Transcript Document
Performance Task Literacy • Develop foundational knowledge about the assessment continuum, the Smarter Balanced Assessment System, and Universal Design for Learning Purpose of This Training • Learn about Smarter Balanced performance tasks, how they assess college and career readiness, and where they fit into the assessment continuum. • Use Smarter Balanced scoring tools and processes to analyze student work and develop a deeper understanding of the Smarter Balanced performance tasks and the instructional shifts of the Common Core State Standards. • Plan for all students to learn the skills and content necessary to gain mastery on the Common Core State Standards and to demonstrate that mastery on the Smarter Balanced performance tasks. Evidence-Centered Design (ECD) Each claim is accompanied by statements about the kind of evidence needed to support the claim. Evidence statements are called “assessment targets”. Target Standard CC Standard CLAIM Claims are broad statements about what students should know and be able to do to demonstrate CCR. CC Target CC Standard Each target shows how one or more (or parts) of the CCSS addresses the target. Draft Claims for ELA Include… …one overarching claim broken down for grades 3-8 Overall Claim— Students can demonstrate progress toward college and career readiness in English language arts and literacy. …and for high school Overall Claim— Students can demonstrate college and career readiness in English language arts and literacy. Draft ELA/Literacy Claims Overall claims are broken down into four assessment claims; one from each ELA strand Claim #1 Reading Claim #2 Writing Claim #3 Speaking Listening Claim #4 Research/Inq uiry Students can read closely and analytically to comprehend a range of increasingly complex literary and informational text. Students can produce effective and well-grounded writing for a range of purpose and audiences. Students can employ effective speaking and listening skills for a range of purposes and audiences. Students can engage in research and inquiry to investigate topics, and to analyze, integrate, and present information. 5 Claim 1 Reading Students can read closely and analytically to comprehend a range of increasingly complex literary and informational text. 1. Targets 1–7 correspond with literary texts 2. Targets 8–14 correspond with informational texts 3. Assessment targets are linked to the content clusters within the Common Core State Standards. Now let’s look at a specific target for Claim 1. Elementary School Claim 1: Reading Reading Students can read closely and analytically to comprehend a range of increasingly complex literary and informational text. • 50% Literary texts: stories, poems, plays/drama, myths, mysteries, science fiction, historical fiction • 50% Informational texts: literary nonfiction, historical documents, scientific articles, technical texts Grade 5 Claim 1 Target 4 RL-2 Determine a theme of a story, drama, or poem from details in the text, including how characters in a story or drama respond to challenges or how the speaker in a poem reflects upon a topic; summarize the text. Claim #1 Reading: Students can read closely and analytically to comprehend a range of increasingly complex literary and informational text. Target 4 REASONING & Evaluation: Use supporting evidence to justify interpretations (theme, events, conflicts/challenges, setting, character development/ interactions, point of view) RL-3 Compare and contrast two or more characters, settings, or events in a story or drama, drawing on specific details in the text (e.g., how characters interact). RL-6 Describe how a narrator’s or speaker’s point of view influences how events are described. (DOK 3) Claim 2 Writing Students can produce effective and well-grounded writing for a range of purpose and audiences. – Targets 1, 3, & 6: Revise/Write Brief Texts – Targets 2, 4, & 7: Compose Full Texts including essays and narratives – Target 5: Use of text features, e.g., headings, subheadings, etc. – Target 8: Language & Vocabulary Use – Target 9: Edit/Clarify – Target 10 Technology As students grow older, and their tasks become more complex, one task may include two or more targets Now let’s look at a specific target for Claim 2. Middle School Claim 2: Writing Writing Students can produce effective and well-grounded writing for a range of purpose and audiences. • Middle School Claim 2 Tasks include: – Narrative writing – Informational/explanatory writing – Argumentative writing Grade 7 Claim 2 Target 1 W.3 a. Target 1 1.WRITE/REVISE BRIEF TEXTS: Claim # 2 Writing: Students can produce effective and well-grounded writing for a range of purpose and audiences. Apply narrative strategies (e.g., dialogue, description,) and appropriate text structures and transitional strategies for coherence when writing or revising one or more paragraphs of narrative text (e.g. closure, introduce narrator or use dialogue when describing an event) Engage and orient the reader by establishing a context and point of view and introducing a narrator and/or characters; organize an event sequence that unfolds naturally and logically. b. Use narrative techniques, such as dialogue, pacing, and description to develop experiences, events, and/or characters. c. Use a variety of transition words, phrases, and clauses to convey sequence, signal shifts from one time frame or setting to another, and show the relationships among experiences and events. d. Use precise words and phrases, relevant descriptive details, and sensory language to capture the action and convey experiences and events. e. Provide a conclusion that follows from and reflects on the narrated experiences or events. (DOK 2) Claim 3 Speaking Listening Students can employ effective speaking and listening skills for a range of purposes and audiences. For Claim three there are three assessment targets Target 1 Language & Vocabulary Use Target 2 Clarify Message Target 3 Plan/Speak/Present Target 4 Listen/Interpret Now let’s look at a specific target for claim 3 Grade 11 Claim 3 Target 3 SL-1 Initiate and participate effectively in a range of collaborative discussions (oneon-one in groups and teacher-led) with diverse partners on grades 11–12 topics texts and issues building on others’ ideas and expressing their own clearly and persuasively. Target 3 PLAN/SPEAK/PRESENT: Gather Claim #3 Speaking and Listening: Students can produce effective and well-grounded writing for a range of purpose and audiences. and organize information compose and orally deliver short (e.g., summaries) and longer (presentations) for different purposes and audiences drawing from a range of digital media to enhance the message or intent . SL-4 Present information findings and supporting evidence conveying a clear and distinct perspective such that listeners can follow the line of reasoning alternative or opposing perspectives are addressed and the organization development substance and style are appropriate to purpose audience and a range of formal and informal tasks. SL-5 Make strategic use of digital media (e.g. textual graphical audio visual and interactive elements) in presentations to enhance understanding of findings reasoning and evidence and to add interest. SL-6 Adapt speech to a variety of contexts and tasks demonstrating a command of formal English when indicated or appropriate. (DOK 3 DOK 4) Claim 4 Research/Inqui ry Students can engage in research and inquiry to investigate topics, and to analyze, integrate, and present information. For claim 4 there are seven assessment targets Target 1 Plan/Research Target 2 Interpret & Integrate Information Target 3 Analyze Information/Sources Target 4 Use Evidence to support an argument or position Target 5 Language & Vocabulary Use Target 6 Edit/Clarify Target 7 Technology Grade 4 Claim 4 Target 3 Claim #4 Research and Inqiry: Students can employ effective speaking and listening skills for a range of purposes and audiences. Target 3 ANALYZE INFORMATION/SOURCES: Distinguish relevant-irrelevant information (e.g., fact/opinion) W-8 Recall relevant information from experiences or gather relevant information from print and digital sources; take notes and categorize information, and provide a list of sources. W-9 Draw evidence from literary or informational texts to support analysis, reflection, and research. (DOK 2) Language Standards are Integrated • Language acquisition will be assessed as part of Claims 1, 2, and 3. How to Read and Interpret the Draft Summative Assessment Targets Tables Grade Level Text of Claim Targets Targets are mapped to standards Structure of Item Specification Table 19 W-9 Draw evidence from literary or informational texts to support analysis, reflection, and research 20 What Are Claims and Targets? • “Claims are the broad statements of the assessment system’s learning outcomes.” • “For each Claim, a set of Assessment Targets are provided. . . . the assessment targets describe the expectations of what will be assessed by the items and tasks within each claim.” Smarter Balanced General Item Specifications Key Phrases • Interaction with varied, rich stimuli • Engages students in a scenario – Solve a problem – Create a product with a specific purpose • Application of knowledge and skills • Integration . . . across multiple standards • Assesses what selected- and constructed-response items cannot Session 3.B: Claims and Targets The overall claim for grades 3–8: “Students can demonstrate progress toward college and career readiness in English language arts and literacy.” The overall claim for grade 11: “Students can demonstrate college and career readiness in English language arts and literacy.” Session 3.B: Claims and Targets Claims, Targets, and Standards Session 3.B: Claims and Targets You May Have Noticed . . . • Research claim and targets assessed in the constructed- and selected-response items • Writing claim and targets assessed in the full write • Reading targets NOT assessed • NO claims or targets associated with the Classroom Activity ELA Literacy Summative Assessment Blueprint • http://www.smarterbalanced.org/wordpress/wpcontent/uploads/2014/05/ELA_Preliminary_Blueprint-2014_04-30Final.pdf How will this impact my instruction? • Create performance tasks for your classroom or department. • Incorporate common scoring among staff • Incorporate authentic projects in your curriculum • Other ideas? Smarter Balanced Item Types CAT Assessment Items Performance Tasks – Focus on grade-level content skills – Focus on students’ ability to problem solve in real-life situations – Computer adaptive (item difficulty depends on response to each prior item) – Focus on previous grade-level content skills, with some integration of on-grade-level skills – Questions are machine-scored – Include both machine-scored and hand-scored questions – Primarily assess Claim 1, but do – Primarily assess Claims 2, 3, and 4 include problem solving Structure of a Smarter Balanced Performance Task • Each performance task has an explicit overall task stated within the Stimulus. • Each performance task has a total of six questions (items), some with multiple components. • First two questions are to support understanding of the context of the Stimulus, and are typically machinescored. • Questions 3–6 build to resolve an overarching question, and some or all of these are hand-scored. • Interdependencies exist among questions 3–6 in a controlled manner. • Each question within a performance task is aligned to the CCSS, the SMPs, DOK, and Smarter Balanced Claims. Each performance task consists of six questions, which provide evidence of the Claims as follows: – Between 0 and 2 questions within the performance task give students an opportunity to provide evidence of Claim 2. – Between 2 and 4 questions within the performance task give students an opportunity to provide evidence of Claim 3. – Between 1 and 2 questions within the performance task give students an opportunity to provide evidence of Claim 4. Claim 1: Concepts and Procedures • Students can explain and apply mathematical concepts and carry out mathematical procedures with precision and fluency. Claim 2: Problem Solving • Students can frame and solve a range of complex problems in pure and applied mathematics. Claim 3: Communicating Reasoning • Students can clearly and precisely construct viable arguments to support their own reasoning and to critique the reasoning of others. Claim 4: Data Analysis and Modeling • Students can analyze complex, real-world scenarios and can use mathematical models to interpret and solve problems. Claim 1: Concepts and Procedures Students can explain and apply mathematical concepts and carry out mathematical procedures with precision and fluency. • Generally DOK level 1 Claim 2: Problem Solving Students can frame and solve a range of complex problems in pure and applied mathematics. • Students can solve well-posed problems • The components or information needed to solve the problem are contained within the stimulus for that specific question • Generally DOK level 1 or 2 Claim #2 Problem Solving Claim 3: Communicating and Reasoning Students can clearly and precisely construct viable arguments to support their own reasoning and to critique the reasoning of others. • Students communicate about the mathematics and problem solving • Students justify solutions • Students determine correct logic or arguments • Students identify assumptions being used within the task • Nearly always DOK level 3 and could include Claim #3 Communicating Reasoning Claim 4: Data Analysis and Modeling Students can analyze complex, real-world scenarios and can use mathematical models to interpret and solve problems. • Students solve problems in which all needed information is not contained within the stimulus for the specific question. • Students make decisions regarding multiple solution pathways. • Students analyze external information that may modify a previous solution. • Students make improvements to a model or develop a new model based on a described situation or task. • Generally DOK levels 2, 3, or 4 Claim #4 Modeling and Data Analysis Claim 1: Concepts and Procedures Claim 2: Problem Solving Claim 3: Communicating Reasoning Claim 4: Data Analysis and Modeling Evidence of Claim 1 shows that students can “do math.” Evidence of Claims 2, 3, and 4 shows that students can apply mathematics to novel situations, think and reason mathematically, and use math to analyze empirical situations, understand situations better, and improve decisions. Standards for Mathematical Practice 1. Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them. 2. Reason abstractly and quantitatively. 3. Construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others. 4. Model with mathematics. 5. Use appropriate tools strategically. 6. Attend to precision. 7. Look for and make use of structure. 8. Look for and express regularity in repeated reasoning. Recommended Resources: Performance Task Specifications: – http://www.smarterbalanced.org/wordpress/wpcontent/uploads/2012/05/TaskItemSpecifications/PerformanceTasks/P erformanceTasksSpecifications.pdf Accessibility Guide for Classroom Activities: – http://sbac.portal.airast.org/wpcontent/uploads/2014/03/Accessibility-Guide-for-Classroom-ActivitiesFinal.pdf Classroom Activity Administration Guidelines: – http://sbac.portal.airast.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/ClassroomActivity-and-Performance-Task-Administration-Guidelines.pdf