Transcript Slide 1

Planning Infrastructure Group
www.nndev.co.uk
Infrastructure Planning
www.nndev.co.uk
1. Background
2. Programme of Development
3. Moving Forward
www.nndev.co.uk
Infrastructure to support growth
Sustainable Communities Plan
MKSM Sub-Regional Strategy
• Estimated MKSM infrastructure
costs £8.3bn over 30 years
• “Central and local Government
will work, through the InterRegional Board and other
available avenues, to secure
commitment to the funding for
key infrastructure and other
investment essential to
delivering this Growth Area
Strategy in a sustainable
fashion.”
www.nndev.co.uk
Core Spatial Strategy
Vision
“…growth in homes and jobs will have been matched by investment in
infrastructure, services and facilities, creating a more self sufficient
area, better able to meet the needs of local people…”
CSS Policy 6
• Development will be supported by timely delivery of
infrastructure, services and facilities
• Developers to either make direct provision or contribute to
infrastructure required by development either alone or
cumulatively with other development
www.nndev.co.uk
Increased focus on Infrastructure
Planning Policy Statement 12
• Core strategy should be backed by evidence of what physical,
social and green infrastructure is needed to support development
• Infrastructure planning should identify, as far as possible:
 Infrastructure needs and costs
 Phasing of development
 Funding sources; and
 Responsibilities for delivery
• Key infrastructure stakeholders should engage with process
• Tests of soundness (Justified/ Effective)
North Northamptonshire ahead of game with CSS and NNDC
Programme of Development but further work needed
www.nndev.co.uk
Programme of Development
•
NNDC leads infrastructure planning on behalf of partnership
•
The Programme of Development (PoD) is the infrastructure
plan for North Northamptonshire
•
The PoD identifies infrastructure needed to deliver the Core
Spatial Strategy - uses technical work and plans/ aspirations
from infrastructure providers
•
Reviews possible funding sources: mainstream public funding,
GAF, CIF, private investment, as well as possible developer
contributions
•
Identifies gaps in infrastructure funding and investment
priorities for Growth Area Funding allocations
www.nndev.co.uk
Summary Funding Position (PoD)
Totals c £1.6 billion
www.nndev.co.uk
Summary Funding Position (PoD)
Total
TOTAL COST
Total Public Funding
£1,598,686,943
£778,654,514
Total Private Funding
£48,946,667
Funding GAP
Development
Contribution
Total Funding GAP
after DC
Major Roads
www.nndev.co.uk
-£771,085,762
£362,098,080
-£408,987,682
£348,080,000
Equates to approximately £36,000
per home
Based on approximately £17,000 per
home (less for brownfield)
Average £31.5m per year
What has been achieved?
1. North Northamptonshire has secured significant investment
• Total Growth Funding - £72.1 million
• Total funding from regional and national streams for
transport projects - £193 million (assuming A14 £120 million)
2. Strategic ‘show stoppers’ of A14 and waste water capacity have
been addressed through partnership working with agencies
3. PoD highly rated by Government ….. but funding allocation far
short of evidenced need. Bid for £90 million in 2009/11 but
received £19.4 million
How do we do better?
www.nndev.co.uk
Moving forward
Further work on the PoD is underway to:
•underpin the Core Spatial Strategy review and district development plan
documents
•provide the robust evidence base for the draft development contributions
SPD/ CIL
•enable a resubmission of the PoD in 2010 for next CSR and support
partners in bidding for resources
This entails
•refreshing and reviewing some of the information
•building a robust evidence base
•filling gaps e.g. on local infrastructure
•testing/ challenging some of the costs and assumptions
•building linkages across the core themes
•considering opportunities for co-location
www.nndev.co.uk
Moving forward
This is being accomplished through
•close partnership working facilitated by the ‘PIG’ (Planning
Infrastructure Group) made up of representatives of the NNDC,NNJPU
and Local Authorities
•consultation with key stakeholders individually and on a theme by
theme basis
• reporting via the NNDC Stakeholder Group as the ‘Reference Group’
to the NNDC Board and Joint Planning Committee
•engagement with the LSP/ LAA process including Regeneration &
Growth Group
www.nndev.co.uk
Moving forward – Key Tasks
Preparing stakeholder position statements setting out current
infrastructure and service plans
Preparing a costed infrastructure schedule for each district to 2021,
reviewing sources of funding and identifying gaps
Completed
Complete draft development contribution SPD followed by
consultation period
April 2010
Considering further infrastructure requirements arising from post
2021 growth options
Establishing a co location sub group
Ongoing
Refreshing and reviewing the PoD re-submission
Late 2010
www.nndev.co.uk
Model
being
populated
May 2010
Local Investment Plan (LiP)
• LiP will set out investment required
for an area to deliver the agreed
vision and economic purpose
•NNDC co-ordinating the
preparation of the LiP
•providing the evidence base for the
Local Investment Agreement to
prioritise HCA investment decisions
for 2011-13
www.nndev.co.uk
Key Issues/Priorities
Roads & Public Transport
•A14 Jct 7-9 programmed Jct 4-7 under review for work before 2021
•A45 issues around Chowns Mill & Wilby Way c£20million
•A509 IWIMP NW Wellingborough funding/ completion of design issues
•Town Centre strategies, advanced works underway
•Bus strategies and lack of strategic approach to modal shift
www.nndev.co.uk
Education
•University challenge
•Tresham, Wellingborough
•extended services, co-location
•BSF programme
•Growth beyond 2021 will require an additional 2 secondary schools and 8-9
primary schools
www.nndev.co.uk
Health & Social Care
•acute care requirement
•ageing population with extra care housing implications
•learning disabilities, reducing the reliance on residential care and replacing it
with supported living accommodation
•accessibility of services
•co-location of health services with other community uses in ‘hubs’ utilising
current asset base
•New PCT MKSM model ‘simul8’ results awaited
www.nndev.co.uk
Emergency Services
•relocation of Kettering fire station and additional station for Corby
•possible relocation of Thrapston station if required to allow for Town Centre
regeneration
•safer communities team bases for Police in SUE’s
•criminal justice centre increase from 33-50 cells to allow for growth, number
reduced if more homes built to secured by design.
•Kettering and part of Corby police stations to be released for redevelopment
as part of reprovision
•Police one stop shops in Town Centres provided as co-location with partners
www.nndev.co.uk
Utilities
•Central Networks and National Grid respond to requests for extra
connections and do not forward plan due to constraints of OFGEM
•Anglian Water £600 per house tariff for Flood Risk Protection not currently
being collected by Corby BC with no evidence base to support figure in other
LA’s
•Anglian Water AMP, OFWAT allowed less investment than requested, Anglian
now to prioritise investment decisions
www.nndev.co.uk
Culture & Sport
•North Northants Culture Investment Plan published in draft, further
information on timing and alternative funding to be explored
•North Northants strategic sports facilities framework published, application
of standards to be agreed by PIG and by consultation on document by
NORTOFT
www.nndev.co.uk
Economic Regeneration
•£79 Million over 15 Years to deliver a full Fit For Market Scheme
£23.5 Million to support Inward Investment Activities over a 15 Year Period
•Construction Futures levy to be agreed based on WNDC model
www.nndev.co.uk
Green Infrastructure
•Draft North Northants Green Infrastructure Investment Plan submitted but
requires work to prioritise projects and identify funding streams
www.nndev.co.uk