Transcript Document
THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT(FEIS) THE KIGGAVIK PROJECT ᑭᖑᓪᓕᖅᐹᖅ ᐊᕙᑎᕗᑦ ᐊᒃᑐᖅᑕᐅᓂᖃᕐᓂᐊᖅᑎᓪᓗᒍ ᐅᖃᐅᓯᒃᓴᓕᐊᖅ ᑭᒡᒐᕕᖕᒥ ᐱᓕᕆᐊᖑᔪᒪᔪᒃᑯᑦ Summary ᓇᐃᓪᓕᒋᐊᖅᓯᒪᔪᒃᑯᑦ February 25, 2015 ᕕᕗᐊᕆ 25, 2015 Introduction ᐱᒋᐊᕈᑎᖓ • The purpose of the Kiggavik FEIS technical review was to ensure that the potential impacts and benefits were comprehensively assessed through scientific, socio-economic and impact assessment best practices are fundamentally reflected in the FEIS, and that the IQ is incorporated through out. • ᑭᒡᒐᕕᒃᑯᑦ ᐱᓕᕆᐊᖑᔪᒪᔪᖅ ᑭᖑᓪᓕᖅᐹᒃᑯᑦ ᐊᕙᑎᕗᑦ ᐊᒃᑐᖅᑕᐅᓂᖃᕐᓂᐊᖅᑎᓪᓗᒍ ᐅᖃᐅᓯᒃᓴᓕᐊᑦ ᓯᕕᑐᔪᒃᑯᑦ ᕿᒥᕐᕈᔭᐅᓂᓖᑦ ᐊᒃᑐᖅᓯᓂᐅᓇᔭᖅᑐᑦ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᐱᕚᓪᓕᕈᑎᒃᓴᑦ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᖅᑕᐅᑦᑎᐊᖅᓯᒪᖁᑉᓗᒋᑦ ᓱᓇᑐᐃᓐᓇᕐᓂᒃ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᐃᓂᒃᑯᑦ, ᐃᓅᖃᑎᒌᖕᓂᒃᑯᑦ ᑮᓇᐅᔾᔭᒃᓴᕈᑎᒃᓴᒃᑯᑦ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᐃᓂᒃᑯᑦ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᐊᒃᑐᖅᓯᓂᐅᓂᐊᖅᑐᒃᑯᑦ ᐱᐅᓂᖅᐹᒃᑯᑦ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᐃᔾᔪᑏᑦ ᐅᖃᐅᓯᐅᓯᒪᔪᑦ ᑭᖑᓪᓕᖅᐹᒃᑯᑦ ᐊᕙᑎᕗᑦ ᐊᒃᑐᖅᑕᐅᓂᖃᕐᓂᐊᖅᑎᓪᓗᒍ ᐅᖃᐅᓯᒃᓴᓕᐊᒃᑯᑦ, ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᐃᓄᐃᑦ ᖃᐅᔨᒪᔭᑐᖃᖏᑦ ᐊᑐᓕᖅᑎᖅᑕᐅᓯᒪᖁᑉᓗᒍ ᓇᐅᒃᑯᓗᒃᑖᖅ. Main areas of potential concern ᐃᓱᒫᓘᑕᐅᓯᒪᓗᐊᖅᑐᑦ • Inuit Qaujimajatuqangit (IQ). • The resin in pulp milling process. • Access road from Baker Lake to the Kiggavik Project site. • Air quality and noise. • Water quality. • Wildlife. • Marine transportation. • Human health. • Socio-Economic’s. • ᐃᓄᐃᑦ ᖃᐅᔨᒪᔭᑐᖃᖏᑦ • Resin in Pulp ᓄᖑᔪᐃᑦᑐᖅ ᖃᓄᖅ ᐱᓕᕆᐊᖑᓇᔭᕐᓂᖓ. • ᐊᑉᖁᑎᒃᓴᖅ ᖃᒪᓂ’ᑐᐊᕐᒥ ᑭᒡᒐᕕᖕᒧᑦ. • ᓯᓚᐅᑉ ᖃᓄᐃᓐᓂᖓ ᓂᐱᖃᕐᓂᕐᓗ. • ᐃᒪᐅᑉ ᖃᓄᐃᓐᓂᖓ. • ᐆᒪᔪᑦ. • ᐃᒪᒃᑯᑦ ᐃᖏᕐᕋᔪᓕᕆᓂᖅ. • ᐃᓄᐃᑦ ᖃᓄᐃᙱᑦᑎᐊᕈᑎᒃᓴᖏᑦ. • ᐃᓅᖃᑎᒌᖕᓂᖅ - ᑮᓇᐅᔾᔭᒃᓴᕐᓂᕐᓗ. Inuit Qaujimajatuqangit (IQ) ᐃᓄᐃᑦ ᖃᐅᔨᒪᔭᑐᖃᖏᑦ • Limited integration of IQ in relation to water, freshwater fisheries, aquatic species, climate change and health risk. • Additional clarity is needed on how AREVA intends to include IQ in the analysis of potential project effects, mitigations and monitoring programs. • ᐊᑐᓕᖅᑎᖅᑕᐅᓯᒪᙱᓗᐊᖅᑐᖅ ᐃᓄᐃᑦ ᖃᐅᔨᒪᔭᑐᖃᖓ ᐃᒪᐅᑉ ᒥᒃᓵᓄᑦ, ᐃᒪᑦᑎᐊᕙᒃᑯᑦ ᐃᖃᓗᓕᕆᓂᒃᑯᑦ, ᐃᒪᕐᒥᐅᑕᓕᕆᓂᒃᑯᑦ, ᓯᓚᐅᑉ ᐊᓯᔾᔨᖅᐸᓪᓕᐊᓂᖓᒍᑦ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᐋᓐᓂᐊᕐᓇᖅᑐᓕᕆᓂᒃᑯᑦ. • ᑐᑭᓯᓇᖅᓯᒃᑲᓐᓂᕆᐊᓕᒃ ᖃᓄᖅ ᐊᕇᕙᒃᑯᑦ ᐅᔭᕋᖕᓂᐊᖅᑐᓕᕆᔨᒃᑯᑦ ᐃᓚᐅᑎᑦᑎᓂᐊᕐᒪᖔᑕ ᐃᓄᐃᑦ ᖃᐅᔨᒪᔭᑐᖃᖏᓐᓂᒃ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᐃᓂᒃᑯᑦ ᐱᓕᕆᐊᖑᔪᒃᑯᑦ ᐊᒃᑐᖅᓯᓂᐅᓂᐊᖅᑐᓂᒃ, ᐋᖅᑭᒋᐊᖅᓯᒍᑎᒃᑯᑦ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᐃᔾᔪᑎᒃᓴᒃᑯᑦ. Resin-in-Pulp Milling Process Resin-in-Pulp ᓄᖑᔪᐃᑦᑐᖅ ᖃᓄᖅ ᐱᓕᕆᐊᖑᓇᔭᕐᓂᖓ • The area of concern is: • The sizing and number of the safety screens to control the escape of resin fragments • The resin that passes through the screens is deposited in the Tailings Containment Facility (TCF). • AREVA be able to show they have minimized the resin fragments that go into the TCF • ᐃᓱᒫᓘᑕᐅᔪᑦ ᐅᑯᑎᒎᓇᖅ: • ᐊᖏᓂᖏᑦ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᖃᑉᓯᐅᓂᖏᑦ ᐊᑦᑕᓇᖅᑐᒦᑎᑦᑎᖁᔨᙱᓐᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᑕᓗᒋᔭᐅᔪᑦ ᓄᖑᔪᐃᑦᑐᕋᓗᐃᑦ ᓯᐊᒻᒪᖁᓇᒋᑦ. • ᓄᖑᔪᐃᑦᑐᖅ ᑕᓗᒋᔭᐅᔫᑉ ᐅᖓᑖᒎᖅᑐᖅ ᐃᓕᔭᐅᕙᒃᖢᓂ ᑯᕕᖅᑕᕐᕕᖕᒧᑦ. • ᐊᕇᕙᒃᑯᑦ ᐅᔭᕋᖕᓂᐊᖅᑐᓕᕆᔨᒃᑯᑦ ᑕᑯᑎᑦᑎᔪᓐᓇᕐᓗᑎᒃ ᒥᑭᓂᖅᐹᒃᑯᑦ ᓴᖅᑭᑦᑐᖃᓕᕋᔭᕐᓂᖓᓄᑦ ᓄᖑᔪᐃᑦᑐᓂᒃ ᑯᕕᖅᑕᕐᕕᖕᒧᑦ. Access Road from Baker Lake to Kiggavik Project Site ᐊᑉᖁᑎᒃᓴᖅ ᖃᒪᓂ’ᑐᐊᕐᒥ ᑭᒡᒐᕕᖕᒧᑦ • Access road to the site is proposed to be either a seasonal winter road or an all season road over the 114 km distance from Baker Lake. • AREVA needs to define which of the road options will be chosen in order to add clarity and certainty to the environmental assessment process. • ᐊᑉᖁᑎᒃᓴᖅ ᑭᒡᒐᕕᖕᒧᑦ ᐊᑐᓕᖁᔭᐅᓯᒪᔪᖅ ᓴᓇᔭᐅᓇᔭᕐᓂᖓᓄᑦ ᐅᑭᐅᑉ ᐃᓚᐃᓐᓇᖓᓄᑦ ᐊᑐᓕᖅᑎᖅᑕᐅᓯᒪᖃᑦᑕᕐᓗᓂ ᐅᕝᕙᓘᓐᓃᑦ ᐅᑭᐅᓗᒃᑖᒃᑯᑦ ᐊᑐᖅᑐᒃᓴᒥᒃ ᐊᑉᖁᑎᓕᐅᕋᔭᕐᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᑕᑭᓂᖓ ᐅᖓᑖᓃᑦᑐᖅ 114 ᑭᓛᒥᑕᑦ ᖃᒪᓂ’ᑐᐊᕐᒥ. • ᐊᕇᕙᒃᑯᑦ ᐅᔭᕋᖕᓂᐊᖅᑐᓕᕆᔨᒃᑯᑦ ᓇᓗᓇᐃᖅᓯᔭᕆᐊᓖᑦ ᓇᓕᐊᒃᑰᕐᓂᐊᕐᒪᖔᕐᒥᒃ ᐊᑉᖁᑎᒃᓴᒃᑯᑦ ᑐᑭᓯᓇᖅᓯᒋᐊᒃᑲᓐᓂᕈᓐᓇᖁᑉᓗᒍ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᓇᓗᓇᐃᑦᑎᐊᕈᒪᑉᓗᒍ ᐊᕙᑎᓕᕆᓂᒃᑯᑦ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᕈᑕᐅᓂᐊᖅᑐᒃᑯᑦ. Air quality and Noise ᓯᓚᐅᑉ ᖃᓄᐃᓐᓂᖓ ᓂᐱᖃᕐᓂᕐᓗ • The air quality sampling program is generally well designed • KIA recommendations to be added to the current air quality monitoring program: • The generator exhausts and the underground mine ventilation system. • Sampling from the incinerator for hydrogen chloride, metals, NOx and particulates. • Add background monitoring sampling stations to the north-east of the Kiggavik site near the ore stockpile and to the north-west of the Sisson mine site. • Develop appropriate action criteria for deposition of uranium, metals and radionuclides in dust fall • Develop appropriate acceptable site specific target criteria for concentrations of uranium, metals and radionuclides in snow and caribou fecal pellets. • Proper safety signage be posted by AREVA to identify the active mining areas. • ᓯᓚᐅᑉ ᖃᓄᐃᓐᓂᖓᓄᑦ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᕈᑎ ᐋᖅᑭᑦᑎᐊᖅᓯᒪᔪᖅ • ᑭᕙᓪᓕᕐᒥ ᐃᓄᐃᑦ ᑲᑐᔾᔨᖃᑎᒌᒃᑯᑦ ᐊᑐᓕᖁᔨᔪᑦ ᐃᓚᓯᒋᐊᖁᔨᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᓯᓚᐅᑉ ᖃᓄᐃᓐᓂᖓᓄᑦ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᕈᑎᒃᑯᑦ ᐅᑯᓂᙵ: • ᐃᑯᒪᓅᕈᑎᒃᑯᑦ ᓴᖅᑭᑉᐸᓪᓕᐊᔪᓂᒃ ᓄᓇᐅᑉ ᐊᑖᒍᓪᓗ ᐊᓄᕆᑑᑎᒥᒃ. • ᖃᐅᔨᓴᐃᖃᑦᑕᕐᓂᖅ ᐃᒐᒃᑯᑦ hydrogen chloride-ᖃᕋᔭᖅᑐᓂᒃ, ᓴᕕᕋᔭᓂᒃ, N0x-ᓂᒃ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᐃᓗᓕᕆᔭᖏᓐᓂᒃ. • ᐱᒋᐊᕈᑕᐅᖃᑦᑕᖅᓯᒪᔪᒃᑯᑦ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᕈᑎᓂᒃ ᐊᑐᓕᖅᑎᕆᓗᑎᒃ, ᖃᐅᔨᓴᐃᕝᕕᒃᑕᖃᕐᓗᓂ ᐅᐊᖕᓇᖓᑕ ᐱᖓᖕᓇᖅᐸᓯᖓᓂ ᑭᒡᒐᕕᐅᑉ ᐅᔭᖅᑲᑦ ᖃᓕᕇᓕᖅᓯᒪᔪᑦ ᖃᓂᒋᔭᖓᓂ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᐅᐊᖕᓇᖓᑕ ᑲᓇᖕᓇᖅᐸᓯᖓᓂ Sisson ᐅᔭᕋᖕᓂᐊᕐᕕᒃᑯᑦ. • ᓴᖅᑭᑎᑦᑎᓗᑎᒃ ᖃᓄᖅᑑᕈᑎᒃᓴᓂᒃ ᓄᒃᑎᖅᑎᕆᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᓄᖑᔪᐃᑦᑐᓂᒃ, ᓴᕕᕋᔭᕐᓂᒃ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ radionuclide-ᓂᒃ ᐳᔪᒃᑯᑦ ᑲᑕᒐᖅᑐᒃᑯᑦ • ᓴᖅᑭᑎᑦᑎᓗᑎᒃ ᓈᒻᒪᒋᔭᐅᓇᔭᖅᑐᓂᒃ ᐅᔭᕋᖕᓂᐊᕐᕕᒃᑯᑦ ᖃᓄᐃᓕᐅᕈᑎᖃᕆᐊᖃᕐᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᓄᖑᔪᐃᑦᑐᓂᒃ, ᓴᕕᕋᔭᕐᓂᒃ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ radionuclide-ᓂᒃ ᐊᐳᑎᒃᑯᑦ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᑐᒃᑐᑦ ᐊᓇᖏᑦᑎᒍᑦ. • ᓈᒻᒪᒃᑐᓂᒃ ᐊᑦᑕᓇᖅᑐᒦᑎᑦᑎᑦᑕᐃᓕᒪᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᑎᑎᕋᖅᓯᒪᔪᓂᒃ ᓴᖅᑭᑎᑦᑎᓯᒪᖃᑦᑕᕐᓗᑎᒃ ᐊᕇᕙ ᐅᔭᕋᖕᓂᐊᖅᑐᓕᕆᔨᒃᑯᑦ ᓇᓗᓇᐃᖅᓯᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᐱᓕᕆᔪᖃᕐᓂᖓᓄᑦ ᐅᔭᕋᖕᓂᐊᖅᑐᖃᕐᓂᖓᓄᑦ. Noise and vibration ᓂᐱᖃᕐᓂᐅᔪᖅ ᓴᔪᒃᐸᓪᓚᖕᓂᐅᕙᒃᑐᕐᓗ • The noise baseline assessment is drawn on literature review • KIA Recommendation • confirmation of the existing baseline noise environment at the noise sensitive receptors is required through a noise baseline study. • Helicopter noise and aircraft noise impact have not been addressed • KIA Recommendation • A detailed Helicopter and aircraft noise assessment to be completed • ᓂᐱᖃᕐᓂᒃᑯᑦ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᕈᑎ ᑎᑎᕋᐅᑕᐅᓯᒪᓗᓂ ᕿᒥᕐᕈᔭᐅᔪᓐᓇᖅᑐᒃᑯᑦ • ᑭᕙᓪᓕᕐᒥ ᐃᓄᐃᑦ ᑲᑐᔾᔨᖃᑎᒌᒃᑯᑦ ᐊᑐᓕᖁᔭᖏᑦ • ᓇᓗᓇᐃᖅᓯᓂᖅ ᒫᓐᓇᐅᔪᖅ ᓂᐱᖃᕈᑕᐅᔪᓂᒃ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᐃᕝᕕᐅᖃᑦᑕᕐᓂᐊᖅᑐᒃᑯᑦ ᑲᒪᒋᔭᐅᔭᕆᐊᓕᒃ ᓂᐱᖃᕐᓂᐅᔪᒃᑯᑦ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᕈᑎᒃᑯᑦ. • ᖁᓕᒥᒎᓖᑦ ᓂᐱᖃᕐᓂᖏᑦ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᑎᖕᒥᓲᑦ ᓂᐱᖃᕐᓂᖏᑦ ᖃᓄᖅ ᐊᒃᑐᖅᓯᓯᒪᖕᒪᖔᑕ ᑲᒪᒋᔭᐅᓯᒪᙱᑦᑐᑦ • ᑭᕙᓪᓕᕐᒥ ᐃᓄᐃᑦ ᑲᑐᔾᔨᖃᑎᒌᒃᑯᑦ ᐊᑐᓕᖁᔭᖏᑦ • ᓇᓗᓇᐃᔭᐃᓯᒪᑦᑎᐊᕆᐊᓖᑦ ᖁᓕᒥᒎᓕᒃᑯᑦ ᑎᖕᒥᓲᒃᑯᑦ ᓂᐱᖃᕐᓂᐅᕙᒃᑐᓂᒃ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᕈᑕᐅᓯᒪᔪᒥᒃ Water quality ᐃᒪᐅᑉ ᖃᓄᐃᓐᓂᖓ • AREVA has developed a dataset from all of the lakes and rivers sampled in the project area, which the KIA refers to as a “regional baseline”. • KIA suggestion: it would be better to use the measured data from the receiver lake, in this case Judge Sissons Lake, • ᐊᕇᕙᒃᑯᑦ ᐅᔭᕋᖕᓂᐊᖅᑐᓕᕆᔨᒃᑯᑦ ᓴᖅᑭᑎᑦᑎᓯᒪᔪᑦ ᖃᕆᑕᐅᔭᒃᑯᑦ ᑎᑎᖅᑲᖃᕐᕕᐅᔪᓂᒃ ᑕᓰᑦ ᑰᓪᓗ ᒥᒃᓵᓄᑦ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᕈᑕᐅᓯᒪᔪᒃᑯᑦ ᐱᓕᕆᕝᕕᐅᔪᒪᔪᒃᑯᑦ, ᑭᕙᓪᓕᕐᒥ ᐃᓄᐃᑦ ᑲᑐᔾᔨᖃᑎᒌᒃᑯᑦ ᑕᐃᔭᖓ ᐃᒪᓐᓇ “ᑭᕙᓪᓕᕐᒥ ᐱᒋᐊᕈᑕᐅᓯᒪᔪᖅ”. • ᑭᕙᓪᓕᕐᒥ ᐃᓄᐃᑦ ᑲᑐᔾᔨᖃᑎᒌᒃᑯᑦ ᐃᒪᓐᓇᐃᖁᔨᔪᑦ: ᐱᐅᓂᖅᓴᐅᓇᔭᖅᑐᖅ ᐊᑐᕈᑎᒃ ᐆᒃᑐᕋᐅᑕᐅᓯᒪᔪᒃᑯᑦ ᑎᑎᕋᖅᓯᒪᔪᓂᒃ ᑲᒪᒋᔭᐅᕝᕕᐅᔪᓂᒃ ᑕᓯᕐᓂᒃ, ᓲᕐᓗ ᑖᒻᓇ ᐱᔾᔪᑎᒋᑉᓗᒍ Judge Sissons ᑕᓯᐅᓇᔭᖅᑐᖅ, Zooplankton Monitoring Program ᑕᓰᑦ ᓇᑎᖏᓐᓂᒃ ᐆᒪᔪᑦ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᖅᑕᐅᓂᖏᑦ • Issue: Areva do not propose zooplankton as part of the monitoring program • However, AREVA has made specific predictions of effect of the effluent discharge on zooplankton and these predictions cannot be verified in the absence of sampling of zooplankton. • KIA has suggested that a program of zooplankton be part of the ongoing project monitoring. • ᐱᔾᔪᑕᐅᔪᖅ: ᐊᕇᕙ ᐅᔭᕋᖕᓂᐊᖅᑐᓕᕆᔨᒃᑯᑦ ᐊᑐᓕᖁᔨᓯᒪᙱᑦᑐᑦ ᑕᓰᑦ ᓇᑎᐊᓂ ᐆᒪᔪᑦ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᕈᑕᐅᔪᒃᑯᑦ ᐱᖃᑕᐅᓇᔭᕐᒪᖔᑕ • ᑭᓯᐊᓂᓕ, ᐊᕇᕙ ᐅᔭᕋᖕᓂᐊᖅᑐᓕᕆᔨᒃᑯᑦ ᓇᓚᐅᑦᑖᕐᓂᖃᖃᑦᑕᖅᓯᒪᔪᑦ ᐊᒃᑐᖅᓯᓂᐅᓇᔭᖅᑐᓂᒃ ᑕᓰᑦ ᓇᑎᐊᓄᑦ ᐆᒪᔪᑦ ᓴᖅᑭᑦᑎᕕᐅᓇᔭᖅᐸᑕ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᑕᒪᒃᑯᐊ ᓇᓚᐅᑦᑖᕈᑕᐅᓯᒪᔪᑦ ᓇᓗᓇᐃᖅᑕᐅᓪᓚᑦᑖᕈᓐᓇᙱᑦᑐᑦ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᕈᑕᐅᓪᓚᑦᑖᖅᓯᒪᙱᑉᐸᑕ. • ᑭᕙᓪᓕᕐᒥ ᐃᓄᐃᑦ ᑲᑐᔾᔨᖃᑎᒌᒃᑯᑦ ᐃᓱᒪᓯᒪᔪᑦ ᑕᓰᑦ ᓇᑎᖓᓂ ᐆᒪᔪᑦ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᕈᑕᐅᔪᒃᑯᑦ ᐱᖃᑕᐅᖁᑉᓗᒋᑦ. Effluent Quality Impact Assessment ᓴᖅᑭᑉᐸᓪᓕᐊᔪᑦ ᖃᓄᐃᑦᑑᓂᖏᑦ ᐊᒃᑐᖅᓯᓂᖃᕋᔭᖅᑎᓪᓗᒋᑦ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᕈᑎ • The FEIS provides effluent concentrations distributions for the Sissons and Kiggavik WTP and the Kiggavik RO Discharge. • KIA has asked for clarification on what statistics on effluent quality were used for input parameters to the water quality • ᑭᖑᓪᓕᖅᐹᒃᑯᑦ ᐊᕙᑎᕗᑦ ᐊᒃᑐᖅᑕᐅᓂᖃᕐᓂᐊᖅᑎᓪᓗᒍ ᐅᖃᐅᓯᒃᓴᓕᐊᖅ ᐃᓗᓕᖃᖅᑐᖅ ᓴᖅᑭᑉᐸᓪᓕᐊᔪᒃᑯᑦ ᓯᓚᒃᑯᑦ ᐱᑕᖃᕋᔭᕐᓂᖓᓄᑦ Sissons-ᒥ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᑭᒡᒐᕕᖕᒥ ᐃᒪᕐᒥᒃ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᐃᕝᕕᖕᒥ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᑭᒡᒐᕕᖕᒥ Osmosis ᓴᖅᑭᑉᐸᒃᑎᓪᓗᒍ. • ᑭᕙᓪᓕᕐᒥ ᐃᓄᐃᑦ ᑲᑐᔾᔨᖃᑎᒌᒃᑯᑦ ᐊᐱᕆᓯᒪᔪᑦ ᑐᑭᓯᒋᐊᖅᑎᑕᐅᔪᒪᑉᓗᑎᒃ ᖃᓄᐃᑦᑐᓂᒃ ᓈᓴᐅᑎᓕᕆᔾᔪᑎᓂᒃ ᓯᓚᒃᑯᑦ ᓴᖅᑭᑉᐸᓪᓕᐊᔪᒃᑯᑦ ᓇᓗᓇᐃᔭᐅᑎᖃᓚᐅᕐᒪᖔᑕ ᐊᒃᑐᖅᓯᓂᖃᕋᔭᖅᑎᓪᓗᒋᑦ ᐃᒪᐅᑉ ᖃᓄᐃᓐᓂᖓᓄᑦ Greenhouse Gas Management and Reduction Plan ᓯᓚᒃᑯᑦ ᐳᔪᑦ ᐊᐅᓚᑕᐅᓂᖏᑦ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᐱᑕᖃᙱᓐᓂᖅᓴᐅᓕᖁᑉᓗᒍ ᐸᕐᓇᐅᑎ • ᑭᕙᓪᓕᕐᒥ ᐃᓄᐃᑦ ᑲᑐᔾᔨᖃᑎᒌᒃᑯᑦ ᐊᑐᓕᖁᔨᓯᒪᔪᑦ • KIA has recommended that ᐊᕇᕙᒃᑯᑦ ᐅᑯᓂᙵ ᐊᑐᐃᓐᓇᕈᖅᑎᑦᑎᖁᑉᓗᒋᑦ: AREVA should provide: • ᓱᖏᐅᑎᔪᓐᓇᕐᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᐊᐅᓚᑦᑎᔾᔪᑎᒥᒃ • an adaptive management plan for Greenhouse Gas Management and Reduction • annual estimates of Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions for all stages of mine life and • annual review of means to reduce and minimize project emissions of greenhouse gases. ᐸᕐᓇᐅᒻᒥᒃ ᓯᓚᒃᑯᑦ ᐳᔪᑦ ᐊᐅᓚᑕᐅᔾᔪᑎᒃᓴᖏᓐᓄᑦ ᐱᑕᖃᙱᓐᓂᖅᓴᐅᓕᖁᑉᓗᒍᓗ • ᐊᕐᕌᒍᑕᒫᒃᑯᑦ ᓇᓚᐅᑦᑖᕈᑎᑦ ᓯᓚᒃᑯᑦ ᐳᔪᐃᑦ ᓴᖅᑭᖃᑦᑕᕐᓂᖏᓐᓄᑦ ᓇᐅᒃᑯᑐᐃᓐᓇᖅ ᐅᔭᕋᖕᓂᐊᕐᕕᒃ ᐊᐅᓪᓚᕐᓂᖃᖅᑎᓪᓗᒍ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ • ᐊᕐᕌᒍᑕᒫᒃᑯᑦ ᕿᒥᕐᕈᔾᔪᑏᑦ ᖃᓄᐃᓕᒋᐊᕈᑎᒃᑯᑦ ᐱᑕᖃᙱᓐᓂᖅᓴᐅᓕᖁᑉᓗᒋᑦ ᐳᔪᐃᑦ ᓯᓚᒃᑯᑦ. Downstream Effects on Water Quality ᑰᒃᑐᒃᑯᑦ ᐊᒃᑐᖅᓯᓂᐅᓇᔭᖅᑐᑦ ᐃᒪᐅᑉ ᖃᓄᐃᓐᓂᖓᓄᑦ • KIA has recommended that: • AREVA provide an assessment of the downstream extent of measurable changes in water quality for the Kiggavik Project. • Complete an assessment of whether or not measurable effects are predicted at the point of discharge of the Anigaq River into Baker Lake. • ᑭᕙᓪᓕᕐᒥ ᐃᓄᐃᑦ ᑲᑐᔾᔨᖃᑎᒌᒃᑯᑦ ᐃᒪᓐᓇ ᐊᑐᓕᖁᔨᓯᒪᔪᑦ: • ᐊᕇᕙᒃᑯᑦ ᐅᔭᕋᖕᓂᐊᖅᑐᓕᕆᔨᒃᑯᑦ ᐊᑐᐃᓐᓇᕈᖅᑎᑦᑎᓗᑎᒃ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᕈᑎᒋᓯᒪᔭᖏᓐᓂᒃ ᑰᒃᑐᒃᑯᑦ ᐊᓯᔾᔨᖅᓯᓯᒪᓂᐅᓇᕙᖅᑐᓂᒃ ᐃᒪᒃᑯᑦ ᑭᒡᒐᕕᖕᒥ. • ᖃᐅᔨᓴᐃᔾᔪᑎᖃᕐᓗᑎᒃ ᐱᑕᖃᕐᓂᐊᖅᑑᔭᕐᒪᖔᑦ ᓱᓇᓂᒃ ᐳᔪᕐᓘᑎᓂᒡᓘᓐᓂᑦ ᐊᓂᖓᖅ ᑰᖕᒥ ᖃᒪᓂ’ᑐᐊᕐᒧᑦ. Wildlife ᐆᒪᔪᑦ • KIA finds this lack of clarity obscures the ability to assess the potential cumulative effects of the project. • AREVA should clarify thresholds and definitions for significance determination. • ᑭᕙᓪᓕᕐᒥ ᐃᓄᐃᑦ ᑲᑐᔾᔨᖃᑎᒌᒃᑯᑦ ᖃᐅᔨᓯᒪᔪᑦ ᑕᒪᓐᓇ ᑐᑭᓯᓇᑦᑎᐊᖅᓯᒪᙱᑎᓪᓗᒍ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᐃᑦᑎᐊᕐᓇᙱᒻᒪᑦ ᓴᖅᑭᑉᐸᓪᓕᐊᓂᐊᖅᑐᓂᒃ ᐊᒃᑐᖅᓯᓂᐅᓇᔭᖅᑐᓂᒃ ᐱᓕᕆᐊᒃᑯᑦ. • ᐊᕇᕙ ᐅᔭᕋᖕᓂᐊᖅᑐᓕᕆᔨᒃᑯᑦ ᓇᓗᓇᐃᖅᓯᓇᔭᕐᒪᑕ ᐱᒋᐊᕈᑎᓂᒃ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᑐᑭᓕᐊᕈᑎᓂᒃ ᐱᒻᒪᕆᐅᔪᒃᑯᑦ ᓇᓗᓇᐃᔭᐅᑎᓂᒃ. Wildlife Mitigation and Monitoring Plan ᐆᒪᔪᓕᕆᓂᒃᑯᑦ ᐋᖅᑭᒋᐊᖅᓯᒍᑏᑦ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᐃᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᐸᕐᓇᐅᑎᑦ • AREVA needs to address the following • Provide clarity in the cumulative effects assessment . • Provide clarity on the assessment of road options on caribou harvests • Further define details of mitigation and monitoring programs within the WMMP, • ᐊᕇᕙᒃᑯᑦ ᐅᔭᕋᖕᓂᐊᖅᑐᓕᕆᔨᒃᑯᑦ ᐅᑯᓂᙵ ᑲᒪᒋᐊᕆᐊᓖᑦ • ᑐᑭᓯᓇᖅᓯᑎᑦᑎᒋᐊᕐᓗᑎᒃ ᑲᑎᑕᐅᓯᒪᔪᒃᑯᑦ ᐊᒃᑐᖅᓯᓂᐅᓇᔭᖅᑐᒃᑯᑦ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᕈᑎᒋᓯᒪᔭᒥᓂᒃ. • ᑐᑭᓯᓇᖅᓯᑎᑦᑎᒋᐊᕐᓗᑎᒃ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᕈᑎᒋᓯᒪᔭᒥᓂᒃ ᐊᑉᖁᑎᑖᕆᓇᔭᖅᑕᒃᑯᑦ ᖃᓄᖅᑑᕈᑎᒃᑯᑦ ᑐᒃᑐᓐᓇᓱᖃᑦᑕᖅᑐᓪᓗ ᒥᒃᓵᓄᑦ • ᓇᓗᓇᐃᖅᓯᒃᑲᓐᓂᕐᓗᑎᒡᓗ ᐋᖅᑭᒋᐊᖅᓯᔾᔪᑎᒃᓴᖏᓐᓂᒃ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᐃᔾᔪᑎᒃᓴᖏᓐᓂᒃ ᐆᒪᔪᓕᕆᓂᒃᑯᑦ ᐋᖅᑭᒋᐊᖅᓯᔾᔪᑎᒃᓴᒃᑯᑦ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᐃᓂᕐᒧᓪᓗ ᐸᕐᓇᐅᑎᒃᑯᑦ Uncertainty of Caribou Herds and Use of Data for Assessment ᓇᓗᓇᕈᑕᐅᔪᑦ ᑐᒃᑐᑦ ᑲᑎᙵᖃᑦᑕᕐᓂᖏᓐᓄᑦ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᑎᑎᕋᖅᓯᒪᔪᓂᒃ ᐊᑐᕋᔭᕐᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᕈᑎᒃᓴᒃᑯᑦ • The KIA has recommended that AREVA Clarify uncertainty in the caribou assessment, the Proponent should explain: • How the changes in regional herd definitions over the past 2 years affect the assessment conclusions, and • How the lack of access to Government of Nunavut Department of Environment collar data for the 5 herds potentially overlapping the regional area affects the assessment conclusions • ᑭᕙᓪᓕᕐᒥ ᐃᓄᐃᑦ ᑲᑐᔾᔨᖃᑎᒌᒃᑯᑦ ᐊᑐᓕᖁᔨᓯᓯᒪᔪᑦ ᐊᕇᕙᒃᑯᑦ ᐅᔭᕋᖕᓂᐊᖅᑐᓕᕆᔨᒃᑯᖏᓐᓂᒃ ᓇᓗᓇᐃᔭᐃᖁᑉᓗᒋᑦ ᓇᓗᓕᐅᖅᑲᒍᑕᐅᔪᓂᒃ ᑐᒃᑐᑦ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᖅᑕᐅᓯᒪᓂᖏᓐᓄᑦ, ᐅᔭᕋᖕᓂᐊᕈᒪᔪᑦ ᑐᑭᓯᑎᑦᑎᒋᐊᕋᔭᕐᒪᑕ: • ᖃᓄᖅ ᐊᓯᔾᔨᖅᓯᒪᔪᑦ ᑭᕙᓪᓕᕐᒥ ᑐᒃᑐᑦ ᐅᖃᐅᓯᐅᓂᖏᑦ ᑕᒻᕉᖕᓂᒃ ᐅᑭᐅᓂᒃ ᖄᖏᓵᖅᑐᓂᒃ ᐊᒃᑐᖅᓯᓂᖃᖅᓯᒪᑎᒋᖕᒪᖔᑕ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᕈᑕᐅᓯᒪᔪᒃᑯᑦ ᓴᖅᑭᓯᒪᔪᒃᑯᑦ, ᐊᒻᒪᓗ • ᖃᓄᖅ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᐃᑦᑎᐊᖅᓯᒪᙱᓐᓂᖅ ᓄᓇᕗᑦ ᒐᕙᒪᒃᑯᖏᑦᑕ ᐊᕙᑎᓕᕆᔨᒃᑯᖏᑦᑎᒍᑦ ᖁᖓᓯᕈᑎᒃᑯᑦ ᑎᑎᕋᐅᓯᖃᖅᓯᒪᑎᓪᓗᒋᑦ ᑕᓪᓕᒪᐅᔪᒃᑯᑦ ᑐᒃᑐᖃᕐᕕᐅᕙᒃᑐᒃᑯᑦ ᐃᒻᒪᖄ ᖃᓕᕇᓕᖅᓯᒪᓇᔭᕐᓂᖏᑦ ᑭᕙᓪᓕᕐᒥ ᐊᒃᑐᖅᓯᓯᒪᓂᖃᕈᓐᓇᕐᒪᑦ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᕈᑎᒃᑯᑦ ᐃᓱᓕᒍᑕᐅᓯᒪᔪᒃᑯᑦ Marine Transportation ᐃᒪᒃᑯᑦ ᐃᖏᕐᕋᔪᓕᕆᓂᖅ • Gaps in the underwater noise modelling lead to uncertainties in the impact predictions. • The dispersal of accidental fuel spills was not modelled • The cumulative and trans-boundary impact assessments have been weakened by assessing impacts in isolation • KIA request: A robust monitoring programs to inform adaptive management and timely mitigation of unforeseen impacts is needed • ᐊᒥᒐᖅᑐᑦ ᐃᒪᐅᑉ ᐊᑖᒍᑦ ᓂᐱᖃᕐᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᐆᒃᑐᕋᐅᑕᐅᕙᒃᑐᑦ ᓇᓗᓇᖅᓯᒍᑕᐅᕙᖕᒪᑕ ᐊᒃᑐᖅᓯᓂᐅᓇᔭᖅᑐᒃᑯᑦ ᓇᓚᐅᑦᑖᖅᑕᐅᓯᒪᔪᓄᑦ. • ᓴᖅᑭᑎᑦᑎᓂᖅ ᐱᕐᕈᓗᐊᕿᓂᒃᑯᑦ ᐅᖅᓱᐊᓗᖕᒥ ᑯᕕᔪᖃᖅᐸᑦ ᖃᐅᔨᒋᐊᖅᑕᐅᓯᒪᙱᒻᒪᑦ • ᑲᑎᑕᐅᓯᒪᔪᑦ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᑭᒡᓕᖃᕐᕕᐅᔪᒃᑯᑦ ᐊᒃᑐᖅᓯᓂᐅᓇᔭᖅᑐᑦ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᕈᑏᑦ ᓴᙲᓪᓕᒋᐊᖅᑕᐅᓯᒪᔪᑦ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᐃᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᐊᒃᑐᖅᓯᓯᒪᔾᔪᑎᓂᒃ ᐃᖕᒥᒃᑯᑦ • ᑭᕙᓪᓕᕐᒥ ᐃᓄᐃᑦ ᑲᑐᔾᔨᖃᑎᒌᒃᑯᑦ ᑐᒃᓯᕋᖅᑐᑦ: ᓴᙱᔪᒃᑯᑦ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᕈᑎᒃᓴᒥᒃ ᑐᓴᖅᑎᑦᑐᒪᑉᓗᒋᑦ ᓱᖏᐅᑎᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᐊᐅᓚᑦᑎᔩᑦ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᐋᖅᑭᒋᐊᖅᓯᒍᑏᑦ ᓂᕆᐅᓇᙱᑦᑐᓂᒃ ᐊᒃᑐᖅᓯᔾᔪᑕᐅᓇᔭᖅᑐᒃᑯᑦ ᐊᑐᕆᐊᖃᕐᒪᑕ Human Health ᐃᓄᐃᑦ ᖃᓄᐃᙱᑦᑎᐊᕈᓐᓇᖁᑉᓗᒋᑦ • The AREVA health and safety policy is comprehensive but is not fully consistent with the corporate policy. • these two policies must be made consistent • Chemicals of concern: not all of the chemicals of concern are described. • The KIA has recommended the following: • The potential risk of hydrogen sulphide needs to be more fully addressed. • Information on ion-exchange resins and potential health and safety risks need to be included. • Several chemicals of concern are not identified as IARC listed agents, in particular arsenic, cadmium and cadmium compounds, this should be clarified. • hydrogen sulphide risks should be included in this description. • ᐊᕇᕙᒃᑯᑦ ᐅᔭᕋᖕᓂᐊᖅᑐᓕᕆᔨᒃᑯᑦ ᐃᓄᐃᑦ ᖃᓄᐃᙱᑦᑐᓐᓇᖁᑉᓗᒋᑦ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᐊᑦᑕᓇᖅᑐᒦᖁᓇᒋᑦ ᒪᓕᒐᖓ ᓯᕕᑐᔫᔪᖅ ᑭᓯᐊᓂ ᒪᓕᓗᐊᙱᑦᑐᖅ ᑯᐊᐳᕇᓴᐅᔫᑉ ᒪᓕᒐᖓᓂᒃ. • ᑖᑉᑯᐊ ᒪᓕᒑᒃ ᒪᓕᒍᑎᔭᕆᐊᓖᒃ • ᐃᓱᒫᓘᑏᑦ ᐃᓚᒃᓴᓕᐊᖑᕙᒃᑐᒃᑯᑦ: ᐃᓚᒃᓴᓕᐊᖑᕙᒃᑐᑦ ᑕᒪᕐᒥᒃ ᐅᖃᐅᓯᐅᓯᒪᙱᑦᑐᑦ. • ᑭᕙᓪᓕᕐᒥ ᐃᓄᐃᑦ ᑲᑐᔾᔨᖃᑎᒌᒃᑯᑦ ᐊᑐᓕᖁᔨᓯᒪᔪᑦ ᐅᑯᓂᙵ: • ᐅᓗᕆᐊᓇᕈᓐᓇᕐᓂᖓ hydrogen sulphide ᐃᓗᐃᑦᑐᒃᑰᓂᖅᓴᖅ ᑲᒪᒋᔭᐅᔭᕆᐊᓕᒃ. • ᑐᑭᓯᒋᐊᕈᑎᒃᓴᑦ ion-ᑯᑦ ᑭᐴᑎᖃᑦᑕᕋᔭᕐᓂᖏᑦ resin-ᑯᑦ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᐋᓐᓂᐊᓕᕈᑕᐅᔪᓐᓇᕐᓂᖏᑦ ᐅᓕᕆᐊᓇᖅᑐᒦᒍᑕᐅᔪᓐᓇᕐᓂᖏᑦ ᐃᓚᐅᖃᑕᐅᔭᕆᐊᓖᑦ. • ᖃᑉᓯᑲᓪᓚᑦ ᐃᓚᒃᓴᕆᔭᐅᕙᒃᑐᑦ ᐃᓱᒫᓘᑕᐅᔪᑦ ᓇᓗᓇᐃᖅᑕᐅᓯᒪᙱᑦᑐᑦ IARC-ᑯᑦ ᑎᑎᕋᖅᑕᐅᓯᒪᕙᒃᑐᒃᑯᑦ ᐱᓗᐊᖅᑐᒥ arsenic, cadmium ᐊᒻᒪᓗ cadmium ᐃᓗᓕᖏᑦ, ᑕᒪᓐᓇ ᑐᑭᓯᓇᖅᓯᑎᒋᐊᖅᑕᐅᓇᔭᕐᒪᑦ. • Hydrogen sulphide-ᑯᑦ ᐅᓗᕆᐊᓇᖅᑐᑦ ᐃᓚᐅᖃᑕᐅᓗᑎᒃ ᑐᑭᓯᒋᐊᖅᑎᑦᑎᔾᔪᑎᒃᑯᑦ. Community Health ᓄᓇᓕᖕᓂ ᐋᓐᓂᐊᖃᕐᓇᙱᑦᑐᓕᕆᓂᖅ • There are still significant risks perceptions by the communities related to the health and radiation risks related to food sources. • KIA has recommended that there be an ongoing systematic review for Baker Lake area caribou and lichens to determine the potential for any long-term health issues. • ᐱᒻᒪᕆᐊᓗᖕᓂᒃ ᐅᓗᕆᐊᓇᖅᑐᖃᕋᔭᕐᓂᖓᓄᑦ ᐃᓱᒪᒋᔭᐅᔪᖅ ᓱᓕ ᓄᓇᓕᖕᓂ ᐋᓐᓂᐊᖃᕐᓇᙱᑦᑐᓕᕆᓂᒃᑯᑦ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ radiation-ᑯᑦ ᐅᓗᕆᐊᓇᖅᑐᒃᑯᑦ ᐱᔾᔪᑎᒋᑉᓗᒋᑦ ᓂᕿᒋᔭᐅᕙᒃᑐᑦ. • ᑭᕙᓪᓕᕐᒥ ᐃᓄᐃᑦ ᑲᑐᔾᔨᖃᑎᒌᒃᑯᑦ ᐊᑐᓕᖁᔨᔪᑦ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᕈᑎᒃᓴᑦ ᑲᔪᓰᓐᓇᖁᑉᓗᒋᑦ ᖃᒪᓂ’ᑐᐊᒃᑯᑦ ᑐᒃᑐᒋᔭᐅᔪᒃᑯᑦ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᐱᕈᖅᑐᒃᑯᑦ ᓇᓗᓇᐃᔭᐃᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᓯᕗᓂᒃᓴᒧᑦ ᐋᓐᓂᐊᓕᕈᑕᐅᓇᔭᕐᒪᖔᑕ. Socio-Economic Environment ᐃᓅᖃᑎᒌᖕᓂᒃᑯᑦ - ᑮᓇᐅᔾᔭᒃᓴᕈᑎᒃᓴᒃᑯᓪᓗ • AREVA does not provide any indication on the types of infrastructure and services provided in the communities as well as the conditions for each in the available services.. This information must be provided for the following community infrastructure and services. • A discussion on the cumulative effects on the existing community infrastructure and services must be provided: • • • • • • • • Water; Sewage / waste water; Power; Fuel tanks; Solid waste; Fire protection; Search and rescue; Community freezer • ᐊᕇᕙᒃᑯᑦ ᐅᔭᕋᖕᓂᐊᖅᑐᓕᕆᔨᒃᑯᑦ ᓇᓗᓇᐃᔭᐃᓯᒪᙱᑦᑐᑦ ᐱᖁᑎᕐᔪᐊᓂᒃ ᐱᔨᑦᓯᕋᐅᑎᓂᒃ ᐊᑐᐃᓐᓇᕈᖅᑎᖅᑕᐅᓇᔭᖅᑐᓂᒃ ᓄᓇᓕᖕᓂ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᖃᓄᐃᑦᑑᓇᔭᕐᒪᖔᑕ ᐊᑐᓂ ᐊᑐᐃᓐᓇᐅᔪᑦ ᐱᔨᑦᓯᕋᐅᑏᑦ. ᑕᒪᒃᑯᑎᒎᓇᖅ ᑐᑭᓯᒋᐊᕈᑎᒃᓴᑦ ᐊᑐᐃᓐᓇᕈᖅᑎᖅᑕᐅᔭᕆᐊᓖᑦ ᐅᑯᑎᒎᓇᖅ ᓄᓇᓕᖕᓂ ᐱᖁᑎᕐᔪᐊᓕᕆᓂᒃᑯᑦ ᐱᔨᑦᓯᕋᐅᑎᓕᕆᓂᒃᑯᓪᓗ. • ᐅᖃᖃᑎᒌᒍᑏᑦ ᑲᑎᑕᐅᓯᒪᔪᒃᑯᑦ ᐊᒃᑐᖅᓯᓂᐅᓇᔭᖅᑐᓄᑦ ᓄᓇᓕᖕᓂ ᐱᖁᑎᕐᔪᐊᓕᕆᓂᒃᑯᑦ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᐱᔨᑦᓯᕋᐅᑎᓕᕆᓂᒃᑯᑦ ᐊᑐᐃᓐᓇᕈᖅᑎᖅᑕᐅᔭᕆᐊᓖᑦ: • • • • • • • • ᐃᒪᕐᒧᑦ; ᐊᓇᖅᑕᐅᑎᓕᕆᓂᕐᒧᑦ/ ᐃᒪᐃᑦ ᐊᑐᖅᑕᐅᔾᔮᙱᑦᑐᑦ; ᖃᐅᒻᒪᖅᑯᑎᓕᕆᓂᖅ; ᐅᖅᓱᐊᓗᖃᐅᓯᕝᕖᑦ; ᐊᒃᑕᑯᑦ; ᖃᑉᑎᕆᔾᔪᑏᑦ; ᕿᓂᖅᑏᑦ; ᓄᓇᓕᖕᓂ ᖁᐊᖅᓰᕝᕖᑦ Income and Inflation ᑮᓇᐅᔭᓕᐊᑦ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᐊᑭᑦᑐᕆᐊᕈᑕᐅᕙᒃᑐᑦ • KIA has recommended that AREVA should indicate if the potential increase in income, as the result of the employment in the project, will have any potential impact on the inflation. If yes, AREVA should clarify what might be some of the mitigation measures. • ᑭᕙᓪᓕᕐᒥ ᐃᓄᐃᑦ ᑲᑐᔾᔨᖃᑎᒌᒃᑯᑦ ᐊᑐᓕᖁᔨᓯᒪᔪᑦ ᐊᕇᕙᒃᑯᑦ ᐅᔭᕋᖕᓂᐊᖅᑐᓕᕆᔨᒃᑯᖏᑦ ᓇᓗᓇᐃᖅᓯᓇᔭᕐᒪᑕ ᑮᓇᐅᔭᓕᐊᒃᑯᑦ ᐃᓚᒋᐊᕈᑏᑦ, ᓴᓇᓗᓂ ᐅᔭᕋᖕᓂᐊᖅᑐᓂ, ᐊᒃᑐᖅᓯᓂᖃᕈᓐᓇᕐᓂᐊᕐᒪᖔᑕ ᐊᑭᑦᑐᕆᐊᕈᑕᐅᕙᒃᑐᓄᑦ. ᐊᖏᖅᐸᑕ, ᐊᕇᕙᒃᑯᑦ ᓇᓗᓇᐃᖅᓯᓇᔭᕐᒪᑕ ᖃᓄᖅ ᐋᖅᑭᒋᐊᖅᓯᓇᔭᕐᒪᖔᕐᒥᒃ. Traditional Culture ᐃᓕᖅᑯᓯᑐᖃᓕᕆᓂᖅ • The KIA has recommended more clarification and assessment is needed to better determine the potential impacts of the project activities on traditional culture. • ᑭᕙᓪᓕᕐᒥ ᐃᓄᐃᑦ ᑲᑐᔾᔨᖃᑎᒌᒃᑯᑦ ᐊᑐᓕᖁᔨᓯᒪᔪᑦ ᑐᑭᓯᓇᖅᓯᑎᑦᑎᒋᐊᖁᔨᑉᓗᑎᒃ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᐃᖁᔨᑉᓗᑎᒃ ᓇᓗᓇᐃᔭᐃᑦᑎᐊᕐᓂᖅᓴᐅᓇᔭᕐᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᐊᒃᑐᖅᓯᓂᐅᓇᔭᖅᑐᓂᒃ ᐱᓕᕆᐊᖑᔪᒃᑯᑦ ᐱᓕᕆᐊᖃᖅᑎᓪᓗᒋᑦ ᐃᓕᖅᑯᓯᑐᖃᓕᕆᓂᕐᒥᒃ. Community Involvement Plan ᓄᓇᓕᖕᓂ ᐃᓚᐅᖃᑕᐅᑎᑦᑎᔪᒪᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᐸᕐᓇᐅᑎ • Community engagement could be improved through a Community Involvement Plan (CIP). • More information is required with regard to the CIP during the project construction, operations and decommissioning phases. • The KIA has recommended that AREVA clarify if there will be “Project Offices” set up and staffed in the other six communities. • ᓄᓇᓕᖕᓂ ᖃᓄᐃᓕᐅᖅᑎᑦᑎᖃᑦᑕᕐᓂᖅ ᐱᐅᓯᕚᓪᓕᕆᐊᖅᑕᐅᔪᓐᓇᖅᑐᖅ ᓄᓇᓕᖕᓂ ᐃᓚᐅᖃᑕᐅᑎᑦᑎᖃᑦᑕᕐᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᐸᕐᓇᐅᑎᒃᑯᑦ. • ᑐᑭᓯᒋᐊᕈᑎᒃᓴᓂᒃ ᐱᑕᖃᒃᑲᓐᓂᕆᐊᓕᒃ ᓄᓇᓕᖕᓂ ᐃᓚᐅᖃᑕᐅᑎᑦᑎᓂᖅᓴᐅᖃᑦᑕᕈᒪᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᐸᕐᓇᐅᑎᒃᑯᑦ ᐅᔭᕋᖕᓂᐊᕐᕕᒃ ᓴᓇᔭᐅᑎᓪᓗᒍ, ᐊᐅᓚᑕᐅᑎᓪᓗᒍ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᐅᒃᑯᐊᖅᑕᐅᓕᖅᐸᑦ. • ᑭᕙᓪᓕᕐᒥ ᐃᓄᐃᑦ ᑲᑐᔾᔨᖃᑎᒌᒃᑯᑦ ᐊᑐᓕᖁᔨᓯᒪᔪᑦ ᐊᕇᕙᒃᑯᑦ ᐅᔭᕋᖕᓂᐊᖅᑐᓕᕆᔨᒃᑯᑦ ᓇᓗᓇᐃᔭᐃᖁᑉᓗᒋᑦ “ᐱᓕᕆᐊᖑᔪᒃᑯᑦ ᑎᑎᕋᕐᕕᓕᐅᕐᓂᐊᕐᒪᖔᑕ” ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᓴᓇᔨᖃᕐᓂᐊᕐᒪᖔᑦ ᐊᓯᖏᓐᓂᒃ ᐊᕐᕕᓂᓕᖕᓂᒃ ᓄᓇᓕᖕᓂ.