Transcript Slide 1

INTERNATIONAL
ENVIRONMENTAL
TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Environmental Solutions
About IET
2


IET’s Best In Class Technology Solutions

IET’s Core Technologies are cutting edge solutions to the world’s growing demand for
effective and environmentally conscious waste disposal and water treatment requirements

IET’s Core Technologies offer superior performance to all of today’s available alternatives

Increased efficiency & operating effectiveness

Reduced operating costs – minimal material handling, simple process with low maintenance requirements

Broad application scope, quick installation, and highly scalable design
IET’s Bundled Technology Solution

Proprietary technology portfolio of complementary products and solutions
CORE TECHNOLOGIES

Thermal Waste Gasification (WG/TO) – Solid Waste Disposal


Process generates significant quantities of recoverable heat and scrap - opportunities include the
commercial resale of electric power and recycled metals/glass
Electrocoagulation Water Purification & Treatment (EC)

Instantaneous treatment of large volumes of water; requires no chemicals
COMPLEMENTARY TECHNOLOGIES

Nataprene space-age polymer & EC113 Concrete Treatment

Highly complementary to the design & construction of IET’s core technology projects
About IET
3

IET’s Unique Opportunity



IET is a “Diamond in the Rough”

Historical focus on technology R&D NOT sales & marketing

Substantial project pipeline despite limited sales & marketing resources to date

3rd party verification of Best In Class claims – State of PA, State of FL, International Governments
IET’s Waste & Water Treatment Focus

Capitalizes on the positive global reputation regarding WG/TO & EC as industry best practices

Financially Attractive – Recession proof industry, large capital allocations/mandates, high profit margins

Best of the Best - bundled offering of proprietary technologies that are the Best in Class of the best practices
Business Development Strategy

Sales – Attain sales & revenue potential through strategic partnerships and internal
expansion

Strategic Investors – Resources necessary to promote business growth internally and externally

Strategic Engineering Partners – Meet current and future demand

Growth & Acquisition – leverage it’s core technologies, robust project pipeline, and
strong profit margins

Goals – Worldwide Waste & Water Treatment Portfolio of $5 billion via tax-efficient
strategy utilizing retained earnings
IET Products
4
Waste Gasification Thermal Oxidation (WG/TO)
•
•
•
•
Industrial, Municipal and Hazardous Waste Disposal Applications
Process recognized as a renewable energy source
US Patent Awarded 2002
First plant successfully launched in 1996 (Anchorage, AK)
Water Treatment & Purification through Electrocoagulation (EC)
•
•
•
•
Wide range of applications and system sizes including desalinization
Capital & operating costs are a fraction of alternative technologies
US Patent Pending
Extensive R&D by IET engineers since 2002
Nataprene
• Replaces rubber, synthetics, steel, and alloys in manufacturing processes and mining operations
• Complementary applications with IET’s WG/TO and EC Solutions - e.g. critical EC component design
• Proprietary IP acquired by IET in 2005
EC113 Concrete Treatment
•
•
•
•
Prevents contaminates from entering concrete without blocking its ability to breath
Strengthens concrete to a hardness of granite and prevents corrosion on the steel rebar
Complementary applications with IET’s WG/TO and EC Solutions
Patented process utilizing chemicals, EC treated water, and special vacuum/pressure injection system
Mechanics of Thermal Waste Gasification
5
What is Thermal Waste Gasification?



The chemical conversion of organic solids and liquids into synthetic gases is achieved through highly
controlled conditions of heat and availability of oxygen
Disassociates the molecules of a complex waste substance into simple gases
Highly efficient method of breaking down hazardous organic substances such as Dioxins and Furons
A Two Step Process
Primary Gasification Cell




The waste is unloaded the primary cell (16 cells with varying holding capacity depending on facility);
municipal waste doesn’t require specific organization
Each cell is surrounded by a steel box where a refractory will insulate, but not hold the heat for a long
time
The oxygen-starved process allows combustible waste to be converted to gas and sterile, white ash
which is recyclable
The released gas is predominantly composed of CO and H2
Secondary Gas Processor Cell



Outside air is then mixed with the gas from the primary and flared off at a temperature up to 2000 F
This efficient method allows for leftover metals to be further recycled
Finally, the introduction of turbines into this process provides new forms of renewable energy for
surrounding areas
Process Flow Diagram of
IET’s Waste Gasification System
6
MSW In
Flue
Gas
Gasifier
Syn
Gas
Thermal
Oxidizer
Flue
Gas
Waste Heat
Boiler
Flue
Gas
Proprietary
Scrubber
Fly Ash
Air
Power
Generation
Bottom
Ash
Recyclables
Proven Technology
7


The state of the art IET System

IET’s technology was recently approved by The Florida Department of
Environmental Protection following rigorous 3rd party due diligence by world
renowned environmental engineering firm Golder Associates (www.golder.com)

The State of Pennsylvania commissioned a $2M research report on 35
hazardous/solid waste processing technologies. It concluded that IET's gasification
process would clearly serve as the best technology

Proven application of technology – First facility online in Anchorage, AK (1996)
How the IET System is superior to alternative technologies:

Patented waste gasification process (2002)

Lower capital investment costs than less efficient alternative technologies

Lower operating expenses result in higher profitability

Multiple cell units working simultaneously – highly scalable & efficient to maintain

Emissions from IET’s system are lower than federal regulations without the use of
scrubbers

More types of waste can be gasified with IET’s system than the competitors’
systems – ranging from tires to plastics to large furniture items
Thermal Waste GasificationProcess Facts and Advantages
8

















Supported by the United States Department of Energy
Eliminates 98.5% of all combustible waste materials
Large scalability (modular cells range from 2 to 2500 ton systems)
Average installation time is 4 to 6 months, depending on the size
Provides for 100% recycling of aluminum, metals, and gases
Clean and quite operation-no noise or obnoxious odors
No pre-sorting or trash separation before processing
Moisture in the waste does not affect performance
Eliminated animals, birds, and insect scavenging in the waste
Kills all pathogens in medical waste
No special handling of medical waste is required
Reduces volume of medical waste by over 98%
Eliminated future need for landfills for combustible waste
Small land requirements are less than 1% of landfill sites
Very inexpensive operating costs/low cost of installation.
Operator training and installation provided by IET
Service and warranty provided by IET
Water Purification through
IET’s Electrocoagulation
9
Electrocoagulation Defined:




EC is based on the principle of introducing an electrical current to
induce a chemical reaction in water
This reaction causes the destabilization of most suspended
particles, bacteria, viruses, cysts, dissolved materials, metals, most
hydrocarbons and many organics
Once destabilized, positively charged ions react with negatively
charged particles in the water resulting in floc precipitates that
approach a highly stable state
The floc created is highly stable and can therefore be easily
separated from the water by a number of conventional secondary
separation techniques
Advantages of IET’s
Electrocoagulation
10





IET’S technology reduces or eliminates the need for the use of
chemicals and polymers that are normally used for this treatment;
therefore, resulting in reduced sludge production and easier
operation
IET’S technology can be used as a pre-treatment to remove TOC’S
prior to adding chlorine, thus greatly reducing the formation of
trihalomethanes (THM) and haloacetic acids (HAA)
IET’S Electrocoagulation kills virus, cysts, and coliform bacteria;
eliminating one of the largest problems with water contamination that
face many communities
The sludge formed during the use of IET’S electrocoagulation is
easier to handle and to dewater due to the absence of chemicals
and bound water
Finally, the sludge has been repeatedly tested and proven to be
leachant-free; thus ensuring sludge doesn’t repeatedly dissolve in
the water again
Effectiveness of IET’s Electrocoagulation
Technology
11









Systems are available in a wide range of sizes, from portable
Emergency Drinking Water Unit, to permanent installations with
over 10,000 gallons per minute of capacity
Removes arsenic from drinking water-lined to cancer of bladder,
lungs, and skin
Removes pesticides, complex organics, and suspended solids
Effective breaking of oil/water emulsions
Removes coal fines and slurry from process water
Waste water treatment to eliminated hog, cattle, and poultry sewage
lagoons
Replacement of chemical flocculants in water treatment plants
Pre-treatment of salt, or brackish, water before filtration
Proven treatment of landfill leachate
Nataprene
12

What is Nataprene



Nataprene is a proprietary, premium-grade, high
performance TDI-PTMEG polyether polymer
advanced material with extreme versatility which
was formulated and developed by Marnat
Industrial Company, LLC
It contains urethane groups and is created by
reacting isocyanates with polymers and chain
extenders. By varying the nature of these
components, many properties can be created for
variety of applications
Performance and use




Has outworn ordinary rubbers and plastics, often
by a factor of 8:1
Products are distinctive with respect to their
abrasion and corrosion resistance as well as it’s
load-bearing capacity and hardness
Offers high-impact resistance, elasticity,
translucence, and high resistance to oils, ozone
degradation, and gamma ray radiation
Is used in such industries as power, utilities,
sand and gravel companies, pulp and paper
processing, mining, marine, and aeronautics
IET’s EC113 Concrete Treatment
13
The Deterioration of Concrete:


As concrete ages and is exposed to the elements of heat, cold, carbon
dioxide, chlorides and other chemicals it begins to deteriorate
When these chemicals penetrate the concrete there is a drop in pH that
results in the corrosion of the steel rebar. This corrosion expands to many
times the size of the original steel, causing the surface to spall and exposes
this corroded steel
The IET Concrete Injection System:




This system is able to transform corrosion active concrete to a passive
state, measured by a industry accepted corrosion rate. ECII3, a water
soluble proprietary formulation, penetrates and migrates through the
cement micro gel pores and lining structure to the rebar level
Reverses the conditions that affect the durability of concrete by protecting
against freeze/thaw damage, salt scaling, and sulfate attacks
Protection is provided both at the reinforcing steel and by a reduction of
chloride ion ingress
It reacts at the rebar surface to convert rust into a strong chemically inert
protective surface
Performance Traits of EIT’S EC 133
14











Establish a protective film on the rebar surface
Convert rust to a hard inner shell
Purge and stabilize contaminants
Reduce water penetration
Evaluate and/or control pH
Increase compressive strength
Provide resistance to acid
Substantially reduce porosity
Increase hardness
Increase surface adhesion
Seals micro-cracking
IET – Principal Biographies
15

Bob Gorley

Roger Kolb

F. William Gillmore

Eugene Markovics – Nataprene

Anthony Fiasco & Robert Walde – EC113 Concrete Treatment
Financial Projections –
Waste Gasification & Electrocoagulation
16
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
IET - Sales Revenue
Thermal Waste Gasification Technology (WG)
$
Electrocoagulation Water Treatment Technology (EC) $
Equipment & Material Costs
$
52,000,000 $
25,000,000 $
33,500,000 $
150,000,000 $
50,000,000 $
90,000,000 $
250,000,000 $
75,000,000 $
147,500,000 $
350,000,000 $
100,000,000 $
205,000,000 $
500,000,000
150,000,000
295,000,000
Net Revenue
$
43,500,000 $
110,000,000 $
177,500,000 $
245,000,000 $
355,000,000
General & Administrative
Office & Rent
Sales & Travel
Marketing Materials
Legal & Accounting
Misc. Expenses
Salary - Existing Management Team
Bob Gorley - CEO
Roger Kolb - Waste Gasification Engineer
William Gilmore - Electrocoagulation Engineer
Salary - Personnel Requirements
COO
Senior Project Engineer
Project Engineer
CFO
Admin - Office Manager/HR
Admin - Office Support
V.P. of Sales & Marketing
Sales Associate
Sales - WG Service & Support
Sales - EC Service & Support
Sales Assistant
$
$
$
$
$
$
60,000
120,000
250,000
250,000
150,000
250,000
120,000
150,000
500,000
250,000
250,000
500,000
120,000
150,000
500,000
250,000
250,000
500,000
120,000
150,000
500,000
250,000
250,000
500,000
$
$
$
200,000 $
120,000 $
120,000 $
200,000 $
120,000 $
120,000 $
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
125,000
75,000
100,000
65,000
100,000
60,000
30,000
250,000
150,000
120,000
150,000
65,000
55,000
200,000
120,000
120,000
120,000
60,000
Total Expenses
$
2,075,000 $
3,620,000 $
Net Profit (Pre-Tax)
$
41,425,000 $
106,380,000 $
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
120,000
150,000
500,000
250,000
250,000
500,000
200,000 $
120,000 $
120,000 $
200,000 $
120,000 $
120,000 $
200,000
120,000
120,000
250,000
150,000
120,000
150,000
65,000
55,000
200,000
120,000
120,000
120,000
60,000
250,000
150,000
120,000
150,000
65,000
55,000
200,000
120,000
120,000
120,000
60,000
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
250,000
150,000
120,000
150,000
65,000
55,000
200,000
120,000
120,000
120,000
60,000
3,620,000 $
3,620,000 $
3,620,000
173,880,000 $
241,380,000 $
351,380,000
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
International Environmental Technologies
Project Pipeline – Waste Gasification & Waste Gasification-To-Energy
17
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
LOCATION
CLIENT
QUOTED
PRICE
PROJECTED GROSS
PROFIT/TERMS
Waste Gasification
Dixie County, Florida
Dixie Waste Serives, Inc.
$5.25 million
$2 million
1
STATUS/NOTES
- All permits issued by the state of
Florida and Dixie County
- Contract executed
33% at initiation of contract
150 tons per day
- All Due Diligence completed
- In process of obtaining funding
2
Waste Gasification
Ensenada, Mexico
Tratamientos Ambientale de
Scorpion, S.A.
800 tons per day
- Land owned and improvements
$47 million
$11 First Phase
(200 tons per day First Phase)
$23 million
$5 million First Phase
33% at initiation of contract
3
under construction
- Contract signed
- Permits partially received, balance
expected within 30 days
- Site owned; Funding in place
Gasification to Energy
Italy
E.J. Greensystem, S.R.L.
$10 million
$5 million
- Pushing to finalize contract and
33% at initiation of contract
- Italy has mandate for this type of
fund $600,000 pilot plant at site
100 tons per day
(First out of 16 plants in process)
4
Gasification to Power
1000 tons per day
plant with significant financial rewards
Bucks County,
Pennsylvania
Monangahella Power
Valley
- Proposal agreed upon
$100 million
$50 million
- Contract & Funding in process
- Company underwent state funded $2
33% at initiation of contract
million study of technologies in this area.
IET chosen as best by a wide margin.
International Environmental Technologies
Project Pipeline – Waste Gasification & Waste Gasification-To-Energy
18
5
PROJECTED GROSS
PROFIT/TERMS
Government of Turkey
Daniel Park, Agent
$20 million
$10 million
E.J. Greensystem, S.R.L.
$600 million
LOCATION
CLIENT
Gasification to Power
Turkey
200 tons per day
6
QUOTED
PRICE
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Gasification to Energy
$300 million
Shadi Arnita of Kuwait
Kuwait
Has first right to handle this
$36 million
project. Funded by Kuwait.
8
Haiti
Government of Haiti/
World Bank
Waste to Energy Projects
Waste to Energy
$150 million
Abu Dhabi Government
Environmental Committee
from the Iraq War
- Haiti pushing to move ahead
- Funding in place from World Bank
33% at initiation of contract
U.A.E., Abu Dhabi
- Projects to process waste piled up
- Multiple projects
$300 million
$160 million
1600 tons per day
10
$18 million
payback from electricity purchase
33% at initiation of contract
3000 tons per day
9
government mandate. Government
allows high return and quick
33% at initiation of contract
600 tons per day +
Waste to Energy Projects
for the plant
- 15 separate projects in Italy under
Italy
(16 projects)
Waste Gasification
- Government has funding in place
33% at initiation of contract
7752 tons per day
7
STATUS/NOTES
$80 million
33% at initiation of contract
as a priority project
- This area needs this technology
and governments are pushing
- Funding in place
- Brazil in significant push for waste
Porto Lasa, Brazil
Government of Brazil
$220 million
$110 million
and water projects
- Representative owns significant
International Environmental Technologies
Project Pipeline – Electrocoagulation Water Treatment
19
1
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
LOCATION
CLIENT
QUOTED
PRICE
PROJECTED GROSS
PROFIT/TERMS
Pre-Treat Drinking Water
Haiti
Government of Haiti World Bank
$50 million
$35 million
STATUS/NOTES
- Prime Minister of Haiti and Environmental
Minister pushing to meet IET together with
33% at initiation of contract
World Bank in Washington D.C.
- $80 million already set aside for Water
Projects in Haiti by World Bank
2
Pre-Treat Drinking Water
Brazil
Government of Brazil
$90 million
$63 million
- Negotiations in process with government
- These systems are necessary to help meet
5000 + Separate Systems
33% at initiation of contract
new water standards which must be in
place by the end of 2008
- IET needs to bring a demo system to Brazil
to finalize the deal
3
Waste Water Treatment
Plant
Panama City,
Panama
Government of Panama
with funding from Trust
$50 million
$35million
- IET is the most competitive bidder with
33% at initiation of contract
4
Waste to Energy Plants
All Locations
IET
- Funding in place
$20 million
the best technology
$14 million
- This is part of quoted price for Waste to Energy
33% at initiation of contract
(prevent scaling/mineral deposits in
boilers)
5
Pre-Treatment and Waste
Water Treatment
India
Hydro Labs/ Government $200 million
(Multiple Systems)
$140 million
(Total Work)
33% at initiation of contract
6
E.C. Water Treatment
Italy
E.J. Greensystem S.R.L.
$50 million
$35 million
7
Waste Water Treatment
(Oil & Sand Water)
Canada
Creative Energy
$200 million
$140 million
- Significant demand in India from multiple clients
- Unlimited projects
International Environmental Technologies
Project Pipeline – Key Developments
20

Golder Associates is the top environmental engineering, permitting, and
construction company in the world with 130 offices in 26 countries. Golder
handled the engineering due diligence and permitting with Dixie County
Florida and the Florida Department of Environmental projection. They
have been so impressed by the technology, they want to represent IET
world-wide

E.J. Greensystem, S.R.L. in addition to working with 16 current projects in
Italy wishes to represent IET for all of Italy and Mediterranean Basin

Representatives of Haiti and the World Bank including the Prime Minister
and the Environmental Minister have selected IETs Waste Gasification and
Water. Technology and funding is in place from the World Bank

M.J. Aslan Environmental Engineering with significant relationships in
the Middle East and Europe wishes to represent IET in the U.A.E., Abu
Dhabi, Europe, and North Africa
rd
3
Party Verification of Technology
21

The following list of IET’s WG/TO technology benefits were taken
directly from 3rd party statements after a careful study of the process

commercially proven with mixed waste streams particularly MSW and waste tires

requires minimal presorting and processing of waste including tires

environmentally appropriate - yielding low air emissions well within EPA and EU standards
and sterile ash

recapture of recyclables after gasification reduces material handling requirements

relatively low operating costs

robust primary cells with relatively few moving parts

very good utilization of the feed stock with high yield of useable energy

minimal waste disposal requirements, i.e., approximately 10% of incoming volume

modular, scalable and easily expandable to accommodate increased demand