Transcript Slide 1
Response to Intervention ( AKA: RtI ) A Little History… • Pre-Referral Teams (Ducks in a row) • Care Teams (Problem admiration Society) • Teacher Support Teams (“Laundry List,” Accommodations, “It ain’t over until somebody cries”) • Problem Solving Teams (Agenda, Problem Statement, Intervention vs. Accommodation, Data • Standard Treatment Response Teams Beth Wood 3-tiered model in both academics and behavior Academic Systems Behavioral Systems Intensive, Individual Interventions •Individual Students •Assessment-based •High Intensity •Of longer duration 1-5% 5-10% Targeted Group Interventions •Some students (at-risk) •High efficiency •Rapid response Universal Interventions •All students •Preventive, proactive Intensive, Individual Interventions •Individual Students •Assessment-based •Intense, durable procedures 1-5% 5-10% Targeted Group Interventions •Some students (at-risk) •High efficiency •Rapid response 80-90% 80-90% Universal Interventions •All settings, all students •Preventive, proactive What is RtI? Response to Intervention is the use of high quality instruction matched to student need using level of performance and learning rate over time to make educational decisions. What is RtI? Response to Intervention is the use of high quality instruction matched to student need using level of performance and learning rate over time to make educational decisions. How are these students doing? 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Gen Ed at risk 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr Level? 4th Qtr Rate? Time? How are these students doing? 100 Reading Growth 90 80 70 60 Gen Ed at risk 50 40 30 20 10 0 1st Qtr Level ? 2nd Qtr Rate? 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr Time? Critical Questions • What do we expect students to learn? • How will we know when they have learned it? • How will we respond when they don’t? • What will we do with the students who have already learned it? Whatever It Takes DuFour et. Al. Problem Solving Features • Designed for individual students • Isolate, identify, and define the problem(s) • Target the behavioral/ academic performance or skill deficit with studentspecific interventions • Frequent progress checks • Instructional decisions based on data Beth Wood Standard Treatment Response •Based on Benchmark/Universal Screening for ALL students in the fall, winter, and spring •Reading, Math, Writing, Attendance, Performance •Grade Level or Department Meetings •Supplemental instruction for groups of students with similar skill defects or fragile skills (Tiers) •Intensive instruction for chronic non-responders •Progress Monitoring •Decision-making on live data •Frequent review of data STEP ONE Pick a target ! A Very Good Place to Start Take an inventory: Current instructional initiatives? Professional Learning Communities (PLC) Positive Behavior Schools (PBS) Reading First Are current systems working? If so, integrate initiatives. Remember circuits in systems can overload! #1 PLC Question • What do we expect students to learn? GLE, Curriculum Benchmark, Skill Evidence of Mastery Prerequisite Skills Describe the principles of federalism, separation of powers, checks and balances, purpose of majority rule, and dual sovereignty. Students will be able to describe how the legislative branch checks the executive branch of government. Knowledge of the 3 branches of government and concept of checks and balances. Decode VC, CV,CVC, VCC, CVCV combinations 25 nonsense words read correctly in 1 minute Letter sound fluency Assessment Target Date FormativeGraphic Organizer SummativeConstitution Test End of 2nd quarter AIMSweb probes End of 2nd Quarter Step Two Data analysis and making connections Three-tiered Intervention Model Tier 1: Curriculum-based assessments used to determine appropriate interventions and strategically designed instruction provided to all students (80-90%) Tier 2: Targeted prevention or remediation for students whose performance and rate of progress lag behind the norm (5-10%) Tier 3: Specialized intervention protocol for students with the most intense needs (1-5%) Universal Screening Pyramid construction through… • Frequent and efficient measurementsCurriculum-Based Measurement (CBM) AIMSweb DIBELS Common Assessments • Cyclical standardized/normed group testingFall/Spring (i.e. ITBS/MAP) Universal Screening • Administered Early Fall, Winter, Late Spring • “Big Picture” of intervention effectiveness adjustments • Pyramid adjustment STEP THREE Interventions * Tier One Interventions Implementation in classroom setting Instruction based on data Delivery based on data Grouping based on data Scientifically Research-based, EvidenceBased, or (minimally) Promising Practice status High Quality Classroom Instuction • Focus on the established curriculum • Effective lesson design • Proven instructional practices, strategies and resources • Researched-based group/individual interventions • Communication/collaboration among instructional staff • Guiding principle of student-centered decisionmaking More Intervention Strategies • • • • • • • • Non-linguistic reps Metaphors, analogies Mnemonics Concept association Recognizing effort Practice & homework Cooperative Learning Summarizing • • • • • • • • Note taking Generate/test hypotheses Advance organizers Cueing & Questioning Teaching vocabulary Teaching details Organizing ideas Teaching skills/processes Tier One Intervention Tips • Flexible grouping • Differentiated Instruction • Classroom Learning Centers Tier Two Interventions Individual and small group for targeted skill, concept, and behavior instruction Continues only until the specific skill, concept, or behavior is in place (Usually short term) Typically occurs 2-3x per week Different interventions than Tier 1 Tier Three Interventions • Similar to Tier Two • Formalized Written Plan • Longer and more frequent delivery of focused instruction Standard Treatment Protocol • A set of evidence based practices (standard treatment) • Designed to be used in a systematic manner • Often scripted or highly structured • High probability of producing change • Replaces less precise brainstorming sometimes associated with problem solving. • Allow decision-making teams to be more efficient and effective! The 3 MOST important factors for instructional interventions: Fidelity Fidelity Fidelity Strategy Websites • • • • • • • • • • • • http://www.interventioncentral.org http://www.aimsweb.com http://www.specialconnections.ku.edu http://www.resourceroom.net http://rti4success.org “National Center on RtI” http://its.guilford.k12.nc.us/act/strategies http://iris.peabody.vanderbilt.edu/ http://edweb.sdsu.edu/triton/guides/sfa.html http://www.enchantedlearning.com http://www.graphicorganizers.com http://rtinetwork.org http://www.fcrr.org “Florida Center for Reading Reseach” * STEP FOUR Relevant/Reliable Progress Monitoring Monitoring of Implementation Tier 1: Defines necessary instructional modifications; Provides proficiency level data; Identifies students in need of Tier 2 interventions; Serves all students; 3x per year Tier 2 : Determines the effectiveness of intense intervention protocol; Provides rate of progress data; Serves targeted students; 2x per week Tier 3 : Determines proficiency of targeted skills and rate of progress; generates decisions for need of 504 plans or IEPs; _x per individual plans Curriculum-Based Measurement Data from CBM measures serve as indicators of academic proficiency in subject areas such as math, reading, and writing, just like… – Temperature in degrees serves as an indicator of overall wellness – Weight in pounds serves as an indicator of overall health – A litmus test serves as an indicator of a solution’s acidity Erika Lempke Curriculum-Based Measurement for Universal Screening • Technical Characteristics – Predict performance • Reliable • Valid – Reflect progress • Reliable • Valid – Tied to other measures of academic proficiency • Practical Characteristics – Inexpensive – Easy to use – Time efficient – Sensitive to small changes in performance – Easy to understand Erika Lempke The Glue RtI is a team sport The Glue Codified Processes and Procedures • • • • • • • Schedule and Timelines Team Activities Data Collection Protocols Common Assessments Assessment Calendars Staff roles and responsibilities Staff Training Problem Solving Team Process or Building-wide Issue Student-specific Issue Technical Support Personnel Building Leadership Classroom Teacher Problem Solving Core Membership Roles Responsibilities Support Plan Plan School Community Data Collection System Plan Student At the meeting… • Students are identified through the distribution report or other data • Interventions are discussed and selected • Groups are created • Implementers are pinpointed • Blocks of intervention time are identified • Realistic and ambitious goals developed • Progress Monitoring measures and schedules are selected At the meeting… • Plans are made to collect and graph data • Fidelity of Implementation checks are planned for upfront • Follow up meetings to review data and make decisions are scheduled • Materials, resources, and any needed professional development are provided • And later, progress is published and celebrated! Resources/Acknowledgements Steve Belden Beth Wood Erika Lempke