Transcript Slide 1
Status & Readiness of the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer
Workshop of the Americas NYU August 4, 2009
J. Chapman - University of Michigan
on behalf of the ATLAS Muon Groups
Particular Thanks to C. Ferretti, D. Levin, E. Diehl & A. Belloni (Harvard)
Overview Status
• Hardware almost completed – Status at closure: – MDT Endcap fibers replaced – RPC nearing 95.5% coverage – TGC ready soon, after 7 months • ATLAS DAQ functioning well – CSC working to reach design L1 rate
• Most data from 2008 runs
• Muon Sub-detector will be ready for collisions!
4-August-2009
Workshop of the Americas (NYU) – J. Chapman
2
Outline
•
Very Quick Detector Description
•
Sub-detectors Status
•
Detector Control System Status
•
Challenges to Precision Calibration
•
Alignment System – next talk
•
Commissioning Results
•
Conclusions
Workshop of the Americas (NYU) – J. Chapman
4-August-2009 3
ATLAS Muon Spectrometer
•
Three stations in an air-core toroidal magnetic field (superconducting) (barrel: |η|<1.4 , endcap: 1.6<|η|<2.7)
• Four different technologies: – Monitored Drift Tubes (MDT): precision chambers in the bending direction – Cathode Strip Chambers (CSC): precision chambers at |η|>2.0
– Resistive Plate Chambers (RPC): trigger |η|<1.05 + 2 nd – Thin Gap Chambers (TGC): trigger 1.05<|η|<2.4 + 2 nd coordinate coordinate MDT CSC RPC TGC #chambers 1150 32 606 3588 #channels 354k 30.7k
373k 318k Resolution (RMS) 35 μm (z&R) 40 μm (R) 10 mm (z) 2-6 mm (R) 3-7 mm (φ) 5 mm (φ) 10 mm (φ) •
Performance goal: stand-alone Δp/p~10% at 1 TeV
sagitta ~ 500 μm along
Q
measured with a resolution ~50μm
4-August-2009
Workshop of the Americas (NYU) – J. Chapman
4
Spectrometer Layout
Side View Beam View
4-August-2009
Muons cross 3 layers of precision chambers for sagitta measurement Trigger chambers are placed on both sides of middle precision layer (+ a few elsewhere)
Workshop of the Americas (NYU) – J. Chapman
5
Monitored Drift Tubes
• System features low failures – Readout channels: ~0.2% – T-sensors: ~0.3% – B-sensors: ~0.5% – Alignment: ~1-2% • Final actions taken – Fiber replacement C & A side – Replaced a few faulty cards & sensors, sealed gas leaks – Switched barrel mezzanines to 50MHz & exchanged a few cards that did not operate successfully at higher speed • Single-hit efficiency above 99% • Hit resolution near design value Chambers in DAQ (2009)
Workshop of the Americas (NYU) – J. Chapman
4-August-2009 6
MDT Occupancy
1090/1150 Chambers installed – 99.6% operational
TGC vs MDT correlation Lines
↔
noisy channels
4-August-2009
MDT Occupancy – chamber
Φ vs η
Hot spots due to access shafts circled
Workshop of the Americas (NYU) – J. Chapman
7
EE Chamber Installation
• Additional MDTs – EEL Sector 5 installed – Mounted on Toroid • Other sectors soon – EELA11 next – EELA14 follows
• Side C follows A
– Schedule is uncertain
Workshop of the Americas (NYU) – J. Chapman
4-August-2009 8
RPC Status
• 95.5% operative (out of 396 towers) • < 4% broken HV connectors or electronic components • < 1% leaky gas channels • Temperature problem forces top sectors to run at 9.2kV (9.6kV) 4-August-2009
Workshop of the Americas (NYU) – J. Chapman
9
RPC Performance
• Cosmic data provides good evaluation of RPC – Hit efficiency in the high 90% region – expect the tails to be reduced with HV tuning – Resolution is as expected • Timing calibration for trigger is underway
4-August-2009
Workshop of the Americas (NYU) – J. Chapman
10
RPC Performance with MDT tracks
- Events triggered by RPCs with ¾ majority From: G.Aielli
- Only 1 MDT track reconstructed by MuonBoy - Look at 4 th layer when trigger justified offline by 3 layers
BM BM
113860 113860 with HV=9.6kV, Vth=-1V 4-August-2009 normalized to strip pitch
Workshop of the Americas (NYU) – J. Chapman
11
TGC Status
• • •
All chambers installed with final gas CO 2 : n-C 5 H 12 (55:45) Now: 3 chambers (less than 0.8‰) are problematic TGC trigger worked very well during DAQ periods Fall 2008 data
4-August-2009
TGC trigger timing
Workshop of the Americas (NYU) – J. Chapman
12
TGC Performance
• Low rate of faulty channels – ~0.02% in Middle Layer – ~0.5% in Inner Layer – No holes in coverage • L1 rate limited to 45kHz – Redundant information removed. Ready for tests • Last runs (HV+gas) in 2008 – MDT/TGC work halted runs – Oil contamination of gas damaged vessel. System will be back mid August 2009
4-August-2009
Workshop of the Americas (NYU) – J. Chapman
13
CSC Status
• 2 of 128 panels unusable – covered by redundancy • New ROD firmware progress – Current status: max L1 rate < 1kHz; – ROD crashes after ~1k events fixed – Test stand & two SLAC engineers at CERN for redesign effort • Commissioning the CSC with cosmics is difficult – Low probability to hit CSC – Only 50k events in 2008 with 199, 4-hit segments in CSC.
Workshop of the Americas (NYU) – J. Chapman
4-August-2009 14
Securing & Maintaining Precision
• Knowing the drift time R-T function & offset t 0 .
– Depends on gas temperature, composition, & pressure – Depends on pulse amplitude (time walk) & wire sag – Depends on electronics delays & trigger timing (t 0 ) • Knowing the chamber alignment & B-field • Sensitivity figures: – Drift velocity at wall is ~20
μ
m/ns (50
μ
m in 2.5ns) –
D
t of 7 o C corresponds to ~ 17ns ( many
s
) – Wire sag for largest chambers ~ 500
m
m – Plots for other variables visible in gas monitor
Workshop of the Americas (NYU) – J. Chapman
4-August-2009 15
•
MDT Detector Control System
The DCS provides initialization of the chambers and reads out
– – – – – –
voltages/temperatures of ~18k F.E. electronic cards and power supply over 13k temperature sensors ~2k Hall probes gas parameters alignment system ...
T>25°C •
Note: 7 o C variation from bottom to top!
T<18°C
Workshop of the Americas (NYU) – J. Chapman
4-August-2009 16
MDT Gas Monitoring & Prompt Calibrations
Recycler
(D. Levin, N. Amram et al)
• Track gas quality via maximum drift time
gas supply line
• Compare behavior of MDT gas for supply and exhaust lines • Precision: below 1ns in the maximum drift time measurement, once/hour • Universal Time-to-Radius (RT) relations published every two hours • Gas volume exchange – Muon Spectrometer ~2 weeks refresh – Gas Monitor ~2 hours
gas exhaust
Workshop of the Americas (NYU) – J. Chapman
4-August-2009 16
MDT gas Drift-time (T max ) & Cavern Humidity
ns D
t
=
720-685ns = 35ns Oct 2007 Dec 2008 • Monitoring TDC spectra continuously since August 2007 • Results displayed at mdtgasmon.grid.umich.edu
• Transients due to gas system interventions or occasional component failures • Overall variation in maximum drift time caused by gas mixture change from – External humidity – Intentional water vapor injection
4-August-2009
Workshop of the Americas (NYU) – J. Chapman
18
MDT Calibration with Cosmic-rays
• Difficult due to asynchronous nature of cosmic rays with LHC clock
25ns and variable TOF between trigger and precision chambers. Recovered by t 0 -tuning algorithm.
• Dedicated L2 stream
3 centers for all chambers in 24h • Collision data critical to obtain final precision
Residuals vs. Radius
t 0
fit 4-August-2009
Workshop of the Americas (NYU) – J. Chapman
19
Segment Reconstruction Performance
Outer layers Inner layer • • • •
Performance from clean sample: No shower (#segments/event<20) Track passing at least 2 stations Extrapolation pass the 3 Segment on each station rd station
Efficiency(ε)= #Seg(found)/#Seg(expect)
Fall 2008 <ε>=98.4%
4-August-2009
For cosmic rays
o
enlarged single-hit error (1 mm)
o o
relaxed matching angle minimum 3 hits per segment
Workshop of the Americas (NYU) – J. Chapman
20
Track Reconstruction
MDT hits distribution peaked at 12, 14 and 20 (expected) Tails: overlap small-large sectors
Number of hits
Track residual ~ 250 μm worse than segment residual (expected): - misalignment - multiple scattering 4-August-2009
Workshop of the Americas (NYU) – J. Chapman
21
Inner Detector vs. Spectrometer
Δp(top-bottom) 2 x 3 Gev loss in calorimeters
Cosmic ray passing in the Inner Detector split in two tracks at the perigee.
3 GeV loss in the calorimeter.
MS tracks corrected for the E loss compared with ID tracks ΔP[GeV/c]
4-August-2009
Workshop of the Americas (NYU) – J. Chapman
22
Conclusions
• • • • •
Hardware: status very good (nearing completion) Trigger:
–
Coverage much improved from 2008
–
Timing between detector elements still being tuned Calibration:
–
Calibration centers returning constants in 36 hours
–
Fine tuning of constants awaiting collision data Alignment: Chamber position & orientation known Track segment finding, reconstruction efficiency, & resolution is improving & will continue to improve
Still a lot of work to do, but the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer is ready for beam
Workshop of the Americas (NYU) – J. Chapman
4-August-2009 23
Backup Slides
Alignment Issues
Layers, Locations, & Labels
EO EM EI
4-August-2009
Workshop of the Americas (NYU) – J. Chapman
25
Fake Segments
Form pattern recognition: 1 track should to give 1 segment/station From noise hits: study #segments far from the only track in the event
Fall 2008 avg=1.1
Fall 2008 avg=2.3·10 -4
4-August-2009
Workshop of the Americas (NYU) – J. Chapman
26
ATLAS Muon Detector
4-August-2009
Endcap 1.05<| η|<2.7
three wheels (Small, Big, Outer) of TGC + MDT/CSC Barrel | η|<1.05: I=inner, M=middle, O=outer layers of RPC + MDT in S=small and L=large sectors
Workshop of the Americas (NYU) – J. Chapman
27
• • • •
MDT/CSC Status
1090/1150 MDT + 32/32 CSC chambers installed Shutdown: recovered ~7k MDT tubes, replaced MDT BW optical fibers, doubled speed for all MDT readout electronics Now: > 99.5 % MDT channels operational and 99.9% of the chambers are read by the ATLAS DAQ + 98.5 % CSC layers Work continuing on CSC readout Driver (ROD) firmware
Inner, Middle and Outer MDT occupancy (Fall 08): sector vs.
ηID
4-August-2009
Workshop of the Americas (NYU) – J. Chapman
28
• • •
Precision Chambers Alignment
Grid of ~12k optical sensors monitoring/reconstructing chamber position, rotation angles and deformations Track-based alignment used for global positions (Endcap Wheels-Barrel and Spectrometer-ID) After shutdown over 99% of the devices working and the degradation due to a few missing sensors is negligible
4-August-2009
Barrel Endcap
Workshop of the Americas (NYU) – J. Chapman
29
Barrel Alignment: Large vs. Small Sectors
4-August-2009
Workshop of the Americas (NYU) – J. Chapman
30
Alignment in the Barrel
• • •
10 5 μ ± (20 GeV) enough to align at 30 μm (Small sectors: 5×statistics) Initial geometry + alignment traces displacement in relative mode Track + alignment parameters inside one global fit (correlations included)
•
Tracks (magnetic field off runs)
–
Close to the IP (precision plane)
– – –
Traversing 3 stations Straight line fit inner-outer MDT Residuals in the middle chamber ~ sagitta = 22±7 μm
4-August-2009
Workshop of the Americas (NYU) – J. Chapman
31
Alignment in the Endcap
•
Corrected sagitta = 2±27 μm
– – –
3 segments tracks (EI-EM-EO) in the same sector Angle segments-straight line EI-EO segments < 5/50 mrad (sagitta only) At least 1 trigger phi hit (good 2nd coordinate measurement)
4-August-2009
Workshop of the Americas (NYU) – J. Chapman
32
Spectrometer Overview
• Designed to trigger on and measure muons with Pt
≳
GeV with resolution 3% < 250 GeV to 10% @ 1 TeV.
3 • Magnetic field from air-core torroids: barrel + 2 endcap • Trigger detectors (trigger + 2nd coordinate measurement) – 0<
η
<1.0 (Barrel) Resistive Plate Chambers (RPC) 373k chan – 1.0<
η
<2.4 (Endcap) Thin Gap Chambers (TGC) 318k chan • Precision detectors
– 0<η<2.0
Monitored Drift Chambers (MDT) 354k chan – Monitored
⇨
Positions monitored by an alignment system – 2.0<
η
<2.7 Cathode Strip Chambers (CSC) 30.7k chan • Alignment – determine chamber positions to ~50
μ
m – Separate optical alignment systems for barrel & endcap complemented by alignment with tracks
.
Workshop of the Americas (NYU) – J. Chapman
4-August-2009 33