Transcript Slide 1

OVERVIEW
• look at some of the key challenges facing
teachers/teaching
• critique some of the policy responses to these
• examine some “alternative” ways to respond to the
challenges professional responsibility
• TONE making a difference versus “alas, woe is us”
A FUTURE FROM 1997 (HARGREAVES)
“Will we see exciting and positive new partnerships
being created with groups and institutions beyond the
school, and teachers learning to work effectively, openly
and authoritatively with those partners
OR
Whether we will see the deprofessionalisation of
teaching as teachers crumble under the multiple
pressures, intensified work demands and reduced
opportunities to learn from colleagues”
SOME PRESSURES, CHALLENGES
• the world we live in has, and is changing – this is the
world we are preparing young people for
• young people have, are changing
• traditional notions of the teacher/teaching have, are
changing
 Qs for us = How, if at all, are we changing to ensure
we are genuine leaders of learning? Are we making a
difference? Are we doing the best we can?
THINK ABOUT …
• increasing globalisation & competition, with greater global
economic, social, political turbulence – national boundaries
fading; new “threats” e.g. GFC, terrorism, climate change …
• emerging (new) nation “giants”- challenges to the “west” as the
dominant economic driver, decision-maker, leader …
• impact of knowledge revolution and information age – techno-tot
tweeters, information access explosion
• increase in consumerism, customer orientation and customer
expectation – lack of personal accountability, complaint/blame
others mentality, “me” focus
• politicisation of education - uncertainties, shifting
commitments
• growing short-term focus, profit/ accountability focus
in both private & public sector – short term v longer
term ► “now” generation
• growing use of private sector principles & practices in
the public sector – government intervention,
corporate managerialism
CHANGE IS IMPACTING ON US … GENERALLY
CHANGE IS IMPACTING ON US … INDIVIDUALLY
THIS MEANS FOR US, AS EDUCATORS …
• some argue much of what we currently do in
education is already irrelevant to the future &
education of young people
• Choices for us, we can …
 become irrelevant OR wait for others to “fix”
everything for us (it won’t happen!!) OR we make and
lead the changes ourselves (we take professional
responsibility)
POLICY RESPONSES TO “FORCE” CHANGE
• increasing “accountability” processes, such as
Standards approach:
• Standards for teachers, for principals
• Standards for professional development
• Standards for teacher preparation
• NAPLAN, My School – fixation on student
achievement as measured by limited/limiting tests
• reporting data to someone on just about everything
SOMETIMES WE FEEL LIKE THIS
• continuing search for the “silver bullet” for success
• Finland, Asia, USA …
• criticisms from business that education is in crisis –
as though all businesses are successful!
• leads to a response that is characterised by:
• defend, rationalise & deflect
• Global Education Reform Movement = competition,
standardisation, choice, test-based accountability etc does
effect change in a sustainable way - in some places it has
become “corrupted”
• we also know that collaboration, focussed teaching, equity
built around a trust-based, well educated profession does
(see Sahlberg, 2012)
i.e.
enhanced professionalism & professional
responsibility
ACCOUNTABILITY & PROFESSIONALISM
Hargreaves et al (2009):
accountability
external


professional responsibility
internal
individual and collective
This about putting the professionals back in
charge! But they need to lead that charge!
A WAY FORWARD …
• we know that change in education is difficult
• this, in part, is because changing educators is difficult
• “dumping” silver bullets, a-contextually – leads to
failure
• we need take seriously:
→ the challenges of professional learning/
development – time, $s, resistance …
 that sustainability is critical in change
IMPLICATIONS FOR US
• educators (i.e. us) need to be leading & engaging at
deep levels in/with their profession
↓
• educators need to know why they are educators and
for what purposes i.e. the for what and about what
questions
• this is about our professionalism
THESE RELATE TO
• broader societal responsibilities of educators
↓
• the inappropriateness of the formulaic and list-grouplabel accountability approach to education as the
dominant discourse e.g. Standards
↓
• shifting from the superficial “what” of education and
educating to examining the “why”
MELBOURNE DECLARATION (2008)
As a nation Australia values the central role of education
in building a democratic, equitable and just society - a
society that is prosperous, cohesive and culturally
diverse ....
Schools play a vital role in promoting the intellectual,
physical, social, emotional, moral, spiritual and
aesthetic development and wellbeing of young
Australians, and in ensuring the nation’s ongoing
economic prosperity and social cohesion.
A PROFESSIONAL REPONSIBILITY APPROACH REQUIRES US TO
DEMONSTRATE PROFESSIONAL CAPABILITIES SUCH AS …
•
•
•
we must be vision-driven - this should be a vision
about creating a better future for all students
 Q =what do I stand for?
our work must be purposeful, values driven
 Q = why am I doing what I do?
we must be learners
 Q = am I at the cutting edge of teachinglearning?
• we must support (internal & external) educators in
their pursuit of change, excellence and learning for all
 Q = where/what internal/external resources
can we access for our professional
learning/development?
• we must be able to articulate what we mean by quality
education and be able to communicate that across
many diverse stakeholders
 Q = what do we understand by quality in
education?
•
we must accept responsibility, moral responsibility for
our work
 Q = Is this the best I can do? Am I prepared to
take responsibility for my actions?
•
our work is an on-going journey & requires risk taking,
creativity - commitment and conviction are
mandatory
 Q = Would I be happy for my child to be in my
class and to attend my school?
• if we want to be taken seriously in the future we need
to engage with these types of issues now
• we need to open up what we do to professional
scrutiny – and be prepared to defend what we do in
the name of education
• we need to connect with, and shape, our profession
These are what define us as professionals, they are what
PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY is about
SO WHAT NEXT…
• there is no place for complacency in education
• start some conversations about these issues
• challenge, challenge, challenge – get back to basics
• what are my non-negotiables
• listen, engage, learn, grow
SOME PARTICULAR CHALLENGES ACROSS THE AGES …
FOR THOSE NEARING RETIREMENT
cynic or sage
FOR THOSE IN MID CAREER
follower or leader
FOR THOSE EARLY IN CAREER
got it sorted or getting it sorted
SOCIETY IS DEPENDING ON THE WORK EDUCATORS DO
FOR ITS FUTURE
• Durkheim put it this way 150 years ago:
education is an eminently social matter … forming the
child into an “ideal adult”, ready to take his or her place
in society … and, through education, society prepares
the conditions for its own survival
•Dinham put it this way earlier this year:
Life isn’t fair, but good teaching and good schools are
the best means we have of overcoming disadvantage
and opening doors of opportunity for young people
SOME DREAMS … FROM 2001
• “Parents will continue to dream of schools that are vital,
democratic, interactive, self-motivating learning
communities” (President ACSSO)
• We need “school cultures where teachers also ask hard
questions of each other and are prepared to provide
disconfirming feedback and take a stand or at least
debate their bottom lines in terms of good practice. …
professional respect is also about having enough
professional trust in a colleague to challenge to listen
and to focus on quality outcomes for kids” (Principal, SA)
What differences are you making?