Transcript Document
Telephone-based coping skills training for patients awaiting lung transplantation The INSPIRE Investigators Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC Washington University Hospital, St. Louis, MO Background • Awaiting lung transplantation is usually highly stressful • Rate of depression and anxiety disorders is ~45% and 50% respectively • Daily function is often compromised • Mortality rate among listed patients is 30% Barriers to Psychosocial Intervention • Severity of Illness • Geography Possible approach? INSPIRE Purpose • To evaluate the efficacy of a telephonebased psychosocial intervention for patients awaiting lung transplantation with respect to: • Psychological well-being • Daily function/Quality of life • Survival while awaiting transplant Methods • Dual-site randomized clinical trial • Coping Skills vs Usual Care • Randomization stratified by cystic fibrosis/non cystic fibrosis and time on waiting list Eligibility Criteria • Male or female outpatients 18 years of age • A diagnosis of end-stage pulmonary disease and currently on the active list for lung transplantation • Capacity to give informed consent and follow study procedures Exclusion Criteria • dementia • delirium • psychotic features including delusions or hallucinations • acute suicide or homicide risk DESIGN CST Assessment Assessment Follow-up Usual Care 12 Weeks 2 years Interventions Coping Skills Training • 12 Weekly sessions of 30-45 minutes • Workbook • Therapy sessions randomly selected for adherence to protocol • Therapists received routine supervision from senior therapist Usual Care • Monthly monitoring • Maintain usual level of contact with transplant team • Continue usual medications • Referred to psychological treatment if necessary Analytic Strategy • Similar to General Linear Model • Intent-to-treat • Propensity score approach with ML imputation • Propensity scores adjust for baseline value of response, age, ethnicity, income, education, gender, diagnosis, hx of psychiatric tx • Results similar between CACE and ITT Patient Flow Patients on candidate list screened from 12/00 to 7/04 (N = 533) Consented (N = 411) Completed baseline assessments (N = 389) CST (n = 200) Usual care control (n = 189) Attrition Analysis Reason for attrition CST N = 200 UC N = 189 Total N = 389 Deceased 5 (2.5) 8 (4) 13 (3.3) Transplanted 26 (13) 18 (9.5) 44 (11) Delisted 3 (1.5) 1 (0.5) 4 (1) Dropped out 25 (12.5) 3 (1.5) 28 (7.2) Completed tx but not post tx assessment 15 (7.5) 27 (6.9) 12 (6.3) Final Completion Rate: N = 273 CST UC N = 126 (63/78%) N = 147 (78/98%) Sample Size for Analysis N = 328 CST UC N = 166 N = 162 Completers (273) + Dropouts (28) + No post-tx Assessment (27) = 328 Results Background Characteristics Variable CST UC Age, yrs, mean (SD) 50 (11) 50 (12) Male N (%) 75 (45) 69 (43) Caucasian, N (%) 147 (89) 140 (86) Education > HS, N (%) 104 (64) 103 (63) Annual Income > $50K, N (%) 66 (40) 64 (40) Hx of Psychotropic medication, N (%) 44 (27) 45 (28) Hx of Psychotherapy, N (%) 9 (5) 9 (6) BDI Score, mean (SD) 13 (8) 11 (7) PQLS Score, mean (SD) 70 (17) 72 (15) GHQ Score, mean (SD) 49 (24) 45 (19) Sf-36 Mental Health Score, mean (SD) 23 (5) 24 (4) Attrition analysis: Odds of dropout cbt - 1:0 ghqtott1 - 60:30 white - 1:0 female - 1:0 cf - 1:0 copd - 1:0 somecollege - 1:0 incgt50k - 1:0 psymeds - 1:0 psytx - 1:0 sf36menhltht1 - 27:22 bditott1 - 16:6 saitott1 - 45:28 1.50 0. 95 0.50 2.50 3.50 4.50 5.50 Pulmonary Diagnoses 45 40 Usual Care CST % of Group 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 PD O C CF P PH PF id o rc a S M LA 's a r -1 ge a n e ph l m a n se i E er h t O Adherence: Therapy Sessions Attended Status N = 200 All 12 sessions 126 (63) At least 8 sessions 148 (74) No sessions 17 (8.5) Values are N (%) Mental Health Outcomes • • • • • • • Beck Depression Inventory General Health Questionnaire Spielberger State Anxiety Scale SF-36 Mental Health SF-36 Vitality Perceived Stress Scale Perceived Social Support State Anxiety 44 SAI 40 36 32 p = .040 28 CST UC Depressive Symptoms 18 16 BDI 14 12 10 8 p = .002 6 CST UC General Health Questionnaire 60 (negative affect) 55 GHQ 50 45 40 35 p = .027 30 CST UC 27 SF36 Mental Health 26 MH 25 24 23 22 p = .0005 21 CST UC 15 SF36 Vitality 14 VIT 13 12 11 10 p = .0005 9 CST UC Perceived Stress 26 24 PSS 22 20 18 16 p = .008 14 CST UC Perceived Social Support 80 78 76 PSSS 74 72 70 68 66 p = .06 64 CST UC Effect Sizes Usual Care CST BDI GHQ Anxiety SF 36MH SF 36Vit Stress -1.00 -0.75 -0.50 -0.25 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 Effect (SD) “Depression” (BDI > 10) No Change Improved Worse Usual Care 101 (63) 49 (30) 12 (7) CST 70 (42) 4 (2) 92 (55) Values are N (%) Anxiety No Change Improved Worse Usual Care 92 (57) 53 (33) 17 (10) CST 70 (42) 7 (4) 89 (53) Values are N (%) Therapy-related reduction in depression and anxiety • OR for post-CST depression = 0.395 – p = .004 • OR for post-CST anxiety = 0.537 – p = .031 Based on logistic regression model adjusting for background covariates and status at study entry Quality of Life/Physical Function Pulmonary Quality of Life 90 85 80 CST UC PQLS 75 Better 70 65 60 55 Poor p = .003 50 Pre-Treatment Level SF36 Emotional Role 6 5.8 ER 5.6 5.4 5.2 p = .616 5 CST UC SF36 Pain 11 Pain 10 9 8 p = .531 7 CST UC SF36 Physical Role 6 PR 5.5 5 4.5 p = .512 4 CST UC SF36 Social Function 7 SF 6.5 6 5.5 p = .597 5 CST UC SF36 General Health 13 12 GH 11 10 9 8 p = .751 7 CST UC Shortness of Breath 78 73 SOB 68 63 58 53 p = .738 48 CST UC Survival 0.9 --- CST, 22 (11%) Deaths 0.8 log(Probability of Survival) 1.0 Survival Until Transplant --- Usual Care, 21 (11%) Deaths 0 200 400 600 Days 800 1000 1200 0.8 0.7 --- CST, 38 (19%) Deaths 0.6 --- Usual Care, 26 (14%) Deaths 0.5 log(Probability of Survival) 0.9 1.0 All Survival 0 200 400 600 800 Days 1000 1200 Conclusions • Telephone-based therapy is a feasible psychological intervention among pulmonary transplant candidates • Behavioral interventions are associated with reduced depression and general distress relative to usual care • Behavioral interventions are associated with improved pulmonary quality of life among sicker patients • No apparent effect on physical function or survival Intervention & Session Topics • • • • • • • • • • • • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Introduction to the program Review of your life story Progressive relaxation training Mini-practices (relaxation) Goal setting I: pleasant activities Goal setting II: rest-activity cycles Calming self-statements I Calming self-statements II Problem-solving I Problem-solving II Preventing and dealing with setbacks Review and Maintenance Mental Health Outcomes as a “Factor” Variable Before Tx After Tx SH36 Mental Health 0.893 0.873 BDI 0.839 0.847 GHQ 0.861 0.848 State Anxiety 0.821 0.870 Correlation between Before and After = 0.74, P < .0001 Treatment Effect on Negative Affect • CST associated with Improvement on Negative Affect Factor, p < .001 • CST accounted for about 3.5% of the variance in post-treatment negative affect Pilot Study • Phone-based CST was associated with – Reduced depression – Reduced anxiety – Improved pulmonary QOL – Improved general well-being Napolitano et al., Chest, 2000 • Study sample small, limited power (N= 71) • Therapist also performed assessments • No assessment of medical outcomes