Transcript Integration of Humanitarian Clusters with strengthening of

Strengthening Inter-linkages between
Development and Humanitarian
Programmes:
Mapping and Analysis of Gaps
RCO and OCHA
HCT
Tuesday September 12th 2012
1
Context and Process
Context
Process and Outcomes of work
In context of transition environment,
the UN and partners are:
• Maintaining a balance between
scaling-up service delivery while
enhancing national systems
• Harmonized approaches
emphasizing national policy
engagement and systems
development
• Maintaining a capacity, and
where possible strengthening
national systems, to respond
quickly and adequately to
residual and new humanitarian
needs
• Facilitated by RCO and OCHA
• Part I: Mapping of humanitarian,
recovery and development
• Part II: Participatory meetings
and dialogue between
humanitarian and development
actors, prioritization of gaps.
• Synthesis, feedback and revision
• Efforts to seek synergies,
collaboration, complementarity
and develop shared
understanding
• Inform evolving humanitarian
architecture and funding appeals,
priorities for ZUNDAF, DRM
Strategy etc.
2
Mapping of humanitarian, recovery and development
Humanitari
an Cluster
Recovery
opportunit
ies
identified
in JEROF
(2010)
Main
nonhumanita
rian not
included
in CAP
2012
Relevant
ZUNDAF/JI
M
Outcome
Programme in place/ Progress/Sector
Recovery
Relevant
Govern
policies,
structures
UN/ZUNDAF
inc. relevant
Flagship
Significant
Funding
Source
NGO and
other
partners
Agriculture
Education
Food
Assistance
Health
Nutrition
WASH
Protection
Multisector
Livelihood
3
Agriculture: Analysis of gaps and priorities for inter-linkages
Disaster Response Capacity
• Humanitarian
– No gaps
• Risks
– Low productivity, limited
private sector, inadequate
safety-nets
• Strengthening national
capacity
– NEWU and early warning
– DCP and MoAMID
– FNC
Recovery/development
• Sustainable approaches for input
assistance (co-payment,
conservation farming)
• Co-ordination structures
•
•
MTP
ACWG
• Finalization of Agricultural Policy
• Sustainable transparent funding
system e.g. levies
• Post-harvest management
• Accountability and demand of
services
4
Education: Analysis of gaps and priorities for inter-linkages
Disaster Response Capacity
• Humanitarian
– No gaps
• Risks
– Lack of Gov funding for
strengthening school systems
• Strengthening national
capacity
– Expand DRR in schools
– Strengthen link between
MoESAC and DCP
– ENN and EMIS
– Schools grants
Recovery/development
• Integration of national coordination structures, potential
“partner-forum”
• Adherence of standards of school
construction
• Prioritize Satellite schools
• Scaling up EMIS
• Secure continued funding for
BEAM
• School Grants
• School Development Committees
(SDCs)
5
Food Assistance (inc. SP/FS): Analysis of gaps and priorities for
inter-linkages
Disaster Response Capacity
• Humanitarian
– 1.6 million affected by acute
food insecurity (Jan-Mar
2013)
– Some chronically food
insecure (in absence of
safety-net, social assistance)
– Innovative approaches to
food assistance
• Strengthening national
capacity
• DCP and FNC
• DRM Strategy
Recovery/development
• National social protection
framework
• Expansion of cash transfers for
chronically vulnerable (labor
constrained)
• National system for food and
nutrition insecurity (vulnerability)
analysis strengthened through
FNC/ZIMVAC (link to PISCES)
• Economic opportunities
expanded (inc. Food/Cash for
Assets)
• Implementation of Food and
Nutrition Security Policy
6
Health: Analysis of gaps and priorities for inter-linkages
Disaster Response Capacity
• Humanitarian
– Support for health
surveillance and response to
water-borne diseases
• Strengthening national
capacity
– National Health Emergency
Operation Center (NHEOC)
– MoHCW and DCP
– Environmental Health
Alliance (EHA) at su-national
level
Recovery/development
• Health sector co-ordination ,
revive HDP forum
• Stunting: Scaling up nutrition in
HTF and multi-sectoral
interventions
• Scaling up response to address
maternal mortality through multifaceted interventions including
waiver of user fees etc.
7
Nutrition: Analysis of gaps and priorities for inter-linkages
Disaster Response Capacity
Recovery/development
• Humanitarian
• Scaling-up opportunities for IYCF
in HTF
• Scaling up multi-sectoral analysis
and response through FNC (SUN,
FNSP, Flagship)
• Revert cluster back to
MoHCW/ND Nutrition Technical
WG and support co-ordination
• Nutrition Strategy
• Micro-nutrient deficiencies
• HIV/AIDS and nutrition (esp > 5
years)
– No gaps
• Risks
– Underlying causes not addressed,
capacities for response limited,
high HIV/AIDS
• Strengthening national
capacity
•
•
•
Establish national nutritional
surveillance system
Analysis of multi-sectoral food and
nutrition insecurity at sub-national
level
Referral and treatment of
malnourished through MoHCW Rapid
Response Teams
8
WASH: Analysis of gaps and priorities for inter-linkages
Disaster Response Capacity
• Humanitarian
– Response to ‘life-threatening’
water-borne outbreaks including
in schools, under-served areas
and urban areas
• Risks
– Systemic disrepair, over-reliance
on one emergency donor, partial
coverage of development
programmes
• Strengthening national
capacity
– DRR in WASH Policy, DCP/CPU
and MoWater, national NGOs
Recovery/development
• Strengthening national coordination structures in line with
WASH sector review/Policy
• Mapping of under-served areas
• Expansion of rural WASH to
remaining 30 Districts (consortia
of NGOs?)
• Prevention (“soft side”)
• WASH in clinics
• Sustainable funding (e.g. water
levies)
• Large-scale investment for system
overhaul ($800 million, WB)
9
Protection : Analysis of gaps and priorities for inter-linkages
Disaster Response Capacity
• Humanitarian
–
Short-term immediate assistance for
• Returnees
• Asylum seekers/Refugees
• ‘Displaced/mobile’
– Recovery assistance to
‘displaced/mobile’
• Strengthening national
capacity
– Preparedness for mass
returnees/mass influx
– DCP not mandated for civil
violence preparedness, UN
preparedness
– Integrate protection into
Ministries/sectors
Recovery/development
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Access of returnees to development
programmes
Strengthening national capacity for
response and follow-up of
unaccompanied minors
Capacity to respond to asylum
seekers (camps, adherence to laws)
Strengthening capacity of RG office
‘Displaced/mobile’ (resettlement,
governance and protection, access to
basic services)
Strengthening national protection
and human rights
frameworks/architecture
Ratification/domestication of
Kampala Convention
Scale-up national social protection 10
Livelihoods: Analysis of gaps and priorities for inter-linkages
Disaster Response Capacity
• Humanitarian
– No critical gaps
• Strengthening national
capacity
– Significant contribution to
strengthening resilience
– DRM Strategy must include
‘economic opportunities’ that
reduce vulnerabilities
Recovery/development
• Strengthening of Government-led
co-ordination structures (MTP,
link with PRIZE, PRP, LICI,
Flagship), need for secretariat
support
• Sector development (evidence,
documentation of best practices,
expertise)
• Longer-term planning and
funding
• Close links with emerging:
•
•
Social protection framework
Agricultural sector
11
Concluding Observations
• Residual humanitarian gaps only in areas of WASH/health, protection
and food assistance
• Increasing opportunities for UN and partners in responding to above,
strengthen and reinforce national capacity
• National Disaster Risk Management
– Sector accountabilities, role of DCP as co-ordinator
– DRM Strategy and Sector/Ministries policies important for defining
accountabilities for disaster response
– Longer-term commitment for strengthening national capacity
• Equity and access by most vulnerable need to remain priorities within
recovery/development programmes
• Humanitarian co-ordination have triggered scope for further
strengthening of Government-led co-ordination structures (with
appropriate support)
• Appropriate comprehensive strategy for “displaced/mobile”
population needs further discussion
• National Social Protection Framework
12