Transcript Slide 1
TPA ACTION PLANS TO ADDRESS CONGESTION AT THE PORT OF DAR ES SALAAM Mr. Jason Rugaihuruza Port Manager Dar es Salaam Port 25th – 26th September 2008 1 AN OVERVIEW 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. INTRODUCTION PORT CONGESTION MAIN CAUSES OF CONGESTION DECONGESTING STRATEGIES ACTION PLANS TO ADDRESS PORT CONGESTION CHALLENGES 2 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 DSM Port berths 1.2 Total berths: 11 and lighter quay Total quay length: 2,600m Port Terminals General Cargo Terminal - 8 berths Container Terminal – 3 berths Oil terminals • SPM • KOJ I & II Grain Terminal 3 1.3 Transit corridors: The transit corridors served by the port of Dar-es-Salaam are TAZARA corridor, Central corridor, Tanga corridor and Mtwara corridor. These corridors are supported by road, rail, lake or/and pipeline transport system. 4 4 DR DR CONGO CONGO 3 4 3 2 2 1 1 NB: NB:1- Mtwara corridor, 2- DSM TAZARA corridor, 1- Mtwara corridor, 2- DSM TAZARA corridor, 3- DSM Central corridor, 4- Tanga corridor 3- DSM Central corridor, 4- Tanga corridor 5 2. PORT CONGESTION 2.1 Port started to experience congestion end of year 2006, and severe congestion was from November 2007. 2.2 Main congestion indicators include: (a) Long waiting times for ships at outer anchorage, and high ship turnround times. 6 (i) Waiting time (days/ship) 8 7 Days/ship 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Aug08 GCT 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.9 0.7 CT 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.5 1.6 4.3 7.5 GCT – General Cargo Terminal CT – Container Terminal 7 (ii) Turnround time (Days/ship) 12 Days/ship 10 8 6 4 2 0 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Aug08 GCT 2.7 2.8 2.9 3.5 4.3 3.8 4.1 4.6 3.5 CT 1.2 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.5 1.9 2.9 6.2 10.9 GCT – General Cargo Terminal, CT – Container Terminal Long ship turnround times since 2006, indicates slow quay and yard operations. This is a sign of congestion of ships at outer anchorage and congestion of containers in the terminal. 8 (b) High berth occupancy rates 90 80 70 % 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 GCT CT 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Aug-08 41.1 33.4 40.6 32.4 46.6 32.7 43.6 47.1 44.7 45 43.5 47.5 48.5 46.3 53.8 59.2 71.2 83 The berth occupancy for Container Terminal for year 2007 and 2008 level above 60% which is a sign of congestion. 9 High dwell times of containers 30 25 Days/container (c) 20 15 10 5 0 Days/Container 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Aug08 25.9 16.6 16.7 17 17.1 20.2 22.2 19.8 25 The dwell time for the terminal from the design perspective was 10 days. The actual dwell time as shown above indicates that containers overstay in the terminal thus creating congestion and slowing down10 operations. (d) Lower crane productivity (moves per crane net hour) 30 Moves per hour 25 20 15 10 5 0 2000 2001 2002 Moves/hour 15 19 20 2003 2004 2005 2006 23 24 24 22 2007 Aug08 19 16 The crane productivity has been falling down since 2006, an indication of long ship waiting times, turnround times and yard congestion. 11 3. MAIN CAUSES OF CONGESTION 3.1 Insufficient container storage space. The Container Terminal intrinsic capacity is 250,000 TEUs per annum. This capacity was surpassed in year 2004, where the Terminal handled throughput of 259,369 TEUs. In year 2007, the Terminal handled 343,436 TEUs, surpassing its designed capacity by 37.4%. 12 Terminal throughput versus its capacity 400000 TEU'S 300000 200000 100000 0 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Throughput 149100 166327 201058 259369 293919 307791 343436 250000 250000 250000 250000 250000 250000 250000 Capacity 2001 13 3.2 Long container dwell times Long Container dwell times have direct impact on Terminal capacity. The higher the dwell time the lower the capacity, resulting in yard congestion. STACKING HEIGHT Dwell time (in days) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 3 high 4 high 5 high 2,127,332 1,063,666 709,111 531,833 425,466 354,555 303,905 265,917 236,370 212,733 193,394 177,278 163,641 151,952 141,822 2,836,443 1,418,222 945,481 709,111 567,289 472,741 405,206 354,555 315,160 283,644 257,858 236,370 218,188 202,603 189,096 3,545,554 1,772,777 1,181,851 886,388 709,111 590,926 506,508 443,194 393,950 354,555 322,323 295,463 272,735 253,254 236,370 Based on current Container Terminal area of 3,157 groundslots. 14 Capacity versus dwell times Annual capacity (in TEUs) 4,000,000 3,500,000 3,000,000 2,500,000 2,000,000 1,500,000 1,000,000 500,000 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Dwell time in days 3 high 4 high 5 high 15 3.3 Sharp increase of container volumes 400000 TEU'S 300000 200000 100000 0 2000 2001 2002 2003 Imports 62119 68921 73090 90135 105594 115215 121471 160100 Exports 60549 66519 68297 77663 93730 113513 120776 145065 Transshipment 1980 6280 12409 18319 27790 Total 2004 2005 29661 2006 30453 2007 28815 124648 141720 153796 186117 227114 258389 272700 333980 Containerized cargo traffic trend has been reflecting a positive increase of 15.1% per annum as from year 2000 to 2007. In year 2007, the proportion of containerized cargo to dry cargo traffic was 62%, as compared to 48% in year 2000. 16 3.4 Poor inland transport: • Many roads are not fully paved (85% of the roads) resulting in long travel times. • Low availability of locomotives and rolling stock. TRL : 1.0 metres gauge, with capacity of 2.5 million tons and achieving less than 30% per annum. TAZARA: 1.067 metres gauge, with capacity of 5 million tons, and achieving less than 12% per annum. 17 Cargo clearance (in ‘000 metric tons) 3000 2500 2000 Metric tons (i) 1500 1000 500 0 Road Rail 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 1089 1061 1160 1307 1606 1646 2069 2478 333 351 266 273 258 233 208 204 The Cargo clearance by all modes has been increasing by 9.5% per annum since 2000. Clearance by road has been increasing by 12.5% while by rail has been declining by 6.8%. 18 (ii) Cargo clearance (in ‘000 tons) and percent share by modes 2001 ROAD TRL 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 1061 1160 1307 1606 1646 2069 2478 168 104 89 79 185 133 83 35 57 51 73 48 75 121 TAZARA %Share ROAD 83.9 87.8 90.3 91.4 87.6 90.9 92.4 TRL 13.3 7.9 6.2 4.5 9.8 5.8 3.1 TAZARA 2.8 4.3 3.5 4.2 2.6 3.3 4.5 The share of cargo cleared by road has been keeping on rising while that of rail has been falling. The shortage of wagons contributes to decline of cargo clearance share compared to road mode of transport. 19 4. DECONGESTING STRATEGIES 4.1 Increase of Container Terminal capacity (groundslots) and use of Inland depots. 4.2 Better utilization of terminal capacity within the port (equipment, workforce, space, procedures, IT). 4.3 Joint effort by stakeholders to reduce dwell time of cargo in the port. 20 5. ACTION PLANS TO ADDRESS PORT CONGESTION 5.1 Short-term measures No. Action plan Implementation Computerize all operations and interface with terminal operators Harbour view has been put in place, and now cargo system is being installed and training is in progress. Working 24 hours Operations and billing system are on 24 hours basis. 3 TPA General Cargo Terminal has started handling containers since June 2007. Todate 112 container ships with containers 24,267 TEUs have been handled at General Cargo Terminal. 4 Port Community network should be adapted. Looking for a developer, Consultant and funds 1 2 21 No. Action plan Implementation 5 Enforcing a punitive tariff to discourage shipping Continues to be being implemented. agents who delay submitting manifest. 6 Vessels to discharge containers at Mtwara port for transhipment to DSM port TPA and TRA are setting up modalities of starting operations in October 2008. To transfer containers to ICDs. There are now 6 ICDs that are receiving containers from the port; TRH, MOFED, AMI, MCCL, DICD and UICD. Total capacity of ICDs is 8,300 TEUs. 7 22 No. Action plan Implementation 8 Three auctions are now being conducted To speed up auctioning of at various stations per week; DSM port cargo overstayed in the port and Ubungo. 9 TPA continue to acquire sufficient cargo handling equipment including heavy lift equipment - for general cargo berths TPA has acquired more cargo handling equipment such as 2 mobile cranes, 3 reachstackers. Four Mobile cranes are on order. Campaign on ensuring faster container clearance from the port/ICDs Preparations are underway to educate customers on cargo clearance procedures. 10 23 No. Action plan Implementation 11 Space of Ex-TANESCO, copper yard and Securing and providing New TISCAN are being paved. The more space within the port additional space can accommodate about for container handling. 3,000 TEUs. 12 The use of space for stuffing, stripping and verification of all local cargo outside the port area. TPA has discouraged stuffing/stripping activities inside the port. 13 To utilize Mbeya and Isaka as fully fledged ICDs Efforts are underway to reopen and utilize Mbeya and Isaka dry ports by end of 2008. 24 No. 14 15 Action plan Implementation TPA to improve entry and exit gates. Tender document is being prepared. The project is expected to end by March 2009. TPA to liaise with government on the need to change land use in favour of port industry of the area surrounding the port Efforts are underway to make use of the ex-NASACO area, Kurasini area in favour of the Port industry; 25 No. Action plan 16 TICTS and TRL to co-ordinate on availability of wagons, and establish procedures and identify improvements 17 18 To change the tariff that will ensure customers take their cargo in time and bring dwell time to below 10 days. TICTS to introduce truck safety check for all trucks entering the terminal to avoid breakdowns and accidents. Implementation Use of block trains to Kigoma and Isaka is underway. Recommendations are with SUMATRA Safety Marshall procedures are already in place. 26 No. Action plan Implementation 19 Submission of complete manifest by Shipping lines. Submission of partial manifest is now allowed by TRA. 20 Scanning of containers immediately after discharging from vessel; will reduce Pending acquiring considerable extra space and improvements of documentation. This is being done for ICDs today. clearance process time. 21 TICTS to improve productivity and purchase of additional equipment. Additional equipment have been ordered and some have arrived such as 9 TTs, 2 mobile cranes, 4 reachstackers, 7 RTGs. 1 SSG is expected in 2009. 27 No. 22 23 24 Action plan Implementation All overstayed containers to be Containers are moved from TICTS to moved immediately to their Ubungo ICD in order to create space designated bonded at main terminal. warehouses. TICTS to transfer all local cargo (containers) for verification to ICDs and leave space for other use. Plans are underway TICTS to provide online information of invoices and improve method of payment to include electronic transfers and/or debit cards Done - possible from EDI receipt from shipping line 28 No. Action plan 25 Large importers should be allowed to collect their containers direct from the port. 26 TICTS should maximize transfers of containers to Ubungo by rail locomotive/wagons. 27 TICTS to ensure port tariff encourages early off take and reduction in use as storage area. Tariff also to include penalty for removal of long stay boxes. Implementation Being done but space does not fully permit. TICTS has started transferring Containers. To be submitted to SUMATRA for approval. 29 No. Action plan 28 TRL to bring into service MV Kaawa and Pamba to increase haulage capacity of wagons/transit cargo to and from Uganda/Kenya as MV Umoja capacity is limited. 29 Shortage of wagons and locomotives (TRL and TAZARA). Implementation The operation is Underway Recently TAZARA received new 100 and 2 locomotives, and TRL has acquired 69 wagons. TRL to rehabilitate 300 wagons and will be available for use towards the end of year 2009. 30 No. Action plan Implementation 30 To reduce road blocks to at least by 75%. E.g from DAR to TUNDUMA there are 25 of In progress them! Introduce a sticker system to show that the traffic has been checked. 31 Government to maintain roads and infrastructure - this is a major block and restriction to efficient trade - Nelson In progress Mandela Road, Port Access Road must be urgently upgraded and widened. 32 TRA to streamline document verification work to avoid duplication. In progress 31 2.2 Medium-term measures No. Action plan Implementation 1 To improve and use Mwanza South port warehouses for Uganda TPA/TICTS are following up. cargo, and also Isaka dry port for Burundi cargo. 2 TPA to do maintenance dredging along the quay to increase draft. 3 TRL to encourage private investment in wagon Plans are underway ferries and locomotives. A contractor has been engaged and work has started and expected finishing time is in December 2008. 32 No. 4 5 Action plan TICTS to secure areas outside the port for ICDs operations. Implementation Plans are underway. TPA to establish one stop shop for cargo clearance Surveys and designs are ready. so that all customers and Feasibility study is underway. stakeholders are under one roof. 33 5.3 Long-term measures No. Action plan Implementation 1 Construction of multistorey car park by TPA so that cars are moved out To be ready by end year 2010. of the port and leave space for container handling. 2 Construction of Container Terms of reference are being prepared Terminal at Bagamoyo. for feasibility study. 3 Construction of container berths 13 and 14 To be ready by 2012. adjacent to KOJ. 34 5.4 Short term Action plans implementation results: (a) Container stock level Short term action plans implementation have shown positive results by reducing congestion of the containers at the terminal from stock level of 11,714 TEUs mid-February 2007 to 6,315 TEUs mid-March 2007. Stock level increased again to 7,897 TEUs mid-September 2008. The terminal holding capacity is 7,500 TEUs. The number of import containers at the terminal has significantly declined from 7,521 TEUs beginning of February 2008 to 4,021 TEUs mid-September 2008. 35 Ship at outer anchorage Number of ship at outer anchorage has decreased from 14 vessels per day beginning of February 2007 to 0 vessels beginning of September 2008. SUM M ARY OF VESSELS STATUS AT OUTER ANCHORAGE FROM 01/01/2008 - 24/09/2008 20 18 16 Days 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 08 1S ep - 08 1A ug - 08 1Ju l- -0 8 1Ju n 1M ay -0 8 08 1A pr - 08 1M ar - eb -0 8 1F -0 8 0 1Ja n (b) No of Vessels at OA Maximum waiting time per vessel (Days) 36 04 /0 2 12 /0 2 28 /0 2 07 /0 3 12 /0 3 17 /0 3 21 /0 3 25 /0 3 29 /0 3 03 /0 4 08 /0 4 15 /0 4 21 /0 4 25 /0 4 30 /0 4 9/ 5 16 /5 23 /5 29 05 /5 -J u 11 n -J u 23 n -J u 28 n -J u 02 n -J u 06 l -J u 10 l -J u 14 l -J u 18 l -J u 22 l -J u 26 l -J u 30 l -J 03 ul -A 07 ug -A 11 ug -A 15 ug -A 20 ug -A 24 ug -A 28 ug -A 01 ug -S 05 ep -S 09 ep -S 13 ep -S 17 ep -S ep TEUS CONTAINERS ON HAND (IN TEUs): CONTAINER TERMINAL MAIN TERMINAL 28/2/2008 - 21/9/2008 14,000 12,000 10,000 8,000 6,000 4,000 2,000 0 Import full Export full Empties TRM Total Holding Capacity (7500) 37 6.0 CHALLENGES 6.1 Creating port capacity ahead of demand. 6.2 To handle the increasing general cargo, bulk cargo and container traffic. 6.3 Coordination with inland transport modes through business corridors to achieve high utilization of available capacity and seamless transfer of cargo along the entire logistic chain. 6.4 To continue improving port facilities and capacity in order to handle efficiently the increasing traffic. 38 6.5 Inter-connectivity and cooperation with other ports to face challenges of traffic increase. 6.6 Setting up a good port community system with the challenge of promoting port efficiency, cost effectiveness and marketing. The Port Community system entails exchange of information on cargo and vessels among stakeholders. This will also involve information on port related activities such as booking of wagons. 6.7 To improve security and safety of people, cargo, port facilities and vessels in accordance with ISPS code. 39 7.8 To continue creating a productive and motivated workforce and manage the intellect created in the workforce. 7.9 To complete and implement the Port Master Plan study. 40 THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION 41