Transcript Document
FSC Review Why review coordination performance? • National and subnational coordination performance review is essential for clusters to – – – – – Take stock of functions and deliverables of the cluster Identify good practice Identify what the partners can do to improve coordination Identify functions that require (external) support Follow trend in performance • National and subnational coordination performance review helps clusters to – Be accountable within the cluster to the CLAs, HC/HCT and other stakeholders – Be accountable to national authorities and affected population SOMALIA What is reviewed? • • • Review performance of the cluster as a coordinating body : Are we delivering as expected, at the right time, in the right way, and is it useful? – e.g. is strategy made in consultation with partners, and does it guide projects of partners? Does not look at performance of individual partners Is not a staff appraisal of cluster coordinators • Is based on the Six Core Functions for all clusters (see IASC Coordination Reference Module (October '12): i. Supporting service delivery ii. Informing strategic decision-making of the HC/HCT for the humanitarian response iii. Planning and strategy development iv. Advocacy v. Monitoring and reporting vi. Contingency planning/preparedness SOMALIA Plus Accountability to Affected Populations How is it reviewed? • Process initiated every 6 months • Implemented and analysed separately for national and sub-national coordination • On-line anonymous self-assessment mechanism to gather feedback to reflect on and improve cluster performance • Based on a consultative, participative approach, and a mix of objectively verifiable facts and feedback from partners: SOMALIA Step 1: The Email Invitation SOMALIA The Assessment Form Somalia Food Security SOMALIA SOMALIA SOMALIA Step 2: Automatic analysis of feedback from partners and coordinators, scoring of each function/sub-function Performance status 1. Supporting service delivery 1.1 Provide a platform to ensure that service delivery is driven by the agreed strategic priorities 1.2 Develop mechanisms to eliminate duplication of service delivery 2. Informing strategic decision-making of the HC/HCT for the humanitarian response 2.1 Needs assessment and gap analysis (across other sectors and within the sector) 2.2 Analysis to identify and address (emerging) gaps, obstacles, duplication, and cross-cutting issues. 2.3 Prioritization, grounded in response analysis SOMALIA Step 3 – Analysis findings shared with all partners Step 4 – Organization of a SAG meeting to discuss these findings: discuss success factors, good practice and constraints, agree on follow-up actions Step 5 – Outcome of the SAG meeting shared with all partners, CLA, other stakeholders SOMALIA Thank You Q&A SOMALIA