Transcript Dutch approach to CDM
Clean Development Mechanism The Dutch Approach
Reginald Hernaus Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment 25-4-2020
Objective of the presentation (1)
Provide insight into
: The “over all” Dutch climate change policy -The international legal framework: UN FCCC and the Kyoto Protocol Clean Development Mechanism The Dutch CDM Purchase Programme
2
Objective of the presentation (2)
-
The role of “VROM” and the host countries
Memoranda of Understanding -Letters of Approval -Declarations of Approval -Impact of the Dutch CDM Programme on Central and Latin America -Challenges
3
The “over all” Dutch Climate Change policy
Full commitment vis-a-vis UN FCCC and the Kyoto Protocol -Reduction target for the emissions of greenhouse gases: -6% (2008-2012) -200 Million Tonne of CO2 equivalent ”50% domestically and 50% internationally”
4
The international legal framework
-UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UN FCCC, 1992) -Kyoto Protocol (1997) -Bonn Agreement (2001) -Marrakech Accords and Executive Board (2001) -COP-9: afforestation and reforestation (2003)
5
Clean Development Mechanism
-Triple objective of Article 12 of the Kyoto Protocol:
1) Achieving sustainable development 2) Contributing to the ultimate objective of the UN FCCC 3) Achieving compliance with reduction commitments
6
The Dutch CDM Purchase Programme
-Multi-track approach:
-Carboncredits.nl (CERUPT) -International Multilateral Financial Institutions (IFC, IBRD and CAF) -Private Financial Institutions (Rabobank International) -Bilateral CER Purchase Agreements (BCPAs) with host countries (under consideration)
7
The role of “VROM” and the host countries (1)
-Participation requirements under UN FCCC and Kyoto protocol ”Participation in a CDM project activity is voluntarily” (this implies: on an equal basis) -CDM project cycle stipulates the involvement of the Governments (LoA, DoA)
8
The role of “VROM” and the host countries (2)
Pro active: “VROM” may facilitate the submissions of LoAs by means of bilateral talks or a MoU!
Features of a MoU: -
Intension for a long standing cooperation -Not legally binding -A quantified insight into the potential for CDM cooperation with VROM -Support underlying activities, willingness to purchase CERs, if projects qualify
9
The role of “VROM”and the host countries (3)
MoU: No prerequisite for CDM cooperation!
-Results so far: -
Panama, Costa Rica, Colombia, El an Salvador, Guatemala, Uruguay, Nicaragua and Bolivia Amount of Mton CO2 eq vary per MoU: 5 30 Mton
10
Impact of the Dutch CDM Programme on Central and Latin America
CCAD/Prosiga workshop: “How to develop CDM projects in Central America?” San Salvador, El Salvador, March 27-28, 2003
-CDM Project activities:
- CERUPT : “pending”: Panama (3), Costa Rica (3), El Salvador (1), Bolivia (1), Brazil (2), Jamaica (1): CERUPT: 11 out of 18!
-IBRD, IFC: pending: Brazil,Belize,Chile Colombia,Guyana,Peru -CAF: pending: Bolivia,Colombia,Nicaragua
11
Challenges (1)
-Entry into force of the Kyoto protocol!
“Stirr up” the carbon market!
-
Need to “promote equitable geographic distribution at regional and subregional level”!:
-C(osta Rica) or C(hina) Development Mechanism?
-C(ameroon) Development Mechanism?
12
Challenges (2)
-New Dutch Government underway! (Impact for the Dutch CDM Purchase Programme?) -Executive Board Ruling available and in development!
-The baseline methodolog(y)(ies), as applied under CERUPT, accepted by the Executive Board will be key!!
13
Challenges (3)
”It takes two to tango”
-A need for institutional CDM capacity in host countries -Identification of the (interim) Designated National Authority (DNA) for the CDM -Role of the host countries acquired in order to keep the CDM “clean”
14
CDM a living issue!
For the latest developments
: WWW: CDMINFO.NL
For any remarks and/or questions:
e-mail: [email protected]
15