Radioactive Noble Gases in BOREXINO Techniques for
Download
Report
Transcript Radioactive Noble Gases in BOREXINO Techniques for
Operation of bare Gediodes in LN2 / LAr Purification of N2/Ar
Hardy Simgen
Max-Planck-Institute for Nuclear Physics
Heidelberg
Outline
Introduction
/ Motivation
Experimental techniques
Final results of N2 purification tests
Ar purification tests
Conceptional design of a gas
purification plant for GERDA
Future plans (GERDA without gas
purification?)
Conclusion
17/07/2015
H. Simgen, MPI for Nuclear Physics / Heidelberg
2
Motivation
Ultra-pure
LN2/LAr will be used in the
GERDA experiment.
– Cooling medium for Ge crystals
– Passive shield against external radiation
– Active shield (LAr)
Removal
of Rn (Ar/Kr) crucial
Developed techniques can be applied
in other low-level projects
17/07/2015
H. Simgen, MPI for Nuclear Physics / Heidelberg
3
Ar and Kr: mass spectrometry
Ar: 10-9 cm3 (1 ppb; ~1.4 nBq/m3 for 39Ar in N2)
Kr: 10-13 cm3 (0.1 ppt; ~0.1 Bq/m3 for 85Kr in N2)
17/07/2015
H. Simgen, MPI for Nuclear Physics / Heidelberg
4
Low-level proportional
counters
222Rn:
17/07/2015
30 Bq 0.5 Bq/m3 for
H. Simgen, MPI for Nuclear Physics / Heidelberg
222Rn
in N2
5
MoREx
17/07/2015
(Mobile Radon Extraction Unit)
H. Simgen, MPI for Nuclear Physics / Heidelberg
6
Gas purification by the gas
adsorption process
Simple
(cheap) process to obtain
highest purities
Efficiency depends on
– Temperature
– Pore size structure of adsorber
– Polarity of adsorber
– Mobility of gases (gas phase / liquid phase)
Equilibrium
constant.
17/07/2015
described by Henrys
H. Simgen, MPI for Nuclear Physics / Heidelberg
7
Henrys law and retention volume
n=Hp
n
= number of moles adsorbed [mol/kg]
p = partial pressure of adsorptive [Pa]
H = Henrys constant [mol/(kg·Pa)]
H
determines the retention volume:
VRet = H R T mAds
17/07/2015
H. Simgen, MPI for Nuclear Physics / Heidelberg
8
Purification in the column
N equilibrium stages
CN = ½ C 0
C0
H
VRe t
RTmads
CN
VRet H ( )
17/07/2015
H. Simgen, MPI for Nuclear Physics / Heidelberg
VP
9
Final results of N2 purification
tests
Purification
of liquid N2 from Rn
Purification of liquid N2 from Kr
Purification of gaseous N2 from Kr
17/07/2015
H. Simgen, MPI for Nuclear Physics / Heidelberg
10
Adsorption model for charcoals
Influence
of pores is neglected.
Valid for adsorbers with wide pore
size distribution.
Gas
TC [K]
PC [bar]
TC·PC-0.5
[K·bar-0.5]
Ar
151
49
21.6
2×102
6.8
N2
126
34
21.6
2×102
7
Kr
209
55
28.2
2×105
7
Rn
377
63
47.6
1014
~8
17/07/2015
H [mol/(kg·Pa)]
@ 77 K
Pore size
[Å]
H. Simgen, MPI for Nuclear Physics / Heidelberg
11
Purification of LN2 from
222Rn
At
low temperatures: Strong binding of
radon to all surfaces.
Easy trapping with activated carbon
@ 77 K.
Problem: 222Rn emanation due to 226Ra!
– Activated carbon „CarboAct“:
222Rn emanation rate (0.3 0.1) mBq/kg.
– ~100 times lower than other carbons.
N2
purity <0.5 Bq/m3 achieved.
17/07/2015
H. Simgen, MPI for Nuclear Physics / Heidelberg
12
Purification of liquid N2 from Kr
Krypton
is nobler than radon
Binding energies are smaller Henrys
constants are much smaller
Moreover: Similar size of N2/Kr
– N2 may displace adsorbed Kr
– Adsorption efficiency drops down
N2
purification from Kr requires careful
selection of adsorber/temperature etc.
17/07/2015
H. Simgen, MPI for Nuclear Physics / Heidelberg
13
Investigated adsorbers
Molecular
sieves and zeolithes
– not favorable
Carbon
based adsorbers:
– Carbo Act: low 222Rn emanation rate, wide
pore size distribution.
– Activated carbons with enhanced fraction
of pores around 7 Å (Charcoal Cloth FM1250, CarboTech C38/2).
– Carbosieve SIII (Carbon molecular sieve:
Only small pores (<40 Å)).
17/07/2015
H. Simgen, MPI for Nuclear Physics / Heidelberg
14
Results / Breakthrough curves
T=77K (liquid phase)
17/07/2015
H. Simgen, MPI for Nuclear Physics / Heidelberg
15
Results:
Purification of liquid N2 from Kr
Adsorber
N
H
[mol/Pa/kg]
Molecular sieves
no purification effect
Zeolithes
poor purification ability
Synthetic carbon CarboAct
1±1
(6 ± 2) 10-2
CarboTech C38/2
8±2
(2 ± 1) 10-2
Charcoal Cloth FM1-250
13 ± 3
(3 ± 1) 10-2
Carbosieve SIII
2±1
(8 ± 1) 10-2
17/07/2015
H. Simgen, MPI for Nuclear Physics / Heidelberg
16
Liquid phase versus gas phase
Liquid
phase purification is preferred
from economical point of view, but:
– higher mobility in gas phase.
– faster diffusion in gas phase.
Low
T required!
Better
results are expected for low
temperature gas phase purification.
17/07/2015
H. Simgen, MPI for Nuclear Physics / Heidelberg
17
Purification of gaseous N2 from Kr
Two
ways to guarantee gas phase:
– high flow rate: No time for N2 to cool down.
– Liquid argon cooling (TLAr = TLN2 + 10 K).
Ultrapure
LN2 for tests procured from
“Westfalen AG”
– doped with 400 ppt Kr
All
carbon based adsorbers were tested
17/07/2015
H. Simgen, MPI for Nuclear Physics / Heidelberg
18
Results / Breakthrough curves
T=87K (gas phase)
17/07/2015
H. Simgen, MPI for Nuclear Physics / Heidelberg
19
Results:
Purification of gaseous N2 from Kr
Adsorber
N
H [mol/Pa/kg]
Synthetic carbon CarboAct
15 ± 3
0.21 ± 0.02
CarboTech C38/2
13 ± 3
0.19 ± 0.01
Charcoal Cloth FM1-250
9±2
0.16 ± 0.02
Carbosieve SIII
29 ± 4
0.34 ± 0.02
– Purification ability in gas phase 4-10 times
better than in liquid phase!
steeper
17/07/2015
breakthough curves (larger N).
H. Simgen, MPI for Nuclear Physics / Heidelberg
20
Purification of N2 – Summary
Ar
removal by adsorption is impossible.
222Rn removal easy, even for liquid N2.
– Low 222Rn emanation rate of the adsorber
required.
Kr
removal by adsorption is possible:
– But only in gas phase sufficiently effective.
– Gas phase is technically more challenging.
– still more difficult than Rn removal (much
larger adsorption column required).
17/07/2015
H. Simgen, MPI for Nuclear Physics / Heidelberg
21
Purification of Ar
Theory
predicts very similar adsorption
behaviour for Ar and N2.
However
TLAr = TLN2 + 10 K: Adsorption
at higher temperatures less efficient.
T
100 K required for gas phase
adsorption.
222Rn
17/07/2015
removal should not be a problem.
H. Simgen, MPI for Nuclear Physics / Heidelberg
22
Measurements of 222Rn in argon
LN2 class 4.0
CRn ~ 50 µBq/m3
No.
Gas
Amount
CRn in trap 1 [mBq/m3] CRn in trap 2 [mBq/m3]
1
Ar 4.6
117 m3
2.9 ± 0.2
–
2
Ar 4.6
141 m3
0.20 ± 0.02
<0.0005 (90% CL) *
3
Ar 5.0
200 m3
6.0 ± 0.1
0.006 ± 0.001 **
* gas phase purification
** liquid phase purification
17/07/2015
8.5 ± 0.1 mBq/m3 at truck filling time
H. Simgen, MPI for Nuclear Physics / Heidelberg
23
Towards the realization of a
gas purification plant
Questions:
– Purpose: Rn only or also Kr?
– Selection of adsorber (How much?)
– Selection of operating conditions (liquid
phase / gas phase)
– Frequency of regeneration (2 columns ?)
– Degree of automation (refilling)
Knowledge
is available
– Decisions have to be taken now…
17/07/2015
H. Simgen, MPI for Nuclear Physics / Heidelberg
24
Conceptional desgin of N2/Ar
purification plant
Experiment
El. valve
(level control)
Particle
filter
LN2/LAr
17/07/2015
Flow/mass
meter
AC
Pump
El. valve
(level control)
H. Simgen, MPI for Nuclear Physics / Heidelberg
25
Investigation of storage tanks
222Rn
decays away
– Final contamination given by
emanation of storage tank
Regular
222Rn
purity N2 @ LNGS: ~50 Bq/m3
– from 3 x 6m3 tanks
– 222Rn emanation rate can be calculated
200 mBq per tank
Special
3 m3 storage tank for highest
purities (LINDE):
– 222Rn emanation rate: 2.7 mBq (!)
expected gas purity: 1.3 Bq/m3
17/07/2015
H. Simgen, MPI for Nuclear Physics / Heidelberg
26
Future activities
Clean
storage tanks are available (in
terms of 222Rn)
But Ar/Kr contamination?
Companies can produce low Ar/Kr
nitrogen
– But problems in delivery (Contamination
during refilling / storage)
Complete
delivery chain must be
carefully checked!
If result OK: No purification plant
necessary for GERDA
17/07/2015
H. Simgen, MPI for Nuclear Physics / Heidelberg
27
Conclusions
Selected
adsorbers were tested for gas
and liquid phase purification of N2.
CarboAct was chosen (low 222Rn
emanation rate)
Argon purification tests have been
performed (Results similar as for N2)
Conceptional design of purification plant
done: Final decisions to be taken
Tests of storage tanks and delivery chain
will clarify if purification can be avoided.
17/07/2015
H. Simgen, MPI for Nuclear Physics / Heidelberg
28
Radioactive noble gases in the
atmosphere
Source
222Rn
85Kr
39Ar
42Ar
17/07/2015
Primordial
238U
235U
fission (nuclear fuel
reprocessing plants)
Concentration (STP)
10 - ?00 Bq/m3 air
1.4 Bq/m3 air
1.2 MBq/m3 Kr
Cosmogenic
17 mBq/m3 air
1.8 Bq/m3 Ar
Cosmogenic
0.5 µBq/m3 air
50 µBq/m3 Ar
H. Simgen, MPI for Nuclear Physics / Heidelberg
29