Transcript 2013 - Mandaluyong

DIVISION OF CITY SCHOOLS
City of Mandaluyong
Division Plan for CY 2013
Type of Learners:
-In-school:
-33,859 Elementary/kinder
-18,193 Secondary
-174 Elem. SPED
-21 Sec. SPED
-3,027 Jose Fabella Memorial School
(Special School)
PROBLEM ANALYSIS
ACCESS
The secondary schools have a PCR of
64.67 which means that it does not
meet R.A. 7880, schools with severe
shortage of classrooms.
The PCR of Elem. Schools is 54.15
which means that it does not meet the
R.A. 7880 even with double shifting.
 GER (Elem.) has increased to
88.38 in 2011, however it is below
the PDP target of 108.27%.
 GER (HS) has increased to 81.32
in 2011 , however it is below the
PDP target of 86.86.
Causes:
• In the elementary the enrolment of the entire
Division increased from 29,923 to 31,308
(2009-2011).
• The enrolment for secondary schools
increased from 16,270 to 17,857 (20092011)
• A significant number of learners are enrolled
in Private Schools and public schools in
nearby divisions.
• Transfer of learners to other public schools
in nearby divisions and provinces
Strategies:
ACCESS
• Request to the LGU Executives for the
construction of medium rise building in Andres
Bonifacio Integrated School and Jose Fabella
Memorial School with buildable space.
• Establishment of new School Annexes and
Integrated Schools(1 elem. School and 1
Integrated School)
• Conduct of school mapping to determine the
school-age children.
• Conduct of advocacy campaigns.
QUALITY
NAT for the last 3 Years (Elementary)
SCHOOL
YEAR
MATHEMATICS ENGLISH SCIENCE FILIPINO HEKASI
46.64
56.35
50.91
69.95
56.11
2009-2010
53.35
55.15
49.55
71.79
59.04
2010-2011
46.54
53.66
52.64
61.30
51.17
2011-2012
MPS
55.99
57.77
53.06
80
2009-2010
60
2010-2011
40
2011-2012
20
0
• Increase/decrease of NAT MPS for elementary has been erratic in
the last three years and way below the 75% National MPS target.
QUALITY
NAT for the last 3 Years (Secondary)
School
Year
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
MATHEMATICS
36.66
39.81
42.62
ENGLISH SCIENCE FILIPINO HEKASI
48.83
50.61
52.92
41.84
38.86
39.12
60.55
64.26
52.34
38.82
53.60
55.08
Critical
Thinking
MPS
45.34
49.46
51.65 48.81
70
60
50
40
30
2009-2010
20
2010-2011
10
2011-2012
0
• Increase/decrease of NAT MPS for secondary has been erratic in
the last three years and way below the 75% National MPS target.
QUALITY
Causes:
• Low reading performance as manifested in Phil-IRI results.
• Teacher competence and capacity in managing different types of
learners, innovative teaching style and strategies and curricular
reforms.
• Frequent suspension of classes due to heavy rains and typhoons
• Existence of 2 shifts in all schools divisions in some schools
divisions
• Overlapping of extra-curricular activities across levels (attending
trainings, workshops, celebrations, contests and meetings)
• Frequent floodings and other geophysical problems in four
schools.
• Instructional supervisory style/strategies of School Heads and
Supervisors.
• Absence for Incentive and Award System for high performing
learners
Strategies:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
QUALITY
Roll out of PASBE - SBM ACCESs
Implementation of K to12 Curriculum
Implementation of strategic reading program in all schools.
Identification of least mastered skills in NAT and provide appropriate learning
activities for remediation/reinforcement
Enhancement of Assessment/Testing Program of the Division and Schools
Effective and efficient implementation of the K-12 Curriculum and other reforms
Development of learning modules as a catch-up instruction during suspension of
classes/ holding of make-up Saturday classes.
Establishment of additional Special Science Elementary Schools
Enhancement of library hubs, eClassrooms and ICT Integration in teaching.
Creation of the learning resource portal (division and school websites)
Regulation of Co-Curricular activities for learners and add-on tasks for teachers
division heads, supervisors and principals.
Capability building programs for instructional managers, school heads and teachers.
Launching of Incentive and Award System for High Performing Learners
EFFICIENCY
• Elem. Schools have an insignificant drop-out
rate for the last three year ranging from
0.67% to .0.49% whereas HS have a range of
5.95% to 2.13%. It can be noted that Elem.
and HS have decreasing drop-out rate for the
last three years.
• Completion Rate for both elementary and
secondary is below the PDP target. (93.8%
elem. and 77.97% HS)
• CSR for both elem. and HS is above the PDP
targets.
Causes:
EFFICIENCY
• Frequent floodings and other geophysical
problems.
• Teacher competence and capacity in
managing different types of learners,
innovative teaching style and strategies
and curricular reforms
• High cost of living resulting to irregular
attendance of learners.
• Parental involvement
Strategies:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
EFFICIENCY
Convergence with barangay and LGU officials.
Launching of Eco-Savers Program
Institutionalization of Greening Program.
Implementation of Disaster and Risk Reduction Program.
Capability building programs for teachers.
Establishment of additional Open High Schools.
Effective and efficient implementation of the K-12 Curriculum and
other reforms
Increasing the number of beneficiaries for the Feeding Program.
Strict adherence to no collection policy and regulations on the
requirements of school projects and other co-curricular activities.
Institutionalization of parents support system/Guidance and
counseling services to learners.
Maintain Medical and Health Services to less privilege learners.
Recommend additional beneficiaries for the 4Ps Program.
Widen coverage of relevant ALS Livelihood Programs.
Request for additional slots for GASTPE grantees
GOVERNANCE
• Absence of Plantilla Items for administrative and financial staff of the
Division Office and Schools.
• Full implementation of eBEIS, LIS. However, some ICT Support
systems like LRMDS and AMS are still to be implemented.
• Information dissemination process with in the division needs
upgrading.
• Absence of permanent ADR committees in the division and schools.
• The division is only on the start up stage of the implementation Child
Protection Policy.
• School Audit Team is no yet in placed.
• Preparation of Work and Financial Plan and Annual Procurement
Plan is for compliance only
• Incentive and award system for School heads, supervisors, teachers
and non-teaching personnel needs enhancement.
• Consultative and Support System between and among DepEd
Officials, Local School Board and Congressional Office is very
evident.
Causes:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
GOVERNANCE
Division office has no authority to create and fill plantilla items
Continuing support funds for internet connections not sustained
LRMDS and AMS implementation is still on process.
Resistance to change and slow adaptability of division and school
officials and personnel ICT-enhanced processes.
Low level of awareness on ADR law and processes
Central Office had just released the DepEd Order on Child
Protection Policy
Low level of awareness on the significance of School Audit Teams
Low level of expertise in the preparation of Work and Financial Plan
and Annual Procurement Plan
Incentive and award system is not well publicized
Strategies:
GOVERNANCE
• Wait patiently for the approval of the Rationalization Plan
• Request authority to fill for vacant non-teaching items
• Include allocation of the salaries of Guards/ Utility Workers / Clerks
of the division office and schools in the SEF budget.
• Follow strictly the calendar of the implementation of LRMDS and
AMS
• Utilization of the Division website for the paperless info
dissemination, transactions, and reports.
• Conduct capability building for ADR and Accounting and Auditing
Processes, Rules and Regulations among the division and school
officials and concerned teachers.
• Conduct of Orientation on DepEd on Child Protection Policy.
• Retrain division and school officials on the preparation of Work and
Financial Plan and Annual Procurement Plan
• Convene the division and school Incentive and Awards Committees
• Continuous interfacing between and among the DepEd Officials,
Local School Board and Congressional Office.
GOALS
• Expand and improve participation and absorptive
capacity of all schools and learning centers (ACCESS &
EFFICIENCY)
• Achieve proficiency level of performance in all learning
areas/strands for all levels (QUALITY)
• Ensure that the learning competencies are responsive to
the fast-changing environment (QUALITY)
• Ensure synergy of support systems in the management of
educational services (GOVERNANCE)
GOALS
OBJECTIVES:
• Increased GER, NER, AIR, NIR by 2% - 5%
from the previous year
• Increased MPS in NAT by 2% - 5%
• Increased CSR, CR & GR by 2% - 5%
• Decreased SDR, SLR, Failure & Repetition
Rates to 0.5% in the elementary level and to 2%
in the secondary level
• Increased efficiency in management and
operations (frontline services and other related
functions)
CY2013 Programs/Activities/Projects
MFO 1.
1 K – 12 Basic Education Program
2 Assessment/Testing Program
3 Kinder Education for all 5 year kids
4 Mother Tongue-Based Multi-Lingual Education (MTB-MLE)
5 Special Science Elementary School
6 ESEP
7 SPED
8 Special Schools
9 Open High Schools
10 ICT Enhanced Instruction
11 eClassrooms
12 Dynamic Leaning Program conceptualized by the Bernidos of Bohol
13 Voch-Tech Schools
14 Strategic Reading Program
15 Values Formation Program
16 Campus Journalism
17 Sports Development
18 Scouting Program
19 Journalism Program
20 MTAP Program
22 Alternative Delivery Mode (ADM) in Formal Basic Education
23 ALS Basic Literacy and Livelihood Program
24 School Health and Nutrition Program
25 Child – Friendly School Program
26 Opening of Annex School and Integrated School
27 Special Program for the Arts
28 Special Program for Foreign Languages
29 Upgrading of Science Laboratory Room ,Facilities and Speech Laboratory
30 Reproduction of modules for K-12 /OHS/ALS
31 Revitalized Guidance Program for Secondary Schools
32 Guro Ko, Patnubay Ko Counselling Program
33 Incentive and award system for high performing learners
MFO 2.
4
Capability building program for school heads and supervisors on
Instructional Leadership, Financial Management and Legal Procedures and
ALS Programs.
Capability building program for teachers on Strategies and Content, ICT
enhanced instruction and Child Protection
Capability building program for School Audit Teams, ADR Teams and Child
Protection Committee.
Development and enhancement of Division Website
5
Advocacy campaigns on various programs and projects
6
Accreditation of elem. and sec. schools (PASBE)
7
SBM ACCESs
8
Interfacing with Local School Board and Congressional Office
9
National Greening Program / Disaster Risk Reduction Programs
10
Eco-savers Program
Incentive and award system for division officials, school heads, teachers
and non-teaching personnel
12. Hiring of Legal Consultant
1
2
3
11
MFO 3.
Standardization and recognition of Private
1
Schools
Orientation – Workshop on LIS
2
Implementation
Capability building program for School
3
heads and Teachers on K-12 BEC
Budget Allocation
FUND
2010
2011
2012
SEF
295,000,000
295,000,000
300,000,000
GAA
377,602,000
434,615,000
460,022,000
672,602,000
729,615,000
760, 022,000
Total