Methods for Assessing Student Learning Outcomes

Download Report

Transcript Methods for Assessing Student Learning Outcomes

Methods for Assessing
Student Learning
Outcomes
Beth Wuest
Interim Director, Academic Development and Assessment
Lisa Garza
Director, University Planning and Assessment
February 15, 2006
Workshop Goals
To become:

more aware of the importance of methods of assessment in relation
to student learning outcomes and program improvement

more knowledgeable about direct and indirect assessment methods

more competent at developing methods for assessing student
learning outcomes

more knowledgeable about using and adapting assessment
methods that are currently in practice

more adept at reviewing methods for assessing effectiveness and
efficiency
Overview

For evidence of success and program
improvement
 All
programs are requested to have 5-8
learning outcomes with two assessment
methods for each outcome by March 31, 2006
 An assessment report of these outcomes will
be due toward the end of the 2006-2007
academic year
Linkages to Other University
Assessment
Academic Program Review
 College and University strategic planning
 Program and University accreditations

Definitions

Outcomes
 Desired

results expressed in general terms
Methods
 Tools
or instruments used to gauge progress
toward achieving outcomes

Measures
 Intended
performance targets expressed in
specific terms
Focus
At present we are focusing only on
outcomes and methods. Although
measures should be considered when
developing these, they will not be
specifically addressed until the first
assessment cycle (2006-2007).
Student Learning Outcomes

Describe specific behaviors that a student of
your program should demonstrate after
completing the program

Focus on the intended abilities, knowledge,
values, and attitudes of the student after
completion of the program
Key questions to consider

What is expected from a graduate of the program?

What is expected as the student progresses through the
program?

What does the student know? (cognitive)

What can the student do? (psychomotor)

What does the student care about? (affective)
Why are Student Learning Outcomes
So Important?

basis for program improvement

instruction, course design, curricular design

communicate instructional intent

increase awareness of learning (for students)

common language

advising materials

promotional materials

support accreditation
Methods of Assessing Learning
Outcomes

should provide an objective means of supporting the
outcomes, quality, efficiency or productivity of programs,
operations, activities or services

should indicate how you will assess each of your
outcomes

should indicate when you will assess each outcome

provide at least two ways to assess each outcome
Categories of Assessment Methods

student learning

direct assessments evaluate the competence of students


indirect assessments evaluate the perceived learning


student perception, employer perception
program or unit processes

direct assessments evaluate actual performance


customer satisfaction, error rates, time, cost, efficiency, productivity
indirect assessments evaluate the perceived performance


exam scores, rated portfolios
perceived timeliness, perceived capability
curriculum

methods used to check alignment of curriculum with outcomes

curriculum mapping
Examples of Direct Methods















Samples of individual student work
Pre-test and post-test evaluations
Standardized tests
Performance on licensure exams
Blind scored essay tests
Internal or external juried review of student work
Case study/problems
Capstone papers, projects or presentations
Project or course imbedded assessment
Documented observation and analysis of student
behavior/performance
Externally reviewed internship or practicum
Collections of work (portfolios) of individual students
Activity logs
Performances
Interviews (including videotaped)
Examples of Indirect Methods

Questionnaires and Surveys






Students
Graduating Seniors
Alumni
Employers
Syllabi and curriculum analysis
Transcript analysis
Describing Assessment Methods

What are you going to use?


Of and/or by whom?


point-of-service, capstone, throughout the year, end of program
For what purpose?


student, mentor, focus group, alumni
Context (e.g., where or when)?


presentation, assignment, test, survey, observation, performance
rating
desired learning outcome
example: Test the students at the end of the program for
their level of knowledge in XYZ
Creating Assessment Methods
What
Who
Where/When
Outcomes
Presentation
Student
Point-of-service
Learning
Assignment
Alumni
Capstone
Quality
Portfolio
Customer
Throughout the year
Timeliness
Test or exam
Instructor
End of year
Skills
Project
Mentor
End of program
Satisfaction
Performance
Focus group
In course
Preparation
Survey
Process
On the job
Efficiency
Direct measurement
Employer
Transcripts
Creating Assessment Methods
What
Who
Where/When
Outcomes
Presentation
Student
Point-of-service
Learning
Assignment
Alumni
Capstone
Quality
Portfolio
Customer
Throughout the year
Timeliness
Test or exam
Instructor
End of year
Skills
Project
Mentor
End of program
Satisfaction
Performance
Focus group
In course
Preparation
Survey
Process
On the job
Efficiency
Direct measurement
Employer
Transcripts
Locally Developed Surveys

institutional level
 alumni
survey
 academic advising
survey
 image survey
 student satisfaction
survey
Joe Meyer, Director,
Institutional Research

program or department
level
 advisory
board surveys
 employer surveys
 customer surveys
 program-specific surveys
 graduating senior survey
Curriculum or Course-based

performance-based
 capstone
courses
 capstone projects
 case studies
 classroom assessment
 course-embedded assignments
 course-embedded exam questions
 portfolios
 reflective essays
Types of Examinations or Tests

standardized exams
 national test
 state test

juried competitions
 recitals
 shows or

exhibitions
locally developed exams
 pre-post tests
 course-embedded
exam questions
 comprehensive exam
 qualifying exam
Assessment Matrix Can be Useful to
Link the “Where” with the
“Outcomes”
Learning
Outcome
Course
1234
Course
2345
Course
3456
Capstone
Introduced
Emphasized
Used
Assessed
Skills and
knowledge
Introduced
Used
Assessed
Communication
skills
Introduced
Application of
theory
Emphasized
Hints on Selecting Methods

match assessment method with learning outcome


Students completing BS in xyz will demonstrate competence in abc
principles comparable to graduates of other similar national programs

Student will be tested with a locally developed exam administered at the end
of the program

Students’ scores on the xyz principles on the xyz national examination
administered twice a year will be examined
the assessment results should be usable

Students completing BS in xyz will demonstrate competence in
conducting research

Seniors at the end of their capstone course develop a research design to
address the intended research question posed in a case study. A rubric will
be designed to assess the effectiveness of their ability to construct a
research design.

Graduating seniors will complete a senior research project. Completion of
the project will be recorded.
Not Useful
Hints on Selecting Methods




results should be easily interpreted and unambiguous
data should not be difficult to collect or access
information should be directly controllable by the unit or
program
identify multiple methods for assessing each outcome






direct and indirect methods
qualitative and quantitative
passive or active methods
within different courses
conducted by different groups
identify subcomponents where other methods may be
used that allow deeper analysis
Hints on Selecting Methods

use methods that can assess both the strengths and
weaknesses of your program

capstone or senior projects are ideal for student learning
outcomes assessment

when using surveys, target all stakeholders

build on existing data collection

accreditation criteria

program review
exercise
Selecting the “Best” Assessment
Methods






relationship to assessment — provide you with the
information you need
reliability — yields consistent responses over time
validity — appropriate for what you want to measure
timeliness and cost — preparation, response, and
analysis time; opportunity and tangible costs
motivation — provides value to student, respondents are
motivated to participate
other


results easy to understand and interpret
changes in results can be attributed to changes in the program
After Identifying the Potential List of
Assessment Methods You Need to…

select the “best” ones


consider possible performance targets for the future


try to identify at least two methods for assessing each outcome
balance between stretch targets versus achievable targets
Examples of methods

survey (using the Graduating Senior Survey) the students at the end of the
program as to their intention to continue their education in a graduate program
(indirect method)

students will rate their likelihood of attending a graduate program on a survey
(using the Graduating Senior Survey) that they will complete at the end of the
program

xyz graduates’ admission rate to xyz graduate program in the State of Texas will
be reviewed
After Identifying the Potential List of
Assessment Methods You Need to…

develop assessment instruments







surveys
exams
assignments
scoring rubrics
portfolios
ideally you want them to be reliable, valid, and cheap
approaches
 use external sources
 seek help from internal sources (e.g., Academic Development and
Assessment Office)

do it yourself

the instrument may need to be modified based on assessment
results
Challenges and Pitfalls

one size does not fit all — some methods work well for
one program but not others

do not try to do the perfect assessment all at once —
take a continuous improvement approach

allow for ongoing feedback

match the assessment method to the outcome and not
vice-versa
Example

Outcome 1: Graduates will be satisfied that their
undergraduate degree has prepared them to succeed in
their professional career

xyz graduates will be surveyed in the annual alumni survey on their
preparedness to succeed in their career


95% of the xyz graduates surveyed in the annual alumni survey report that the xyz
program enabled them to be “very prepared” or “extremely prepared” to succeed in
their career (next phase)
on-site internship supervisors each semester will rate interns from the xyz
program on their skills necessary to succeed in the workplace

90% of on-site internship supervisors each semester rate interns from the xyz program
as having the skills necessary to succeed in their career (next phase)

students in their capstone course will be administered a locally
developed, standardized exam regarding career preparedness


95% of student in their capstone course are able to successful answer
90% of the questions regarding career preparedness on a locally
developed, standardized exam (next phase)
scores of graduates who have taken the state licensure exam in xyz
within one year of graduating from the xyz program will be evaluated

85% of the graduates are able to pass the state licensure exam in xyz
within one year of graduating from the xyz program (next phase)

senior portfolios will be examined annually using a locally devised rubric
to show evidence of preparedness for success in related professional
careers on three key measures: communication, leadership, and ethics


90% of senior portfolios examined annually using a locally devised rubric will
show evidence of preparedness for success in related professional careers
on three key measures: communication, leadership, and ethics (next phase)
students will be observed performing basic technical lab skills
necessary for successful employment in a senior laboratory course

90% of students will be able to perform basic technical lab skills necessary
for successful employment in a senior laboratory course (next phase)
Re-Cap of Process
Step 1: Define program mission
Step 2: Define program goals
Step 3: Define student learning
outcomes
Step 4: Inventory existing and
needed assessment methods
Step 5: Identify assessment methods for each
learning outcome
questions
and
comments