Transcript CoE - DCS

Centres of Excellence
Progress Report May 2006
6/2/2006
1
Introduction & Background
 The purpose of this presentation is to provide a status
report on all actions, activities and interventions that
have taken place to date in relation to establishing
Centres of Excellence in all regions.
 The Department has identified Correctional Centres
across various Regions to serve as Centres of
Excellence where an environment will be created for
the provision of holistic integrated programmes and
services to the offender in order to produce socially
responsible individuals.
6/2/2006
2
Introduction & Background
 The Department intends to achieve, through a systematic
process of piloting and translating the prescripts and ideals
of the White Paper on Corrections, into sustainable
practice in selected centres, that will be characterized by
the:
 Provision of holistic, integrated and needs-based services to
offenders within needs-driven facilities aimed at producing socially
responsible persons;
 Effective management and control over all critical challenges that
could have a significant impact on rehabilitation;
 Presence of competent Rehabilitation- orientated personnel who
are recruited, trained, retrained and developed in the "Ideal
Correctional Official";
 Meaningful support for its overall Corrections-mandate from highly
functional external partnerships with families, communities and
society at large
6/2/2006
3
Approved Centres of Excellence
 Western Cape
 Malmesbury Medium A Correctional Centre
 Goodwood Correctional Centre
 Dwarsrivier Correctional Centre
 Drakenstein Medium B Juvenile Correctional Centre
 Pollsmoor Female Correctional Centre
 Voorberg Medium B Correctional Centre
6/2/2006
4
Approved Centres of Excellence
 Eastern Cape
 Cradock Correctional Centre
 Idutywa Correctional Centre
 Stutterheim Correctional Centre
 East London Medium C Correctional Centre
 Kirkwood Correctional Centre
 Umtata Maximum Correctional Centre
 Queenstown Correctional Centre
6/2/2006
5
Approved Centres of Excellence
 KwaZulu/ Natal
 Ebongweni Maximum Correctional Centre Kokstad
 Durban Juvenile Correctional Centre
 Durban Female Correctional Centre
 Pietermaritzburg Correctional Centre
 Ekuseni Youth Development Correctional Centre
 Empangeni Community Corrections
6/2/2006
6
Approved Centres of Excellence
 Free State & NCape
 Groenpunt Juvenile Correctional Centre
 Goedemoed Medium A Correctional Centre
 Douglas Correctional Centre
 Sasolburg Correctional Centre
 Kroonstad Medium C
 Kuruman Correctional Centre
6/2/2006
7
Approved Centres of Excellence
 Mpumalanga, Limpopo &
Northern Cape
 Middelburg Correctional Centre
 Ermelo Correctional Centre
 Rustenburg Juvenile Correctional Centre
 Makhado Correctional Centre
 Klerksdorp Correctional Centre
 Modimolle Correctional Centre
6/2/2006
8
Approved Centres of Excellence
 Gauteng
Emthonjeni Juvenile Correctional Centre
(Bavianspoort)
Leeuwkop Juvenile Correctional Centre
Johannesburg Medium Correctional Centre
Johannesburg Female Correctional Centre
Pretoria Central Correctional Centre
6/2/2006
9
Progress: Policies
Alignment of the Correctional Services
Act No. 111 of 1998 with the White Paper
on Corrections SA (2005)
Policies have been developed and
aligned with the Principles of the White
Paper.
Implementation plans have been
developed for roll-out to regions
6/2/2006
10
Progress: Documentation
 Various documents, frameworks and tools
have been drafted, approved and
distributed for implementation in Centres of
Excellence e.g. White Paper on
Corrections; Brochures; Video; Checklist
for compliance; Implementation plan;
Integrated Project Plan; ORP document; A
webpage for Centres of Excellence
6/2/2006
11
Progress: Training on
programmes
 Orientation of all personnel in Centres of Excellence on Concept
Document
 Service Delivery Orientation for personnel (frontline training)
 Change Management training sessions
 Training of Heads of Correctional Centres by HRD on:
 Communication
 ORP (broad outline)
 Training of Correctional Supervision and Parole Board members
(52 CSPB established and trained)
 Training / orientation sessions at 6 identified Centres of
Excellence on the ORP. These centres will serve as blue print
for the roll-out of the ORP to other Centres of Excellence in the
regions
6/2/2006
12
Progress: Training of staff
 Correctional Intervention Teams (Relevant Section Heads)
 Correctional programmes personnel
 Educators
 Skills Development practitioners
 Psychologists
 Social Workers
 SRAC
 Spiritual Care Workers
 Health
 HIV and AIDS
 Workshop and Agriculture personnel
 Social Reintegration
 Head of Community Corrections
 Head of Correctional Centre from all CoE in region + 3 other
key personnel
6/2/2006
13
Progress: Audit of facilities &
Security
The installation of security equipment at
access control points of 66 Correctional
Centres (Centres of Excellence and other High
Risk Correctional Centres) are in process to be
finalized - Contract HQ 2/2005: Installation of
security equipment at access points of Centres
of Excellence,
Security fences with CCTV coverage and
detection system that link up with a control
room are also in the process to be finalized at
Centres of Excellence.
6/2/2006
14
Progress: Structures
Steering committees have been established
on all organizational levels in order to
oversee the implementation, manage and
coordinate processes and also the facilitate
adherence to and compliance with guiding
documentation and procedures:
National (Chairperson: CDC Development
and Care)
Regional (DRC)
Management Area (Area Commissioner)
6/2/2006
15
Progress: Tools & Frameworks
 Admission risk / needs assessment:
 Conducted during Admission and within 24 hours after
admission
 Comprehensive Health Assessment &
Comprehensive risk / needs Assessment
 Conducted during Assessment phase within 21 days after
admission
 Offender Profiling
 Framework to profile offenders based on assessment
outcomes, risks and needs
 Correctional Sentence Plan
 Intervention plan for each offender based on his / her specific
risks and needs
6/2/2006
16
Progress: Structures
The Project Manager for Centres of
Excellence has also been appointed
and has assumed duty on 1 April 2006.
Correctional Supervision and Parole
Board (CSPB) – all 52 were
established and trained
Unit Management
Assessment teams
6/2/2006
17
2. Unit
Management
3. Policies
1. Structures
4. ORP
10. Case file
5.Tools
9. Resources
8. Training
6/2/2006
7. QA
6. Programmes
18
Matrix: Structures for overseeing
implementation CoE
Level
Name of
Coordinator
Members Frequency
(list)
of meetings
Reports
on
progress
Comments on
achievements
& challenges
Head
Office
Regional
Office
Management
Area
6/2/2006
19
Matrix: Unit Management
Comments. Reasons why
targets were not reached
Structured day (example)
Number of case files
opened for new admissions
Number of Case files
opened
Names of Case Officers
Names of Case
Management Supervisors
Names of Unit Managers
Description of Unit eg Unit
1
Number of units
20
6/2/2006
Matrix: Policies
Comments with regard to
achievements and nonachievements
Monitoring ( frequency,
levels (who is monitoring
when)
Implementation (target date
for completion)
Training (Number of
officials trained)
Available & communicated
Procedures
Policy (approved policies)
21
6/2/2006
Matrix: ORP
Comments. Reasons
why targets were not
reached
Progress
Intervention
Sentence Plan
Profiling
22
6/2/2006
Assessment
Numbers per month
Targets per month
New admissions
Existing
Matrix: Tools
Type of
tool
Availability Training
of tools
Implemen- M&E
tation
Comments on
achievements
and challenges
Initial Risk Assessment
Comprehensive Risk Assessment
Profiling
Sentence Plan
Check List for CoE
Audit Tools
Integrated Project Plan
6/2/2006
23
Matrix: Programmes
Comments on
achievements and
challenges
Numbers of offenders
scheduled to attend progr
Numbers of offenders
attending programme
Manual
Audited / quality assured
Duration
Target group
Service provider (internal or
external)
Objectives
Name of programme
24
6/2/2006
Matrix: Quality Assurance
Comments on
achievements and
challenges
Intended outcome
Reports generated
Impact assessment tool
Duration
Manual
Module
Operational Agreement
25
6/2/2006
Quality assurance
Target group
Name of service
provider
Internal providers
External providers
Matrix: Training
Sentence planning
CIT
Profiling
MIS
Comments.
Reasons why
targets not
reached
CAT
Follow-up training
scheduled/
completed
Training provider
(internal/ external)
Assessment tools
Nr of competency
certificates
issued
Nr of certificates
of attendance
issued
CMC
26
6/2/2006
Number of
persons trained
Training needs
registered
Type of training
Unit Management
ORP
Matrix: Resources
Comments. Reasons
why targets were not
reached
Registered
shortcomings (with doc
evidence
Shortcomings on post
establishment per
occupational group
Vacancies per
occupational group
27
6/2/2006
Total nr of staff on post
establishment
Type of resource
Staff
Matrix: Case File - content
Comments on
achievements and
challenges
Pre-release assessment
Feedback on interventions
Case notes
Individualized day roster
Profile
Sentence plan
Orientation information
check list
Comprehensive Risk
Assessment
Initial Risk Assessment
Intake form
28
6/2/2006
Way forward
 Finalization and approval of outstanding Policies &
Procedures;
 Implementation of approved Policies and Procedures;
 Development of an Integrated Project Plan based on
the Operational Plans of Branches for the 2006/07
financial year.
 Monitoring the implementation of the ORP in the
Centres of Excellence;
 Finalization of Compulsory Programme Policy and
piloting of programmes in Centres of Excellence;
 Development of an instrument / mechanism to
measure the impact and effectiveness of all
programmes and services;
6/2/2006
29
Way forward
 Development of an automated Quality
Assurance system;
 Development of measures to improve the
working environment;
 Further training of functionaries on:




6/2/2006
Unit Management
‘Ideal Correctional Official’
ORP
Feedback on matrixes
30
Thank you
Together we can…
Build a caring correctional system that truly belongs to all
6/2/2006
31