Transcript Document

2014 Annual Meeting
Cross Insurance Center, Bangor
Welcome
Chip Reeves, MRC Board President
• MRC’s Mission
– Affordable
– Environmentally sound
– Focused on the long-term
• Election Results
– Ken Fletcher elected, Sophie Wilson and Josh
Reny re-elected, all to three-year terms.
2014 MRC Annual Meeting
2
Treasurer’s Report
Sophie Wilson, MRC Board Treasurer
REVENUE
FY 2014
Budget
FY 2014 Year-End FY 2015 Proposed
Estimate
Budget
Municipal Dues Basis
2014 Tons 179,000 @ $1.25
$
225,000.00
$
224,000.00 $
223,750.00
BHE Parity Deal Monitoring Agreement
$
57,000.00
$
57,870.00 $
58,000.00
Budget Stabilization Fund Transfer*
$
720,675.00
$
748,197.00 $
676,400.00
PERC Oversight Committee
Reimbursement
$
10,000.00
$
10,560.00 $
10,000.00
$1,012,675.00
$
TOTAL REVENUES
2014 MRC Annual Meeting
1,040,627.00
$
968,150.00
3
EXPENSES
FY 2014
Budget
FY 2014 Year-End
Estimate
FY 2015 Proposed
Budget
Legislative Advocacy (PretiFlaherty)
$
55,000.00
$
55,000.00
$
65,000.00
Administrative Services (Ex. Director and Outside services)
$
209,495.00
$
180,000.00
$
180,000.00
Technical Consultant (CommonWealth)
$
122,180.00
$
105,000.00
$
125,400.00
Legal Services (Eaton Peabody-General)
$
15,000.00
$
15,000.00
$
15,000.00
Legal Services (Eaton Peabody-Specialized)
$
50,000.00
$
52,000.00
$
30,000.00
Audits (Loiselle, Goodwin & Hinds)
$
12,000.00
$
11,500.00
$
12,000.00
Insurance (general liability, D&O)
$
10,000.00
$
8,900.00
$
10,000.00
USAE Litigation
$
50,000.00
$
60,000.00
$
60,000.00
Contingency Fund
$
10,000.00
$
4,200.00
$
10,750.00
$
533,675.00
$
491,600.00
$
508,150.00
Legal & Property Acquisition Agent
$
143,000.00
$
160,000.00
Fiberight Project Development & Engineering Services
$
134,000.00
$
152,000.00
$
300,000.00
Post 2018 Communications
$
69,000.00
$
62,000.00
$
60,000.00
Asset Option Purchase
$
63,000.00
$
64,000.00
$
-
RFEI Process Evaluation
$
30,000.00
$
52,000.00
$
-
UM Engineering Peer Review by Professors/Researchers
$
10,000.00
$
20,000.00
$
-
DEP PBD processing costs
$
30,000.00
$
39,027.00
$
-
Subtotal Operations
Post 2018 Planning Activity
Post 2018 Planning Contingency
$
Subtotal Post-2018 Planning
TOTAL EXPENSES
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
100,000.00
479,000.00
$
549,027.00
$
460,000.00
$1,012,675.00
$
1,040,627.00
$
968,150.00
2014 MRC Annual Meeting
4
Exciting News
Greg Lounder, MRC Executive Director
• Location secured for a new processing facility.
• Agreement with Fiberight nearing completion.
• UMaine review of the technology.
• Working on solutions for facility residuals.
2014 MRC Annual Meeting
5
How Did We Get Here?
Dan McKay, Eaton Peabody Attorney
2004
2007
• MRC permits joint exercise of MRC right of first refusal
allowing current PERC Partners to assume control and
USAE to become general partner.
• MRC begins active monitoring of emerging MSW
technologies.
• Post-2018 planning continues with primary focus on PERC
extension.
2008
• Off-site meeting focuses on emerging alternative MSW
management technologies.
2009
• MRC Board resolves that PERC extension is its preferred
post-2018 option.
2014 MRC Annual Meeting
6
How Did We Get Here? (Cont.)
• MRC cooperates with USAE to effect PERC refinancing.
Facilitates release of reserve funds to benefit PERC and
USAE.
• USAE develops economic model for post-2018 operation.
Brings economic feasibility of PERC extension into
question with tipping fee projection of more than $110/ton.
• Other issues emerge (volume, GAT, out-of-state waste).
2010-2011
• MRC Board voices concern with pricing and other issues.
• MRC meets with Private Partners to discuss concerns with
feasibility of post-2018 PERC extension.
• USAE informs MRC of PERC's intent to cease operations
in 2018.
2014 MRC Annual Meeting
7
How Did We Get Here? (Cont.)
• MRC Board begins to consider alternative post-2018
options while seeking to continue dialogue with USAE
regarding PERC extension.
2010-2011 (cont.)
• USAE does not respond to requests for further
dialogue.
• MRC requests proposal from USAE to address pricing
and other issues. USAE does not respond.
2012
• MRC steps up evaluation of emerging technologies,
requests joint evaluation. USAE does not respond.
2014 MRC Annual Meeting
8
How Did We Get Here? (Cont.)
• MRC continues to request USAE to participate in a joint
evaluation of alternative technologies. USAE refuses,
asserting without substantiation that there are no viable
alternatives.
2013
• MRC presents USAE with a comprehensive term sheet
to address all outstanding partnership issues, including
alternative technologies and potential extension of the
PERC agreements beyond 2018. USAE does not
respond.
• MRC invites PERC to participate in an RFEI process to
solicit potential alternative technologies for the post2018 period. USAE refuses.
• MRC issues RFEI. Receives numerous responses.
• Private Partners introduce L.D. 1483 in effort to gain
government subsidies to support higher tipping fees.
2014 MRC Annual Meeting
9
How Did We Get Here? (Cont.)
• Hire lobbyists to promote. Assure MRC that lobbyists are
being engaged by USAE and not at Partnership expense.
2013 (cont.)
• USAE reneges. Bills Partnership for more than $750,000
in lobbying expenses incurred in 2013. MRC objects.
• USAE lobbyists begin organized effort to end run the MRC
and lobby MRC Communities directly.
• MRC files suit against USAE over lobbying fees.
2014
• Lobbying efforts continue unabated at Partnership
expense over MRC objections.
• PERC Holdings initiates effort to formulate plan to
incorporate PERC into MRC's evolving post-2018 plan.
MRC agrees to consider any reasonable proposal.
2014 MRC Annual Meeting
10
The Future of MSW Processing
for the MRC
George Aronson, Commonwealth Resource Management
MSW Management After 2018:
Roles of Fiberight and the MRC
Fiberight
Own, design, get permits for, finance, construct, startup, operate and maintain, sell products, manage
residuals
The MRC
Own the site, lease land to Fiberight, agree to provide
municipal MSW, help manage residuals, maintain
oversight role
As landlord, the MRC has a clear basis for oversight
2014 MRC Annual Meeting
12
MSW Management After 2018:
The Fiberight Facility
•
Technology based on pilot plant in Virginia and
equipment in MRFs and pulp mills
•
Other plants will be in Iowa and Maryland
•
Designed for 150,000 to 200,000 tons per year
•
No out-of-state MSW accepted or needed
•
Divert at least 80% of incoming MSW
•
Send residuals to existing off-site landfills
2014 MRC Annual Meeting
13
MSW Management After 2018:
Three Business Agreements
1. Site Lease: MRC leases site to Fiberight with site use
restrictions and basis for oversight
2. Master MSW Supply Agreement: A contract between
MRC and Fiberight that supports financing, insulates
towns from liability, and simplifies management and
compliance
3. Town Ratification Agreements: Agreements between
the towns and the MRC on delivery of MSW to
Fiberight
2014 MRC Annual Meeting
14
MSW Management After 2018:
Key Provisions
•
Tip fees start under $70 per ton with rebates down to the $60s or
even the $50s per ton
•
Towns have delivery obligations, but the MRC has the only hard
GAT (if needed)
•
Towns can start waste reduction and enhanced recycling programs
at will
•
Towns can elect to send recyclables to Fiberight
•
Initial term of 15 years from commercial operation date
•
Full set of liability protections (milestones, defaults, etc.)
2014 MRC Annual Meeting
15
How did we get here? Three Stages
2007 to
2013
Worked to extend the existing
arrangement (with the private partners
in PERC
2013 to
2014
Solicited and evaluated vendor
proposals; chose to work with
Fiberight
2015 to
2018
Complete development, construct and
enter operation
2014 MRC Annual Meeting
16
Stage 1: Extension of PERC
2007 Monitored emerging technologies
2008 Evaluated converting PERC to mass-burn and
other retrofits
2009 MRC received first extension proposal concept.
Board voted extension as preferred option after
2018
2010 Refined economic models. MRC issues of GATs,
PERC scale-down, need for out-of-state MSW
2011 MRC received proposal at $110 per ton, with other
issues: responded with 11-point letter
2014 MRC Annual Meeting
17
Stage 1: Extension of PERC
• MRC suspended efforts on extension until
PERC private partners address the issues.
• MRC asked about joint evaluation of
2012
technologies.
• No response was received to either request.
• Partners indicated that PERC will likely close in
2018.
2014 MRC Annual Meeting
18
Step 2: Solicit and Evaluate Proposals
June
2013
• MRC issues Request for Expressions of Interest
(RFEI); advertises for vendors and technologies
Aug.
2013
• MRC receives 13 responses, begins evaluation,
visits five facilities
Dec.
2013
• MRC identifies Fiberight as a leading candidate
and detailed evaluation begins
• MRC identifies nine potential sites
2014
• MRC files PBD for two sites to host a landfill
• Maine DEP indicates PBD will not be approved
2014 MRC Annual Meeting
19
Step 2: Solicit and Evaluate Proposals
• MRC secures option on Hampden site
• MRC pursues other ways to manage residuals
2014
• MRC retains University of Maine for peer review
of the Fiberight technology
• MRC gives PERC private partners 90 days
notice (to January 2015) to provide their
proposal and address the issues identified in
2012
2014 MRC Annual Meeting
20
Step 3: Overall Schedule
2015
• MRC will make exclusive commitment to
preferred vendor and technology
• Apply for permits, develop infrastructure
• Negotiate agreements
2016
• Get municipal approvals
2017
• Get permits, get financing, start construction
• Construct facility and infrastructure
2018
• Start commercial operation
2014 MRC Annual Meeting
21
Step 3: Events in 2015
Winter
• MRC will make exclusive commitment to
preferred vendor and technology
• Apply for permits, develop infrastructure
Spring
• Negotiate agreements
• Fiberight applies for permits
Summer
• Negotiate agreements
Fall
• Finalize agreements to present at the 2015
MRC Annual Meeting in December
2014 MRC Annual Meeting
22
Hampden Site Introduction
Denis St. Peter, PE
CES President & Senior Project Manager
• Centroid of MSW generated by MRC communities
• Town leadership support as host community
• Conforms with Town’s Comprehensive Plan & Zoning
• Enhances Town’s proposed development plans
• Significant distance from nearest residences
• Proximity to I-95 Exit
• Suitability of property - DEP siting requirements
2014 MRC Annual Meeting
23
MRC Requests for the Towns
1. Monitor MRC communications
2. Evaluate role in and needs for post-2018 system
3. Plan for Councils or Town Meeting to act on MRC
proposals starting December 2015 (plan for warrant
articles, etc.)
4. Give feedback on contents of agreements
5. Support MRC legislative positions
2014 MRC Annual Meeting
24
FOR MORE INFORMATION:
www.mrcmaine.org
Greg Lounder – MRC Executive Director
207-664-1700 – [email protected]