Overview of the CDA Procurement Process

Download Report

Transcript Overview of the CDA Procurement Process

Regional Border Economic
Development Forum
September 3, 2005
TTC – Purpose and Need
• Move people and goods across
Texas faster, safer and more reliably
• Rapid population growth
• Increase in registered vehicles
• Increase in international truck traffic
• Forecasts indicate transportation
demand will continue
Concentration of Truck Traffic
1998 Texas
Truck Flows
TTC – Phased Development
• Plans call for TTC to be developed
over the next 50 years or so
• Built as needed and as private
sector funding makes it feasible
TTC – Conceptual Development
Current Transportation Needs
• Provide alternative to I-35 Oklahoma to Mexico/Gulf Coast
Element
• Develop I-69 – Northeast Texas to
Mexico element
TTC –
Priority
Routes
TTC-35 Milestones
Comprehensive Development Agreement
• July ’03 to November ‘04
• December 16, 2004
• March 11, 2005
Environmental Study
• February 2004
• Spring 2004
• Fall 2004
• Spring 2005
Reviewed conceptual and
detailed proposals from three
developer teams
Commission Action and Award
CDA signed with Cintra-Zachry
Official kick-off/Notice of Intent
First round of public meetings (26)
Second round of public meetings
(44)
Third round of public meetings (47)
TTC-35
Preliminary
Corridor
Alternatives
TTC-35 Environmental Study Continues
• Preliminary alternatives to be narrowed
to preferred corridor alternative
• Fall 2005 – Public hearings to get
comments on the preferred corridor
• Spring 2006 - Expected completion of
Initial environmental study
• Additional studies needed to determine
route and authorize construction
TTC-35 Schedule – Two Concurrent Processes
CDA Process
Select Long-term Partner (Dec. 16 ‘04)
Initial Scope of Work
Facility Development
Project 1
Project 2
Project 3
Environmental Process
Tier One (Ongoing)
Project 1 Tier Two
Project 2 Tier Two
Project 3 Tier Two
TTC-35 CDA Contractual Relationship
TxDOT
Private Sector Developer
(Master CDA Contract)
Truck Toll
Roads
Master
Planned
Projects
Independent
Facility
Agreements*
Passenger
Rail
Facility 1 - DBOM
Facility 2 - DBFO
Facility 1 - DB
Facility 2 - DBFO
Toll Roads
Freight Rail
Utilities
Facility 1 - DBB
Facility 2 - DBFO
Facility 1 - DB
Facility 2 - DBFO
Facility 1 - DBB
Facility 2 - DBFO
* Separate Contracts.
Some Negotiated with Developer and Others Publicly Procured.
Cintra-Zachry Team
•
•
Cintra, Concesiones de Infraestructuras de
Transporte, S.A. (Spain)
Zachry Construction Corp. (San Antonio, TX)
• Ferrovial-Agromán
• OTHON, Inc.
• Earth Tech, Inc.
• Railroad Industries Incorporated
• PriceWaterhouseCoopers
• Amey
• JP Morgan Securities
• Mercator
• Bracewell & Patterson
• Public Resources Advisory Group
• Pate Engineers, Inc.
• Southwestern Capital Markets
• Aguirre & Fields LP
• National Corporate Network
• Rodriguez Transportation Group
• HRM Consultants
Highlights of Cintra-Zachry Proposal
• A 50-year partnership with near, mid, and long
term projects to develop the Trans-Texas
Corridor from Oklahoma to Mexico
• Anticipates over $6 billion in near-term
transportation construction projects
• Anticipates a payment in excess of $1 billion to
TxDOT for additional transportation projects
within the Corridor
• Negotiate the right to operate and collect tolls
for up to 50 years
Highlights are Conceptual
• All proposed Facility alignments, locations,
financing, and schedules shown in the following
slides are conceptual and subject to the
following:
– NEPA process and public input
– Environmental approvals
– FHWA approvals
– TxDOT review and approvals
– Final traffic and revenue forecasts and
financial modeling
Near-, Mid-, and LongTerm Facilities
Near Term (2005 – 2010)
SH 130 – Segments 5 and 6
Dallas Southeast Connector
Dallas Northeast Connector
Georgetown to Temple
Temple to Dallas SE Connector
San Antonio Southeast Loop
UP Railroad Relocation (MoPac)
Mid Term (2010 – 2025)
IH 10 Expansion, Seguin to San Antonio SE Loop
SH 130 – Segments 1 to 4
Long Term (2025 - )
Dallas to Austin Freight Rail
Dallas to Austin High Speed Rail
Austin – San Antonio High Speed Rail
Forth Worth Southwest & Northwest Connector
San Antonio to Rio Grande Valley
Conceptual
Proposed Cintra Near-Term Facilities
Estimated Construction and Right of Way Costs*
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
► $ 710,000,000
Toll Road – S. of Austin to San Antonio
► $ 1,793,000,000
Toll Road – S. of Dallas to E. of Dallas
Toll Road – E. of Dallas to N. of Dallas
Initial
Toll Road – Georgetown to Temple
Scope
Toll Road – Temple to S. of Dallas
of Work
Toll Road – S. of San Antonio to E. of
San Antonio
► $ 775,000,000
► $ 986,000,000
► $ 1,694,000,000
► $489,000,000
► $852,000,000
Railroad Relocation Project – Central
Texas
*Estimates are subject to the environmental process and final terms.
2014
2015
Proposed Cintra Near-Term Facilities
Concession Fees*
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
► $ 36,700,000
Toll Road – S. of Austin to San Antonio
► $ 580,000,000
Toll Road – S. of Dallas to E. of Dallas
Toll Road – E. of Dallas to N. of Dallas
Initial
Toll Road – Georgetown to Temple
Scope
Toll Road – Temple to S. of Dallas
of Work
Toll Road – S. of San Antonio to E. of San
Antonio
Railroad Relocation Project – Central Texas
*Estimates are subject to the environmental process and final terms.
► $ 407,900,000
► $ 116,300,000
► $ 32,300,000
2012
2013
2014
201
I-69/TTC - Milestones
Background
• ISTEA and TEA 21
•
•
1998
2000
•
2001
Environmental Study
• January 2004
• Spring 2004
• Spring 2005
Designated as Congressional High Priority
Corridor (Port Huron, Michigan to Texas/Mexico
border)
FHWA approval for environmental streamlining
I-69 national corridor divided into 32
subsections
TxDOT selects engineering consultant
Official kick-off/Notice of Intent
First round of public meetings (11)
Expanded study area
I-69/TTC –
Expanded
Study Area
I-69/TTC – Environmental
Study Continues
• Identifying reasonable corridor alternatives is ongoing
• Summer 2005 – Public meetings to get comments on the
reasonable corridor alternatives
• Winter 2005 - Identify preferred corridor alternative based
on comments from previous public meetings
• Spring 2006 – Public hearings to get comments on the
preferred corridor
• Winter 2006 - Expected completion of initial environmental
study
• Additional studies needed to determine route and authorize
construction
I-69/TTC
Comprehensive Development
Agreement
• It will likely be modeled after the
CDA for TTC-35
• No proposals have been submitted
Trans-Texas Corridor
Questions and Discussion
Contact Information
Amadeo Saenz, Jr., P.E.
Assistant Executive Director
Engineering Operations
125 East 11th Street
Austin, TX 78701-2483
Phone: (512) 305-9504
FAX : (512) 463-0283