Transcript Slide 1

NGO Seminar on the Slovenian Presidency to the EU
–
ENVIRONMENT
Ljubljana, 7. – 8. June 2007
Decision-making process in the EU and the
role of NGOs in this process
Regina Schneider, EEB
Head of Communications
European Environmental Bureau
Bureau Européen de l’Environnement
Main points of my presentation:
• How decisions are made in the European Union –
- Responsibilities and mandates of the EU institutions
- The decision-making process
Possibilities for NGOs/public involvement
The perfect timing of lobbying
The possible target groups in the EU context
European Environmental Bureau
Bureau Européen de l’Environnement
Responsibilities and mandates of the EU institutions
• There are basically two main areas in which you may
wish to influence or ‘lobby’ EU institutions:
– the legislative process
– implementation and enforcement
• For EU decision-making Commission, Council and EP
are the 3 most important EU Institutions
European Environmental Bureau
Bureau Européen de l’Environnement
The Commission (1)
 26 DGs (Directorate General)
DG Environment, DG Agriculture, DG Regional Policy,
DG Industry, DG Energy and Transport, …
‘The Commission’ can also refer to the college of 27
Commissioners, 1 per Member State
Slovenia: Janez Potočnik, Commissioner in charge of
Science and Research
European Environmental Bureau
Bureau Européen de l’Environnement
The Commission (2)
 Right of initiative
- Proposals for new legislation or the revision of existing
legislation must be tabled by the Commission; it is on basis of
these proposals that Council and EP act
- Get involved during the preparatory phase of a legal text
- Usually good consultation
- Process takes about 2-6 years
Advantages:
- It is easier to influence a text during the drafting phase
- You will know the text very well which helps to elaborate your
positions and when lobbying the EP and the Council
Improvements: Better possibilities for public participation, stakeholder
meetings, better access to documents
European Environmental Bureau
Bureau Européen de l’Environnement
European Commission (3)
• Internal working papers leading to publication of a
`thinking paper´.. White paper/`Towards strategy´
• Questionnaires , stakeholder political or
expert meetings
• Internet consultations
• Impact assessment studies of options /inputs
• Inter Service Consultation (fight with other DGs)
• Final proposal Green paper or
directive/regulation/communication
 1 DG develops but in end the whole Commission
has to adopt it to have a Commission proposal
European Environmental Bureau
Bureau Européen de l’Environnement
The European Parliament (1)
• 785 MEPs elected for 5 years, 27 nationalities,
21 languages, 8 political ´parties´
• 20 Committees – covering the DGs plus
additional issues (eg women´s rights) – meet
2 x month in Brussels
• Committees – eg Env. and Public Health Committee,
Budget Committee – all have own secretariats
• Parties groups – also all have own secretariats
• Plenary (all 785) 1 x month in Strasbourg
European Environmental Bureau
Bureau Européen de l’Environnement
The European Parliament (2)
Environment and budget 2 areas with
important EP competences
- In the environment sector the EP fully
participates in the legislative process through
the co-decision process.
- For agriculture, for instance, this is not the
case (foreseen in the EU Constitution to
extend co-decision procedure to agriculture)
European Environmental Bureau
Bureau Européen de l’Environnement
The European Parliament (2)
• For each law/regulation there is a leading MEP in charge of
drafting the report (rapporteur). This MEP is `shadowed´ by 1
MEP from each of 7 other parties
(if a Communication EP can chose if it reacts – own initiative
report – no co-decision)
• 1 or more committees may adopt amendments but normally only
one (lead committee) will decide which ones go to plenary vote.
• Rapporteur drafts his/her amendments then MEPs in th
committee propose more. Committee votes on all of them
• Only amendments adopted in Committee plus extras suggested
by plenary are voted on in plenary
… during the EP’s Plenary Sessions, in what is called a
Parliament `reading´
European Environmental Bureau
Bureau Européen de l’Environnement
The Council (1)
Council of the EU
• Represented by rotating `presidency´, changes each
6 months (currently German presidency, then
Portuguese, Slovenian, French …)
Councils for the different policy sectors
• Environment Council, Agriculture Council, Transport,
Energy …
• Each one has working groups – eg on energy or a
specific directive proposal - composed of national
ministerial experts plus permanent representation
staff
European Environmental Bureau
Bureau Européen de l’Environnement
The Council (2)
Adopts legislative texts, in most cases in cooperation with the European Parliament (EP) in
the co-decision procedure introduced with the
Maastricht Treaty revision and extended to
more areas in Amsterdam Treaty revision
http://ec.europa.eu/codecision/index_en.htm
• Concludes international conventions (eg in the
transport, fisheries, trade sector)
European Environmental Bureau
Bureau Européen de l’Environnement
The Council (3)
The Permanent Representations prepare the
dossiers for the Council meetings
Important to lobby at national and EU level:
national Ministries and Permanent
Representations
Improved access to documents and
transparency helpful, eg to know which
countries block, try to weaken a proposal
European Environmental Bureau
Bureau Européen de l’Environnement
The Council (4)
Lobby possibilities
On 1 particular issue, and there to all ministries or
concentrating on the ‘difficult’ countries
Letter or meetings prior to Council meetings
Phone calls, personal contacts with people in
charge in the cabinet
Letter or document (eg EEB Memorandum) to EU
Presidency
Press releases, press briefings
European Environmental Bureau
Bureau Européen de l’Environnement
Co-decision procedure
• Involves the three different institutions and 2 readings – and this
takes time
• Each reading in Parliament - first in small committee, then in
whole Plenary
• Each reading in Council – Formation WG then Ministers
• EC proposal then
– 1st read. - EP, Council, (EC reactions),
– 2nd read. - EP, Council/EC/EP (trialogue/conciliation)
• Players: Commission experts, ministry's experts, EU politicians,
trade unions, industry … and, of course, civil society groups
• Principle: communication, negotiation until a compromise is
reached
European Environmental Bureau
Bureau Européen de l’Environnement
The Brussels Scene
 Lobbying is part of the political life
 Around 18,000 lobbyists
 Big majority industry lobby, some political lobbyists
 Only around 2% lobby on behalf of civil society
organisations
(environment, health, consumer, social, animal welfare etc)
 Number of potential interesting contact persons
50,000 or more (in Commission, EP, Permanent
Representations, local and regional offices, media
…)
European Environmental Bureau
Bureau Européen de l’Environnement
Perfect timing of lobbying and
the possible target groups in the EU context
No golden rules, it varies from case to case.
However, some recommendations
• get involved as early as possible
• take the time to identify who your key contact persons are; they
will change during the legislative process
• if appropriate, identify the country which risks to block or
weaken a proposal
• prepare yourself a timetable
• Question of capacity, but don’t limit your lobbying to ‘one group’,
i.e. not only to those working on environmental issues, not only
to one political party in the EP, not only to the people of your
country …
European Environmental Bureau
Bureau Européen de l’Environnement
Lobbying
• Build coalitions with other environmental stakeholders
and those from other sectors, if you have social,
consumer or health partners or cooperate with the trade
unions this increases your outreach and the weight of
your arguments
• Main target groups are the EU decision makers, but you
should also follow what the other stakeholders do, know
their main arguments and be ready to react to them
• Media, help to inform the public
European Environmental Bureau
Bureau Européen de l’Environnement
Thank you for your attention
The EU decision-making process is
complex.
If we want to have influence
we have to do the right thing at the right
moment at the right level.
Our chances our better if we cooperate.
European Environmental Bureau
Bureau Européen de l’Environnement