all building types.
The ASHRAE 90.1 1989 model data is closest to Target
Finder results.
The ASHRAE 90.1 1989 has been the code in place
until recently and closely follows the intent of the
Architecture 2030 program
Subsequent Code improvements can be easily
benchmarked to identify how they alone improve the
EUI from the 1989 baseline.
PAGE 17
Sustainable Buildings 2030
© 2008
THE WEIDT GROUP
Establish Savings Targets from the
Benchmark
Architecture 2030 proposes the same % reduction
for all building types.
For 2010 it establishes a 60% reduction in
consumption
Is this feasible for all building types?
PAGE 18
Sustainable Buildings 2030
© 2008
THE WEIDT GROUP
Establish Savings Targets from the
Benchmark
Annual kBtu / SF Benchmark EUI's
Equivalent ASHRAE
1989 B3 Savings % to
meet target finder 60%
goal
ASHRAE
1989 B3
Model
Target
Finder
2010 60%
Savings
Goal
Warehouse
62
93
37
40%
Small Hotel
125
119
47
62%
Medium office
100
117
47
53%
Primary school
119
127
51
57%
Stand-alone retail
152
178
71
53%
Hospital
206
268
107
48%
Supermarket
316
371
148
53%
Building Type Name
The equivalent percentage savings ranges from 62% for the Small
Hotel to 40% savings for the Warehouse building type. This analysis
raises the question of using a standard savings percentage for all
building types or having it vary based on building type.
PAGE 19
Sustainable Buildings 2030
© 2008
THE WEIDT GROUP
Analysis of Hospital savings opportunities
Hospital: Gas Boiler/ Water-Cooled Chiller
Total Building Energy kBtu/SF
250.00
208.15
195.4
200.00
179.3
32 %
Savings
154.6
140.5
150.00
100.00
50.00
0.00
Code
1989 Code
1989 Savings
% Savings
PAGE 20
Code
208.15
B1
B1
195.4
12.7
6%
B2
B2
179.3
28.9
14%
B3
B4
B3
154.6
53.5
26%
B4
140.5
67.6
32%
Conclusion:
Hospitals are one example
where current technologies and
design methods are not
available to reduce energy
consumption by 60% today.
Sustainable Buildings 2030
© 2008
THE WEIDT GROUP
Development of Building Energy
Benchmarks for “Typical” Building Types
We are completing work on simulating Energy
Benchmarks for over 30 different building types.
We have researched average building
characteristics from the DOE models and hundreds
of projects we have archived.
These models utilize average building
characteristics by building type for:
Space use type
Space use distribution
Operational schedules for lights, plugs, etc.
Envelope parameters
HVAC parameters
PAGE 21
Sustainable Buildings 2030
© 2008
THE WEIDT GROUP
Development of Building Energy
Benchmarks for “Typical” Building Types
What we have found from our review of the data is
there is a large variation in consumption results for
“Typical” Building types.
The large variation in consumption results is due to the
large variation in each projects unique building program
requirements, mainly:
Space use type
Space use distribution – this can be significant
Operational schedules for lights, plugs, etc.
HVAC parameters
PAGE 22
Sustainable Buildings 2030
© 2008
Sample Distribution of Code Base Office
Building Consumption
THE WEIDT GROUP
Office Building Sample
13
12
Different Offcie Buildings
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
50
100
150
Annual kBtus /SF / year
200
250
Average kBtu/ SF/ YR
PAGE 23
Sustainable Buildings 2030
© 2008
Office Building Percentage Difference from
Average
THE WEIDT GROUP
Office Building Sample
13
12
Different Office Buildings
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
-60%
PAGE 24
-40%
-20%
0%
20%
40%
60%
% difference from Benchmark
Sustainable Buildings 2030
80%
100%
120%
© 2008
THE WEIDT GROUP
Dissemination of the Sustainable Buildings
2030 Energy Benchmark System
A web-based calculation tool will be developed to
allow project designers to:
Use “default” building characteristic or have the ability
to “customize” characteristics based on their unique
building program elements.
Editable building characteristics will include:
Building location
Building gross floor area
Building type(s)
Number of floors
Space type, floor area% and hours of use.
Cooling and heating system
Fuel source types for building
PAGE 25
Sustainable Buildings 2030
© 2008
THE WEIDT GROUP
Dissemination of the Sustainable Buildings
2030 Energy Benchmark System
After results are entered the web-based tool will
calculate:
Total Energy Target Standard in kBtu/SF goal based on
2030 savings criteria.
Fuel source end use in kBtu/SF for the Target Standard.
Target Standard CO2 emissions by fuel source.
PAGE 26
Sustainable Buildings 2030
© 2008
THE WEIDT GROUP
Summary
We can’t use National Averages
We can’t use Target Finder
We need a lot of space type and operational variables
Modeled data can provide us the flexibility and
accuracy we need
Modeled data aligns well with the intent of 2030
ASHRAE 89 is the best code base to use to reflect the
intent of 2030
We need to formulate the appropriate range of %
savings by building type to be cost-effective.
PAGE 27
Sustainable Buildings 2030
© 2008
THE WEIDT GROUP
THE WEIDT GROUP
PAGE 28
Sustainable Buildings 2030
© 2008