Transcript Document
Implications of RtI Implementation
for NYS Schools
Matthew Giugno
Barbara Miller
New York State Education Dept.
VESID
[email protected]
[email protected]
(518) 486-7462
7/17/2015
1
Information Sources
Federal Statute (PL 108-446)
Federal Regulations (300 CFR)
State Laws and Regulations
Materials from “National Research Center
on Learning Disabilities” (NRCLD)
Materials from NERRC
LRP – “Special Educator”
NASDSE publication on LD/RtI
Other States
7/17/2015
2
Presentation Content
IDEA
Requirements
Part 117 Regulations (Screening)
Part 100 Regulations (pre K -12)
Part 200 Regulations (Special Ed.)
Contracts for Excellence (C4E)
Guidance to School Districts
7/17/2015
3
IDEA Requirements
Procedures to determine LD through RtI (or
similar approach):
Evaluation
Data-based progress
Student observation
Written Report
Group determination of disability
7/17/2015
4
Why RtI
Provides appropriate learning for all
students
Uses school-wide progress monitoring
Promotes early identification of potential
problems
Uses multiple measures of performance,
not measurement at a single point in time
Can be used as a component of LD
determination
7/17/2015
5
Regulatory Amendments
Part
117
Part 100
Part 200
7/17/2015
6
Part 117
117.3
(d) Diagnostic Screening
– Screening in literacy, math, motor and
cognitive development
– Review of instruction to ensure that
explicit and valid instruction used
– Periodic monitoring
– Instruction tailored to meet needs “with
increasing levels of targeted
intervention and instruction”
7/17/2015
7
Amendments to Parts 100 and 200
Section 100.2 (ii)
– Response to Intervention Programs (RtI)
Section 200.2 (b)
– Board of Education Requirements
Section 200.4 (j) - LD Procedures
– Referral
– Individual Evaluation
– Process for determining eligibility
– Criteria for LD determinations
– Documentation for eligibility determination
7/17/2015
8
Amendments to Section 100.2 (ii)
Schools may establish RtI as follows:
– Appropriate instruction for all students
– Increasing levels of intervention
– Frequent screenings and assessments
– Increasing levels of intervention
– Application of information to make decisions
– Written notification to parents
Student performance data & gen. ed.
services
Strategies to increase learning
Parents right to request evaluation
7/17/2015
9
Amendments to Section 100.2
District
selects RtI structure
– Criteria to determine levels
– Types of interventions
– Data to be collected
– Progress monitoring
Staff
7/17/2015
Development to implement RtI
10
LD Definition
Section 200.1(zz)(6)
Learning disability means a disorder in
one or more of the basic psychological
processes involved in understanding or in
using language, spoken or written, which
manifests itself in an imperfect ability to
listen, think, speak, read, write, spell, or
to do mathematical calculations…
7/17/2015
11
200.2
adopt
written policy that establishes
administrative practices and
procedures
– which may include a RtI process pursuant
to 100.2(ii)
7/17/2015
12
200.4 (j)
Additional
Procedures for
Identifying
Students with LD
7/17/2015
13
Evaluation- 200.4 (j) (1)
Variety
of assessment tools and
strategies
No single procedure
Observation
– From routine classroom instruction; or
– Arrange to have observation conducted
7/17/2015
14
Evaluation- 200.4 (j) (1)
Underachievement
is not due to lack
of appropriate instruction, CSE must
consider:
– Data of appropriate instruction
– Data-based documentation of repeated
assessments provided to parents
7/17/2015
15
200.4 (j) (2)
CSE
makes determination
– Gen. Ed. Teacher
– Person qualified to conduct diagnostic
exams
7/17/2015
16
Criteria – 200.4 (j) (3)
Student does not achieve adequately for
age, or grade level standards in one or
more of:
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Oral expression
Listening comprehension
Written expression
Basic reading skills
Reading fluency skills
Reading comprehension
Math calculation
Math problem solving, and
7/17/2015
17
Criteria – 200.4 (j) (3)
– Student does not make sufficient
progress when using RtI; or
– Exhibits patterns of strengths and
weaknesses:
Performance,
achievement or both
Relative to age, grade-level standards, or
intellectual development
7/17/2015
18
Criteria – 200.4 (j) (3)
Exceptions
– Visual, hearing or motor disabilities
– Mental retardation
– Emotional disturbance
– Cultural factors
– Environ. or economic disadvantage; or
– LEP
7/17/2015
19
200.4 (j) (4)
Not
prohibited from considering
severe discrepancy, except
– Not allowed after 7/1/2012 for
K-4
LD
7/17/2015
in Reading
20
Documentation – 200.4 (j) (5)
Written report includes:
–
–
–
–
–
Whether student has LD
Basis for determination
Relevant behavior
Educationally relevant medical findings
Student does not achieve adequately, and
Does
not make sufficient progress, or
Exhibits pattern of strengths and weaknesses
– Exclusion factors
7/17/2015
21
Documentation – 200.4 (j) (5)
If
RtI process is used:
– Instructional strategies used and data
– Parents notified
7/17/2015
22
C4E Allowable Program:
Dedicated Instructional Time
(100.13 CR)
7/17/2015
1.
dedicated block(s) of time
created for instruction;
2.
research-based core
instructional program;
3.
a response-to-intervention
program; and/or
4.
individualized intensive
intervention shall be provided.
23
Guidance Document
Guiding
principles for using RtI
Tools to guide implementation of an
RtI model
Special considerations
Professional development areas
Using data from RtI to determine LD
Resources
7/17/2015
24
Systemwide School Approach
Integration
of general and special ed
service delivery
Leadership
Identification of current support
systems to support RtI (i.e., PBIS)
7/17/2015
25
Principles of RtI
Systemwide school approach
Prevention and Early identification
Universal Screening
Multiple tiers of intervention
Progress monitoring
Decision making process
Design of service delivery model
Parent involvement
Fidelity of implementation
7/17/2015
26
Tools to Guide Implementation
School readiness survey
Identification of screening tools
Identification of research based reading
instruction
Implementation of a multi-tiered process
– Determination of cut-off points
– Progress monitoring and analysis of
data
– Determination of appropriate
interventions
7/17/2015
27
Special Considerations
Cultural
Upper
elementary, intermediate and
secondary students
ELL students
7/17/2015
28
Professional Development
Collaboration
between general and
special educators
Changing roles
School leadership
Data gathering and data analysis
Identifying appropriate researchbased instruction/interventions
7/17/2015
29
LD Determination
Definition of LD
Using data from RtI as part of the
comprehensive multidisciplinary
evaluation
Criteria to determine LD
– Student was provided appropriate instruction
– Data from screenings, curriculum based
measures and progress monitoring to
determine
Performance
level
Rate of learning or pattern of strengths and
weaknesses
– Exclusion factors
7/17/2015
30
Schoolwide Systems
Academic
Intensive Interventions
Behavioral
1-5%
Intensive Individual Interventions
5-10%
Small Group Interventions
Scientific, Research Based
Core Instruction
7/17/2015
Targeted Group Interventions
80-90%
Universal Interventions
31
Next Steps
RtI
Guidance Document
RtI TA Center
Grants to schools as pilot sites
7/17/2015
32
Resources/Links
www.rti4success.org
www.nrcld.org
www.ncld.org
www.nasdse.org
www.aimsweb.com
www.dibels.org
www.interventioncentral.org
7/17/2015
33